References
- Abelson, R. P. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. LEA.
- Anderson, C. (2008, June 23). The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired.com. https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/
- Autman, H., & Kelly, S. (2017). Reexamining the writing apprehension measure. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 80(4), 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490617691968
- Baker, A. (2018, April 11). STEM is far more than the lone genius. ScientificAmerican.com. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/budding-scientist/stem-is-far-more-than-the-lone-genius/
- Boster, F. J. (2002). On making progress in communication science. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00818.x
- Canary, D. J., & Hause, K. S. (1993). Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication? Communication Quarterly, 41(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369874
- Carey, S. S. (2011). A beginner's guide to scientific method (4th ed). Cengage Learning.
- Carnap, R. (1991). Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. In R. Boyd, P. Gasper, & J. D. Trout (Eds.), The philosophy of science (pp. 85–94). MIT Press.
- Casad, B. J. (2019, October 9). Confirmation bias. Encyclopedia Britannica [online]. https://www.britannica.com/topic/institutionalized-bias
- Chaffee, S. H., & Berger, C. R. (1987). What communication scientists do. In C. R. Berger, & S. H. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 99–122). Sage.
- Chalmers, A. F. (1999). What is this thing called science? (3rd ed). Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
- Croucher, S., & Kelly, S. (2019). Measurement issues in intercultural communication. In J. Mazer, & E. Graham (Eds.), Communication research measures III: A sourcebook (pp. 141–159). Sage.
- Croucher, S. M., Kelly, S., Rahmani, D., Subanaliev, T., Jackson, K., Galy-Badenas, F., Lando, A. L., Chibita, M., Nyiranasbimana, V., Turdubaeva, E., Eskiçorapçı, N., Condon, S., Stanalieva, G., & Orunbekov, B. (2019). A multi-national validity analysis of the personal report of communication Apprehension (PRCA-24). Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602783
- Firestein, S. (2012). Ignorance: How it drives science. Oxford University Press.
- Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: Practical guide for improving communication. Zondervan.
- Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
- Keating, D. M., & Totzkay, D. (2019). We do publish (conceptual) replications (sometimes): publication trends in communication science, 2007-2016. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(3), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1632218
- Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed). Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
- Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed). University of Chicago Press.
- Levine, T. R., & McCroskey, J. C. (1990). Measuring trait communication apprehension: A test of rival measurement models of the PRCA-24. Communication Monographs, 57(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759009376185
- Lewens, T. (2016). The meaning of science: An introduction to the philosophy of science. Basic Books.
- Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison approach. Wadsworth.
- McEwan, B., Carpenter, C. J., & Westerman, D. (2018). On replication in communication science. Communication Studies, 69(3), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1464938
- Popper, K. R. (1968). The logic of scientific discovery. Harper Row Publishers. Incorporated.
- Rosenthal, R. (1991). Replication in behavioral research. In J. W. Neuliep (Ed.), Replication in the social sciences (pp. 1–30). Sage.
- Rozin, P. (2001). Social psychology and science: Some lessons from Solomon Asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0501_1
- Silver, N. (2015). The signal and the noise: Why so many predictions fail–but some don’t. Penguin Books.
- Vigen, T. (2015). Spurious correlations. Hachette Books.
- Violanti, M., Kelly, S., Garland, M., & Christen, S. (2018). Instructor clarity, humor, immediacy, and student learning: Replication and extension. Communication Studies, 69(3), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1466718
- Wegner, D. M. (1992). The premature demise of the solo experiment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(4), 504–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292184017
- Woelfel, J., & Fink, E. L. (1980). The measurement of communication processes: Galileo theory and method. Academic Press.
- Wolman, B. B. (1965). Toward a science of psychological science. In B. B. Wolman, & E. Nagel (Eds.), Scientific psychology (pp. 3–23). Basic Books.
- Wood, J. T. (2002). A critical response to John Gray’s Mars and Venus portrayals of men and women. Southern Communication Journal, 67(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940209373229