Media Content Diversity: Conceptual Issues and Future Directions for Communication Research

References

• Allen, R. L., & Izcaray, F. (1988). Nominal agenda-diversity in a media-rich, less-developed society. Communication Research, 15, 29–50.
   Google Scholar
• Aminpur, K. (2006, January 22). Die Jugend und die Mullahs. [The youth and the mullahs]. Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, 3, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous (2004, February 23). How to ensure media diversity. Business Week, 3871, 140.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous (2006). Kartellamt untersagt Fusion von Springer und ProSiebenSat.1. [Federal Cartel Office prohibits merger of Springer and ProSiebenSat.1]. Spiegel online. Retrieved January 23, 2006, from http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,396882,00.html
   Google Scholar
• Artz, B. L. (1998). Hegemony in black and white: Interracial buddy films and the new racism. In Y. R. Kamalipour & T. Carilli (Eds.), Cultural diversity and the U.S. media (pp. 67–78). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aslama, M. (2006). The diversity challenge: Changing television markets and public service programming in Finland, 1993–2004. Working paper, Donald McGannon Communication Research Center, Bronx, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Aslama, M., Hellman, H., & Sauri, T. (2004). Does market-entry regulation matter? Competition in television broadcasting and programme diversity in Finland, 1993–2002. Gazette, 66, 113–132.
   Google Scholar
• Atwater, T. (1984). Product differentiation in local TV news. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 757–762.
   Google Scholar
• Atwater, T. (1986). Consonance in local television news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30, 467–472.
   Google Scholar
• Bagdikian, B. H. (2004). The new media monopoly. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. E., & Kubler, F. (2004). Sicherung der Meinungsvielfalt durch mehr Markt? Die rechtspolitische Entwicklung der Medienkonzentrations-kontrolle in den Vereinigten Staaten [More market as a safeguard for diversity of opinions? How the control of media concentration processes develops in the U.S.]. Media Perspektiven, 24, 81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, R. (2005). American journalism and the politics of diversity. Media, Culture & Society, 27, 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Berens, H., & Hagen, L. (1997). Der Fall “Brent Spar” in Hauptnachrichten-sendungen. Ansatze zur Operationalisierung von Qualitatskriterien fur die Bildberichterstattung [The case of “Brent Spar” in evening news shows: Approaches for operationalizing criteria to assess the quality of news coverage]. In G. Bentele & M. Haller (Eds.), Aktuelle Ent-stehung von Offentlichkeit (pp. 539–549). Konstanz, Germany: UVK.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, S. T., & Waldfogel, J. (2001). Do mergers increase product variety? Evidence from radio broadcasting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1009–1025.
   Google Scholar
• Blevins, J. L. (2002). Source diversity after the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Media oligarchs begin to colonize cyberspace. Television & New Media, 3, 95–112.
   Google Scholar
• Blobaum, B. (1992). Journalismus, Offentlichkeit und Vielfalt [Journalism, public, and diversity]. In G. Rager & B. Weber (Eds.), Publizis-tische Vielfalt zwischen Markt und Politik (pp. 150–171). Dusseldorf, Germany: Econ.
   Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G. (1991). In pursuit of program range and quality. Studies of Broadcasting, 27, 191–206.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, T. P. (2001). Intermedia agenda setting in the 1996 presidential election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 26–44.
   Google Scholar
• Branahl, U. (1992). Publizistische Vielfalt als Rechtsgebot [Media diversity as a legal command]. In G. Rager & B. Weber (Eds.), Publizistische Vielfalt zwischen Markt und Politik (pp. 85–109). Dusseldorf, Germany: Econ.
   Google Scholar
• Brosius, H.-B., & Reinemann, C. (1998). Themenvielfalt in der Bevolker-ungsagenda Ost-und Westdeutschlands [Issue diversity of the audience agenda in East and West Germany]. Publizistik, 43, 273–286.
   Google Scholar
• Brosius, H.-B., & Zubayr, C. (1996). Vielfalt im deutschen Fernsehprogramm. Eine Analyse der Angebotsstruktur offentlich-rechtlicher und privater Sender [Diversity on German TV: An analysis of public and private television channels]. Ludwigshafen, Germany: LPR-Schriftenreihe, Band 12.
   Google Scholar
• Bruck, P. A. (Ed.). (1993). Medienmanager Staat. Von den Versuchen des Staates, Medienvielfalt zu ermoglichen: Medienpolitik im internation-alen Vergleich [The nation as a media manager: Attempts to support media diversity in an international perspective]. Munich, Germany: R. Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, T., & Marcinkowski, F. (1997): Politische Information im Fernsehen. Eine Langsschnittstudie [Political information on television: A long-term study]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Chalaby, J. K. (2005). Deconstructing the transnational: A typology of cross-border television channels in Europe. New Media & Society, 7, 155–175.
   Google Scholar
• Croteau, D. (2006). The growth of self-produced media content and the challenge to media studies. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23, 340–344.
   Google Scholar
• Danielian, L. H., & Reese, S. D. (1989): A closer look at intermedia influences on agenda setting: The cocaine issue of 1986. In P. Shoemaker (Ed.), Communication campaigns about drugs (pp. 47–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Davie, W. R., & Lee, J. (1993). Television news technology: Do more sources mean less diversity? Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 37, 453–464.
   Google Scholar
• DeBens, E. (1998). Television programming: More diversity, more convergence? In K. Brants, J. Hermes, & L. van Zoonen (Eds.), The media in question: Popular cultures and public interests (pp. 27–37). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, A. S., & Bates, B. J. (1991). Channel diversity in cable television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 35, 159–166.
   Google Scholar
• Del Rio, E. (2006). The Latina/o problematic: Categories and questions in media communication research. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 30 (pp. 387–429). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Dimmick, J. (2004). Introduction [special issue]. Journal of Media Economics, 17, 85–86.
   Google Scholar
• Dines, G., & Humez, J. M. (Eds.). (2003). Gender, race, and class in media: A text-reader (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dominick, J. R., & Pearce, M. C. (1976). Trends in network prime-time programming, 1953–1974. Journal of Communication, 26, 70–80.
   Google Scholar
• Donsbach, W. (2004). Psychology of news decisions: Factors behind journalists professional behaviour. Journalism, 5, 131–157.
   Google Scholar
• Donsbach, W., & Dupre, D. (1994). Mehr Vielfalt oder “more of the same” durch mehr Kanale? Moglichkeiten zum Unterhaltungsslalom im deutschen Fernsehen zwischen 1983 und 1991 [More diversity or more of the same as a result of more channels? Opportunities for the use of entertainment programs on German TV, 1983–1991]. In L. Bosshart & W. Hoffmann-Riem (Eds.), Medienlust und Medien-nutz (pp. 229–247). Munich, Germany: Olschlager.
   Google Scholar
• Dowd, T. J. (2004). Concentration and diversity revisited: Production logics and the U. S. mainstream recording market, 1940–1990. Social Forces, 82, 1411–1455.
   Google Scholar
• Downing, J., & Husband, C. (Eds.). (2005). Representing “race”: Racism, ethnicities, and media. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eilders, C. (2000). Media as political actors? Issue focusing and selective emphasis in the German quality press. German Politics, 9, 181–206.
   Google Scholar
• Eilders, C. (2001). Die Darstellung von Protesten in ausgewahlten deutschen Tageszeitungen [The depiction of political protest in selected German newspapers]. In D. Rucht (Ed.), Protest in derBundesrepublik. Strukturen und Entwicklungen (pp. 275–311). Frankfurt, Germany: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Eilders, C. (2002). Conflict and consonance in media opinion: Political positions of five German quality newspapers. European Journal of Communication, 17, 25–63.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, M. (2004a). Media diversity: Economics, ownership, and the FCC. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, M. (2004b). Broadcast network television, 1955–2003: The pursuit of advertising and the decline of diversity. Journal of Media Economics, 17, 145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Elasmar, M. G. (Ed.). (2003). The impact of international television: A paradigm shift. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Enzensberger, H. M. (1962): Journalismus als Eiertanz. Beschreibung einer Allgemeinen Zeitung fur Deutschland [Journalism as a balancing act. Description of a general newspaper for Germany]. In H. M. Enzensberger (Ed.), Einzelheiten, Teil I (pp. 18–73). Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Feldmann, V. (2004). Der Kunde als Konig? Zum Beitrag der Unterneh-mensstrategie fur die Vielfalt der Medieninhalte-Produktion [Customer is king? How business strategies contribute to diversity in media content production]. In M. Friedrichsen & W. Seifert (Eds.), Effiziente Medienregulierung. Marktdefizite oder Regierungsdefizite?(pp. 53–70) Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Foote, J. S. (1995). The structure and marketing of global television news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39, 127–133.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, J. S., & Showalter, S. W. (1974). Evening network news selection: A confirmation of news judgment. Journalism Quarterly, 51, 712–715.
   Google Scholar
• Gentz, N., & Kramer, S. (Eds.). (2006). Globalization, cultural identities, and media representations. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, L. M. (2002). Ownership concentration and product variety in daily newspaper markets. In L. F. Cranor & S. Greenstein (Eds.), Communications policy and information technology: Promises, problems, prospects (pp. 235–251). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. E. (1994). The promise fulfilled? An empirical analysis of program diversity on television. The Journal of Media Economics, 7, 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, H. (1995). Watching race: Television and the struggle for “Blackness.” Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, B. S., & Brand, J. E. (1998). U.S. minorities and the news. In Y. R. Kamalipour & T. Carilli (Eds.), Cultural diversity and the U.S. media (pp. 3–22). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, E., & Barnett, H. J. (1971). TV program diversity-New evidence and old theories. American Economic Review, 61(2), 89–93.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, L. (2001). Out of the mainstream: Sexual minorities and the mass media. In M. G. Durham & D. M. Kellner (Eds.), Media and cultural studies: Keyworks (pp. 405–423). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, K. E. (1992). Staatliche Forderung fur publizistische Vielfalt in Schweden [Governmental support for media diversity in Sweden]. In G. Rager & B. Weber (Eds.), Publizistische Vielfalt zwischen Markt und Politik (pp. 135–149). Dusseldorf, Germany: Econ.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (Ed.). (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hallenberger, G. (1997). Dimensionen des Begriffs “Vielfalt” [Dimensions of the term “diversity”]. In H. Kohl (Ed.), Vielfalt im Rundfunk (pp. 10–20). Konstanz, Germany: UVK Medien.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, M. (2000). TUV fur Regionalblatter [A MOT test for regional newspapers]. Message, 4, 44–48.
   Google Scholar
• Halloran, J. D., Elliott, P., & Murdock, G. (1970). Demonstrations and communication: A case study. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hargrove, T., & Stempel III, G. H. (2006a). Anti-government anger spurs 9/11 conspiracy belief. Survey: Few American adults use blogs to get news. newsPolls.org. Retrieved November 11, 2006, from http://newspolls.org/story.php?story_id=55
   Google Scholar
• Hargrove, T., & Stempel III, G. H. (2006b). Survey: Few American adults use blogs to get news. ScrippsNews. Retrieved November 11, 2006, from http://www.shns.com/shns/scrippsnews/index.cfm?action=detail&pk=BLOG-POLL-083106
   Google Scholar
• Hart, K.-P. R. (2003). Representing gay men on American television. In G. Dines & J. M. Humez (Eds.), Gender, race, and class in media: A text-reader (2nd ed., pp. 597–607). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, J. (1992). Publizistische Vielfalt aus wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Sicht [Media diversity from an economic perspective]. In G. Rager & B. Weber (Eds.), Publizistische Vielfalt zwischen Markt und Politik(pp. 232–250). Dusseldorf, Germany: Econ.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, C. (1999). Die Thematisierungsleistung von Print, Fernsehen und WorldWideWeb. Ein inhaltsanalytischer Vergleich der Angebote von Focus, Spiegel und Stern [Comparing issues of print media, television, and the WorldWideWeb. A comparison of Focus, Spiegel, and Sternt. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Hellman, H. (2001). Diversity-an end in itself? Developing a multimea-sure methodology of television programme variety studies. European Journal of Communication, 16, 181–208.
   Google Scholar
• Hetsroni, A., & Tukachinsky, R. H. (2006). Television-world estimates, real-world estimates, and television viewing: A new scheme for cultivation. Journal of Communication, 56, 133–156.
   Google Scholar
• Hillve, P., Majanen, P., & Rosengren, K. E. (1997). Aspects of quality in TV programming: Structural diversity compared over time and space. European Journal of Communication, 12, 291–318.
   Google Scholar
• Hillve, P., & Rosengren, K. E. (1996). Swedish public service television-Quality for sale? In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Quality assessment of television(pp. 231–252). Luton, England: University of Luton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann-Riem, W. (1987). National identity and cultural values: Broadcasting safeguards. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31, 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann-Riem, W. (1996). Regulating media-The licensing and supervision of broadcasting in six countries. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holtz-Bacha, C. (1997). Development of the German media market: Opportunities and challenges for U.S. media firms. The Journal of Media Economics, 10, 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Holtz-Bacha, C. (2000). WahlwerbungalspolitischeKultur. Parteienspots im Fernsehen 1957–1998 [Campaign ads and political culture: TV commercials in Germany 1957–1998]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Holznagel, B. (1997). Vielfaltskonzepte in Europa [Concepts of diversity in Europe]. In H. Kohl (Ed.), Vielfalt im Rundfunk (pp. 94–103). Kon-stanz, Germany: UVK Medien.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, P. J. (1994). Media and media policy in Germany. The press and broadcasting since 1945 (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Iosifides, P. (1999). Diversity versus concentration in the deregulated mass media domain. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 152–162.
   Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, S., Leggart, T., Litman, B., Raboy, M., Rosengren, K. E., & Kam-bara, N. (1996). Diversity in television programming: Comparative analysis of five countries. In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Quality assessment of television (pp. 253–263). Luton, England: University of Luton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, S., & Maramatsu, Y. (1996). Why measure diversity? In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Quality assessment of television (pp. 199–202). Luton, England: University of Luton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarren, O. (1992). Publizistische Vielfalt durch lokale und sublokale Medien? Inter-Media-Agenda-Building-Ein Systemansatz zur Real-analyse von Medienleistungen im lokalen Raum [How local and sub-local media contribute to diversity. Intermedia agenda building as a systemic approach for the re-analysis of local media performance]. In G. Rager & B. Weber (Eds.), Publizistische Vielfalt zwischen Markt und Politik (pp. 65–84). Dusseldorf, Germany: Econ.
   Google Scholar
• Jarren, O. (2000). Gesellschaftliche Integration durch Medien? Zur Begrundung normativer Anforderungen an Medien [Social integra-tion through the media? On the justification of normative requirements for the media]. Medien & Kommunikations wissenschaft, 48, 22–41.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffres, L. W., Cutietta, C., Sekerka, L., & Lee, J. (2000). Newspapers, pluralism, and diversity in an urban context. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 157–184.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, R., & Kellner, D. (2004). New media and internet activism: From the “Battle of Seattle” to blogging. New Media & Society, 6, 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kamalipour, Y. R., & Carilli, T. (Eds.). (1998). Cultural diversity and the U.S. media. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kambara, N. (1992, March). Study of the diversity indices used for programming analyses. Studies of Broadcasting, 28, 195–205.
   Google Scholar
• Kepplinger, H. M. (1985). Die aktuelle Berichterstattung des Horfunks. Eine Inhaltsanalyse der Abendnachrichten undpolitischen Magazine [Coverage on current affairs on the radio: A content analysis of evening news and political features]. Freiburg, Germany: Alber.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (1999). Empirical testing on an unasked question in Turner v. FCC: Do must-carry rules enhance diversity? Communications and the Law, 21(2), 55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Knoche, M. (1980). Die Messbarkeit publizistischer Vielfalt [Measurabil-ity of media diversity]. In S. Klaue, M. Knoche, & A. Zerdick (Eds.), Probleme der Pressekonzentrationsforschung (pp. 127–138). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Knoche, M., & Lindgens, M. (1988). Selektion, Konsonanz und Wirkungs-potential der deutschen Tagespresse. Politikvermittlung am Beispiel der Agentur-und Presseberichterstattung uber die GRUNEN zur Bundestagswahl 1987 [Selectivity, consonance and impact of German newspapers: A case study of wire service and press reports on the Green Party, federal elections 1987]. Media Perspektiven, 8, 490–510.
   Google Scholar
• Kubler, F. (2005). Konzentrationskontrolle durch Rundfunkorganisation [Concentration supervision by organizing the broadcasting system]. In C.-M. Ridder, W. R. Langenbucher, U. Saxer, & C. Steininger (Eds.), BausteineeinerTheoriedesoffentlich-rechtlichenRundfunks(pp.77–89). Opladen, Germany: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, S. (1987). The effects of intracity competition on daily newspaper content. Journalism Quarterly, 64, 281–291.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, S. (1989). A model of demand for news: Impact of competition on newspaper content. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Lemert, J. B. (1974). Content duplication by the networks in competing evening newscasts. Journalism Quarterly, 51, 238–244.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, H. J. (1971). Program duplication, diversity, and effective viewer choices: Some empirical findings. American Economic Review, 61(2), 81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. A. (1995). Diversity of network prime-time program formats during the 1980s. The Journal of Media Economics, 8, 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Litman, B. (1979). The television networks, competition and program diversity. Journal of Broadcasting, 23, 393–409.
   Google Scholar
• Litman, B., & Hasegawa, K. (1996). Measuring diversity in U.S. television programming: New evidence. In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Quality assessment of television (pp. 203–230). Luton, England: University of Luton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, S. L. (1979). A fourth television network and diversity: Some historical evidence. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 341–345.
   Google Scholar
• Loosen, W. (2005). Zur “medialen Entgrenzungsfahigkeit” journalist-ischer Arbeitsprozesse: Synergien zwischen Print-, TV-und Online-Redaktionen [Working routines of journalists: Synergies between newsrooms of print media, television, and the Internet]. Publizistik, 50, 304–319.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, J. (2004). Mediale Vielfalt: Ein (Nicht-)Ergebnis von Anbieter-, und/oder Nachfrageinteressen, Marktdefiziten und/oder Regulier-ungsdefiziten? [Media diversity as a result of market mechanisms, demand and supply, or regulation deficits?]. In M. Friedrichsen & W. Seifert (Eds.), Effiziente Medienregulierung. Marktdefizite oder Regier-ungsdefizite? (pp. 11–28) Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Maletzke, G (1980). Integration-eine gesellschaftliche Funktion der Mas-senkommunikation [Integration-a function of mass communication in society]. Publizistik, 25, 199–206.
   Google Scholar
• Mathes, R., & Pfetsch, B. (1991). The role of the alternative press in the agenda-building process: Spill-over effects and media opinion leadership. European Journal of Communication, 6, 33–62.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M. (2006). Konsonanz von Ereignissen und Akteuren in der Nach-richtenberichterstattung [Consonance of events and protagonists in news coverage]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. P. (2000, May 6). Pitfalls of media-mergers. America, 182(16), 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, M., & Reynolds, A. (2002). News influence on our pictures of the world. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 1–18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. G., & Dimmick, J. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of diversity. Communication Research, 30, 60–79.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. G., & Lin, S.-F. (2004). The effect of new networks on U.S. television diversity. The Journal of Media Economics, 17, 105–122.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance: Mass communication and the public interest. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, D. (2000). McQuail’s mass communication theory (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, D. (2005, June). Revisiting diversity as a media policy goal. Paper presented at the International Conference “Demokratisierung der Medien-und Informationsgesellschaft,” Zurich, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, D., & van Cuilenburg, J. (1983). Diversity as a media policy goal: A strategy for evaluative research and a Netherlands case study. Gazette, 31, 145–162.
   Google Scholar
• Merten, K. (1994). Konvergenz der deutschen Fernsehprogramme. Eine Lang-zeituntersuchung 1985–1993 [Convergence of German TV programs. A long-term study 1985–1993]. Munster, Germany: Lit.
   Google Scholar
• Merten, K. (2001). Konsensanalyse. Ein neues Instrument der Inhaltsanal-yse [Consensus analysis: A new instrument of content analysis]. In W. Wirth & E. Lauf (Eds.), Inhaltsanalyse. Perspektiven, Probleme, Potentiale (pp. 234–243). Koln, Germany: von Halem.
   Google Scholar
• Moreau, F., & Peltier, S. (2004). Cultural diversity in the movie industry: A cross-national study. The Journal of Media Economics, 17, 123–144.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Two decades of cultivation research: An appraisal and meta-analysis. In B. Berelson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 20 (pp. 1–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. M. (1997). Rethinking program diversity assessment: An audience-centered approach. The Journal of Media Economics, 10, 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E., & Mathes, R. (1987). The “event as event” and the “event as news”: The significance of “consonance” for media effects research. European Journal of Communication, 2, 391–414.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, B. M. (1978). The economic view of programming. Journal of Communication, 28, 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. H., Gabbadon, N. G., & Chernin, A. R. (2006). Naturalizing racial differences through comedy: Asian, black, and white views on racial stereotypes in Rush Hour 2. Journal of Communication, 56, 157–177.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, J., & de Vreese, C. H. (2003). Agenda-rich, agenda-poor: A cross-national comparative investigation of nominal and thematic public agenda diversity. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15, 44–64.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, S. (2006): Presselenkung und Themenvielfalt im nationalsozialist-ischen Deutschland am Beispiel Thuringer Tageszeitunge [Press control and issue diversity in Nazi Germany: The case of newspapers in Thuringia]. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Erfurt, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. (2002). Viewpoint diversity in cross-owned newspapers and television stations: A study of news coverage of the 2000 Presidential campaign. Washington, DC: Federal Communications Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Rager, G. (1982). Publizistische Vielfalt im Lokalen. Eine empirische Analyse[Media diversity in a local market: An empirical analysis] Tubingen, Germany: Vereinigung fur Volkskunde.
   Google Scholar
• Rager, G., & Weber, B. (Eds.). (1992). Publizistische Vielfalt zwischen Markt und Politik. Mehr Medien-mehr Inhalte? [Media diversity between politics and the market: More media-more content?]. Dusseldorf, Germany: Econ.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, P. (2006). A need for postmodern fluidity? Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23, 345–349.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, S., Gandy, O. & Grant, A. (Eds.). (2001). Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Reinemann, C. (2003). Medienmacher als Mediennutzer. Kommunikations-und Einflussstrukturen im politischen Journalismus der Gegenwart[Political journalists as media users: Structures of communication and influence in contemporary journalism]. Koln, Germany: Bohlau.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, P. (1999). The individual agenda-designing process: How interpersonal communication, egocentric networks and mass media shape the perception of political issues by individuals. Communication Research, 26, 666–700.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, P. (2000). Vielzahl = Vielfalt = Fragmentierung? Empirische Anhaltspunkte zur Differenzierung von Medienangeboten auf der Mikroebene [Multitude = diversity = fragmentation: Empirical evidence of media differentiation in contemporary journalism]. In O. Jarren, K. Imhof, & R. Blum (Eds.), Zerfall der Offentlichkeit?(pp. 168–186) Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, P. (2001a). Visuelle Codierung und Vielfalts-Analysen auf Mikroe-bene. Kategorisierungs-und Auswertungsstrategien fur die ikonog-raphische Untersuchung journalistischer Berichterstattung [Visual coding and the analysis of diversity on a micro-level: Strategies for coding and analysis of iconographic research on media coverage]. In W. Wirth & E. Lauf (Eds.), Inhaltsanalyse. Perspektiven, Probleme, Potentiale (pp. 140–156). Koln, Germany: von Halem.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, P. (2001b). Vielzahl und Fokussierung im regionalen Horfunk. Eine vergleichende Inhaltsanalyse von Nachrichtensendungen auf der Mikroebene [Diversity of local radio news. A content analysis of news shows on the micro-level]. In P. Roessler, G. Vowe, & V. Henle (Eds.), Das Gerausch der Provinz-Radio in der Region (pp. 159–183). Munich, Germany: Kopaed.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, P. (2002, July). Media diversity and the flow of political news: A study of German newspaper coverage and wire service reports. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, P. (2003). Themenvielfalt im Politikressort. Ein Vergleich der Berichtsanlasse von 27 deutschen Tageszeitungen [Issue diversity of political news. A comparison of news reports in 27 German newspapers]. In W. Donsbach & O. Jandura (Eds.), Chancen und Gefahren der Mediendemokratie (pp. 174–187). Konstanz, Germany: UVK Medien.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, P. (2004). Political communication messages: Pictures of our world on international television news. In F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Comparing political communication: Theories, cases and challenges(pp. 271–292). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, P. (May, 2005a). Same pictures, same stories? Diversity on the micro-level of news coverage. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, P. (2005b). The myth of the re-invented journalism: Functional and normative gatekeeping of web communicators. In P. Roessler & F. Krotz (Eds.), The media society and its myths (pp. 177–203). Kon-stanz, Germany: UVK.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, P. (2006). “Erstmal sehen, was die anderen machen.” Vielfalt als Qualitatsmerkmal vs. mediale Koorientierung im journalistischen Alltag [Diversity as a criterion for quality versus journalistic co-orientation as a newsroom routine]. In S. Weischenberg, W. Loosen, & M. Beuthner (Eds.), Medien-Qualitaten (pp. 223–244). Konstanz, Germany: UVK.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, P., Lucke, S., Linzmaier, V., Steinhilper, L. & Willhoft, C. (2006). Ernahrung im Fernsehen. Darstellung und Wirkung: eine empirische Studie [Food on German television: Representation and effects: An empirical study]. Munich, Germany: R. Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Roof, E. D., Trauth, D. M., & Huffman, J. L. (1993). Structural regulation of cable television: A formula for diversity. Communications and the Law, 15(2), 43–70.
   Google Scholar
• Rossmann, C., Brandl, A., & Brosius, H. (2003). Der Vielfalt eine zweite Chance? Eine Analyse der Angebotsstruktur offentlich-rechtlicher und privater Fernsehsender in den Jahren 1995, 1998 und 2001 [A second chance for program diversity? A structural analysis of the content offered by public and private television channels in 1995, 1998, and 2001]. Publizistik, 48, 427–453.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, A. (May, 2004). The ecology of a dual television market: competition and diversity in the Netherlands. Paper presented at the 6th World Media Economics Conference, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Rub, M. (2006, February 12). Ein Leben fur das Internet [A whole life for the Internet]. Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, 6, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, H. (1992). Internationale Medienkonzentration und publizistische Vielfalt [Concentration of international media and diversity]. In G. Rager & B. Weber (Eds.), Publizistische Vielfalt zwischen Markt und Politik (pp. 27–49). Dusseldorf, Germany: Econ.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, R. J. (2003, August 11). The myth of “big media.” Newsweek, 142(6), 42.
   Google Scholar
• Sasser, E. L., & Russell, J. T. (1972). The fallacy of news judgement. Journalism Quarterly, 49, 280–284.
   Google Scholar
• Saxer, U. (1992). Staatliche Forderung und publizistische Vielfalt [Governmental support for media diversity]. In G. Rager & B. Weber (Eds.), Publizistische Vielfalt zwischen Markt und Politik (pp. 110–134). Dus-seldorf, Germany: Econ.
   Google Scholar
• Schlobinski, P., & Siever, T. (Eds.). (2005). Sprachliche und textuelle Merk-male in Weblogs. Ein internationales Projekt [Linguistic and textual characteristics of Weblogs: An international research project]. Net-worx (46). Retrieved November 11, 2006, from http://www.medi-ensprache.net/networx/networx-46.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J., & Wilt, M. (2006). Wie ich blogge?! Erste Ergebnisse der Weblog-Befragung2005 [How I blog: Results of the 2005 Weblog survey]. University of Bamberg, Germany: Berichte der Forschungsstelle “Neue Kommunikationsmedien” 06–01. Retrieved November 11, 2006, from http://www.fonk-bamberg.de/pdf/fonkbericht0601.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schoenbach, K. (1980). Publizistische Vielfalt in Wettbewerbsgebieten [Media diversity in areas of competition]. In S. Klaue, M. Knoche, & A. Zerdick (Eds.), Probleme der Pressekonzentrationsforschung(pp. 145–161). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, W., & Ihle, C. (2005). Wettbewerb und Vielfalt im deutschen Fernsehm-arkt-Eine Analyse der Entwicklung von 1992 bis 2001 [Competition and diversity on the German TV market-an analysis of trends between 1992 and 2001]. In C.-M. Ridder, W. R. Langenbucher, U. Saxer & C. Steininger (Eds.), Bausteine einer Theorie des offentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunks(272–292). Opladen, Germany: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Schwotzer, B. (2005). Nachrichtensynergie vs. Nachrichtenvielfalt [News synergy vs. news diversity]. In Arbeitskreis der Landesmedienan-stalten ALM (Ed.), Fernsehen in Deutschland 2005 (pp. 161–163). Berlin, Germany: Vistas.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. J. (1991). Gatekeeping. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sievert, H. (1998). Europaischer Journalismus. Theorie und Empirie aktu-eller Medienkommunikation in der Europaischen Union [Journalism in Europe: Theoretical and empirical accounts]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sjurts, I. (2004). Einfalt trotz Vielfalt in den Medienmarkten: Eine oko-nomische Erklarung [Simple-mindedness in spite of diversity on the media market: An economic explanation]. In M. Friedrichsen & W. Seifert (Eds.), Effiziente Medienregulierung. Marktdefizite oder Regierungsdefizite? (pp. 71–87). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Southwell, B. G. (2005). Between messages and people: A multilevel model of memory for television content. Communication Research, 32, 112–140.
   Google Scholar
• Staab, J. F. (1990). The role of news factors in news selection: A theoretical reconsideration. European Journal of Communication, 5, 423–443.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, B. (September, 2006). Die Vielfalt der Messung “der Vielfalt”-Uber-legungen zur methodischen Umsetzung des Vielfaltskonzepts [Diversity in measuring “the diversity”-methodological considerations]. Paper presented at the annual DGPuK conference on methods of media studies, Zurich, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, A., Tan, G., & Gibson, T. (2003). Socialization effects of American television on international audiences. In M. G. Elasmar (Ed.), The impact of international television. A paradigm shift (pp. 29–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Teachman, J. D. (1980). Analysis of population diversity. Sociological Methods & Research, 8, 341–362.
   Google Scholar
• Trebbe, J. (1996). Der Beitrag privater Lokalradio-und Lokalfernsehpro-gramme zur publizistischen Vielfalt. Eine Pilotstudie am bayerischen Senderstandort Augsburg [How private radio and TV programs contribute to media diversity: A pilot study of broadcasting in Augsburg, Bavaria]. BLM-Schriftenreihe, Band 39. Munich, Germany: R. Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Trebbe, J. (1998). Lokale Medienleistungen im Vergleich. Untersuchungen zur publizistischen Vielfalt an den bayerischen Senderstandorten Augburg, Landshut und Schweinfurt [Performance of local media in comparison: Media diversity in the Bavarian regions of Augsburg, Landshut, and Schweinfurt]. Munich, Germany: R. Fischer (BLM-Schriftenreihe, Band 47).
   Google Scholar
• Trebbe, J., & Maurer, T. (1999). Horfunklandschaft Niedersachsen 1998. Eine vergleichende Analyse der offentlich-rechtlichen und privaten Radiosender [Radio in Lower Saxonia 1998: A comparative analysis of public and private broadcasters]. Berlin, Germany: Vistas (Schrift-enreihe der NLM, Band 6).
   Google Scholar
• Trebbe, J., & Wei6, H. (1997). Lokale Thematisierungsleistungen. Der Beitrag privater Rundfunkprogramme zur publizistischen Vielfalt in lokalen Kommunikationsraumen [Issue diversity on the local level: The contribution of private broadcasting to media: diversity in local communities]. In G. Bentele & M. Haller (Eds.), Aktuelle Entstehung von Offentlichkeit (pp. 445–465). Konstanz, Germany: UVK.
   Google Scholar
• Van Cuilenburg, J. (2000a). Media for an open and receptive society. On the economic and cultural foundation of open and receptive media diversity. In J. van Cuilenburg & R. van der Wurff (Eds.), Media & open societies. Cultural, economic and policy foundations for media openness and diversity in East and West (pp. 13–23). Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis. van Cuilenburg, J. (2000b). On measuring media competition and media diversity: Concepts, theories and methods. In R. Picard (Ed.), Measuring media content, quality and diversity (pp. 51–84). Turku, Finland: Turku School of Economics and Business Administration. van Cuilenburg, J. (2005). On monitoring media diversity, media profusion, and media performance: Some regulator’s notes. Communications, 30, 301–308.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wurff, R. (2004). Supplying and viewing diversity: The role of competition and viewer choice in Dutch broadcasting. European Journal of Communication, 19, 215–237. van der Wurff, R. (2005). Media markets and media diversity. Communications, 30, 293–301.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wurff, R., & van Cuilenburg, J. (2001). Impact of moderate and ruinous competition on diversity: The Dutch television market. The Journal of Media Economics, 14, 213–229. van der Wurff, R., van Cuilenburg, J., & Keune, G. (2000). Competition, media innovation, and diversity in broadcasting. A case study of the TV market in the Netherlands. In J. van Cuilenburg & R. van der Wurff (Eds.), Media & open societies: Cultural, economic and policy foundations for media openness and diversity in East and West (pp. 119–157). Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis. van Kranenburg, H., Hagedoorn, J., & Pennings, J. (2004). Measurement of international and product diversification in the publishing industry. The Journal of Media Economics, 17, 87–104. van Lunenberg, M. A. (2002). A newspaper content analysis of Dutch industry. Corporate Communications, 7, 126–135. Vergeer, M. (2005). Measuring diversity and level of aggregation. Communications, 30, 312–319. Vettehen, P. H. (2005). “Open diversity” statistics: An illusion of “scientific thoroughness”? Communications, 30, 308–312. Vlasic, A. (2004). Die Integrationsfunktion der Massenmedien. Begriff-sgeschichte, Modelle, Operationalisierung [Social integration as a function of mass media: History of an idea, theoretical models, oper-ationalization]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag. Wakshlag, J., & Adams, W. J. (1985). Trends in program variety and the prime time access rule. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 29, 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Waldeck, J., & Myers, K. (2007). A state of the art review: Organizational assimilation theory, research, and implications for the discipline. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 31 (pp. 321–367). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wanta, W., King, P., & McCombs, M. (1995). A comparison of factors influencing issue diversity in the U.S. and Taiwan. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 7, 353–365.
   Google Scholar
• Wilke, J. (Ed.). (2000). Von der Agentur zur Redaktion. Wie Nachrichten gemacht, bewertet und verwendet werden [Wire services and the newsroom: How news is made, assessed, and used]. Koln, Germany: Bohlau.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. A., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2000). Unchained reaction: The collapse of media gatekeeping and the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal. Journalism, 1, 61–85.
   Google Scholar
• Winseck, D. (2002). Netscapes of power: Convergence, consolidation and power in the Canadian mediascape. Media, Culture & Society, 24, 795–819.
   Google Scholar
• Woldt, R. (1992). Probleme der Messung von Vielfalt [Problems in measuring diversity]. In G. Rager & B. Weber (Eds.), Publizistische Vielfalt zwischen Markt und Politik (pp. 186–211). Dusseldorf, Germany: Econ.
   Google Scholar
• Zook, K. B. (2003). The Fox Network and the revolution in Black television. In G. Dines & J. M. Humez (Eds.), Gender, race, and class in media: A text-reader (2nd ed., pp. 586–596). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar