Critical content analysis: a methodological proposal for the incorporation of numerical data into critical/cultural media studies

References

• Altheide, D. L., & Johnson, J. M. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 485–499). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., & McShane, B. (2019). Retire statistical significance. Nature, 567(7748), 305–307. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. (2008). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. Hyperion.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., & Baym, G. (2004). Philosophies and philosophic issues in communication, 1995–2004. Journal of Communication, 54(4), 589–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02647.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, I. (1985). Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aubrey, J. S. (2004). Sex and punishment: An examination of sexual consequences and the sexual double standard in teen programming. Sex Roles, 50(7/8), 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000023070.87195.07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, R. (2018). Ideology. In M. Kackman & M. C. Kearney (Eds.), The craft of criticism (pp. 11–22). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. (2019). Netflix released more originals in 2019 than the entire TV industry did in 2005. Variety. https://variety.com/2019/tv/news/netflix-more-2019-originals-than-entire-tv-industry-in-2005-1203441709/
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906290531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2014). Statistical analysis of television style: What can numbers tell us about TV editing? Cinema Journal, 54(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2014.0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpini, M. X. D. (2013). Breaking boundaries: Can we bridge the quantitative versus qualitative divide through the study of entertainment and politics? International Journal of Communication, 7, 531–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J. Y., & Lee, E.-H. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report, 19(64), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1028
   Google Scholar
• Corner, J. (2013). Is there a ‘field’ of media research? The ‘fragmentation’ issue revisited. Media, Culture & Society, 35(8), 1011–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713508702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creeber, G. (2006). The joy of text? Television and textual analysis. Critical Studies in Television, 1(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.7227/CST.1.1.11
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCoster, J., & Lichtenstein, B. (2007). Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods in communication research. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(4), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450701636599
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2010). Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercikan, K., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). What good is polarizing research into qualitative and quantitative? Educational Researcher, 35(5), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035005014
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, J. (1989). Understanding popular culture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fürsich, E. (2009). In defense of textual analysis: Restoring a challenged method for journalism and media studies. Journalism Studies, 10(2), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700802374050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2010). Show sold separately: Promos, spoilers and other media paratexts. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., & Lotz, A. D. (2013). A robust and dynamic field. Media, Culture & Society, 35(8), 1019–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713508703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J., & Lotz, A. D. (2019). Television studies. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossberg, L. (1993). Can cultural studies find true happiness in communication? Journal of Communication, 43(4), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01308.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Macqueen, K., & Namey, E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, J. (2019). More than 500 hours of content are now being uploaded to YouTube every minute. TubeFilter. https://www.tubefilter.com/2019/05/07/number-hours-video-uploaded-to-youtube-per-minute/
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 117–127). Hutchison.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S. (2010). Emerging methodologies and methods practices in the field of mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 415–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibberd, J. (2018, December 13). If you think 2018 had too many TV shows, here’s why. Retrieved July 3, 2019, from EW.com website: https://ew.com/tv/2018/12/13/number-tv-shows-2018/.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunting, Kyra. (2014). Genre's disciplining discourses: Cultural difference and contemporary genre television. Ph.D. diss., The University of Wisconsin - Madison, http://ezproxy.uky.edu/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.uky.edu/dissertations-theses/genres-disciplining-discourses-cultural/docview/1722488000/se-2?accountid=11836
   Google Scholar
• Kackman, M., & Kearney, M. C. (Eds.). (2018). The craft of criticism: Critical media studies in practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E., & Liebes, T. (1990). The export of meaning: Cross-cultural readings of Dallas. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, M. C. (2018). Introduction or how to cook an artichoke. In M. Kackman & M. C. Kearney (Eds.), The craft of criticism (pp. 1–8). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, P. (1991). Media contents: Textual analysis of fictional media content. In N. W. Jankowski & K. B. Jensen (Eds.), A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research (pp. 121–132). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. (1941). Remarks on administrative and critical communications research. Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, 9(1), 2–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T., & Taylor, B. (2019). Qualitative communication research methods. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089
   Google Scholar
• McKee, A. (2003). Textual analysis. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, D. (2005). Mcquail’s mass communication theory (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Melody, W., & Mansell, R. (1983). The debate over critical vs. administrative research circularity or challenge. Journal of Communication, 33(3), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02412.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regains. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, D. (1992). Television, audiences, and cultural studies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oleinik, A. (2011). Mixing quantitative and qualitative content analysis: Triangulation at work. Quality & Quantity, 45(4), 859–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9399-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott, B., & Mack, R. (2014). Critical media studies: An introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, L. (2013). Introduction: Mapping media studies. In L. Ouellette (Ed.), The media studies reader (pp. 1–12). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Phillipov, M. (2013). In defense of textual analysis: Resisting methodological hegemony in media and cultural studies. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 30(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2011.639380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramasubramanian, A., & Banjo, O. (2020). Critical media effects framework: Bridging critical cultural communication and media effects through power, intersectionality, context, and agency. Journal of Communication, 70(3), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redfern, N. (2013). Film studies and statistical literacy. Media Education Research Journal, 4(1), 58–73.
   Google Scholar
• Riffe, D., Lacy, S., Watson, B., & Fico, F. (2019). Analyzing media messages (4th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera-Perez, L. (1996). Rethinking ideology: Polysemy, pleasure and hegemony in television culture. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 20(2), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/019685999602000203
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W. D., & Mehta, J. D. (2002). The Rashomon effect: Combining positivist and interpretivist approaches in the analysis of contested events. Sociological Methods & Research, 31(2), 131–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124102031002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researcher (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., & Knafl, G. (2009). On quantizing. Journal of Mixed Methods, 3(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809334210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smythe, D. W., & Van Dinh, T. (1983). On critical and administrative research: A new critical analysis. Journal of Communication, 33(3), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snelson, C. (2016). Qualitative and mixed methods social media research: A review of the literature. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915624574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C. B., & Tashakkori, A. M. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thurman, N. (2017). Mixed-methods communication research: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in the study of online journalism. Sage Research Methods Cases. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526428431
   Google Scholar
• Valdivia, A. (2008). Mixed race on the Disney channel: From Johnnie Tsunami through Lizzie McGuire and ending with the Cheetah Girls. In M. Beltran & C. Foja (Eds.), Mixed race Hollywood (pp. 269–289). New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 21–54. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, K. J. (2018). The sustainability of film and media studies. Cinema Journal, 57(2), 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2018.0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. (2005). Bridging the methodological divide in game research. Simulation & Gaming, 36(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878105282275
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 308–319). Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar