Party-led public participation in neighborhood governance: a comparative analysis of two forms of social networks

References

• Ansell, Chris, and Alison Gash. “Collaborative Platforms as a Governance Strategy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28, no. 1 (2018): 16–32. doi:10.1093/jopart/mux030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin, Johan M., and Eric D. Carlstrom. “Collaboration Exercises: What Do They Contribute? A Study of Learning and Usefulness.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 23, no. 1 (2015): 11–23. doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, Stephen P., and Pacey C. Foster. “The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology.” Journal of Management 29, no. 6 (2003): 991–1013. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00087-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulianne, Shelley. “Building Faith in Democracy: Deliberative Events, Political Trust and Efficacy.” Political Studies 67, no. 1 (2019): 4–30. doi:10.1177/0032321718761466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. “The Form of Capital.” In Cultural Theory: An Anthology, edited by Szeman and T. Kaposy, 81–93. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011/1986.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, Ronald S. “The Network Structure of Social Capital.” Research in Organizational Behavior 22 (2000): 345–423. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22009-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, Paul R. “A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development.” Organization Science 13, no. 4 (2002): 442–455. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Sang Ok., and Bok-Tae Kim. “Power and Cognitive Accuracy in Local Emergency Management Networks.” Public Administration Review 67Special Issue (2007): 198–209. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00828.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, James S. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94 (1988): S95–S120. doi:10.1086/228943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristofoli, Daniela, Marco Meneguzzo, and Norma Riccucci. “Collaborative Administration: The Management of Successful Networks.” Public Management Review 19, no. 3 (2017): 275–283. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1209236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropanzano, Russell, and Marie M. Mitchell. “Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review.” Journal of Management 31, no. 6 (2005): 874–900. doi:10.1177/0149206305279602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Yanhua, and Kevin J. O’Brien. “Relational Repression in China: Using Social Ties to Demobilize Protesters.” The China Quarterly 215 (2013): 533–552. doi:10.1017/S0305741013000714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, Jurian, Ingmar van Meerkerk, and Todd Schenk. “The Evolution of Community Self-Organization in Interaction with Government Institutions Cross-Case Insights from Three Countries.” The American Review of Public Administration 48, no. 1 (2018): 52–66. doi:10.1177/0275074016651142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, Kirk, and Tina Nabatchi. “Evaluating the Productivity of Collaborative Governance Regimes: A Performance Matrix.” Public Performance & Management Review 38, no. 4 (2015): 717–747. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergenc, Ceren. “Political Efficacy through Deliberative Participation in Urban China: A Case Study on Public Hearings.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 19, no. 2 (2014): 191–213. doi:10.1007/s11366-014-9289-z.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, Francis. “Social Capital and Development: The Coming Agenda.” SAIS Review 22, no. 1 (2002): 23–37. doi:10.1353/sais.2002.0009.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, Francis. “Social Capital, Civil Society and Development.” Third World Quarterly 22, no. 1 (2001): 7–20. doi:10.1080/713701144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, Archon. “Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance.” Public Administration Review 66, no. s1 (2006): 66–75. Special issue doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, Mark. “Economic Action, Social Structure, and Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91, no. 3 (1985): 481–510. doi:10.1086/228311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Zhonghua. “The Emergence of the Citizen Concept in Modern China: 1899-1919.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 19, no. 4 (2014): 349–364. doi:10.1007/s11366-014-9302-6.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, Manjul, Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh, Irem Uz, and Vanesa M. Tennant. “The Effects of National Cultural Values on Individuals’ Intention to Participate in Peer-to-Peer Sharing Economy.” Journal of Business Research 97 (2019): 20–29. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, Adam Douglas, Mark Lubell, and Michael McCoy. “Belief System and Social Capital as Drivers of Policy Network Structure: The Case of California Regional Planning.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21, no. 3 (2011): 419–444. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaile Hill, Kim, and Tetsuya Matsubayashi. “Civic Engagement and Mass-Elite Policy Agenda Agreement in American Communities.” American Political Science Review 99, no. 2 (2005): 215–224. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingham, Sean, and Ines Levin. “Can Deliberative Minipublics Influence Public Opinion? Theory and Experimental Evidence.” Political Research Quarterly 71, no. 3 (2018): 654–667. doi:10.1177/1065912918755508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katherine, Knobloch R., Barthel L. Michael, and John Gastil. “Emanating Effects: The Impact of the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review on Voters’ Political Efficacy.” Political Studies 68, no. 2 (2020): 426–445. doi:10.1177/0032321719852254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, Erik-Hans, Jurian Edelenbos, and Bram Steijn. “Trust in Governance Networks: Its Impacts on Outcomes.” Administration & Society 42, no. 2 (2010): 193–221. doi:10.1177/0095399710362716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Huifeng, and Martin de Jong. “Citizen Participation in China’s Eco-City Development. Will ‘New- Type Urbanization’ Generate a Breakthrough in Realizing It?” Journal of Cleaner Production 162 (2017): 1085–1094. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Jun. “Public Participation in China: The Case for Environmental Enforcement.” Journal of Chinese Governance 7, no. 2 (2022): 159–179. doi:10.1080/23812346.2021.1968192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Yuan, Yanjun Zhu, and Catherine Owen. “Participatory Budgeting and the Party: Generating ‘Citizens Orderly Participation’ through Party-Building in Shanghai.” Journal of Chinese Governance 8, no. 1 (2023): 56–82. doi:10.1080/23812346.2022.2035487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Nan. “Social Networks and Status Attainment.” Annual Review of Sociology 25, no. 1 (1999): 467–487. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Nan, and Bonnie H. Erickson. Social Capital: An International Research Program. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Nan, Karen Cook, and Ronald S. Burt. Social Capital: Theory and Research. New York, Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Bingsheng, Jingjing Xiao, Ling Li, and Guangdong Wu. “Do Citizen Participation Programs Help Citizens Feel Satisfied with Urban Redevelopment Policy in China?” Journal of Chinese Governance 7, no. 3 (2022): 341–371. doi:10.1080/23812346.2021.1974221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Chunrong. “Empowered Autonomy: The Politics of Community Governance Innovations in Shanghai, China.” Chinese Public Administration Review 5, no. 1/2 (2016): 61–71. doi:10.22140/cpar.v5i1/2.81.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Yiran. “People’s Will or the Central Government’s Plan? The Shape of Contemporary Chinese Local Governance.” Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 9, no. 2 (2020): 226–242. doi:10.1080/24761028.2020.1744290.
   Google Scholar
• Lucidarme, Steffie, Greet Cardon, and Annick Willem. “A Comparative Study of Health Promotion Networks: Configurations of Determinants for Network Effectiveness.” Public Management Review 18, no. 8 (2016): 1163–1217. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1088567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattingly, Daniel C. The Art of Political Control in China. Cambridge & New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, Daniel J. “Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 38, no. 1 (1995): 24–59. doi:10.5465/256727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrell, Michael E. “Deliberation, Democratic Decision-Making and Internal Political Efficacy.” Political Behavior 27, no. 1 (2005): 49–69. doi:10.1007/s11109-005-3076-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulton, Stephanie, and Jodi R. Sandfort. “The Strategic Action Field Framework for Policy Implementation Research.” Policy Studies Journal 45, no. 1 (2017): 144–169. doi:10.1111/psj.12147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musso, Juliet A., Christopher Weare, Thomas Bryer, and Terry L. Cooper. “Toward ‘Strong Democracy’ in Global Cities? Social Capital Building, Theory-Driven Reform, and the Los Angeles Neighborhood Council Experience.” Public Administration Review 71, no. 1 (2011): 102–111. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02311.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musso, Juliet A., and Christopher Weare. “From Participatory Reform to Social Capital: Micro-Motives and the Macro-Structure of Civil Society Networks.” Public Administration Review 75, no. 1 (2015): 150–164. doi:10.1111/puar.12309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, Diana C. “The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 46, no. 4 (2002): 838–855. doi:10.2307/3088437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, Tina. “Putting the ‘Public’ Back in Public Values Research: Designing Public Participation to Identify and Respond to Public Values.” Public Administration Review 72, no. 5 (2012): 699–708. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02544.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagao, Haruka, and John James Kennedy. “The Rite to Vote: Community Interactions and Grassroots Voter Participation in China.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 26, no. 4 (2021): 613–630. doi:10.1007/s11366-021-09748-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, Nancy. “Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation.” The American Review of Public Administration 34, no. 4 (2004): 315–353. doi:10.1177/0275074004269288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdue, Derrick. “Neighbourhood Governance: Leadership, Trust and Social Capital.” Urban Studies 38, no. 12 (2001): 2211–2224. doi:10.1080/00420980120087135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D., and Lewis M. Feldstein. Better Together: Restoring the American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, Xuan, and Catherine Owen. “The CCP, Campaign Governance and COVID-19: Evidence from Shanghai.” Journal of Chinese Political Science (2022): 1–26. doi:10.1007/s11366-022-09838-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, Tara C., and Sandy M. Hershcovis. “Interpersonal Relationships at Work.” In APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, edited by S. Zedeck, Vol. 3, 223–248. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Tianjian. “Democratic Values Supporting an Authoritarian System.” In The Book How East Asians View Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Siciliano, Michael D. “Professional Networks and Street-Level Performance: How Public School Teachers’ Advice Networks Influence Student Performance.” The American Review of Public Administration 47, no. 1 (2017): 79–101. doi:10.1177/0275074015577110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skvoretz, John, and Filip Agneessens. “Reciprocity, Multiplexity, and Exchange: Measures.” Quality & Quantity 41, no. 3 (2007): 341–357. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9005-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo, Suyeon, and Tina Nabatchi. “Different Process, Different Outcomes? Assessing the Individual-Level Impacts of Public Participation.” Public Administration Review 81, no. 1 (2021): 137–151. doi:10.1111/puar.13272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Beibei. “Grid Governance in China’s Urban Middle-Class Neighbourhoods.” The China Quarterly 241 (2020): 43–61. doi:10.1017/S0305741019000821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, De, Yaying Wu, Ian MacLachlan, and Jieming Zhu. “The Role of Social Capital in the Collective-Led Development of Urbanising Villages in China: The Case of Shenzhen.” Urban Studies 58, no. 16 (2021): 3335–3353. doi:10.1177/0042098021993353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigilia, Carlo. “Social Capital and Local Development.” European Journal of Social Theory 4, no. 4 (2001): 427–442. doi:10.1177/13684310122225244.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, Lily L. “Solidary Groups, Informal Accountability, and Local Public Goods Provision in Rural China.” American Political Science Review 101, no. 2 (2007): 355–372. doi:10.1017/S0003055407070153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Weijie. “Exploring the Determinants of Network Effectiveness: The Case of Neighborhood Governance Networks in Beijing.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26, no. 2 (2016): 375–388. doi:10.1093/jopart/muv017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Ying, and Nick Clarke. “Four Modes of Neighbourhood Governance: The View from Nanjing, China.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 45, no. 3 (2021): 535–554. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, Sophia. “Local Politics, Local Citizenship? Socialized Governance in Contemporary China.” The China Quarterly 226 (2016): 342–362. doi:10.1017/S0305741016000345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Qingwen, Douglas D. Perkins, and Julian Chun- Chung Chow. “Sense of Community, Neighboring, and Social Capital as Predictors of Local Political Participation in China.” American Journal of Community Psychology 45, no. 3-4 (2010): 259–271. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9312-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, Chengzhi, Shujia Hu, and Runxi Zeng. “The Influence of Religious Belief on Political Voting Behaviour of Urban Residents: Empirical Analysis Based on China’s Survey Data.” Chinese. Political Science Review (2021)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Jianxing. “Sustainable Innovation of ‘Three-Governances.” Governance Studies 196, no. 6 (2020): 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Hongjuan, Rong Han, Liang Wang, and Runhui Lin. “Social Capital in China: A Systematic Literature Review.” Asian Business & Management 20, no. 1 (2021): 32–77. doi:10.1057/s41291-019-00081-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Wenguang, Ji Lu, Binbin Song, and Hongping Lian. “Experimentalist Governance in China: The National Innovation System, 2003–2018.” Journal of Chinese Governance 7, no. 1 (2022): 1–26. doi:10.1080/23812346.2021.1934328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Wenxian. “The Theory of Integration of ‘Three-Governances.” Governance Studies 196, no. 6 (2020): 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Chunman, and Jianjun Fu. “Non-Institutional Factors in Shaping Rural Elections and Governance in China: A Pragmatist Perspective.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 26, no. 4 (2021): 631–649. doi:10.1007/s11366-021-09737-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Youlang, and Xufeng Zhu. “Social Ties and Citizen-Initiated Contacts: The Case of China’s Local One-Stop Governments.” Journal of Chinese Governance 7, no. 3 (2022): 418–437. doi:10.1080/23812346.2021.1933809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Chong, and Liao Liao. “The Active Participation in a Community Transformation Project in China: Constructing New Forums for Expert-Citizen Interaction.” Journal of Chinese Governance 7, no. 3 (2022): 372–399. doi:10.1080/23812346.2020.1830569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar