(Dis)connections in anonymous communication theory: exploring conceptualizations of anonymity in communication research

References

• Anonymous. (1998). To reveal or not to reveal: A theoretical model of anonymous communication. Communication Theory, 8(4), 381–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baelden, D., Van Audenhove, L., & Vergnani, T. (2012). Using new technologies for stimulating interpersonal communication on HIV and AIDS. Telematics & Informatics, 29(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baym, N. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, E. W., Mezzina, K., & Thompson, L. A. (2016). Anonymous social media–understanding the content and context of Yik Yak. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (2006). Network news coverage of high-profile crimes during 2004: A study of source use and reported context. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(4), 901–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark-Gordon, C., Workman, K., & Linvill, D. (2017). College students and Yik Yak: An exploratory mixed-methods study. Social Media + Society, 3, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117715696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, D., Silva, L. A., Mondal, M., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, K. P. (2015). The many shades of anonymity: Characterizing anonymous social media content. In Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (pp. 71–80). AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, M. J., & Freeman, C. P. (2011). Unnamed sources: A utilitarian exploration of their justification and guidelines for limited use. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 26(4), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2011.606006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, M., Sahay, S., Scott, C. R., Dadlani, P. T., & McKinley, E. (2018). Technologies of concealment: Appropriateness, effectiveness, and motivations for hiding organizational identity. Western Journal of Communication, 82(2), 194–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1302096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstrand, V. S. (2003). Unmasking Jane and John Doe: Online anonymity and the first amendment. Communication Law and Policy, 8(4), 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326926CLP0804_02
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, K. V., & Fleuriet, C. A. (1991). Presidential anonymity: Rhetorical identity management and the mystification of political reality. Communication Quarterly, 39(3), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379109369803
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S., Pearce, K., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargo, A. L. (2019). Protecting journalists’ sources without a shield: Four proposals. Communication Law & Policy, 24(2), 145–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2019.1586405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyverbom, M., Leonardi, P. M., Stohl, C., & Stohl, M. (2016). The management of visibilities in the digital age: Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 10, 98–109. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & McEwan, B. (2017). Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froomkin, A. M. (1999). Legal issues in anonymity and pseudonymity. The Information Society, 15(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/019722499128574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladney, G. A., Shapiro, I., & Ray, R. (2013). Reasons for veiled sources spike after 2004 scandals. Newspaper Research Journal, 34(2), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/073953291303400204
   Google Scholar
• Green-Hamann, S., & Sherblom, J. C. (2014). The influences of optimal matching and social capital on social support. Journal of Health Communication, 19(10), 1130–1144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.864734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, L., Kurinczuk, J. J., & Ziebland, S. (2010). Infertility; isolation and the Internet. A qualitative interview study. Patient Education and Counseling, 81(3), 436–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, L. W., Bivins, T., Elliott, D., Hanson, C., & Wasserman, E. (2005). Cases and commentaries. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 20(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2005.9679709
   Google Scholar
• Hollenbaugh, E. E., & Everett, M. K. (2013). The effects of anonymity on self-disclosure in blogs: An application of the online disinhibition effect. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, K. K. (2017). Anonymity and interaction in an online breast cancer social support group. Communication Studies, 68(4), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2017.1340902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & Scott, C. R. (2019). Change communication and the use of anonymous social media at work. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(3), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2018-0076
   Google Scholar
• Kimball, M. B. (2011). Granting sources anonymity requires complex process. Newspaper Research Journal, 32(2), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/073953291103200204
   Google Scholar
• Kulik, C. T., Pepper, M. B., Shapiro, D. L., & Cregan, C. (2012). The electronic water cooler: Insiders and outsiders talk about organizational justice on the Internet. Communication Research, 39(5), 565–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211429286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuosmanen, T., Fleming, T. M., & Barry, M. M. (2018). Using computerized mental health programs in alternative education: Understanding the requirements of students and staff. Health Communication, 33(6), 753–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1309620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34(2), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-737390045-9
   Google Scholar
• LeBon, G. (1896). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., & Guanjin, Z. (2018). Intergroup communication in online forums: The effect of group identification on online support provision. Communication Research [Advanced online publication]. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218807041.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X., Andalibi, N., Barkhuus, L., & Naaman, M. (2017). People are either too fake or too real: Opportunities and challenges in tie-based anonymity. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1781–1793). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025956.
   Google Scholar
• Mao, C., & Deandrea, D. (2019). How anonymity and visibility affordances influence employees’ decisions about voicing workplace concerns. Management Communication Quarterly, 33(2), 160–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318918813202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. A., Caramanica, M. R., & Fargo, A. L. (2011). Anonymous speakers and confidential sources: Using shield laws when they overlap online. Communication Law and Policy, 16(1), 89–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2011.536499
   Google Scholar
• Marx, G. (2004). Internet anonymity as a reflection of broader issues involving technology and society. Asia-Pacific Review, 11(1), 142–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13439000410001687797
   Google Scholar
• Marx, G. T. (1999). What's in a name? Some reflections on the sociology of anonymity. Information Society, 15(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/019722499128565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morio, H., & Buchholz, C. (2009). How anonymous are you online? Examining online social behaviors from a cross-cultural perspective. AI & Society, 23(2), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0143-0
   Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, H. (1999). The meaning of anonymity in an information age. The Information Society, 15(2), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/019722499128592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pjesivac, I., & Rui, R. (2014). Anonymous sources hurt credibility of news stories across cultures: A comparative experiment in America and China. International Communication Gazette, 76(8), 641–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048514548534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & de Groot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 27(10), 1243–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012710001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, H., & Scott, C. (2007). Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1428–1451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00380.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A. (2018). Coping with illness digitally. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rains, S. (2007). The anonymity effect: The influence of anonymity on perceptions of sources and information on health websites. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880701262666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains, S. (2014). The implications of stigma and anonymity for self-disclosure in health blogs. Health Communication, 29(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.714861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A., Akers, C., Pavlich, C. A., Tsetsi, E., & Appelbaum, M. (2019). Examining the quality of social support messages produced face-to-face and in computer-mediated communication: The effects of hyperpersonal communication. Communication Monographs, 86(3), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1595076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A., Kenski, K., Coe, K., & Harwood, J. (2017). Incivility and political identity on the Internet: Intergroup factors as predictors of incivility in discussions of news online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(4), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A., & Scott, C. R. (2007). To identify or not to identify: A theoretical model of receiver responses to anonymous communication. Communication Theory, 17, 61–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00288.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reader, B. (2012). Free press vs. free speech? The rhetoric of “civility” in regard to anonymous online comments. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(3), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012447923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A., & Clair, R. P. (1999). Graffiti as communication: Exploring the discursive tensions of anonymous texts. Southern Communication Journal, 65(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949909373152
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., von Krogh, G., & Jager, P. (2013). What’s coming next? Epistemic curiosity and lurking behavior in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, C. (2015). Unidentified speakers in news discourse: A pragmatic approach to anonymity. Journal of Pragmatics, 89, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. R. (2004). Benefits and drawbacks of anonymous online communication: Legal challenges and communicative recommendations. In S. Drucker (Ed.), Free speech yearbook (vol. 41, pp. 127–141). National Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. R. (2013). Anonymous agencies, backstreet businesses, and covert collectives: Rethinking organizations in the 21st century. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. R., Haseki, M., & Kang, K. K. (2017). Anonymous organizational communication. In C. R. Scott & L. K. Lewis (Eds.), International encyclopedia of organizational communication. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc008
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. R., Quinn, L., Timmerman, C. E., & Garrett, D. M. (1998). Ironic uses of group communication technology: Evidence from meeting transcripts and interviews with group decision support system users. Communication Quarterly, 46(3), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379809370107
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. R., & Rains, S. A. (2005). Anonymous communication in organizations: Assessing use and appropriateness. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(2), 157–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318905279191
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. R., Rains, S. A., & Haseki, M. (2011). Anonymous communication unmasking findings across fields. Annals of the International Communication Association, 35(1), 299–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2011.11679120
   Google Scholar
• Sen, S., & Lerman, D. (2007). Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharon, T., & John, N. (2018). Unpacking (the) secret: Anonymous social media and the impossibility of networked anonymity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4177–4194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818768547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, B. R., McTavish, F., Hawkins, R., Gustafson, D. H., & Pingree, S. (2000). Experiences of women with breast cancer: Exchanging social support over the CHESS computer network. Journal of Health Communication, 5, 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/108107300406866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. R., & Riffe, D. (2016). Newspapers use unnamed sources less often in high-stakes coverage. Newspaper Research Journal, 37(3), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532916664377
   Google Scholar
• Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (2015). Group identity, social influence, and collective action online: Extensions and applications of the SIDE model. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 23–46). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stenvall, M. (2008). Unnamed sources as a rhetorical construct in news agency reports. Journalism Studies, 9(2), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701848279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stohl, C., & Stohl, M. (2011). Secret agencies: The communicative constitution of a clandestine organization. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1197–1215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611410839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutko, D. M., & de Souza e Silva, A. (2011). Location-aware mobile media and urban sociability. New Media & Society, 13(5), 807–823. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanis, M. (2008). Health-related on-line forums: What's the big attraction? Journal of Health Communication, 13(7), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730802415316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teich, A., Frankel, M. S., Kling, R., & Lee, Y.-C. (1999). Anonymous communication policies for the internet: Results and recommendations of the AAAS conference. The Information Society, 15(2), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/019722499128538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Nagel, E. (2017). From usernames to profiles: The development of pseudonymity in Internet communication. Internet Histories, 1(4), 312–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2017.1389548
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, K. A. (1999). Anonymity. Ethics and Information Technology, 1(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010066509278
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., Jang, J.-W., & Edwards, A. A. H. (2018). Evaluating health advice in the Web 2.0 environment: The impact of multiple user-generated factors on HIV advice perceptions. Health Communication, 33(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1242036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, J. (2013). Application-layer design patterns for accountable-anonymous online identities. Telecommunications Policy, 37(9), 748–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, T., & Atkin, D. (2018). To comment or not to comment: Examining the influences of anonymity and social support on one’s willingness to express in online news discussions. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4512–4532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818776629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar