Advanced search
Publication Cover
Annals of the International Communication Association Volume 29, 2005 - Issue 1: Communication Yearbook 29
Submit an article Journal homepage
529
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Message Framing and Constructing Meaning: An Emerging Paradigm in Mass Communication Research

Robert H. WicksUniversity of ArkansasCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 335-362 | Published online: 18 May 2016

References

  • Applegate, J. L., & Sypher, H. E. (1988). A constructivist theory of communication and culture. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in interpersonal communication (pp. 41–65). New-bury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Ball-Rokeach, S. J., & DeFleur, M. (1976). A dependency model of mass media effects. Communication Research, 3(3), 21.
  • Bateson, G. (1955, 1972). A theory of play and fantasy. Reprinted in Steps to ecology of mind. (1955/1972). New York: Ballantine Books.
  • Bauer, R. (1964). The obstinate audience. American Psychologist, 19, 319–328.
  • Beniger, J. R., & Gusek, J. A. (1995). The cognitive revolution in public opinion and communication research. In T. L. Glasser & C. T. Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 217–248). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Berkowitz, D. (1996). Work roles and news selection in TV. Examining the business journalism dialectic. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 37(1), 67–81.
  • Bird, S. E., & Dardenne, R. W. (1988). Myth, chronicle, and story: Exploring the narrative qualities of news. In J. W. Carey (Ed.), Media, myths and narrative: Television and the press (pp. 67–86). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Breed, W. (1955). Social control in the newsroom: A functional analysis. Social Forces, 33, 326–355.
  • Brosius, H. B., (1993). The effects of emotional pictures on television news. Communication Research, 20, 105–124.
  • Bryant, J., & Zillmann, D. (1991). Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bryant, J., & Zillmann, D. (2002). Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Buchanan, B. (1991). Electing a president: The Markle commission report on campaign ‘88. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Burke, J. (1968). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Chaffee, S. H., & Schleuder, J. (1986). Measurement and effects of attention to news media. Human Communication Research, 13, 76–107.
  • Cho, J., Boyle, M. P., Keum, H., Shevy, M. D., McLeod, D. M., Shah, D. V., & Pan, Z. (2003). Media, terrorism, and emotionality: Emotional differences in media content and public relations to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47, 309–327.
  • Chyi, H. I., & McCombs (2004). Media salience and the process of framing: Coverage of the Columbine school shootings. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 22–35.
  • Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: Free Press.
  • D’Angelo, P. (2002). News as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 43, 870–888.
  • DeFleur, M. L., & Ball-Rokeach, S. (1989). Theories of mass communication (5th ed.). New York: David McKay.
  • Delia, J. G. (1976). The development of functional persuasive skills in childhood and early adolescence. Child Development, 47, 1008–1014.
  • Delia, J. G. (1977). Cognitive complexity, social perspective-taking, and functional persuasive skills in second-to ninth-grade children. Human Communication Research, 3, 128–134.
  • Delia, J. G., & O’Keefe, B. J. (1979). Constructivism: The development of communication in children. In E. Wartella (Ed.), Children communicating: Media and development of thought, speech, understanding (pp. 157–186). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The issue attention cycle. Public Interest, 28, 38–50.
  • Entman, R. (1991). Framing U.S. Coverage on international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 6–27.
  • Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
  • Entman, R. M. (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20, 415–432.
  • Entman, R., & Rojecki, A., (1993). Freezing out the public: Elite and media framing of the U.S. anti-nuclear movement. Political Communication, 10, 151–167.
  • Esposito, J. L. (1997). Islam and Christianity face to face. Commonwealth, 124(2), 11–17.
  • Fawaz, G. A. (1997). Islam and Muslims in the mind of America. Journal of Palestine Studies, 26(2), 68–81.
  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Festinger, L. (1962). Cognitive dissonance. Scientific American, 207, 93.
  • Fiske, S. T., & S. E. Taylor (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Freedman, J. L., & Sears, D., (1965). Selective exposure. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 58–97). New York: Academic Press.
  • Gamson, W. A. (1988). The 1987 distinguished lecture: A constructionist approach to mass media and public opinion. Symbolic Interaction, 11(2), 161–174.
  • Gamson, W. A. (1989). News as framing: Comments on Graber. American Behavioral Scientist, 33(2), 157–161.
  • Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gamson, W. A. (1995). Constructing social protest. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 85–106). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
  • Gans, H. (1979). Deciding what’s news. New York: Pantheon.
  • Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science. New York: Basic Books.
  • Geiger, S., & Reeves, B. (1991). The effects of visual structure and content emphasis on the evaluation and memory for political candidates. In F. Biocca (Ed.), Television and political advertising (pp. 125–144), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. P. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 172–199.
  • Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). The “mainstreaming” of America: Violence Profile No. 11. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 10–29.
  • Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Golan, G., & Wanta, W. (2001). Second level agenda setting in the New Hampshire primaries: A comparison of coverage in the newspapers and public perceptions of candidates. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 247–259.
  • Graber, D. E. (1988). Processing the news: How people tame the information tide. New York: Longman
  • Grimes, T., & Meadowcroft, J. (1995). Attention to television and some methods for its measurement. In B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 18 (pp. 133–161). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Gunter, B. (1987). Poor reception: Misunderstanding and forgetting broadcast news. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hall, S. (1980). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. In S. Hall, (Ed.), Culture, media and language. London: Hutchinson.
  • Hallin, D. C. (1992). Sound bite news: Television coverage of elections, 1968–1988. Journal of Communication, 42(2), 5–25.
  • Hawkins, R. P., Yong-Ho, K., & Pingree, S. (1991). The ups and downs of attention to television. Communication Research, 18(1), 53–76.
  • Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21, 107–112.
  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
  • Hofstetter, R. C. (1976). Bias in news: Network television coverage of the 1972 election campaign. Dayton, OH: Ohio State University Press.
  • Iyengar, S. (1987). Television news and citizens’ explanations of national affairs. American Political Science Review, 81, 815–831.
  • Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. (1994). News coverage of the Gulf crisis and public opinion: A study of agenda setting, priming, and framing. In W. L. Bennett & D. Paletz (Eds.), Taken by storm (pp. 167–185). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Just, M. R., Crigler, A. N., Alger, D. E., Cook, T. E., Kern, M., & West, D. M. (1996). Crosstalk: Citizens, candidates, and the media in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kahneman, D. A., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.
  • Katz, E., Adoni, H., & Parness, P. (1977). Remembering the news: What the pictures add to recall. Journalism Quarterly, 54, 231–239.
  • Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M., (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communication: Current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Kensicki, L. J. (2004). No cure for what ails us: The media-constructed disconnect between social problems and possible solutions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 53–73.
  • Kern, M. (1989). 30-secondpolitics: Political advertising in the eighties. New York: Praeger.
  • Kern, M., & Wicks, R. H. (1994). Television news and the advertising-driven new mass media election: A more significant role in 1992. In R. Denton (Ed.), The 1992 presidential campaign: A communication perspective (pp. 189–206). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Kim, S., Scheufele, D. A., & Shanahan (2002). Think about it this way: Attribute agenda setting function of the press and the public’s evaluation of a local issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 7–25.
  • Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1990). Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of white opinion on affirmative action for blacks. Social Cognition, 8, 73–103.
  • Klapper, J. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. New York: Free Press.
  • Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1983). The battle for public opinion: The president, the press, and the polls during Watergate. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Lasswell, H. D. (1927). Propaganda technique in the World War. New York: Knopf.
  • Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp. 37–51). New York: Harper.
  • Lau, R. R., Smith, R. A., & Fiske, S. T. (1991). Political beliefs, policy interpretations, and political persuasion. Journal of Politics, 53, 644–675.
  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1948). Mass communication, popular taste and organized social action. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp. 95–118). New York: Harper.
  • Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1968). The peoples’ choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Macmillan.
  • Lowery, S. A., & DeFleur, M. D. (1988). Milestones in communication research. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Maher, T. M. (2001). Framing: An emerging paradigm or a phase of agenda setting. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 83–94). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • McCombs, M., & Ghanem, S. I. (2001). The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 67–82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • McCombs, M. E., Llamas, J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 703–717.
  • McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187.
  • McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. (1997). Communication and democracy. Exploring the intellectual frontiers of agenda setting theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media. New York: American Library.
  • McQuail, D. (1994). Mass communication theory: An introduction (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–277). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Morley, D. (1992). Television, audiences and cultural studies. Routledge: London.
  • Naber, N. (2000). Ambiguous insiders: an investigation of Arab American invisibility. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23, 37–61.
  • Neuman, S. B. (1991). Literacy in the television age: The myth of the TV effect. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Neuman, W. R. (1976). Patterns of recall among television news viewers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 115–123.
  • Neuman, W. R., Just, M. R., & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1973). Return to the concept of powerful media effects. Studies in Broadcasting, 9, 67–112.
  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion—Our social skin (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Norris, P., Kern, M., & Just, M. (2003). Framing terrorism: The news media, the government and the public. London: Routledge.
  • Pan, Z., & Kosicki G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55–75.
  • Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 35–65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Patterson, T. (1980). The mass media election: How Americans choose their president. New York: Praeger.
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
  • Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kasmer, J. A. (1988). The role of affect in the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Donohew, H. E. Sypher, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Communication, social cognition and affect (pp. 117–146).
  • Petty, R. E., Priester, J. R., & Brinol, P. (2002). Mass media attitude change: Implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Pfau, M., Haigh, M., Gettle, M., Donnelly, M., Scott, G., Warr, D., & Wittenberg, E., (2004). Embedding journalists in military combat units: Impact on newspaper story frames and tone. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 74–88.
  • Plato. (1945). The republic. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death. New York: Viking.
  • Potter, W. J. (1991a). Examining cultivation from a psychological perspective: component subpro-cesses. Communication Research, 18, 77–102.
  • Potter, W. J. (1991b). The relationship between first-and second-order measures of cultivation. Human Communication Research, 18, 92–113.
  • Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (pp. 173–212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
  • Price, V., Tewksbury, D. & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thoughts: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481–506.
  • Radway, J. (1984). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy and popular literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
  • Radway, J. (1986). Identifying ideological seams: Mass culture, analytical method, and political practice. Communication, 9, 93–123.
  • Reese, S. D. (2001). Prologue—Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 7–31). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Reese, S. D., & Buckalew, B. (1995). The militarism of local television: The routine framing of the Persian Gulf War. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 12, 40–59.
  • Reese, S. D., Gandy, O. H., Jr., & Grant, A. (2001). Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Reeves, B., & Anderson, D. R., (1991). Media studies and psychology. Communication Research, 18, 597–600.
  • Reeves, B., & Thorson, E. (1986). Watching television: Experiments on the viewing process. Communication Research, 13, 343–361.
  • Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. G., (1998). Analyzing media messages: using quantitative content analysis in research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Robinson, J. P., & Levy, M. (1986). The main source: Learning from television news. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Rubin, A. M. (2002). The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In J. Bryant & D. Zill-mann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1984). Schemata and the cognitive system. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 161–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Said, E. (1997). Covering Islam: How the media and the experts determine how we see the rest of the world. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Scheufele, B. T. (2004, May). Making frames: Testing a model of news production. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122.
  • Schleuder, J. D., White, A. V., & Cameron, G. T. (1993). Priming effects of television news bumpers and teasers on attention and memory. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 37, 437–452.
  • Schramm, W., (1971). The nature of communication between humans. In W. Schramm & D. Roberts (Eds.), The process and effects of mass communication (rev. ed., pp. 3–53), Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • Shah, D. V., Watts, M. D., & Fan, D. V. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue regimes: Explaining Clinton’s public approval in spite of scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 339–370.
  • Shapiro, M. A. (1991). Memory and decision processes in the construction of social reality. Communication Research, 18, 3–24.
  • Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D., (1996). Mediating the message: Theories on influences on news content (2nd ed.). New York: Longman
  • Stauffer, J., Frost, R., & Rybolt, W. (1983). The attention factor in recalling network television news. Journal of Communication, 33(1), 29–36.
  • Stephens, M. (1993). Broadcast news. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
  • Thorson, E., Reeves, B., & Schleuder, J. (1987). Attention to local and global complexity in television messages. In M. L. McGlaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 10, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–222.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
  • White, D. M. (1950). The “gatekeeper”: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27, 383–390.
  • Wicks, R. H. (1992). Schema theory and measurement in mass communication research: Theoretical and methodological issues in news information processing. In S. Deetz (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 15 (pp. 115–145). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Wicks, R. H. (2001). Understanding audiences: Learning to use the media constructively. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
  • Wicks, R. H., & Kern, M. (1993). Cautious optimism: A new proactive role for local television news departments in local election coverage? American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 262–271.
  • Wicks, R. H., & Kern, M. (1995). Factors influencing decisions by local television news directors to develop new reporting strategies during the 1992 political campaign. Communication Research, 22, 237–255.
  • Wilkins, K., & Dowing, J. (2002). Mediating terrorism: Text and protest in interpretations of the siege. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19, 419–437.
  • Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zillmann, D. (1983a). Disparagement humor. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research, Vol. 1. Basic issues (pp. 85–107). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Zillmann, D. (1983b). Transfer of excitation in emotional behavior. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Socialpsychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 215–240). New York: Guilford.
  • Zillmann, D. (1991a). Television viewing and physiological arousal. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 103–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Zillmann, D. (1991b). The logic of suspense and mystery. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 28–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.