Accelerating precision ophthalmology: recent advances

References

• National Research Council Committee on AFfDaNToD. The National Academies Collection: reports funded by National Institutes of Health. Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease. Copyright © 2011 Washington [DC]: National Academies Press [US] National Academy of Sciences. 2011
   Google Scholar
• Koenig IR, Fuchs O, Hansen G, et al. What is precision medicine? Eur Respir J. 2017;50(4):1700391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg GS, Phillips KA. Precision Medicine: from Science to Value. Health Aff [Millwood]. 2018;37(5):694–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroi SE, Reed DM, Sanders DS, et al. Precision medicine to prevent glaucoma-related blindness. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019;30(3):187. DOI:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson AC, Jammal AA, Medeiros FA. A review of deep learning for screening, diagnosis, and detection of glaucoma progression. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(2):42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunaric Megevand G, Bron AM. Personalising surgical treatments for glaucoma patients. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021;81:100879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):262–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham Y-C, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmol. 2014;121(11):2081–2090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA. Neuronal death in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 1999;18(1):39–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ting DSW, Pasquale LR, Peng L, et al. Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(2):167–175. DOI:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas JB, Aung T, Bourne RR, et al. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2017;390(10108):2183–2193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra U, Fujita H, Bhandary SV, et al. Inf Sci. 2018;441:41–49. DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2018.01.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemelings R, Elen B, Barbosa-Breda J, et al. Deep learning on fundus images detects glaucoma beyond the optic disc. Sci Rep. 2021;111:2031310.1038/s41598-021-99605-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Steven K, Qassim A, et al.Automated AI labeling of optic nerve head enables insights into cross-ancestry glaucoma risk and genetic discovery in >280,000 images from UKB and CLSAAm J Hum Genet202110871204–121610.1016/j.ajhg.2021.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathya R, Abraham A. Comparison of supervised and unsupervised learning algorithms for pattern classification. Int J Adv Res Artif Intell. 2013;2(2):34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Liu B, Pan D, Shuai Z, et al. ECSD-Net: a joint optic disc and cup segmentation and glaucoma classification network based on unsupervised domain adaptation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022;213:106530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansouri K, Leite MT, Medeiros F, et al. Assessment of rates of structural change in glaucoma using imaging technologies. Eye. 2011;25(3):269–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakoor KA, Koorathota SC, Hood DC, et al. Robust and Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networks to Detect Glaucoma in Optical Coherence Tomography Images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021;68(8):2456–2466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Kim YK, Ha A, et al.Macular Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Prediction from Red-free Fundus Photography using Hybrid Deep Learning ModelSci Rep2020101328010.1038/s41598-020-60277-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Shen LQ, Pasquale LR, et al. An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Assess Spatial Patterns of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps in Glaucoma. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(9):41. DOI:10.1167/tvst.9.9.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang M, Guth D, Pardeshi AA, et al. Glaucoma Expert-Level detection of angle closure in Goniophotographs with Convolutional neural networks: the Chinese American eye study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;226:100–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue W, Szymanska M, Hu Y, et al. Measures of disease activity in glaucoma. Biosens Bioelectron. 2022;196:113700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousefi S, et al. Detection of longitudinal visual field progression in glaucoma using machine learning. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;193:71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Seo YH, Kim BH. PLoS ONE. 2017a;12(12):e0186738. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0186738
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254(5035):1178–1181. DOI:10.1126/science.1957169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treder M, Lauermann JL, Eter N. Automated detection of exudative age-related macular degeneration in spectral domain optical coherence tomography using deep learning. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(2):259–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atlas V The International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness [ Available from: https://www.iapb.org/learn/vision-atlas
   Google Scholar
• Harding S, et al. Grading and disease management in national screening for diabetic retinopathy in England and Wales. Diabetic Med. 2003;20(12):965–971. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2003.01077.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman M, Buysschaert M, Schwarz PE, et al. Diabetes prevention: global health policy and perspectives from the ground. Diabetes Manag [Lond]. 2012;2(4):309–321.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Gibson E, Ramchal S, et al. Diabetic Retinopathy Screening with Automated Retinal Image Analysis in a Primary Care Setting Improves Adherence to Ophthalmic Care. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021;5(1):71–77. DOI:10.1016/j.oret.2020.06.016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heydon P, Egan C, Bolter L, et al. Prospective evaluation of an artificial intelligence-enabled algorithm for automated diabetic retinopathy screening of 30 000 patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105(5):723–728. DOI:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers TW, Gonzalez-Bueno J, Garcia Franco R, et al. Evaluation of an AI system for the detection of diabetic retinopathy from images captured with a handheld portable fundus camera: the MAILOR AI study. Eye. 2021;35(2):632–638. DOI:10.1038/s41433-020-0927-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porwal P, Pachade S, Kamble R, et al. Indian Diabetic Retinopathy Image Dataset [IDRiD]: a Database for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Research. Data. 2018;3(3):25. DOI:10.3390/data3030025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Y, Nguyen QD, Hamzah H, et al. Artificial intelligence for teleophthalmology-based diabetic retinopathy screening in a national programme: an economic analysis modelling study. Lancet Digital Health. 2020;2(5):e240–9. DOI:10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30060-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarhan MH, Nasseri MA, Zapp D, et al. Machine learning techniques for ophthalmic data processing: a review. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020;24(12):3338–3350. DOI:10.1109/JBHI.2020.3012134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei J, Balasubramanian S, Abdelfattah NS, et al. Proposal of a simple optical coherence tomography-based scoring system for progression of age-related macular degeneration. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255(8):1551–1558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermany DS, Goldbaum M, Cai W, et al. Identifying medical diagnoses and treatable diseases by image-based deep learning. Cell. 2018;172(5):1122–31. e9. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. “U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation.” International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Cham, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lee CS, Tyring AJ, Deruyter NP, et al. Deep-learning based, automated segmentation of macular edema in optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express. 2017;8(7):3440–3448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloca PM, Lee AY, de Carvalho ER, et al. Validation of automated artificial intelligence segmentation of optical coherence tomography images. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8): e0220063-e. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloca PM, Müller PL, Lee AY, et al. Unraveling the deep learning gearbox in optical coherence tomography image segmentation towards explainable artificial intelligence. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):170. DOI:10.1038/s42003-021-01697-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji Z, Chen Q, Niu S, et al. Beyond retinal layers: a deep voting model for automated geographic atrophy segmentation in SD-OCT images. Transl Vision Sci & Technol. 2018;7(1):1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Nassisi M, Wang M, et al. Automated detection and classification of early AMD biomarkers using deep learning. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang G, Fu DJ, Liefers B, et al.Clinically relevant deep learning for detection and quantification of geographic atrophy from optical coherence tomography: a model development and external validation studyLancet Digital Health2021310e665–7510.1016/S2589-7500(21)00134-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liefers B, Taylor P, Alsaedi A, et al. Quantification of key retinal features in early and late age-related macular degeneration using deep learning. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;226:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohno-Matsui K, Shimada N, Yasuzumi K, et al. Long-term development of significant visual field defects in highly myopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(2):256–65.e1. DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan T-E, Anees A, Chen C, et al. Retinal photograph-based deep learning algorithms for myopia and a blockchain platform to facilitate artificial intelligence medical research: a retrospective multicohort study. Lancet Digital Health. 2021;3(5):e317–29. DOI:10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00055-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin D, Xiong J, Liu C, et al.Application of Comprehensive Artificial intelligence Retinal Expert [CARE] system: a national real-world evidence studyLancet Digital Health202138e486–95. DOI:10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00086-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rim TH, Soh ZD, Tham Y-C, et al. Deep Learning for Automated Sorting of Retinal Photographs. Ophthalmol Retina. 2020;4(8):793–800. DOI:10.1016/j.oret.2020.03.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Appiah AP, Hirose T. Secondary causes of premacular fibrosis. Ophthalmol. 1989;96(3):389–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal N, Kofod M, Vorum H, et al. Proteomic analysis of human vitreous associated with idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(4):e333–4. DOI:10.1111/aos.12075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y-C L, Lin K-H, Bair H, et al. Epiretinal membrane detection at the ophthalmologist level using deep learning of optical coherence tomography. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):8424. DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-65405-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang EF, Misra SL, Patel DV. In Vivo confocal microscopy of the human cornea in the assessment of peripheral neuropathy and systemic diseases. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:951081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon MS, Carnt NA, Truong NR, et al. Dendritic cells in the cornea during herpes simplex viral infection and inflammation. Surv Ophthalmol. 2018;63(4):565–578. DOI:10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda K, Nishida T. Ocular allergic inflammation: interaction between the cornea and conjunctiva. Cornea. 2010;29(Suppl 1):S62–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aggarwal S, Kheirkhah A, Cavalcanti BM, et al. Correlation of corneal immune cell changes with clinical severity in dry eye disease: an in vivo confocal microscopy study. Ocul Surf. 2021;19:183–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto Y, Ibrahim OMA. Application of in vivo Confocal Microscopy in Dry Eye Disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(14):Des41–des7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu F, Qin Y, He W, et al.A deep transfer learning framework for the automated assessment of corneal inflammation on in vivo confocal microscopy imagesPLoS ONE2021166e025265310.1371/journal.pone.0252653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Graham J, Dabbah MA, et al. An automatic tool for quantification of nerve fibers in corneal confocal microscopy images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017;64(4):786–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams BM, Borroni D, Liu R, et al. An artificial intelligence-based deep learning algorithm for the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy using corneal confocal microscopy: a development and validation study. Diabetologia. 2020;63(2):419–430. DOI:10.1007/s00125-019-05023-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinson JM, Chanas SA, Hill RE, et al. Corneal development, limbal stem cell function, and corneal epithelial cell migration in the Pax6[±] mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(4):1101–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall LA, Young G, Wolffsohn JS, et al. The influence of corneoscleral topography on soft contact lens fit. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(9):6801–6806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakata LM, Lavanya R, Friedman DS, et al. Comparison of gonioscopy and anterior segment ocular coherence tomography in detecting angle closure in different quadrants of the anterior chamber angle. Ophthalmol. 2008;115(5):769–774. DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.06.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrok MK, Alonso-Caneiro D, Przeździecka-Dołyk J, et al. Comparison of subjective and objective methods of corneoscleral limbus identification from anterior segment optical coherence tomography images. Optom Vis Sci. 2021;98(2):127–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godefrooij DA, de Wit GA, Uiterwaal CS, et al. Age-specific Incidence and Prevalence of Keratoconus: a nationwide registration study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:169–172. . 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus Survey of Ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42(4):297–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty R, Kundu G, Narasimhan R, et al. Artificial Intelligence Efficiently Identifies Regional Differences in the Progression of Tomographic Parameters of Keratoconic Corneas. J Refract Surg. 2021;37(4):240–248. DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20210120-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero-Jiménez M, Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS. Keratoconus: a review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33(4):157–166. quiz 205. DOI:10.1016/j.clae.2010.04.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epidemiology of cataract. Lancet. 1982;1(8286):1392–1393. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(82)92506-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosoda Y, Miyake M, Meguro A, et al. Keratoconus-susceptibility gene identification by corneal thickness genome-wide association study and artificial intelligence IBM Watson. Commun Biol. 2020;3(1):410. DOI:10.1038/s42003-020-01137-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboobaker S, Courtright P. Barriers to Cataract Surgery in Africa: a Systematic Review. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2016;23(1):145–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brant AR, Hinkle J, Shi S, et al.Artificial intelligence in global ophthalmology: using machine learning to improve cataract surgery outcomes at Ethiopian outreachesJ Cataract Refract Surg20214716–1010.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lhuillier L, Jeancolas AL, Renaudin L, et al. Impact of Ophthalmic Surgeon Experience on Early Postoperative Central Corneal Thickness After Cataract Surgery. Cornea. 2017;36(5):541–545. DOI:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morita S, Tabuchi H, Masumoto H, et al. Real-Time Extraction of Important Surgical Phases in Cataract Surgery Videos. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):16590.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor HR, West SK. The clinical grading of lens opacities. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1989;17(1):81–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guo L, Yang J-J, Peng L, et al. A computer-aided healthcare system for cataract classification and grading based on fundus image analysis. Comput Ind. 2015;69(C):72–80.
   Google Scholar
• Yang JJ, Li J, Shen R, et al. Exploiting ensemble learning for automatic cataract detection and grading. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016;124:45–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao L, Li H, Zhang Y, et al. Hierarchical method for cataract grading based on retinal images using improved haar wavelet. Inf Fusion. 2019;53:196–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratap T, Kokil P. Efficient network selection for computer-aided cataract diagnosis under noisy environment. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;200:105927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand PJ, Jamilloux Y, Ecochard R, et al. Uveitis: Autoimmunity … and beyond. Autoimmun Rev. 2019;18(9):102351. DOI:10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahab MA, Mir TA, Zafar S. Optimising drug therapy for non-infectious uveitis. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39(7):1633–1650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacini M, Soriano A, Cimino L, et al. Cytokine profiling in aqueous humor samples from patients with non-infectious uveitis associated with systemic inflammatory diseases. Front Immunol. 2020;11:358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti U, Akbarali S, Solebo AL, et al. 93 a machine learning approach to classification of uveitis in children using anterior segment OCT images of the eye. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2019;A36–37.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson P. Introduction to Expert Systems. 3rd ed. United Kingdom: Addison Wesley; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Mutawa AM, Alzuwawi MA. Multilayered rule-based expert system for diagnosing uveitis. Artif Intell Med. 2019;99:101691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty DK, Talasila A, Shanbhag S, et al. Current state of artificial intelligence applications in ophthalmology and their potential to influence clinical practice. Cogent Eng. 2021 Jan 1;8(1):1920707. DOI:10.1080/23311916.2021.1920707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar