Reconceptualizing Virtual Teaming from a Constitutive Perspective Review, Redirection, and Research Agenda

References

• Ahuja, M., Galletta, D., & Carley, K. (2003). Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study. Management Science, 49, 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123–148.
   Google Scholar
• Anawati, D., & Craig, A. (2006). Behavioral adaptation within cross-cultural virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49, 44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D. J., & Cole, P. (2002). Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In P. M. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 167–186). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arundale, R. B. (1999). An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory. Pragmatics, 9, 119–153.
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.
   Google Scholar
• Aubert, B. A., & Kelsey, B. L. (2003). Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 34, 575–618.
   Google Scholar
• Axley, S. (1984). Managerial and organizational communication in terms of the conduit metaphor. Academy of Management Review, 9, 428–437.
   Google Scholar
• Baba, M. L., Gluesing, J., Ratner, H., & Wagner, K. H. (2004). The contexts of knowing: Natural history of a globally distributed team. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 547–587.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, D. I., & Gossett, L. M. (2007). Alternative times: Communicating the nonstandard work arrangement. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 31 (pp. 274–321). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. P., & Riley, P. (1993). Structuration theory as an ontology for communication research. In S. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 16 (pp. 167–196). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bartesaghi, M., & Castor, T. (2008). Social construction in communication: Reconstituting the conversation. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 32 (pp. 3–39). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27, 14–49.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Boczkowski, P. J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2004). Organizational discourse and new media: A practice perspective. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 359–377). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, W. E., & Vozikis, G. S. (2004). Trust in virtual teams. In S. H. Godar & S. P. Ferris (Eds.), Virtual and collaborative teams: Process, technologies, and practice (pp. 99–113). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B. (1981). Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In M. B. Brewer & B. E. Collins (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (pp. 345–360). New York: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1950)
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K., & Chidambaram, L. (1995). Developmental differences between distributed and face-to-face groups in electronically supported meeting environments: An exploratory investigation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 4, 213–233.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R., & Planalp, S. (2000). Producing emotion(al) messages. Communication Theory, 10, 221–250.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349–399.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney, G. (1983). The rhetoric of identification and the study of organizational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69, 143–158.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney, G. (1991). Rhetoric in an organizational society: Managing multiple identities. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney, G. (2002). Values at work. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney, G., Zorn, T., Planalp, S., & Lair, D. (2008). Meaningful work and personal/social well-being: Organizational communication engages the meanings of work. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 32 (pp. 137–185). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cocroft, B., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1994). Facework in Japan and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18, 469–506.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. G., & Gibson, C. B. (2003). In the beginning: Introduction and framework. In C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 1–13). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Connaughton, S. L., & Daly, J. A. (2004a). Identification with leader: A comparison of perceptions of identification among geographically dispersed and co-located teams. Corporate Communication, 9, 89–103.
   Google Scholar
• Connaughton, S. L., & Daly, J. A. (2004b). Leading from afar: Strategies for effectively leading virtual teams. In S. H. Godar & S. P. Ferris (Eds.), Virtual and collaborative teams: Process, technologies, and practice (pp. 49–75). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Connaughton, S. L., & Daly, J. A. (2005). Leadership in the new millennium: Communicating beyond temporal, spatial, and geographical boundaries. In P. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Communication yearbook 29 (pp. 187–213). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, C., & Poole, M. S. (2005). Strategic organizational communication in global economy. Belmont, CA: Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Coppola, N. W., Hiltz, S. R., & Rotter, N. G. (2004). Building trust in virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47, 95–104.
   Google Scholar
• Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 346–371.
   Google Scholar
• Cramton, C. D., & Hinds, P. J. (2004). Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 231–263.
   Google Scholar
• Crossman, A., & Lee-Kelley, L. (2004). Trust, commitment and team working: The paradox of virtual organizations. Global Networks, 4, 375–390.
   Google Scholar
• Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420–443). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50, 352–364.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554–571.
   Google Scholar
• DeChurch, L. A., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Maximizing the benefits of task conflict: The role of conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 4–22.
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (1994). Representational practices and the political analysis of corporations: Building a communication perspective in organizational studies. In B. Kovacic (Ed.), New approaches to organizational communication (pp. 211–243). Albany: State University New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (2001). Conceptual foundations. In F. M. Jablin & L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 3–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1984). On understanding emotion (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., & Monge, P. (1999). Introduction to the special issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10, 693–703.
   Google Scholar
• Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. B. (2002). Multinational work teams: A new perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. The Academy of Management Journal, 43, 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, H. K., & Sridhar, V. (2005). Analysis of software requirements for engineering exercises in a global virtual team setup. Journal of Global Information Management, 13(2), 21–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2). Retrieved June 11, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/ellison.html
   Google Scholar
• Elron, E. (1997). Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity. Leadership Quarterly, 8, 393–412.
   Google Scholar
• Fairhurst, G. T. (2007). Discursive leadership: In conversation with leadership psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fairhurst, G. T., & Chandler, T. A. (1989). Social structure in leader-member interaction. Communication Monographs, 56, 215–239.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, S. (Ed.). (2000). Emotion in organizations (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fiol, C. M., & OConnor, E. J. (2005). Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions. Organization Science, 16, 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J. (2002). The elusive benefits of the technological support of knowledge management. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 242–248.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. (2006). Discourses of leadership: Gender, identity and contradiction in a UK public sector organization. Leadership, 2(1), 77–99.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (2001). Promoting political engagement. In W. L. Bennett & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future democracy (pp. 56–74). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373–394.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. L. (2002). Loose coupling in global teams: Tracing the contours of cultural complexity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Decoupling and coupling in global teams: Implications for human resource management. In G. K. Stahl & I. Bjorkman (Eds.), Handbook of research in international human resource management (pp. 347–363). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. L. (2007). Loose coupling in global teams: Negotiating tensions across time, space, and culture. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 451–495.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Manuel, J. (2003). Building trust: Effective multicultural communication processes in virtual teams. In C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 59–86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Vermeulen, F. (2003). A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 202–239.
   Google Scholar
• Gillam, C., & Oppenheim, C. (2006). Review article: Reviewing the impact of virtual teams in the information age. Journal of Information Science, 32, 160–175.
   Google Scholar
• Gluesing, J. C., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). Designing and forming global teams. In H. W. Lane, M. L. Maznevski, M. E. Mendenhall, & J. McNett (Eds.), Handbook of global management (pp. 199–226). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Goodbody, J. (2005). Critical success factors for global virtual teams. Strategic Communication Management, 9(2), 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. A., Phillips, M. E., & Sackmann, S. A. (1999). The complex culture of international project teams. In R. A. Goodman (Ed.), Modern organizations and emerging conundrums: Exploring the post industrial subculture of the third millennium (pp. 23–33). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gossett, L. M. (2002). Kept at arm’s length: Questioning the organizational desirability of member identification. Communication Monographs, 69, 385–404.
   Google Scholar
• Govindarajan, V., & Gupta, A. K. (2001). Building an effective global business team. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(4), 63–71.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 33–50.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, T. L., Mannix, E. A., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Conflict and virtual teams. In C. B. Gibson, & S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 335–352). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27, 265–287.
   Google Scholar
• Grosse, C. U. (2002). Managing communication within virtual intercultural teams. Business Communication Quarterly, 65(4), 22–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., Davison, S. C., Snell, S., & Snow, C. C. (1998). When groups consist of multiple nationalities: Towards a new understanding of the implications. Organization Studies, 19, 181–205.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, C. (1995). Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, 73(3), 40–50.
   Google Scholar
• Harre, R. (Ed.). (1986). The social construction of emotions. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, M., Novicevic, M. M., & Garrison, G. (2004). Challenges to staffing global virtual teams. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 275–294.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, L., & Taylor, J. R. (2002). Knowledge management and professional work: A communication perspective on the knowledge-based organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 210–236.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, G. (1994). Cultural diversity in the workplace: Issues and strategies. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003). Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14, 615–632.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, P. J., & Mortensen, M. (2005). Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science, 16, 290–307.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, P. J., & Weisband, S. P. (2003). Knowledge sharing and shared understanding in virtual teams. In C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 21–36). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: The effects of communication media. Human Communication Research, 23, 193–219.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A. B., Wittenbaum, G. M., Paulus, P. B., Hirokawa, R. Y., Ancona, D. G., Peterson, R. S., et al. (2004). A look at groups from the functional perspective. In M. S. Poole & A. B. Hollingshead (Eds.), Theories of small groups: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 21–62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, L. W., & Wigand, R. T. (2004). ICT enabled virtual collaboration through trust. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(1). Retrieved June 5, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue1/hossain_wigand.html
   Google Scholar
• Huysman, M., Steinfield, C., Jang, C. Y., David, K., in’t Veld, M. H., Poot, J., et al. (2003). Virtual teams and the appropriation of communication technology: Exploring the concept of media stickiness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12, 411–436.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedent of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29–64.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791–815.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., Shaw, T. R., & Staples, D. S. (2004). Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 15, 250–264.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530–557.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741–763.
   Google Scholar
• Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 187–213.
   Google Scholar
• Kayworth, T. R., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 7–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kerber, K. W., & Buono, A. F. (2004). Leadership challenges in global virtual teams: Lessons from the field. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 69(4), 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S. (1986). Thinking ahead: The hidden messages in computer networks. Harvard Business Review, 64(1), 46–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchmeyer, C., & Cohen, A. (1992). Multicultural groups: Their performance and reactions with constructive conflict. Group & Organization Management, 17, 153–170.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31, 700–718.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Gibson, C. B., Tesluk, P. E., & McPherson, S. O. (2002). Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc. Academy of Management Executive, 16(3), 67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (1997). The impact of cultural values on employee resistance to teams: Toward a model of globalized self-managing work team effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 22, 730–757.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2001). The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 557–569.
   Google Scholar
• Knoll, K., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1998). Working together in global virtual teams. In M. Igbaria & M. Tan (Eds.), The virtual workplace (pp. 2–23). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Krebs, S. A., Hobman, E. V., & Bordia, P. (2006). Virtual teams and group member dissimilarity: Consequences for the development of trust. Small Group Research, 37, 721–741.
   Google Scholar
• Kristof, A. L., Brown, K. G., Sims, H. P., & Smith, K. A. (1995). The virtual team: A case study and inductive model. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (Vol. 2, pp. 229–253). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T., & Nelson, N. (2002). Reengineering identity: A case study of multiplicity and duality in organizational identification. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 5–38.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, M. (2008). Exposing the spectrum of whiteness: Rhetorical conceptions of white absolutism. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 32 (pp. 227–311). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, G. S., & Pepper, G. L. (2003). Strategies for managing multiple organizational identifications: A case of competing identities. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 528–557.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M., O’Shea, T., & Fung, P. (1995). Constructing the networked organization: Content and context in the development of electronic communications. Organization Science, 6, 462–478.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing & Electronic Commerce, 2, 321–341.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. S. (1994). Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. MIS Quarterly, 18, 143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Leinonen, P., Jarvela, S., & Hakkinen, P. (2005). Conceptualizing the awareness of collaboration: A qualitative study of a global virtual team. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 14, 301–322.
   Google Scholar
• Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779–793.
   Google Scholar
• Lueg, C. (2001). Information, knowledge, and networked minds. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5, 151–159.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1998). The emotional self: A sociocultural exploration. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lurey, J. S., & Raisinghani, M. S. (2001). An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams. Information and Management, 38, 523–544.
   Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., Malhotra, A., Stamps, J., & Lipnack, J. (2004). Can absence make a team grow stronger? Harvard Business Review, 82(5), 131–137.
   Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N., & Ba, S. (2000). Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly, 24, 569–600.
   Google Scholar
• Mannix, E. A., Griffith, T., & Neale, M. A. (2002). The phenomenology of conflict in distributed work teams. In P. M. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 213–233). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 805–835.
   Google Scholar
• Matlay, H., & Westhead, P. (2005). Virtual teams and the rise of e-entrepreneurship in Europe. International Small Business Journal, 23, 279–302.
   Google Scholar
• Maznevski, M. L. (1994). Understanding our differences: Performance in decision-making groups with diverse members. Human Relations, 47, 531–552.
   Google Scholar
• Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11, 473–492.
   Google Scholar
• Maznevski, M. L., Davison, S. C., & Jonsen, K. (2006). Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. In G. K. Stahl & I. Bjorkman (Eds.), Handbook of research in international human resource management (pp. 364–384). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, P. L. (1992). An assessment of the experimental literature on electronic support of group work: Results of a meta-analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 257–280.
   Google Scholar
• Millward, L. J., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Effective virtual teamwork: A socio-cognitive and motivational model. In S. H. Godar & S. P. Ferris (Eds.), Virtual and collaborative teams: Process, technologies, and practice (pp. 20–34). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mokros, H. B. (Ed.). (2003). Identity matters: Communication-based explorations and explanations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mokros, H. B., & Deetz, S. (1996). What counts as real? A constitutive view of communication and the disenfranchised in the context of health. In E. B. Ray (Ed.), Communication and the disenfranchised: Social health issues and implications (pp. 29–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Massey, A. P., & Song, M. (2001). Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1251–1262.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, M., & Hinds, P. J. (2001). Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 212–238.
   Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K., & Clair, R. (1997). Organizational discourse. In T. A. V. Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 181–205). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. (2004). Trust, rationality and the virtual team. In D. Pauleen (Ed.), Virtual teams: Projects, protocols and processes (pp. 317–343). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nandhakumar, J. (1999). Virtual teams and lost proximity: Consequences on trust relationships. In P. J. Jackson (Ed.), Virtual working: Social and organizational dynamics (pp. 46–56). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ngwenyama, O. K., & Lee, A. S. (1997). Communication richness in electronic mail: Critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. MIS Quarterly, 21, 145–167.
   Google Scholar
• Nkomo, S. M., & Cox, T., Jr. (1996). Diverse identities in organizations. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 338–356). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Oetzel, J. G., Ting-Toomey, S., Masumoto, T., Yokochi, Y., Pan, X., Takai, J., et al. (2001). Face and facework in conflict: A cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Communication Monographs, 68, 235–258.
   Google Scholar
• OLeary, M., & Cummings, J. (2001). The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in work teams. Working Paper, 148, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., Yates, J., Okamura, K., & Fujimoto, M. (1995). Shaping electronic communication: The metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organization Science, 6, 423–444.
   Google Scholar
• Pal, M., & Dutta, M. J. (2008). Theorizing resistance in a global context: Processes, strategies, and tactics in communication scholarship. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 32 (pp. 41–87). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Panteli, N. (2005). Trust in global virtual teams. Ariadne, 43. Retrieved May 29, 2006, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue43/
   Google Scholar
• Panteli, N., & Davidson, R. M. (2005). The role of subgroups in the communication patterns of global virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 191–200.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, S., Samarah, I. M., Seetharaman, P., & Mykytyn Jr., P. P. (2005). An empirical investigation of collaborative conflict management style in group support system-based global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(3), 185–222.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, S., Seetharaman, P., Samarah, I. M., & Mykytyn Jr., P. P. (2004). Impact of heterogeneity and collaborative conflict management style on the performance of synchronous global virtual teams. Information & Management, 41, 303–321.
   Google Scholar
• Pauleen, D. J., & Yoong, P. (2001). Relationship building and the use of ICT in boundary-crossing virtual teams: A facilitator’s perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 16, 205–220.
   Google Scholar
• Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2003). Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams. MIS Quarterly, 27, 365–395.
   Google Scholar
• Planalp, S. (1999). Communicating emotion: Social, moral, and cultural processes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Planalp, S., & Knie, K. (2002). Integrating verbal and nonverbal emotion(al) messages. In S. R. Fussell (Ed.), The verbal communication of emotions: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 55–78). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, R., & Page, D. (2001). Managing the virtual team: Critical skills and knowledge for successful performance. In N. J. Johnson (Ed.), Telecommuting and virtual offices: Issues and opportunities (pp. 130–147). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M., & Prosch, H. (1975). Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, M. S. (1999). Organizational challenges for the new forms. In G. DeSanctis & J. Fulk (Eds.), Shaping organization form: Communication, connection, and community (pp. 453–495). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? Side-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 689–715.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, R. E., & Balthazard, P. S. (2002). Understanding human interaction and performance in the virtual team. Journal of Information and Technology Theory and Applications, 4, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L. (1982). Paradigms for organizational communication research: An overview and synthesis. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 192–206.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L. (1983). The interpretive perspective: An alternative to functionalism. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organization: An interpretive approach (pp. 31–54). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., & Pacanowsky, M. E. (Eds.). (1983). Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1996). Bona fide groups: An alternative perspective for communication and small group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 147–178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, S., Liu, M., & Vogel, D. (2006). The effects of electronic collaboration in distributed project management. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15(1), 55–75.
   Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1989). The expression of emotion in organizational life. Research in Organizational Behavior, 11, 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Rasters, G., Vissers, G., & Dankbaar, B. (2002). An inside look: Rich communication through lean media in a virtual research team. Small Group Research, 33, 718–754.
   Google Scholar
• Rutkowski, A., Saunders, C., Vogel, D., & van Genuchten, M. (2007). “Is it already 4 a.m. in your time zone?”: Focus immersion and temporal dissociation in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 38(1), 98–129.
   Google Scholar
• Rutkowski, A. F., Vogel, D. R., van Genuchten, M., Bemelmans, T. M. A., & Favier, M. (2002). E-collaboration: The reality of virtuality. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 45, 219–230.
   Google Scholar
• Sarker, S., Sarker, S., Nicholson, D. B., & Joshi, K. D. (2005). Knowledge transfer in virtual systems development teams: An exploratory study of four key enablers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 201–218.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, C., Van Slyke, C., & Vogel, D. R. (2004). My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. R. (1997). Identification with multiple targets in a geographically dispersed organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 10, 491–522.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. R., Corman, S. R., & Cheney, G. (1998). Development of a structurational model of identification in the organization. Communication Theory, 8, 298–336.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, Y. (2005). Conflict resolution in virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics, 34, 331–345.
   Google Scholar
• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Singelis, T. M., & Brown, W. J. (1995). Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior. Human Communication Research, 21, 354–389.
   Google Scholar
• Sivunen, A., & Valo, M. (2006). Team leaders technology choice in virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49, 57–68.
   Google Scholar
• Sole, D., & Edmondson, A. (2002). Situated knowledge sharing in dispersed teams. British Journal of Management, 13, S17–S34.
   Google Scholar
• Sproull, L. S., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492–1512.
   Google Scholar
• Staples, D. S., & Webster, J. (2007). Exploring traditional and virtual team members “best practices”: A social cognitive theory perspective. Small Group Research, 38, 60–97.
   Google Scholar
• Stohl, C. (2005). Globalization theory. In S. May & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), Engaging organizational communication theory and research (pp. 223–261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stough, S., Eom, S., & Buckenmyer, J. (2000). Virtual teaming: A strategy for moving your organization into the new millennium. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100, 370–378.
   Google Scholar
• Straus, S., & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2003). Social cues and impression formation in CMC. Journal of Communication, 53, 676–693.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. R., Flanagin, A. J., Cheney, G., & Seibold, D. R. (2001). Organizational communication research: Key moments, central concerns, and future challenges. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook 24 (pp. 99–137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. C. (1999). Cultural diversity and work group effectiveness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 242–263.
   Google Scholar
• Timmerman, C. E., & Scott, C. R. (2006). Virtually working: Communicative and structural predictors of media use and key outcomes in virtual work teams. Communication Monographs, 73, 108–136.
   Google Scholar
• Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict style. In Y. Kim & W. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213–235). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ting-Toomey, S. (1994). The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ting-Toomey, S., & Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 187–225.
   Google Scholar
• Ting-Toomey, S., & Oetzel, J. G. (2001). Managing intercultural conflict effectively. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. M., DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (1998). Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Executive, 12(3), 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2005). Locking up emotion: Moving beyond dissonance for understanding emotion labor discomfort. Communication Monographs, 72, 261–283.
   Google Scholar
• Tretheway, A., & Ashcraft, K. L. (2004). Special issue introduction. Practicing disorganization: The development of applied perspectives on living with tension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Trubisky, P., Ting-Toomey, S., & Lin, S.-L. (1991). The influence of individualism-collectivism and self-monitoring on conflict styles. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 12, 269–289.
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J., & Kunda, G. (1989). “Real feelings”: Emotional expression and organizational culture. Research in Organization Behavior, 11, 43–103.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52–91.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 6, 186–203.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23, 342–369.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Bazarova, N. N. (2007). Misattribution in virtual groups: The effects of member distribution on self-serving bias and partner blame. Human Communication Research, 33, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Bunz, U. (2005). The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Communication, 55, 828–846.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50–88.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R. (1997). Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decision Sciences, 28, 975–996.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (1999). Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organization Science, 10, 777–790.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (2001). Organizational identification among virtual workers: The role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. Journal of Management, 27, 213–229.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K., & OReilly, C. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77–140.
   Google Scholar
• Wittenbaum, G. M., Hollingshead, A. B., Paulus, P. B., Hirokawa, R. Y., Ancona, D. G., Peterson, R. S., et al. (2004). The functional perspective as a lens for understanding groups. Small Group Research, 35, 17–43.
   Google Scholar
• Workman, M. (2004). Goals, relationships, information and processes in global virtual team performance. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 5, 348–372.
   Google Scholar
• Zaccaro, S. J., & Bader, P. (2003). E-leadership and the challenges of leading e-teams. Organizational Dynamics, 31, 377–387.
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, N., Amelinckx, A., & Wilemon, D. (2004). Working together apart? Building a knowledge-sharing culture for global virtual teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. (May, 2007). A case study of boundary and identity management in a virtual team. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Zoller, H., & Kline, K. (2008). Theoretical contributions of interpretive and critical research in health communication. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 32 (pp. 89–135). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zorn, T. E., & Taylor, J. R. (2004). Knowledge management and/as organizational communication. In D. Tourish & O. Hargie (Eds.), Key issues in organizational communication (pp. 96–112). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar