Who are the people? Using fandom research to study populist supporters

References

• Achen, C., & Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., & Zaslove, A. (2014). How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, G. (2018, August 27). Alex Marín, creador de Forocoches: “No tengo ideología, ni en política ni en fútbol”. El País. https://elpais.com/elpais/2018/08/21/icon/1534848434_891189.html.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. (2008). Watching television without pity: The productivity of online fans. Television & New Media, 9(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476407307241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, I. (1985). Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Aslanidis, P. (2016). Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies, 64(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslanidis, P. (2017). Populism and social movements. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 305–325). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, R. (2014). Have you seen the news? Uncovering the fan-like behaviours of the news audience. Media International Australia, 150(1), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1415000124
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. (2016). Failure to converge: Presidential candidates, core partisans, and the missing middle in American electoral politics. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667(1), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216661145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M., & Potter, P. (2008). The relationships between mass media, public opinion, and foreign policy: Toward a theoretical synthesis. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060406.214132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baym, N. K. (2000). Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and on-line community. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, J. L. (2014). Expect us: Online communities and political mobilization. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, E. S. (1992). For enquiring minds: A cultural study of supermarket tabloids. University of Tennessee Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, E. S. (2011). Are we all produsers now? Convergence and media audience practices. Cultural Studies, 25(4–5), 502–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.600532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blassnig, S. (2020). Populist online communication–Interactions among politicians, journalists, and citizens [Doctoral dissertation, University of Zurich].
   Google Scholar
• Bonikowski, B., & Gidron, N. (2016). The populist style in American politics: Presidential campaign discourse, 1952–1996. Social Forces, 94(4), 1593–1621. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, P., Hinck, A., Hess, A., & Davisson, A. L. (2018). Poaching politics: Online communication during the 2016 US presidential election. Peter Lang US.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. E. (1994). Soap opera and women’s talk. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Butsch, R. (2008). The citizen audience: Crowds, publics, and individuals. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cantor, M. G., & Pingree, S. (1983). The soap opera. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. Reason: The populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, J. (1992). A cultural approach to communication. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castanho Silva, B., Jungkunz, S., Helbling, M., & & Littvay, L. (2019). An empirical comparison of seven populist attitudes scales. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919833176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, J. (2018). The algorithmic rise of the “alt-right”. Contexts, 17(1), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504218766547
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination theory in human behavior. Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• De Kosnik, A. (2009). Should fan fiction be free? Cinema Journal, 48(4), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.0.0144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., & Larsson, A. O. (2017). Populist online communication: Introduction to the special issue. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1279–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Blassnig, S., & Esser, F. (2017). Extreme parties and populism: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1347–1364. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewoldsen, D. R., Busselle, R., Sethi, N., & Slater, M. (2021). Retrospective imaginative involvement and entertainment narratives: Initial forays. In P. Vorderer & C. Klimmt (Eds.), Oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 735–754). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiesler, C., Morrison, S., & Bruckman, A. S. (2016, May). An archive of their own: A case study of feminist HCI and values in design. In CHI 2016. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2574–2585). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, J. (1989). Reading the popular. Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Social media and populism: An elective affinity? Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 745–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gest, J. (2016). The new minority: White working class politics in an age of immigration and inequality. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gidron, N., & Hall, P. A. (2017). The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. The British Journal of Sociology, 68(S1), S57–S84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Enríquez, C. (2018). La excepción española: el fracaso de los grupos de derecha populista pese al paro, la desigualdad y la inmigración. Real Instituto Elcano.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2007). The news: You gotta love it. In J. Gray, C. Sandvoss, & C. L. Harrington (Eds.), Fandom: Identities and communities in a mediated world (pp. 75–87). NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., Sandvoss, C., & Harrington, C. L. (2007). Fandom: Identities and communities in a mediated world. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M. (2019). The populism of online communities: Constructing the boundary between “blameless” people and “culpable” others. Communication, Culture and Critique, 12(1), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcz009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K., Read, M., & Pauwels, T. (2017). Populism and its causes. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 267–286). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, G. (2017). Making sense of the Alt-right. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hellekson, K. (2009). A fannish field of value: Online fan gift culture. Cinema Journal, 48(4), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.0.0140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, E. D. (2017). Political hobbyism: A theory of mass behavior. http://www.eitanhersh.com/uploads/7/9/7/5/7975685/hersh_th eory_of_hobbyism_v2.0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Highfield, T. (2016). Social media and everyday politics. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hills, M. (2002). Fan cultures. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hinck, A. (2019). Politics for the love of fandom: Fan-based citizenship in a digital world. Louisiana State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinck, A., & Davisson, A. (2020). Fandom and politics. Transformative Works and Cultures, 32. https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2020.1973
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, D. (1989). Soap operas at work. In E. Seither, H. Borchers, G. Kreutzner, & E. Warth (Eds.), Remote control: Television, audiences, and cultural power (pp. 150–167). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, D. (1990). Women audiences and the workplace. In M. E. Brown (Ed.), Television and women’s culture (pp. 61–74). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22(1), 127–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., & Bankert, A. (2017, May 24). Political partisanship as a social identity. In Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Politics. Retrieved 30 Mar. 2021, from https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-250.
   Google Scholar
• Ivarsflaten, E. (2008). What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies, 41(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006294168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006a). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006b). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., & Carpentier, N. (2013). Theorizing participatory intensities: A conversation about participation and politics. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19(3), 265–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856513482090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2018). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Shresthova, S., Gamber-Thompson, L., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Zimmerman, A. (2016). By any media necessary: The new youth activism (connected youth and digital futures). New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. (2017). The alt-right: Reactionary rehabilitation for white masculinity. Soundings, 66(66), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.3898/136266217821733688
   Google Scholar
• Key, V. O. Jr. (1964). Politics, parties, & pressure groups. Crowell.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, B. (2017). Populist online practices: The function of the Internet in right-wing populism. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1293–1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1977). Politics and ideology in Marxist theory: Capitalism, fascism, populism. New Left Books.
   Google Scholar
• Laffan, B. (1996). The politics of identity and political order in Europe. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1996.tb00561.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. Duell, Sloan & Pearce.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2015). Active audiences? The debate progresses but is far from resolved. Communication Theory, 25(4), 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lothian, A. (2013). Archival anarchies: Online fandom, subcultural conservation, and the transformative work of digital ephemera. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(6), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912459132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna, J. A. (2018, April 9). El fundador de ForoCoches: “El ‘a fregar’ y ‘todas putas’ se saca de contexto, es un humor difícil de entender”. ElDiario.es. https://www.eldiario.es/cultura/entrevistas/fundador-ForoCoches-fregary-contexto-entender_0_759075033.html.
   Google Scholar
• Manucci, L. (2017). Populism and the media. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 467–488). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, R. M. (2009). Working for the text: Fan labor and the new organization. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(5), 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877909337861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2017). The populist radical right: A reader. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2018). Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1667–1693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018789490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagle, A. (2017). Kill all normies: Online culture wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the alt-right. John Hunt Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Negre, J. (2018, December 9). El joven propagandista de Vox que montó a Abascal en un caballo. El Mundo. https://www.elmundo.es/cronica/2018/12/09/5c0a9d12fdddff0e388b4606.html.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E., & Rahn, W. M. (2016). Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 election. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667(1), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216662639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande, R. (2018). Squee from the margins: Fandom and race. University of Iowa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, W. (2015). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, V., & Zaller, J. (1993). Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their implications for research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(2), 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1086/269363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radway, J. (1984). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahn, W. M. (2018). Populism in the US. The evolution of the Trump constituency. In K. A. Hawkins, R. E. Carlin, L. Littvay, & C. Rovira Kaltwasser (Eds.), The ideational approach to populism: Concept, theory, and analysis (pp. 350–373). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rey Vázquez, E. (2019, January 16). ). ForoVox. Revista Contexto. https://ctxt.es/es/20190116/Politica/23908/Enrique-Rey-Vazquez-Vox-Forocoches-ultraderecha-jovenes.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M. (2018). What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773917000145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M. (2019). State of the field: How to study populism and adjacent topics? A plea for both more and less focus. European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 362–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roose, K. (2019, August 4). ‘Shut the site down,’ says the creator of 8chan, a megaphone for gunmen. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. S., & Rivers, D. J. (2018). Discursive deflection: Accusation of ‘fake news’ and the spread of mis-and disinformation in the Tweets of President Trump. Social Media + Society, 4(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118776010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., & Ostiguy, P. (2017a). Populism: An overview of the concept and the state of the art. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 1–24). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., & Ostiguy, P. (2017b). Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sandvoss, C. (2003). A game of two halves football, television, and globalization. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schaub, M., & Morisi, D. (2019). Voter mobilisation in the echo chamber: Broadband internet and the rise of populism in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 59(4), 752–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, A., Müller, P., Schemer, C., Wirz, D. S., Wettstein, M., & Wirth, W. (2018). Measuring populist attitudes on three dimensions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(2), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. (2015). ‘Cosplay is serious business’: Gendering material fan labor on Heroes of Cosplay. Cinema Journal, 54(3), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2015.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settle, J. E. (2018). Frenemies: How social media polarizes America. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sides, J., Tesler, M., & Vavreck, L. (2018). Identity crisis: The 2016 presidential campaign and the battle for the meaning of America. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T., & Williamson, V. (2012). The Tea Party and the remaking of Republican conservatism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., Johnson, B. K., Cohen, J., Comello, M. L. G., & Ewoldsen, D. R. (2014). Temporarily expanding the boundaries of the self: Motivations for entering the story world and implications for narrative effects. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruyt, B., Keppens, G., & Van Droogenbroeck, F. (2016). Who supports populism and what attracts people to it? Political Research Quarterly, 69(2), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916639138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanfill, M. (2011). Doing fandom, (mis) doing whiteness: Heteronormativity, racialization, and the discursive construction of fandom. Transformative Works & Cultures, 8. https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2011.0256
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J., & Wichowski, A. (2011). Political discussion online. In R. Burnett, M. Consalvo, & C. Ess (Eds.), The handbook of internet studies (Vol. 11, pp. 168–187). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1170-96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 331–348). Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tesler, M. (2012). The spillover of racialization into health care: How President Obama polarized public opinion by racial attitudes and race. American Journal of Political Science, 56(3), 690–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00577.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesler, M. (2016, August 22). Economic anxiety isn’t driving racial resentment. Racial resentment is driving economic anxiety. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hauwaert, S. M., Schimpf, C. H., & Azevedo, F. (2020). The measurement of populist attitudes: Testing cross-national scales using item response theory. Politics, 40(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395719859306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hauwaert, S. M., & Van Kessel, S. (2018). Beyond protest and discontent: A cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research, 57(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vox [@vox_es]. (2018, August 1). Morning, Somos primeros en las encuestas de Forocoches. Gracias shurs. [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/vox_es/status/1024644627469615104?lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Emotions, media and politics. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S., & Amado, A. (2017). Populist communication by digital means: Presidential Twitter in Latin America. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1330–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, C., Shah, D., Pevehouse, J., Yang, J., Pelled, A., Boehm, F., & Schmidt, J. (2016). How Trump drove coverage to the nomination: Hybrid media campaigning. Political Communication, 33(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1224416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. (2011). Playing with politics: Political fans and Twitter faking in post-broadcast democracy. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 17(4), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856511414348
   Google Scholar