Conceptualizing long-term media effects on societal beliefs

References

• Aarøe, L. (2011). Investigating frame strength: The case of episodic and thematic framing. Political Communication, 28(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.568041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2007). Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time. Media Psychology, 10(1), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701301194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asp, K. (1986). Mäktiga massmedier: studier i politisk opinionsbildning. Akademilitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. (2004). Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new Era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigsby, E., Bigman, C. A., & Gonzales, A. M. (2019). Exemplification theory: A review and meta-analysis of exemplar messages. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(3), 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1681903
   Google Scholar
• Bizer, G., Tormala, Z., Rucker, D., & Petty, R. (2006). Memory-based versus online pro-cessing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 646–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P., & Gross, K. (2005). Values, frames, and citizens’ thoughts about Policy issues: Effects on content and quantity. Political Psychology, 26(6), 929–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00451.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1989). Effects of message repetition on argument processing, recall, and persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J., & Jamieson, K. (1997). Spiral of cynicism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. (2007a). A theory of framing and Opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331_3.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. (2007b). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. (2010). Dynamic Public opinion: Communication effects over time. American Political Science Review, 104(4), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. (2012). Counterframing effects. Journal of Politics, 75(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, P., & Feldman, S. (1984). How people organize the political world: A schematic model. American Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 95–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottam, M., Mastors, E., Preston, T., & Dietz, B. (2016). Introduction to political psychology. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, J., Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1984). Schematic bases of belief change. In J. R. Eiser (Ed.), Attitudinal judgment (pp. 197–226). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J., Fein, J., & Leeper, T. (2012). A source of Bias in public opinion stability. American Political Science Review, 106(2), 430–454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J., & Nelson, K. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 728–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 269–322). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ekström, M. (2016). Young people’s everyday political talk: A social achievement of democratic engagement. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2015.1048207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S., Kinder, D., & Larter, M. (1983). The novice and the expert: Knowledge-based strategies in political cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(4), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90029-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (2017). Social cognition: From brains to culture. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. Journal of Politics, 69, 957–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, S., Lo, J., Vavreck, L., & Zaller, J. (2013). How quickly we forget: The duration of Persuasion effects from Mass communication. Political Communication, 30(4), 521–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.828143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbert, L., Garrett, R. K., & Gleason, L. (2010). A new era of minimal effects? A response to Bennett and Iyengar. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01470.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural Cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kepplinger, H. M., Geiss, S., & Siebert, S. (2012). Framing scandals: Cognitive and emotional media effects. Journal of Communication, 62(4), 659–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01653.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, D., & Kiewiet, R. (1981). Sociotropic politics: The American case. British Journal of Political Science, 11(2), 129–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400002544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, T., & Arendt, F. (2017). Media effects: Cumulation and duration. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0217
   Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). Getting real: The duration of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 959–983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01580.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). What a difference a day makes? The effects of repetitive and competitive news framing over time. Communication Research, 40(2), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212470688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2016). How long do news framing effects last? A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735254
   Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2018). News Framing effects. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., Keer, M., Schuck, A., & Hänggli, R. (2015). The Effects of Repetitive news framing on Political opinions over time. Communication Monographs, 82(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.994646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengauer, G., Esser, F., & Berganza, R. (2012).: Negativity in political news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippmann, W. (1922/1997). Public opinion. Free Press Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. (2007). Beyond accessibility? Toward an online and memory-based model of framing effects. Communications: European Journal of Communication Research, 32(1), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2007.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. (2008). Schemas and media effects. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of communication (pp. 4502–4508). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., & Schemer, C. (2012). Diachronic framing effects in competitive opinion environments. Political Communication, 29(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.694985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. (2014). Setting the Agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. G. (2012). It’s about time: The lifespan of information effects in a multiweek campaign. American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00549.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moons, W., Mackie, D., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2009). The impact of repetition-induced familiarity on agreement with weak and strong arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. (2010). The state of cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151003735018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. (1998). Impersonal influence. How perceptions of mass collectives influence Political attitudes. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D., & Young, L. (2011). Communication and public opinion: Plus Ça change? Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5), 1018–1044. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, R. (1990). The threshold of public attention. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1086/269194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1865–1880. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perse, E., & Lambe, J. (2017). Media effects and society. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Brinol, P., & Priester, J. R. (2009). Mass media attitude change: Implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In J. Bryant, & M. D. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 125–164). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. (2014). A critical analysis of cultivation theory. Journal of Communication, 64(6), 1015–1036. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J. (2012). Media Effects. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News Values and Public Opinion: A theoretical account of Media Priming and framing. In G. A. Barnett, & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in Communication sciences (pp. 173–212). Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Rhee, J. (1997). Strategy and issue frames in election Campaign coverage: A social cognitive account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 47(3), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1997.tb02715.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., Davis, J., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2004). Implication of the mental models approach for cultivation theory. Communications: European Journal of Communication Research, 29(3), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2004.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roskos-Ewoldsen, D., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Carpentier, F. (2009). Media priming: An updated synthesis. In J. Bryant, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 74–93). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Roskos-Ewoldson, D., & Roskos-Ewoldson, B. (2009). Current research in media priming. In R. L. Nabi, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The sage Handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 177–192). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, B. (2004). Framing-effects approach: A theoretical and methodological critique. Communications: European Journal of Communication Research, 29(4), 401–428. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2004.29.4.401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of Political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3(2–3), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt-Beck, R. (2003). Mass Communication, personal Communication and Vote choice. The filter hypothesis of media influence in comparative perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123403000103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt-Beck, R., & Lup, O. (2013). Seeking the soul of democracy: A review of recent research into citizens’ political talk culture. Swiss Political Science Review, 19(4), 513–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrum, L. J. (2009). Media consumption and perceptions of social reality. In J. Bryant, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 50–73). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. (2007). Reinforcing Spirals: the mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual Behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. (2015). Reinforcing Spirals model: Conceptualizing the relationship between media content exposure and the development and maintenance of attitudes. Media Psychology, 18(3), 370–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.897236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H., & Boomgaarden, H. (2017). Dynamic spirals put to test: An agent-based model of Reinforcing Spirals between selective exposure, interpersonal networks, and attitude polarization. Journal of Communication, 67(2), 256–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S., Fournier, P., & Nir, L. (2019). Cross-national evidence of a negativity Bias in psychophysiological reactions to news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(38), 18888–18892. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908369116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S., & McAdams, S. (2015). News, politics, and negativity. Political Communication, 32(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.881942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, C., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D., Jones, J., Peske, M., Raymond, A., & Vig, W. (2000). The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 804–829. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, D. (2009). News Framing theory and research. In J. Bryant, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17–33). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanta, W., & Wu, Y.-C. (1992). Interpersonal communication and the Agenda-setting process. Journalism Quarterly, 69(4), 847–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, J., Mazza, M., & Snyder, L. (1993). Agenda-setting effects of television news coverage and the effects decay curve. Communication Research, 20(3), 408–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365093020003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyer, R. S., & Radvansky, G. A. (1999). The comprehension and validation of social information. Psychological Review, 106(1), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J.-H., Watt, J., Snyder, L., Yan, J., & Jiang, Y. (1993). Public issue priority formation: Media agenda-setting and social interaction. Journal of Communication, 43(1), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01246.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D. (1999). Exemplification Theory: Judging the whole by some of its parts. Media Psychology, 1(1), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0101_5
   Google Scholar