Commentary Mediating the Public Sphere Democratic Deliberation, Communication Gaps and the Personalization of Politics

References

• Albrecht, S. (2006). Whose voice is heard in the virtual public sphere? A study of participation and representation in political debates on the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 9(1), 62–82.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. G., Petersen, A., Wilkinson, C., & Allan, S. (2009). Nanotechnology, risk and communication. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, C. (2003). Culture and democracy: Media, space and representation. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett-Woods, D. (2008). Nanotechnology: Ethics and society. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. (1992). Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B. (2008). Internet-mediated participation beyond the nation state. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B., & Carpentier, N. (Eds.). (2007). Reclaiming the media: Communication rights and democratic media roles. Bristol, UK: Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B., & Van Audenhove, L. (2005). Online political debate: Unbounded citizenship and the problematic nature of a transnational public sphere. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., & Gotze, J. (2001). Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation. London: Hansard Society.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2001). The Internet and democractic discourse: Exploring the prospects for online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 4(4), 613–633.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. (2000). The Internet and the democratization of civic culture. Political Communication, 17(4), 335–340.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. (2003). Why the Internet is not a public sphere. Constellations, 10(1), 95–112.
   Google Scholar
• Delli-Carpini, M. X., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), 315–344.
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, M., Gamson, W., Gerhrard, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. Theory and Society, 31(3), 289–324.
   Google Scholar
• Gurevitch, M., & Blumler, J. G. (2004). State of the art of comparative political communication reseach. In F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Comparing political communications: Theories, cases, and challenges (pp. 325–343). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, N. (2000). Public health communication interventions. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1962/1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (W. Rehq, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haque, B. N., & Loader, B. D. (Eds.). (1999). Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, D., & Kies, R. (2005). Online forums and deliberative democracy. Acta Polit-ica, 40(2), 317–335.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, H. (2009). Re-conceptualising party-centred politics in terms of market: A relationship marketing approach. Unpublished PhD thesis, London, London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, A. I. (2006). The politicisation of private persona: The case of Tony Blair in historical perspective. Unpublished PhD thesis, London, London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, A. I. (2007). A historical exploration of the personalisation of politics in the print media: The British prime ministers 1945–1999. Parliamentary Affairs, 60(3), 371–387.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, A. I. (In press). Personality politics in the United Kingdom. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Losch, A. (2008). Anticipating the futures of nanotechnology: Visionary images as a means of communication. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 18(3- 4), 393–409.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (1974/2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. (1996). Economic and sociological explanations of technological change. In D. MacKenzie (Ed.), Knowing machines: Essays on technical change (pp. 49–66). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P., Keames, M. B., & Wynne, B. (2005). Nanotechnology, governance and public deliberation: What role for the social sciences? Science Communication, 27(2), 268–291.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present: Administering economic, social and personal life. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Min, S.-J. (2007). Online vs. face-to-face deliberation: Effects on civic engagement. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1369–1387.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66(3), 746–758.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2008). Driving democracy: Do power-sharing institutions work? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., & Rogers-Hayden, T. (2007). Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: Risk communication or ‘upstream engagement’? Health, Risk & Society, 9(2), 191–210.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organisational media. Human Communication Research, 19, 451–484.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers-Hayden, T., & Pidgeon, N. (2007). Developments in nanotechnology public engagement in the UK: ‘Upstream’ toward sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(8–9), 1010–1013.
   Google Scholar
• Scammell, M. (2003). Citizen consumers: Towards a new marketing of politics? Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington, retrieved November 15, 2009, from http://depts.washington.edu/gcp/pdf/citizenconsumers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scammell, M., & Semetko, H. (Eds.). (2001). Media, journalism and democracy. Dartmouth, NH: Dartmouth Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schummer, J., & Baird, D. (Eds.). (2006). Nanotechnology challenges: Implications for philosophy, ethics and society. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R. (1999). Why study the media? London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R. (2007). Media and morality: On the rise of the mediapolis. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2008). ‘New Man’ or ‘Son of Manse’? Gordon Brown as a reluctant celebrity father. British Politics, 3(4), 556–575.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. (1993). The theory of the public sphere. Theory Culture & Society, 10(3), 173–189.
   Google Scholar
• Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2006). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317–348.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science Communication, 211(4481), 453–458.
   Google Scholar
• Villa, D. (1999). Theatricality and the public realm. In D. Villa (Ed.), Politics, philosophy, terror: Essays on the thought of Hannah Arendt (pp. 128–155). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52–90.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), 49–90.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, A. (2000). Democracy in the digital age: Challenges to political life in cyberspace. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar