85
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Crossing and Transforming Occupational and Household Gendered Divisions of Labor Reviewing Literatures and Deconstructing Divisions

Pages 301-341 | Published online: 18 May 2016

References

  • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139–158.
  • Alberts, J., & Trethewey, A. (2007, Summer). Building gratitude: Love, honor, and thanks. Greater Good, 4, 20–22.
  • Allen, B. J. (1996). Feminist standpoint theory: A black woman’s (re)view of organizational socialization. Communication Studies, 47, 257–271.
  • Allen, B. J. (2004). Difference matters: Communicating social identity. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
  • Allen, J. (1993). Male elementary teachers: Experiences and perspectives. In C. Williams (Ed.), Doing “women’s work”: Men in nontraditional occupations (pp. 113127). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Allen, S. M., & Hawkins, A. J. (1999). Maternal gatekeeping: Mothers’ beliefs and behaviors that inhibit greater father involvement in family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 199–212.
  • Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53, 1125–1149.
  • Anderson, M. L., & Collins, P. H. (2004). Race, class and gender: An anthology (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson-Wadsworth.
  • Anker, R. (1998). Gender and jobs: Sex segregation of occupations in the world. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office.
  • Ashcraft, K. L. (1999). Managing maternity leave: A qualitative analysis of temporary succession. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 240–280.
  • Aschcraft, K. L. (2005). Resistance through consent? Occupational identity, organizational form, and the maintenance of masculinity among commercial airline pilots. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 67–90.
  • Aschcraft, K. L. (2006). Back to work: Sights/sites of difference in gender and organizational communication studies. In B. J. Wood & J. T. Wood (Eds.), The Sage handbook of gender and communication (pp. 97–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ashcraft, K. L. (2007). Appreciating the “work” of discourse: Occupational identity and difference as organizing mechanisms in the case of commercial pilots. Discourse & Communication, 1, 9–36.
  • Ashcraft, K. L., & Mumby, D. K. (2004). Reworking gender: A feminist communicol-ogy of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Atkinson, M. P., & Boles, J. (1984). WASP (Wives as Senior Partners). Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 681–670.
  • Atkinson, M. P., Greenstein, T. N., & Lang, M. M. (2005). For women, breadwinning can be dangerous: Gendered resource theory and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1137–1148.
  • Attwood, M. & Hatton, F. (1983). “Getting on”: Gender differences in career development: A case study in the hairdressing industry. In E. Gamarnickow, D. Morgan, J. Purvis, & D. Taylorson (Eds.). Gender, class, and work (pp. 115–130). London: Heineman.
  • Belkin, L. (2003, October26). The opt-out revolution. New York Times Magazine, 42–47, 58, 85–86.
  • Bergen, K. M., McBride, M. C., & Kirby, E. L. (2007). “How do you get two houses cleaned?”: Accomplishing family caregiving in commuter marriages. Journal of Family Communication, 7, 287–308.
  • Bittman, M., England, P., Folbre, N., Sayer, L., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 186–214.
  • Bradley, H. (1993). Across the great divide: The entry of men into “women’s jobs.” In C. L. Williams (Ed.), Doing “women’s work”: Men in non-traditional occupations (pp. 10–27). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 562–688.
  • Broman, C. L. (1991). Gender, work-family roles, and psychological well-being of blacks. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 509–521.
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2007). Current Population Survey 11. Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Retrieved June 16, 2008, from http://www.bls/gov/cps/epsaat11.pdf
  • Burgess, N. J. (1994). Gender roles revisited: The development of the “woman’s place” among African American women in the United States. Journal of Black Studies, 24, 391–401.
  • Burrell, G., & Hearn, J. (1993). Gender, sexuality, and organizational theory. In J.
  • Hearn, D. L. Sheppard, P. Tancred-Sheriff, & G. Burrell (Eds.), The sexuality of organization (pp. 29–44). London: Sage.
  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
  • Butterfield, D. A., & Grinnell, J. P. (1990). “Re-viewing” gender, leadership, and managerial behavior: Do three decades of research tell us anything? In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 223–238). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Buzzanell, P. M. (1994). Gaining a voice: Feminist perspectives in organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 7, 339–383.
  • Buzzanell, P. M. (1995). Reframing the glass ceiling as a socially constructed process: Implications for understanding change. Communication Monographs, 62, 327–354.
  • Buzzanell, P. M. (2001). Gendered practices in the contemporary workplace: A critique of what often constitutes front page news in The Wall Street Journal. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 517–537.
  • Buzzanell, P. M. (2003). Feminist standpoint analysis of maternity and maternity leave for women with disabilities. Women & Language, 26, 53–65.
  • Buzzanell, P. M., & Goldzwig, S. (1991). Linear and nonlinear career models: Metaphors, paradigms, and ideologies. Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 466–505.
  • Buzzanell, P. M., Meisenbach, R. Remke, R., Liu, M., Bowers, V., & Conn, C. (2005). The good working mother: Managerial woman’s sensemaking and feelings about work-family issues. Communication Studies, 56, 261–285.
  • Camilleri, P., & Jones, P. (2001). Doing “women’s work”?: Men, masculinity, and caring. In B. Pease & P. Camilleri (Eds.), Working with men in the human services (pp. 5–36). Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
  • Casper, C. M. (2007). Daddy takes care of me! Fathers as care providers. Current Population Reports. Retrieved January 10, 2008, from http://www.census.gov/ prod/3/97pubs/p70–59.pdf
  • Charles, M., & Grusky, D. B. (2004). Occupational ghettos: The worldwide segregation of women and men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Chodorow, N. J. (1989). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Clair, R. P. (1994). Resistance and oppression as self-contained opposite: An organizational communication analysis of one man’s story of sexual harassment. Western Journal of Communication, 58, 235–262.
  • Clair, R. P. (1996). The political nature of the colloquialism, “A real job”: Implications for organizational socialization. Communication Monographs, 63, 249–267.
  • Clair, R. P., & Thompson, K. (1996). Pay discrimination as a discursive and material practice: A case concerning extended housework. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 24, 1–20.
  • Clark, A. (1982). Working life of women in the seventeenth century. London: Routledge.
  • Cockburn, C. (1988). The gendering of jobs. In S. Walby (Ed.), Gender segregation at work (pp. 28–42). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  • Cohen, P. N., & Huffman, M. L. (2002). Occupational segregation and the devaluation of women’s work across U.S. labor markets. Social Forces, 81, 881–908.
  • Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
  • Coltrane, S. (1996). Family man: Fatherhood, housework, and gender equity. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Coltrane, S. (2004). Elite careers and family commitment: It’s (still) about gender. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 596, 214–220.
  • Conn, C. (2004). Blue collar women at work: A feminist poststructuralist reading of gendered identities and materiality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Coontz, S. (1999). The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic Books.
  • Corcoran-Nantes, Y., & Roberts, K. (1997). “We’ve got one of those”: The peripheral status of women in male-dominated industries. In D. Dunn (Ed.), Workplace/women’s place: An anthology (pp. 271–287). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
  • Cowen, R., & Hoffman, M. F. (2008). The flexible organization: How contemporary employees construct the work/life border. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 8, 37–41.
  • Crittenden, A. (2001). The price of motherhood. New York: Metropolitan Books.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Schneider, B. (2001). Becoming adult: How teenagers prepare for the world of work. New York: Basic Books.
  • Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 710–718.
  • Davey, C. L., & Davidson, M. J. (2000). The right of passage? The experiences of female pilots in commercial aviation. Feminism & Psychology, 10, 195–225
  • Deetz, S. A. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Demos, J. (1970). A little commonwealth: Family life in Plymouth Colony. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Dennis, M. R., & Kunkel, A. D. (2004). Perceptions of men, women, and CEOs: The effects of gender identity. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 155–172.
  • Devault, M. L. (1991). Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • DiTomaso, N. (1993). Sexuality in the workplace: Discrimination and harassment. In J. Hearn, D. L. Sheppard, P. Tancred-Sheriff, & G. Burrell (1993), The sexuality of organization (pp. 71–90). London: Sage.
  • Dollahite, D. C., & Hawkins, A. J. (1998). A conceptual ethic of generative fathering. Journal of Men’s Studies, 7, 109–132.
  • Donaldson, M. (1993). What is hegemonic masculinity? Theory and Society, 22, 643–657.
  • Donnison, J. (1988). Midwives and medical men: A history of inter-professional rivalries and women’s rights. New York: Schocken Books.
  • Doucet, A. (2004). “It’s almost like I have a job, but I don’t get paid”: Fathers at home reconfiguring work, care, and masculinity. Fathering, 2, 277–303.
  • Doucet, A. (2007). Do men mother? Fathering, care, and domestic responsibility. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  • Dougherty, D. S., & Smythe, M. J. (2004). Sensemaking, organizational culture, and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 293–317.
  • Douglas, S. J., & Michaels, M. W. (2004). The mommy myth: The idealization of motherhood and how it has undermined women. New York: Free Press.
  • Drago, R., Black, D., & Wooden, M. (2005). Female breadwinner families: Their existence, persistence and sources. Journal of Sociology, 41, 343–362.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256.
  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A metaanalysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685–710.
  • Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3–22.
  • Ehrenreich, B. (2001). Nickel and dimed: On (not) getting by in America. New York: Metropolitan Books.
  • Evans, J. (1997). Men in nursing: Issues of gender segregation and hidden advantage. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 226–231.
  • Evans, J. (2002). Cautious caregivers: Gender stereotypes and the sexualization of men nurses’ touch. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40, 441–448.
  • Evans, J., & Frank, F. (2003). Contradictions and tensions: Exploring relations of masculinities in the numerically female-dominated nursing profession. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 11, 277–292.
  • Fagenson, E. A. (1993). Women in management: Trends, issues, and challenges in managerial diversity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Faludi, S. (1999). Stiffed: The betrayal of the American man. New York: Harper Collins.
  • Fausto-Sterling, A. (1992). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
  • Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866–884.
  • Ferree, M. M., Lorber, J., & Hess, B. B. (2000). Introduction. In M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, & B. B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. xv-xxxvi). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
  • Fletcher, J. K. (1999). Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Folbre, N. (1991). The unproductive housewife: Her evolution in nineteenth-century economic thought. Signs, 16, 463–484.
  • Foster, E. (2008). Commitment, communication, and contending with heteronormativ-ity: An invitation to greater reflexivity in interpersonal research. Southern Communication Journal, 73, 84–101.
  • Gander, E. M. (2003). On our minds: How evolutionary psychology is reshaping the Nature versus nurture debate. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
  • Ganesh, S., & McAlllum, K. (this volume), Discourses of volunteerism. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 33 (pp. 343–383). New York: Routledge.
  • Garlick, B., Dixon, S., & Allen, P. (Eds.). (1992). Stereotypes of women in power: Historical perspectives and revisionist views. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • Gerstein, I. (1973). Domestic work and capitalism. Radical America, 7, 101–130.
  • Geuss, R. (2001). Public goods, private goods. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Giddings, L. (2003). But Who mows the lawn?: The division of labor in same-sex households. In K. S. Moe (Ed.), Women, family and work: Writings on the economics of gender (pp. 85–102). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Glenn, E. N. (2000). The social construction and institutionalization of gender and race: An integrative framework. In M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, & B. B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 3–43). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
  • Golden, A. (2007). Father’s frames for childrearing: Evidence toward a “masculine concept of caregiving.” Journal of Communication, 7, 265–287.
  • Goldin, C. D. (1991). The role of World War II in the rise of women’s employment. The American Economic Review, 81, 741–756.
  • Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Husbands’ participation in domestic work: Interactive effects of husbands’ and wives’ gender ideology. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 585–595.
  • Griswold, R. L. (1993). Fatherhood in America: A history. New York: Basic Books.
  • Haas, S. M., & Stafford, L. (2005). Maintenance behaviors in same-sex and martial relationships: A matched sample comparison. Journal of Family Communication, 5, 43–60.
  • Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Hearn, J., & Collinson, D. L. (1994). Theorizing unities and differences between men and masculinities. In M. Brod & M. Kaufman (Eds.), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 97–118). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hearn, J., Sheppard, D. L., Tancred-Sheriff, P., & Burrell, G. (1993). The sexuality of organization. London: Sage.
  • Heckert, D. A., Nowak, T. C., & Snyder, K. A. (1998). The impact of husbands’ and wives’ relative earnings on marital disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 690–703.
  • Heikes, J. (1991). When men are the minority: The case of men in nursing. The Sociological Quarterly, 32, 389–401.
  • Helgesen, S. (1990). The female advantage: Women’s ways of leadership. New York: Doubleday.
  • Henson, K. D., & Rogers, J. K. (2001). “Why Marcia you’ve changed!” Male clerical workers doing masculinity in a feminized occupation. Gender & Society, 15, 218–238.
  • Herek, G. M. (2004). Beyond “homophobia”: Thinking about sexual prejudice and stigma in the twenty-first century. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 1, 6–24.
  • Hochschild, A. R. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.
  • Holder, T. (1996). Women in nontraditional occupations: Information-seeking during organizational entry. Journal of Business Communication, 33, 9–26.
  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2004). Domestica. In M. L. Anderson & P. Hill Collins (Eds.), Race, class, and gender: An anthology (5th ed., pp. 257–265). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth.
  • Hooks, B. (2001). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
  • Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother nature: Maternal instincts and how they shape the human species. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Jacobs, J. A. (1998). Men in female-dominated fields: Trends and turnover. In C. Williams (Ed.), Doing “women’s work”: Men in non-traditional occupations (pp. 49–63). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Jamison, K. H. (1995). Beyond the double binds: Women and leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Jansma, L. J. (2000). Sexual harassment research: Integration, reformulation, and implications. In P. Kalbfleish (Ed.), Communication yearbook 23 (pp. 163–225). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Johnson, F. (2001). The ideological undercurrents of the semantic notion “working mother.” Women & Language, 25, 21–27.
  • Jorgenson, J. (2002). Engineering selves: Negotiating gender and identity in technical work. Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 350–380.
  • Jurik, N. C. (1985). An officer and a lady: Organizational barriers to women working as correctional officers in men’s prisons. Social Problems, 32, 375–388.
  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
  • Keyton, J. (1996). Sexual harassment: A multidisciplinary synthesis and critique. In B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 19 (pp. 93–155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kimmel, M. S. (2001). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In S. M. Whitehead & F. J. Barrett (Eds.), The masculinities reader (pp. 265–285). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
  • Kirby, E. L., & Krone, K. (2002). “The policy exists but you can’t really use it”: Communication and the structuration of work-family policies. Journal of Applied Communication, 30, 55–77.
  • Kisselburgh, L. G., Berkelaar, B. L., & Buzzanell, P. M. (this volume). Discourse, gender, and the meaning of work: Rearticulating science, technology, and engineering careers through communicative lenses. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 33 (pp. 259–299). New York: Routledge.
  • Kite, M. E. (2001). Changing times, changing gender roles: Who do we want women and men to be? In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of psychology of women and gender (pp. 215–227). New York: Wiley.
  • Kossoudji, S. A., & Dresser, L. J. (1992). Working class Rosies: Woman industrial workers during World War II. Journal of Economic History, 52, 431–446.
  • Krouse, S. S., & Afifi, T. D. (2007). Family-to-work spillover stress: Coping communicatively in the workplace. Journal of Family Communication, 7, 85–122.
  • Lazonick, W. (1979). Industrial relations and technological change: The case of the self-acting mule. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1, 231–262.
  • Lillydahl, J. H. (1986). Women and traditionally male blue-collar jobs. Work and Occupations, 13, 307–323.
  • Linstead, S. (1995). Averting the gaze: Gender and power on the perfumed picket line. Gender, Work & Organization, 2, 192–205.
  • Lopata, H. Z. (1993). The interweave of public and private: A women’s challenge to American society. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 176–190.
  • Lorde, A. (2004). Age, race, class, and sex: Women redefining difference. In M. L. Anderson & P. H. Collins (Eds.), Race, class & gender: An anthology (5th ed., pp. 64–73). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth.
  • Lueptow, L. B., Garovich-Szabo, L., & Lueptow, M. B. (2001). Social change and the persistence of sex typing: 1974–1997. Social Forces, 80, 1–36.
  • Lupton, B. (2000). Maintaining masculinity: Men who do “women’s work.” British Journal of Management, 11, S33–S48.
  • Martin, J. (1990). Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organizational Science, 1, 339–359.
  • Martin, J., Price, R. L., Bies, R. J., & Powers, M. E. (1987). Now that I have it, I’m not sure I want it: The effects of opportunity on aspirations and discontent. In B. A.
  • Gutek & L. Larwood (Eds.), Women’s career development (pp. 42–65). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Martin, S. E. (1994). “Outsider within” the station house: The impact of race and gender on black women police. Social Problems, 41, 383–399.
  • McCreary, D. R. (1994). The male role and avoiding femininity. Sex Roles, 31, 517–531.
  • McKeon, M. (2005). The secret history of domesticity: Public, private, and the division of knowledge. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
  • Medved, C. E. (2004). The everyday accomplishment of work and family: Exploring practical actions in daily routines. Communication Studies, 55, 128–145.
  • Medved, C. E. (2007). Investigating family labor in communication studies: Threading across historical and contemporary discourses. Journal of Family Communication, 7, 1–19.
  • Medved, C. E., Brogan, S., McClanahan, A. M., Morris, J., & Shepherd, G. J. (2006). Work and family socializing communication: Messages, gender, and power. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 161–180.
  • Medved, C. E., & Kirby, E. L. (2005). Family CEOs: A feminist analysis of corporate mothering discourses. Management Communication Quarterly, 18, 435–478.
  • Medved, C. E., & Rawlins, W. K. (2007). At-home fathers and breadwinning mothers: Variations in couples’ approaches to homemaking andmoneymaking. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Meisenbach, R. (2007, November). Discursive constructions of the female as breadwinner: Negotiating identities at home and at work. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago.
  • Mills, A. J., & Chiaramonte, P. (1991). Organization as a gendered communication act. Canadian Journal of Communication, 16, 381–398.
  • Morrison, A. M., & Van Glinow, M. A. (1990). Women and minorities in management. American Psychologist, 45, 200–208.
  • Moss, P., & Tilly, C. (2004). “Soft” skills and race. In M. L. Anderson & P. H. Collins (2004). Race, class & gender: An anthology (5th ed., pp. 239–247). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth.
  • Mumby, D. K. (2001). Communication, organization, and the public sphere: A feminist perspective. In P. M. Buzzanell (Ed.), Rethinking organizational & managerial communication from feminist perspectives (pp. 3–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mumby, D. K. (2005). Theorizing resistance in organizational studies: A dialectical approach. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 19–44.
  • Mumby, D. K., & Putnam, L. L. (1992). The politics of emotion: A feminist reading of bounded rationality. Academy of Management Review, 17, 465–486.
  • Murray, S. B. (1996). “We all love Charles”: Men in child care and the social construction of gender. Gender & Society, 10, 368–385.
  • Nielsen, W. G., & Kunkel, C. A. (2000). Gendered heteronormativity: Empirical illustrations in everyday life. The Sociological Quarterly, 41, 283–296.
  • Noe, R. (1988). Women and mentoring: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 13, 65–78.
  • Norander, S. (2008). Surveillance/discipline/resistance: Carly Fiorina under the gaze of the Wall Street Journal. Communication Studies, 59, 99–113.
  • Oakley, J. G. (2000). Gender-based barriers to senior management positions: Understanding the scarcity of female CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 321–335.
  • Parker, P. S. (2002). Negotiating identity in raced and gendered workplace interactions: The use of strategic communication by African American women senior executives within dominant culture organizations. Communication Quarterly, 50, 251–268.
  • Peplau, L. A., & Beals, K. P. (2004). The family lives of lesbians and gay men. In A. Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 233–248). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Petroski, D. J., & Edley, P. P. (2006). Stay-at-home fathers: Masculinity, family, work and gender stereotypes. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 16(3/4). Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://www.cios.org.remote.baruch.cuny.edu/ getfile/01634_EJC
  • Peters, J. F. (1994). Gender socialization of adolescents in the home: Research and discussion. Adolescence, 29, 914–934.
  • Phipps, P. A. (1990). Occupational resegregation among insurance adjusters and examiners. In B. F. Reskin & P. A. Roos (Eds.), Job queues, Gender queues: Explaining women’s inroads into male occupations (pp. 225–240). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Phillips, A., & Taylor, B. (1980). Sex and skill: Notes towards a feminist economics. Feminist Review, 6, 79–88.
  • Pilcher, J. (1998). Gender matters? Three cohorts of women talking about role reversal. Sociological review online, 3. Retrieved February 27, 2008, from http://www. socresonline.org.uk/3/1/10.html
  • Pollard, P. L. (2005, April). A critical analysis of the glass ceiling phenomenon: A Sloan Work and Family encyclopedia entry. Retrieved April 23, 2008, from ttp://wfnetwork.bc.edu/encyclopedia.php?mode=nav
  • Powell, G. N. (1990). One more time: Do female and male managers differ? Academy of Management Executive, 4, 68–75.
  • Powell, G. N. (1999). Reflections on the glass ceiling: Recent trends and future prospects. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 325–345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Preston, J. A. (1997). Gender and the formation of a women’s profession: The case of public school teaching. In D. Dunn (Ed.), Workplace/women’s place: An anthology (pp. 315–334). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
  • Pringle, R. (1988). Secretary talk: Sexuality, power and work. New York: Verso.
  • Pringle, R. (1993). Male secretaries. In C. L. Williams (Ed.), Doing “women’s work”: Men in nontraditional occupations (pp. 128–151). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Prokos, A., & Padavic, I. (2002). There oughtta be a law against bitches: Masculinity lessons in police academy training. Gender, Work and Organization, 9, 439–459.
  • Raggins, B. R., & Cotton, J. L. (1991). Easier said than done: Gender differences in perceived barriers to gaining a mentor. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 939–951.
  • Raggins, B. R., Townsend, B., & Mattis, M. (1998). Gender gap in the executive suite: CEO and female executives report on breaking the glass ceiling. Academy of Management Executive, 12, 28–42.
  • Rakow, L. F. (1986). Rethinking gender research in communication. Journal of Communication, 36, 11–24.
  • Rawlins, W. K. (1992). Theorizing public and private domains and practices of communication: Introductory concerns. Communication Theory, 8, 369–380.
  • Reskin, B. F. (1988). Bringing the men back in: Sex differentiation and the devaluation of women’s work. Gender & Society, 2, 58–81.
  • Reskin, B. F. (1993). Sex segregation in the workplace. Annual Reviews of Sociology, 19, 241–270.
  • Reskin, B. F., & Roos, P. A. (1990). Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women’s inroads into male occupations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2000). Limiting inequality through interaction: The end(s) of gender. Contemporary Sociology, 29, 110–120.
  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18, 510–531.
  • Risman, B. J. (1986). Can men mother? Life as a single father. Family Relations, 35, 95–102.
  • Rosenblum, K. E., & Travis, T. C. (2003). The meaning of difference: American constructions of race, sex and gender, social class, sexual orientation and disability (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.
  • Rosner, J. B. (1990, November/December). Ways women lead: The command-and-con-trol leadership style associated with men is not the only way to succeed. Harvard Business Review, 68, 119–125.
  • Russell, R. (2007). Men doing “women’s work:” Elderly men caregivers and the gendered construction of care work. Journal of Men’s Studies, 15, 1–18.
  • Sargent, P. (2000). Real men or real teachers: Contradictions in the lives of men elementary teachers. Men and Masculinities, 2, 410–433.
  • Sayer, L. C., & Bianchi, S. (2000). Women’s economic independence and the probability of divorce: A review and reexamination. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 906–943.
  • Schippers, M. (2007). Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theoretical Sociology, 36, 85–102.
  • Schroedel, J. R. (1990). Blue-collar women: Paying the price at home and on the job. In H. Y. Grossman & N. L Chester (Eds.), The experience and meaning of work in women’s lives (pp. 241–260). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Schwartz, F. N. (1989). Management women and the new facts of life. Harvard Business Review, 67, 65–76.
  • Shuler, S. (2003). Breaking through the glass ceiling without breaking a nail: Women executives in Fortune magazine’s “power 50” list. American Communication Journal, 6. Retrieved November 8, 2007, from http://www.acjournal.org/holdings/vol6/ iss2/index.htm
  • Silverstein, L. B. (1996). Fathering is a feminist issue. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 3–37.
  • Skelton, C. (1991). A study of career perspectives in male teachers of young children. Gender & Education, 3, 11–22.
  • Sloan, D. K., & Krone, K. J. (2000). Women managers and gendered values. Women’s Studies in Communication, 23, 111–130.
  • Smith, C. D. (1998). “Men don’t do this sort of thing”: A case study of the social isolation of househusbands. Men and Masculinities, 1, 138–172.
  • Snavely, B. K., & Fairhurst, G. T. (1984). The male nursing student as a token. Research in Nursing and Health, 7, 287–294.
  • Solomon, S. E., Rothblum, E. D., & Balsam, K. F. (2005). Money, housework, sex, and conflict: Same-sex couples in civil unions, those not in civil unions, and heterosexual married siblings. Sex Roles, 52, 561–575.
  • Spelman, E. V. (1988). Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Spradlin, A. L. (1998). The price of “passing”: A lesbian perspective on authenticity in organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 11, 598–605.
  • Stamp, P. (1985). Research note: Balance of financial power in marriage: An exploratory study of breadwinning wives. Sociological Review, 33, 546–557.
  • Stone, P. (2007). Opting out? Why women really quit careers and head home. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Suter, E. A., Daas, K. L., & Bergen, K. L. (2008). Negotiating lesbian family identity via symbols and rituals. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 26–47.
  • Taylor, E., Dwiggins, R., Albert, M., & Dearner, J. (1983). Male nurses: What they think about themselves—and others. RN, 46, 61–62, 64.
  • Tewskbury, R. (1993). Male strippers: Men objectifying men. In C. L. Williams (Ed.), Doing “women’s work”: Men in non-traditional occupations (pp. 168–181). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Thomas, B. J., & Reskin, B. F. (1990). A woman’s place is selling homes: Occupational change and the feminization of real estate sales. In B. F. Reskin & P. A. Roos (Eds.), Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women’s inroads into male occupations (pp. 205–224). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Tichenor, V. (2005). Maintaining men’s dominance: Negotiating identity and power when she earns more. Sex Roles, 53, 191–205.
  • Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (1993). Gender and racial inequality at work: The sources and consequences of job segregation. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
  • Townsley, N. C. (2006). Love, sex, and tech in the global workplace. In B. J. Dow & J. T. Wood (Eds.), The Sage handbook of gender and communication (pp. 143–160). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Trethewey, A. (2001). Reproducing and resisting the master narrative of decline: Midlife professional women’s experience of aging. Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 183–226.
  • Trethewey, A., Scott, C., & LeGreco, M. (2006). Constructing embodied organizational identities: Commodifying, securing, and servicing professional bodies). In B. J. Dow & J. T. Wood (Eds.), The Sage handbook of gender and communication (pp. 123–142). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Turner, P. K. (2004). Mainstreaming alternative medicine: Doing midwifery at the intersection. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 644–662.
  • Urdy, J. R. (1994). The nature of gender. Demography, 31, 561–573.
  • U.S. Census Bureau (2006). SHP-1. Parents and children in stay-at-home parent family groups: 1994 to present. Retrieved December 1, 2007, from http://www.census.gov/ population/socdemo/hh-fam/shp1.pdf
  • U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2007). Household data annual averages. Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat18.pdf
  • Varvus, M. D. (2002). Domesticating patriarchy: Hegemonic masculinity and television’s “Mr. Mom.” Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19, 352–375.
  • Walby, S. (Ed.). (1988). Gender segregation at work. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
  • Waldeck, J., & Myers, K. (2007). Organizational assimilation theory, research, and implications for multiple areas of the discipline. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 31 (pp. 322–369). New York: Erlbaum.
  • Weeks, J. (1986). Sexuality. London: Routledge.
  • Wentworth, D. K., & Chell, R. M. (2001). The role of househusband and housewife as perceived by a college population. The Journal of Psychology, 135, 639–650.
  • West, C. (2004). Black sexuality: The taboo subject. In M. L. Anderson & P. H. Collins (Eds.), Race, class & gender: An anthology (5th ed., pp. 455–460). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth.
  • West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing difference. Gender & Society, 9, 8–37.
  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.
  • Wetherby, T. (1977). Conversations: Working women talk about doing a “man’s job.” Millbrae, CA: Les Femmes.
  • Weyer, B. (2007). Twenty years later: Explaining the persistence of the glass ceiling for women leaders. Women in Management Review, 22, 482–469.
  • Williams, C. L. (1989). Gender differences at work. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Williams, C. L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Social Problems, 39, 253–267.
  • Williams, C. L. (Ed.). (1993). Doing “women’s work”: Men in non-traditional occupations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Williams, J. (2000). Unbending gender: Why work and family conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Wood, J. T. (1994). Who cares? Women, care, and culture. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Wood, J. T., & Conrad, C. (1983). Paradox in the experiences of professional women. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 305–322.
  • Wright, R. & Jacobs, J. A. (1994). Male flight from computer work: A new look at occupational resegregation and ghettoization. American Sociological Review, 59, 511–536.
  • Yoder, J. D., & Berendsen, L. L. (2001). “Outsider within” the firehouse: African American and White women firefighters. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 27–36.
  • Yount, K. R. (1991). Ladies, flirts, and tomboys: Strategies for managing sexual harassment in an underground coal mine. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 19, 396–422.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.