Charting a path: race, research, and practice in communication studies

References

• Abend, G. (2008). The meaning of ‘theory’. Sociological Theory, 26(2), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00324.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afifi, W., & Cornejo, M. (2020). #Commsoweird: The question of sample representativeness in interpersonal communication research. In M. L. Doerfel & J. L. Gibbs (Eds.), Organizing inclusion: Moving diversity from demographics to communication processes (pp. 238–259). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, B. J. (2007). Theorizing communication and race. Communication Monographs, 74(2), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701393055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anguiano, C., & Castañeda, M. (2014). Forging a path: Past and present scope of critical race theory and Latina/o critical race theory in communication studies. Review of Communication, 14(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2014.951954
   Google Scholar
• Asante, G. A. (2019). #Rhetoricsowhite and US centered: Reflections on challenges and opportunities. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 105(4), 484–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2019.1669892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, M. (2021). Misogynoir transformed: Black women’s digital resistance. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Asbury, B. (2015). Critical approaches to interpersonal communication: Charting a future. In D. O. Braithwaite & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 185–197)). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. A. (1980). Brown v. Board of education and the interest-convergence dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 93(3), 518–533. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. A. (1993). Faces at the bottom of the well: The permanence of racism. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. A. (1995). Who’s afraid of critical race theory. University of Illinois Law Review, 4, 893–920. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qg47z.12.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2010). Pragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 95–117). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bondi, S. (2012). Students and institutions protecting whiteness as property: A critical race theory analysis of student affairs preparation. Faculty Publications in Educational Administration, 65. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsedadfacpub/65.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, A. (2012). From the blackhand side: Twitter as a cultural conversation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 529–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, A. (2018). Critical technocultural discourse analysis. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816677532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, A. (2020). Distributed blackness: African American cybercultures. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calvente, L. B. Y., Calafell, B. M., & Chávez, K. R. (2020). Here is something you can’t understand: The suffocating whiteness of communication studies. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 17(2), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2020.1770823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V., & McIlwain, C. (2018). #Communicationsowhite. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, R. S. (1993). Toward an Asian American legal scholarship: Critical race theory, poststructuralism, and narrative space. California Law Review, 81(5), 1241–1323. https://doi.org/10.2307/3480919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chávez, K. R. (2015). Beyond inclusion: Rethinking rhetoric’s historical narrative. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101(1), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2015.994908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condit, C. M. (2004). How should We study the symbolizing animal? Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, C. (1997). Resisting whiteness’ rhetorical silence. Western Journal of Communication, 61(3), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319709374577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. (1988). Race, reform, and retrenchment: Transformation and legitimation in antidiscrimination law. Harvard Law Review, 101(7), 1331–1383. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W., Gotanda, N., Peller, G., & Thomas, K. (Eds). (1996). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. L. (1995). Changing the players and the game: A personal account of the speech communication association black caucus origins. Speech Communication Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889509365420
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S. M. (2015). The “strong Black woman collective”: A developing theoretical framework of the communication process among Black women. Women’s Studies in Communication, 38(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2014.953714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCuir-Gunby, J. T. (2020). Using critical race mixed methodology to explore the experiences of African Americans in education. Educational Psychologist, 55(4), 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1793762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, R. (1989). Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. Michigan Law Review, 87(8), 2411–2441. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2017). Critical race theory: An introduction. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon, F. (1967). Black skin, white masks. Grove Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flaherty, C. (2019, June 13). When white scholars pick white scholars: Communication scholars debate how the field’s distinguished scholars should be picked going forward, in the interest of diversity, equity and inclusion. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/06/13/communication-scholars-debate-how-fields-distinguished-scholars-should-be-picke.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, L. A. (2016). Between abundance and marginalization: The imperative of racial rhetorical criticism. Review of Communication, 16(10), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2016.1183871
   Google Scholar
• Flores, L. A. (2018). Towards an insistent and transformative racial rhetorical criticism. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 15(4), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2018.1526387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, N., López, N., & Vélez, V. (2018). Quantcrit: Rectifying quantitative methods through critical race theory. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, P., Haight, W., Cho, M., Nashandi, N. J. C., & Yoon, J. G. (2019). A mixed methods study of black girls' vulnerability to out-of-school suspensions: The intersection of race and gender. Children and Youth Services Review, 102, 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, E. N. (2015). Settler Colonialism as Structure: A Framework for Comparative Studies of US Race and Gender Formation. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 1(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649214560440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotanda, N. (1991). A critique of “Our constitution is color-blind”. Stanford Law Review, 44(1), 1–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/1228940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, K. L. (2020). Intersectional tech: Black users in digital gaming. LSU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J., & Hall, J. (2010). Dialectics and pragmatism: Being of consequence. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed, pp. 119–143). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Josey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. A. (2010). Critical race theory as a means to deconstruct, recover, and evolve. Communication Law Review, 10(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358590903523419
   Google Scholar
• Grigoryeva, A., & Ruef, M. (2015). The historical demography of racial segregation. American Sociological Review, 80(4), 814–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415589170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney-Lopez, I. F. (1997). Race, ethnicity, erasure: The salience of race to LatCrit theory. California Law Review, 85(5), 1143–1211. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8), 1707–1791. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C. I. (2020). Reflections on whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review Forum, 134(1), 1–10. https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/134-Harv.-L.-Rev.-F.−1- 1-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. (2007). Mock spanish: A site for the indexical reproduction of racism in American English. In J. F. Healey & E. O’Brien (Eds.), Race, ethnicity, and gender: Selected readings (pp. 270–285). Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill-Collins, P. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), S14–S32. https://doi.org/10.2307/800672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill Collins, P. (2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, M. (2002). Seeking difference: African Americans in interpersonal communication research 1975-2000. Howard Journal of Communications, 13(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/106461702753555021
   Google Scholar
• Ignatiev, N. (1995). How the Irish became white. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. L. (1998). Tracing the evolution of “race,” “ethnicity,” and “culture” in communication studies. Howard Journal of Communication, 9(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/106461798247104
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Foucault Welles, B. (2020). #Hashtagactivism: Networks of race and gender justice. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Knight Steele, C. (2021). Digital black feminism. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kubota, R. (2020). Confronting epistemological racism, decolonizing scholarly knowledge: Race and gender in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz033
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 97(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146819509700104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsitz, G. (2007). The racialization of space and the spatialization of race: Theorizing the hidden architecture of landscape. Landscape Journal, 26(1), 10–23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43323751. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.26.1.10
   Google Scholar
• Manning, J. (2020). Examining whiteness in interpersonal communication textbooks. Communication, Culture and Critique, 13(2), 254–258. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaa010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, J., & Denker, K. J. (2021). Beyond the hammer: A critical turn for interpersonal and family communication studies. Review of Communication, 21(3), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2021.1969424
   Google Scholar
• McCann, B. J., Mack, A. N., & Self, R. (2020). Communication's quest for whiteness: The racial politics of disciplinary legitimacy. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 17(2), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2020.1770822
   Google Scholar
• Mcclure, R. P. (1980). A simmelian synthesis for speech communication. Communication Education, 29(4), 361–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528009378440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M. (2012). What comes first? The paradigm or the approach? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 255–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812461574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1997). The racial contract. Cornell University press.
   Google Scholar
• Minniear, M., & Cardwell, M. E. (2021). Critical race theory. In D. O. Braithwaite & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (pp. 246–257). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. (2017). Where is the critical empirical interpersonal communication research? A roadmap for future inquiry into discourse and power. Communication Theory, 27(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J., & Manning, J. (2019). What counts as critical interpersonal and family communication research? A review of an emerging field of inquiry. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1570825
   Google Scholar
• Mudambi, A., Collier, M. J., Scott, L., & Muneri, C. T. (2022). Revisiting whiteness pedagogy: Examining the discursive practices of diverse students in an intercultural communication and conflict course. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 51(6), 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2022.2102060
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., Tindage, M. F., & Atkinson, J. (2016). The evolution of instructional communication research. In P. L. Witt (Ed.), Handbook of communication science: Communication and learning (Vol 16, pp. 13–42). DeGruyter Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501502446-003
   Google Scholar
• Nakayama, T. K., & Krizek, R. L. (1995). Whiteness: A strategic rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 81(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639509384117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono, K. A., & Sloop, J. M. (1995). The critique of vernacular discourse. Communication Monographs, 62(1), 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orbe, M. P., & Allen, B. J. (2008). “Race matters” in theJournal of applied communication research. Howard Journal of Communications, 19(3), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170802218115
   Google Scholar
• Orbe, M. P., Austin, J. T., & Allen, B. J. (2022). ‘Race matters’ in applied communication research: Past, present, and future. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 50(3), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2022.2083407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peller, G. (1990). Race consciousness. Duke Law Journal, 1990(4), 758–847. https://doi.org/10.2307/1372723
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. E. (2015). The whiteness of silence: A critical autoethnographic tale of a strategic rhetoric. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1434–1447. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudick, K. C. (2022). You have to name the problem to fix it: White supremacy inCommunication education. Communication Education, 71(4), 362–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2022.2105921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciullo, N. J. (2019). The persistence of race/racism in communication studies. Canadian Journal of Communication, 44(4), 603–609. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2019v44n4a3637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, M., & Wasow, O. (2016). Race as a ‘bundle of sticks': Designs that estimate effects of seemingly immutable characteristics. Annual Review of Political Science, 19(1), 499–522. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032015-010015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey, P. (2014). Spatial segmentation and the black middle class. American Journal of Sociology, 119(4), 903–954. https://doi.org/10.1086/674561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shome, R. (2000). Outing whiteness. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 17(3), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295030009388402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuter, R. (1976). The promise of participant observation research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909887609360219
   Google Scholar
• Smedley, A. (2007). Race in North America: Origin and evolution of a worldview (3rd ed.). Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, A. (2020). AP tally: Arrests at widespread US protests hit 10,000. https://apnews.com/article/american-protests-us-news-arrests-minnesota-burglary- bb2404f9b13c8b53b94c73f818f6a0b7.
   Google Scholar
• Soliz, J., & Phillips, K. E. (2018). Toward a more expansive understanding of family communication: Considerations for inclusion of ethnic-racial and global diversity. Journal of Family Communication, 18(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2017.1399890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. M., Hintz, E. A., & Duerringer, C. M. (2022). Setting the agenda: Beyond discourse dependence and a dependence on discourse. Journal of Family Communication, https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2022.2041997
   Google Scholar
• Thompson Ford, R. (1994). The boundaries of race: Political geography in legal analysis. Harvard Law Review, 107(8), 1841–1921. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyosaki, S. (2016). Praxis-oriented whiteness research. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 11(3), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2015.1073735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umaña-Taylor, A. J., Quintana, S. M., Lee, R. M., Cross, W. E., Rivas-Drake, D., Schwartz, S. J., … Seaton, E. (2014). Ethnic and racial identity during adolescence and into young adulthood: An integrated conceptualization. Child Development, 85(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, E. K. (2015). Critical cosmopolitanism, antagonism, and social suffering. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101(1), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2015.995433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waymer, D. (2021). Addressing disciplinary whiteness and racial justice advocacy in communication education. Communication Education, 70(1), 114–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1811362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K. C. (2020). Anointments and Prestige: Reflecting on #CommunicationSoWhite with Herman Gray and Oscar Gandy. Communication. Culture and Critique, 13(2), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaa008
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. T., Umi, S. A., Reid, A., & Hendrix, K. G. (2023). Still passed over: Race and the forgotten professors and students of color. Communication Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2022.2145491
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. H. (2015). The national and cosmopolitan dimensions of disciplinarity: Reconsidering the origins of communication studies. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101(1), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2015.995437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuberi, T. (2001). Thicker than blood: How racial statistics Lie. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar