Communicating Quantitative Risk Information

References

• Adelsward, V., & Sachs, L. (1996). The meaning of 6.8: Numeracy and normality in health information talks. Social Science Medicine, 43, 1179–1197.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M., & Preiss, R. W. (1997). Comparing the persuasiveness of narrative and statistical evidence using meta-analysis. Communication Research Reports, 14, 125–131.
   Google Scholar
• Ancker, J. S., Senathirajah, Y., Kukafka, R., & Starren, J. B. (2006). Design features of graphs in health risk communication: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13, 608–618.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. L., Dodman, S., Kopelman, M., & Fleming, A. (1979). Patient information recall in a rheumatology clinic. Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, 18, 245–255.
   Google Scholar
• Baesler, E. J., & Burgoon, J. K. (1994). The temporal effects of story and statistical evidence on belief change. Communication Research, 21, 582–602.
   Google Scholar
• Barke, R. P., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Slovic, P. (1997). Risk perceptions of men and women scientists. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 167–176.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R. S., Inman, M. L., Kao, C. F., & Logan, H. (1992). Negative emotion and superficial social processing. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 323–346.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, C. S. (2001). Communicating for better health: A guide through the medical mazes. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Black, W. C., Nease, R. F., & Tosteson, N. A. (1995). Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 87, 720–731.
   Google Scholar
• Bontempo, R. N., Bottom, W. P., & Weber, E. U. (1997). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception: A model based approach. Risk Analysis, 17, 479–488.
   Google Scholar
• Brase, G. (2002). Which statistical formats facilitate what decisions? The perception and influence of different statistical information formats. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 381–401.
   Google Scholar
• Brase, G., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1998). Individuation, counting, and statistical inference: The role of frequency and whole object representations in judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 127, 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, H. C., Weinbacher, M., & Gyr, K. (1994). Influence of method of reporting study results on decision of physicians to prescribe drugs to lower cholesterol concentration. British Medical Journal, 309, 761–764.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, M. P. (1994). HIV testing in blood banks. In G. Schochetman & J. R. George (Eds.), AIDS testing: A comprehensive guide to technical, medical, social, legal, and management issues (pp. 224–236). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. J. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805–818.
   Google Scholar
• Casscells, W., Schoenberger, A., & Grayboys, T. (1978). Interpretation by physicians of clinical laboratory results. New England Journal of Medicine, 299, 999–1001.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control. (2008). Anthrax Q & A: Risk. Retrieved April 17, 2008, from http://emergency.cdc.gov/agent/anthrax/faq/risk.asp
   Google Scholar
• Church, R. T., & Wilbanks, C. (1986). Values and policies in controversy: An introduction to argumentation and debate. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
   Google Scholar
• Civan, A., Doctor, J. N., & Wolf, F. M. (2005). What makes a good format: Frameworks for evaluating the effect of graphic risk formats on consumers’ risk-related behavior. AMIA Symposium Proceedings (p. 927).
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, L. D., Macfarlane, S., Yanez, C., & Imai, W. (1995). Risk-perception: Differences between adolescents and adults. Health Psychology, 14, 217–222.
   Google Scholar
• Covello, V. (1998). Communicating risk information: A guide to environmental communication in crisis and non-crisis situations, with principles of effective risk communication in crisis and non-crisis situations. In R.V. Kolluru (Ed.), Environmental strategies handbook: A guide to effective policies and practices (pp. 497–538). New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, T. C., Dolan, N., Ferreira, M. R., Tomori, C., Green, K. W., Sipler, A. M. et al. (2001). The role of inadequate health literacy skills in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Investment, 19, 193–200.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, T. C., Long, S. W., Jackson, R. H., Mayeaux, E. J., George, R. B., Murphy, P. W., et al. (1993). Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: A shortened screening instrument. Journal of Family Medicine, 25, 391–395.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, T. C., Williams, M. V., Marin, E., Parker, R. M., & Glass, J. (2002). Health literacy and cancer communication, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 52, 134–149.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Nabi, R. L. (2006). The persuasive influence of emotion in cancer prevention and detection messages. Journal of Communication, 56, 123–139.
   Google Scholar
• Doak, C. C., Doak, L. G., Friedell, G. H., & Meade, C. D. (1998). Improving comprehension for cancer patients with low literacy skills: Strategies for clinicians. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 48, 151–162.
   Google Scholar
• Doyal, L. (2001). Informed consent: Moral necessity or illusion? Quality in Health Care, 10(Suppl. 1), 29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, A. S., Shridharani, K. V., Lou, W., Bernstein, J., & Horowitz, C. R. (2001). Physician-patient discussion of controversial cancer screening tests. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20, 130–134.
   Google Scholar
• Eddy, D. M. (1982). Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 249–267). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., Elwyn, G., & Gwyn, R. (1999). General practice registrar responses to the use of different risk communication tools in simulated consultations: A focus group study. British Medical Journal, 319, 749–752.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerlin, A., Zikmund-Fisher, B., Ubel, P. A., Jankovic, A., Derry, H. A., & Smith, D. M. (2007). Measuring numeracy without a math test: Development of the subjective numeracy scale. Medical Decision Making, 27, 672–680.
   Google Scholar
• Fahey, T., Griffiths, S., & Peters, T. J. (1995). Evidence based purchasing: Understanding results of clinical trials and systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 311, 1056–1060.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorino, D. J. (1989). Technical and democratic values in risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 9, 293–299.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorino, D. J. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15, 226–244.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, K., & Jungermann, H. (1996). Rarely occurring headaches and rarely occurring blindness: Is rarely = rarely? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 153–172.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. (1987). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. K. (1994). Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 14, 1101–1108.
   Google Scholar
• Freimuth, V. S., Chervin, D., Hovick, S., & Johnson-Turbes, C. A. (2007, November). Patterns of response to health risks among the southern poor. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Freimuth, V. S, Linnan, H. W., & Potter, P. (2000). Communicating the threat of emerging infections to the public. Journal of Emerging Infectious Diseases, 6, 337–347.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer, L., Miles, S., Brennan, M., Kuznesof, S., Ness, M., & Ritson, C. (2002). Public preferences for informed choice under conditions of risk uncertainty. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 363–372.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, K., & Grill, L. H. (this volume). Opening up the conversation on genetics in families: The space for communication scholars. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 33 (pp. 213–257). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• George, J. R., & Schochetman, G. (1994). Detection of HIV infection using serologic techniques. In G. Schochetman & J. R. George (Eds.), AIDS testing: A comprehensive guide to technical, medical, social, legal, and management issues (pp. 62–102). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A. K., & Ghosh, K. (2005). Translating evidence-based information into effective risk communication: Current challenges and opportunities. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 145, 171–180.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Calculated risks: How to know when numbers deceive you. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Edwards, A. (2003). Simple tools for understanding risk: From innu-meracy to insight. British Medical Journal, 327, 741–744.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwartz, L. M., & Woloshin, S. (2008). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(2), 53–96.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., van den Broek, E., Fasolo, B., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2005). “A 30% chance of rain tomorrow”: How does the public understand probabilistic weather forecasts? Risk Analysis, 25, 623–629.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684–704.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Ebert, A. (1998). AIDS counseling for low-risk clients. AIDS Care, 10, 197–211.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J., & Kruger, L. (1989). The empire of chance, how probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimes, D. A., & Snively, G. R. (1999). Patients’ understanding of medical risks: Implications for genetic counseling. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 93, 910–914.
   Google Scholar
• Hallowell, N., Statham, H., Murton, F., Green, J., & Richards, M. (1997). “Talking about chance”: The presentation of risk information during genetic counseling for breast and ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6, 269–286.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D. (2006). Toward a theory of evidence: Perceptual dimensions and their relationships to persuasiveness. In P. Riley (Ed.), Engaging argument (pp. 453–460). Washington DC: National Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hanoch, Y. (2004). Improving doctor-patient understanding of probability in communicating cancer-screening test findings. Journal of Health Communication, 9, 327–335.
   Google Scholar
• Harter, L., Japp, P., & Beck, C. S. (Eds.). (2005). Narratives, health, and healing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, R. F., Buchan, I., Edwards, R., Lyratzopoulos, G., McElduff, P., & St. Leger, S. (2003). Communicating risks at the population level: Application of population impact numbers. British Medical Journal, 327, 1162–1165.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, R. F., Sandars, J. E., Patterson, L., & McElduff, P. (2004). GP’s and physicians’ interpretation of risks, benefits, and diagnostic test results. Family Practice, 21, 155–159.
   Google Scholar
• Hembroff, L. A., Holmes-Rovner, M., & Wills, C. E. (2004). Treatment decision-making and the form of risk communication: Results from a factorial survey. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 4, 1184–1120.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbard, J. H., & Peters, E. (2003). Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: Data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice. Annual Review of Public Health, 24, 413–433.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, L. M., & Morrongiello, B. A. (1998). Age and gender differences in school-age children’s appraisals of injury risk. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 23, 229–238.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffrage, U., & Gigerenzer, G. (1998). Using natural frequencies to improve diagnostic inferences. Academic Medicine, 73, 538–540.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffrage, U., Gigerenzer, G., Krauss, S., & Martignon, L. (2002). Representation facilitates reasoning: What natural frequencies are and what they are not. Cognition, 84, 343–352.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffrage, U., & Hertwig, R. (2006). Which world should be represented in representative design? In K. Fiedler & P. Juslin (Eds.), Information sampling and adaptive cognition (pp. 381–408). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffrage, U., Lindsey, S., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Communicating statistical information. Science, 22, 2261–2262.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Horner, S. D., Surratt, D., & Juliusson, S. (2000). Improving readability of patient materials. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 17, 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Huerta, E. E., & Macario, E. (1999). Communicating health risk to ethnic groups: Reaching hispanics as a case study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 25, 23–26.
   Google Scholar
• Huff, D. (1954). How to lie with statistics. London: Gollancz. Institute of Medicine. (2002). Speaking of health: Assessing health communication strategies for diverse populations. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jelalian, E., Spirito, A., Rasile, D., Vinnick, L., Rohrbeck, C., & Arrigan, M. (1997). Risk taking, reported injury, and perception of future injury among adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22, 513–531.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 247, 160–173.
   Google Scholar
• Kazoleas, D. C. (1993). A comparison of the persuasive effectiveness of qualitative versus quantitative evidence: A test of the explanatory hypotheses. Communication Quarterly, 41, 40–50.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, C. S., & Stevens, K. R. (1997). Cultural considerations in promoting wellness. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 11, 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kessels, R. P. C. (2003). Patient’s memory for medical information. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96, 219–222.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiter, G. (1994). Natural sampling: Rationality without base rates. In G. H. Fischer &
   Google Scholar
• D. Laming (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology, psychometrics, and methodology (pp. 375–388). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kolmogorov, A. N. (1956). Foundations of the theory of probability (2nd English ed.). New York: Chelsea.
   Google Scholar
• Kopfman, J. E., Smith, S. W., Ah Yun, J. K., & Hodges, A. (1998). Affective and cognitive reactions to narrative versus statistical evidence in organ donation messages. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 279–300.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuter, M. W., Green, M. C., Cappella, J. N., Slater, M. D., & Clark, E. M. (2007). Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and applications. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33, 221–235.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzenhauser, S. (2003). Welche Informationen vermitteln deutsche Gesundheitsbro-schuren uber die Screening-Mammographie? [What information is provided in German health information pamphlets on mammography screening?] Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung, 97, 53–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzenhauser, S., & Hoffrage, U. (2002). Teaching Bayesian reasoning: An evaluation of a classroom tutorial for medical students. Medical Teacher, 24, 531–536.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzenhauser, S., & Hoffrage, U. (in press). Designing risk communication in health. In P. M. Todd, G. Gigerenzer, & the ABC Research Group, Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzenhauser, S., & Lucking, A. (2004). Statistical formats in Bayesian inference. In R. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgment, and memory (pp. 61–77). Hove, England: Psychological Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Lin, Y., Paulsen, C., & White, S. (2006). The health literacy of America’s adults: Results from the 2003 national assessment of health literacy (NCES 2006–483). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Leiss, W. (1996). Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice. The Annuals of the American Academy, 545, 85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Lemaire, R. (2006). Informed consent—A contemporary myth? Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 88, 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Ley, P. (1979). Memory for medical information. British Journal of Social Clinical Psychology, 18, 245–255.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, S., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2003). Communicating statistical DNA evidence. Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science, and Technology, 43, 147–163.
   Google Scholar
• Lipkus, I. M. (2007). Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: Suggested best practices and future recommendations. Medical Decision Making, 27, 696–713.
   Google Scholar
• Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G., & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21, 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, A. J. (2001). The extent of patients’ understanding of the risk of treatments. Quality in Health Care, 10(Suppl. 1), i14–i18.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, A. J., Hayes, P. D., London, N. J. M., Bell, P. R. F., & Naylor, A. R. (1999). Patients’ ability to recall risk associated with treatment options. Lancet, 353, 645.
   Google Scholar
• Lobb, E. A., Butow, P. N., Kenny, D. T., & Tattersall, H. N. (1999). Communicating prognosis in early breast cancer: Do women understand the language used? Medical Journal of Australia, 171, 290–294.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, D., Hickam, D., & Mazur, M. (1999). How patients’ preferences for risk information influence treatment choice in a case of high risk and high therapeutic uncertainty: Asymptomatic localized prostate cancer. Medical Decision Making, 19, 394–398.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, L. C. (1996). Remembering what the doctor said: Organization and older adults’ memory for medical information. Experimental Aging Research, 22, 403–428.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, G. H. (1969). SMOG grading: A new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12, 639–646.
   Google Scholar
• Mellers, B., & McGraw, P. (1999). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Comment on Gigerenzer and Hoffrage. Psychological Review, 106, 417–424.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M., Hancock, M. S., Miller, W. C., Ford, C. A., Schmitz, J. L., Hobbs, M. M., et al. (2006). Prevalence of HIV infection among young adults in the United States: Results from the Add Health Study. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1091–1097.
   Google Scholar
• Noar, S. M., Harrington, N. G., & Aldrich, R. S. (this volume). The role of message tailoring in the development of persuasive health communication messages. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 33 (pp. 73–133). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 623–644.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2008). Do loss-framed persuasive messages engender greater message processing than do gain-framed messages? A meta-analytic review. Communication Studies, 59, 51–67.
   Google Scholar
• Paling, J. (2003). Strategies to help patients understand risks. British Medical Journal, 327, 745–747.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R. M., Baker, D. W., Williams, M. V., & Nurss, J. R. (1995). The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients’ literacy skills. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10, 537–541.
   Google Scholar
• Parrott, R., Silk, K., Dorgan, K., Condit, C., & Harris, T. (2005). Risk comprehension and judgments of statistical evidentiary appeals: When a picture is not worth a thousand words. Human Communication Research, 31, 423–452.
   Google Scholar
• Paulos, J. A. (1988). Innumeracy: Mathematical illiteracy and its consequences. New York: Hill & Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, E., Lipkus, I. M., & Diefenbach, M. A. (2006). The functions of affect in health communications and the construction of health preferences. Journal of Communication, 56, 140–162.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, E., Vastfjall, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K. & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17, 407–413.
   Google Scholar
• Raghunathan, R., & Pham, M. T. (1999). All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision processes, 79, 56–77.
   Google Scholar
• Reinard, J. C. (1988). The empirical study of the persuasive effects of evidence: The status after fifty years of research. Human Communication Research, 15, 3–59.
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2007). The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: Numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, R. A., & Reynolds, J. L. (2002). Evidence. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 213–232). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roter, D. L., Rudd, R. E., Keoge, J., & Robinson, B. (1986–1987). Worker produced health education material for the construction trades. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 7(2), 109–121.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, R. L., Montori, V. M., Cherrington, A., & Pignone, M. P. (2008). Perspective: The role of numeracy in health care. Journal of Health Communication, 13, 583–595.
   Google Scholar
• Rottenstreich, Y., & Hsee, C. K. (2001). Money, kisses, and electric shocks: On the affective psychology of risk. Psychological Science, 12, 185–190.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, K. E. (1999). Effective explanation of uncertain and complex science. In S. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science (pp. 201–224). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rudd, R. E., & Comings, J. P. (1994). Learner developed materials: An empowering product. Health Education Quarterly, 21(3), 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Rudd, R. E., Comings, J. P., & Hyde, J. N. (2003). Leave no one behind: Improving health and risk communication through attention to literacy. Journal of Health Communication, 8, 104–115.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett, D. L. (1996). On some clinically useful measures of the effects of treatment. Evidence-Based Medicine, 1, 37–38.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett, D. L., Haynes, R. B., Guyatt, G. H., & Tugwell, P. (1991). Clinical epidemiology: A basic science for clinical medicine. Boston: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Salovey, P., Schneider, T. R., & Apanovitch, A. M. (2002). Message framing in the prevention and early detection of illness. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 391–406). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sandman, P. M. (1993). Responding to community outrage: Strategies for effective risk communication. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sarfati, D., Howden-Chapman, P., Woodward, A., & Salmond, C. (1998). Does the frame affect the picture? A study into how attitudes to screening for cancer are affected by the way benefits are expressed. Journal of Medical Screening, 5, 137–140.
   Google Scholar
• Schapira, M. M., Fletcher, K. E., Gilligan, M. A., King, T. K., Laud, P. W., Matthews, B. A., et al. (2008). A framework for health numeracy: How patients use quantitative skills in health care. Journal of Health Communication, 13, 501–517.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Black, W., C., & Welsh, H. G. (1997). The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 966–972.
   Google Scholar
• Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (2001). Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 380–400.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S. L., & Pignone, M. (2002). Numeracy and the medical student’s ability to interpret data. Effective Clinical Practice, 5, 35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S. L., Pignone, M. P., & Lewis, C. L. (2003). A randomized comparison of patients’ understanding of number needed to treat and other common risk reduction formats. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18, 884–892.
   Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, L. (2001). Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust. Risk Analysis, 21, 189–198.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19, 689–701.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). Rational actors of rational fools: Implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics. Journal of Socio-Economics, 31, 329–342.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24, 311–322.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Monahan, J., & MacGregor, D.G. (2000). Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 271–296.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, A. H. (Ed.). (1907). The writings of Benjamin Franklin (Vol. 10). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Strecher, V. J., Greenwood, T., Wang, C., & Dumont, D. (1999). Interactive multimedia and risk communication. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 25, 134–139.
   Google Scholar
• Tappe, M. K., & Galer-Unti, R. A. (2001). Health educators’ role in promoting health literacy and advocacy for the 21st century. Journal of School Health, 71, 477–481.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M., Cunningham, S. J., & Hunt, N. P. (2001). A comparison of information retention at an initial orthodontic consultation. European Journal of Orthodontics, 23, 169–178.
   Google Scholar
• Towle, A., Godolphin, W., Grams, G., & Lamarre, A. (2006). Putting informed and shared decision making into practice. Health Expectations, 9, 321–332.
   Google Scholar
• Tortolero-Luna, G., Glober, G. A., Villarreal, R., Palos, G., & Linares, A. (1995). Cancer research in Hispanic populations in the United States. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 18, 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
   Google Scholar
• Twain, M. (1907). Chapters from my autobiography. North American Review, DXCVIII.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health. (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, E. (1995). The significance of socioeconomic and ethnic diversity for the risk communication process. Risk Analysis, 15, 169–180.
   Google Scholar
• Von Mises, R. (1939). Probability, statistics, and truth. (J. Neyman, D. Scholl, & E. Rabinowitsch, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, M., Lloyd, S., Davidson, J., Meyer, L., Eeles, R., & Ebbs, S. (1999). The impact of genetic counseling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 79, 868–874.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N. D. (1989). Optimistic biases about personal risk. Science, 246, 1232–1233.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N. D. (1999). What does it mean to understand a risk? Evaluating risk comprehension. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 25, 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., & Dillow, S. (2005). Key concepts and features of the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006–471). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedemann, P. M. (1993). Taboo, sin, risk: Changes in the social perception of hazards. In B. Rtick (Ed.), Risk is a construct: Perceptions of risk perception (pp. 41–63). Munich, Germany: Knesebeck.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, X., Wang, M., & Xu, L. (2003). What risks are Chinese people concerned about? Risk Analysis, 23, 685–695.
   Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, K. (1997). When a 12.86% mortality rate is more dangerous than a 24.14%: Implications for risk communication. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 295–506.
   Google Scholar
• Zarcadoolas, C., Pleasant, A. F., & Greer, D. S. (2006). Advancing health literacy: A framework for understanding and action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar