Performance, genetic and ecological insights for the conservation of the endangered large pink, Dianthus superbus L. (Caryophyllaceae) in semi-natural grassland

References

• Aavik, T., R. Holderegger, P. J. Edwards, and R. Billeter. 2013. “Patterns of Contemporary Gene Flow Suggest Low Functional Connectivity of Grasslands in a Fragmented Agricultural Landscape.” Journal of Applied Ecology 50: 395–403. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson-Kottö, I., and A. E. Gairdner. 1931. “Interspecific Crosses in the Genus Dianthus.” Genetica 13: 77–112. doi:10.1007/BF01725040.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, A. 1970. “Sur la présence en Alsace de trois écotypes du Dianthus superbus L.” Bulletin de l’Association Philomathique d’Alsace et de Lorraine 14: 81–87.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, A. 1971. “Contribution à l’étude de la biosystématique du genre Dianthus – Caryophyllaceae.” Comptes-Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, série D 272: 1750–1754.
   Google Scholar
• Broeck, A. V., T. Ceulemans, G. Kathagen, M. Hoffmann, O. Honnay, and J. Mergeay. 2015. “Dispersal Constraints for the Conservation of the Grassland Herb Thymus pulegioides.” Conservation Genetics 16: 765–776. doi:10.1007/s10592-015-0698-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brütting, C., K. Wesche, S. Meyer, and I. Hensen. 2012. “Genetic Diversity of Six Arable Plants in Relation to Their Red List Status.” Biodiversity and Conservation 21: 745–761. doi:10.1007/s10531-011-0212-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, V., and C. Reisch. 2016. “Population Size and Land Use Affect the Genetic Variation and Performance of the Endangered Plant Species Dianthus seguieri ssp. glaber.” Conservation Genetics 17: 425–436. doi:10.1007/s10592-015-0794-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carolin, R. C. 1957. “Cytological and Hybridization Studies in the Genus Dianthus.” New Phytologist 56: 81–97. doi:10.1111/nph.1957.56.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• Ceulemans, T., C. J. Stevens, L. Duchateau, H. Jacquemyn, D. J. Gowing, R. Merckx, H. Wallace, et al. 2014. “Soil Phosphorus Constrains Biodiversity across European Grasslands”. Global Change Biology 20: 3814–3822. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clauzel, C., J. C. Foltête, X. Girardet, and G. Vuidel. 2016. “Graphab 2.0. Manuel d’utilisation.”
   Google Scholar
• De Groot, R. S., R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein, and L. Willemen. 2010. “Challenges in Integrating the Concept of Ecosystem Services and Values in Landscape Planning, Management and Decision Making.” Ecological Complexity 7: 260–272. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, P. 2003. “VEGAN, a Package of R Functions for Community Ecology.” Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 927–930. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. J., and J. Doyle. 1987. “A Rapid DNA Isolation Procedure for Small Quantities of Fresh Leaf Tissue.” Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dray, S., and A. B. Dufour. 2007. “The Ade4 Package: Implementing the Duality Diagram for Ecologists.” Journal of Statistical Software 22: 1–20. doi:10.18637/jss.v022.i04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrich, D. 2006. “AFLPdat: A Collection of R Functions for Convenient Handling of AFLP Data.” Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 603–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Focke, W. O. 1881. Die Pflanzen-Mischlinge: Ein Beitrag zur Biologie der Gewächse [Plant Hybrids: a contribution to Plant Biology], 586. Berlin: Gebruder Borntraeger.
   Google Scholar
• Foltête, J. C., C. Clauzel, and G. Vuidel. 2012. “A Software Tool Dedicated to the Modelling of Landscape Networks.” Environmental Modelling & Software 38: 316–327. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel, A. R., J. Sattler, and C. Reisch. 2017. “Genetic Variation and Performance of the Alpine Plant Species Dianthus callizonus Differ in Two Elevational Zones of the Carpathians.” Alpine Botany 127: 65–74. doi:10.1007/s00035-016-0177-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautier, Y., P. A. Niklaus, and A. Hector. 2009. “Competition for Light Causes Plant Biodiversity Loss after Eutrophication.” Science 324: 636–638. doi:10.1126/science.1169640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henle, K., D. Alard, J. Clitherow, P. Cobb, L. Firbank, T. Kull, D. McCracken, et al. 2008. “Identifying and Managing the Conflicts between Agriculture and Biodiversity Conservation in Europe–A Review”. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 124: 60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooftman, D. A., R. C. Billeter, B. Schmid, and M. Diemer. 2004. “Genetic Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Common Species of Swiss Fen Meadows.” Conservation Biology 18: 1043–1051. doi:10.1111/cbi.2004.18.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jürgens, A., T. Witt, and G. Gottsberger. 2003. “Flower Scent Composition in Dianthus and Saponaria Species (Caryophyllaceae) and Its Relevance for Pollination Biology and Taxonomy.” Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 31: 345–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kati, V., V. Le Corre, S. Michel, L. Jaffrelo, C. Poncet, and C. Délye. 2013. “Isolation and Characterisation of 11 Polymorphic Microsatellite Markers in Papaver rhoeas L. (Corn Poppy), a Major Annual Plant Species from Cultivated Areas.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14: 470–479. doi:10.3390/ijms14010470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, B., H. Culmsee, K. Wesche, and C. Leuschner. 2015. “Historical and Recent Fragmentation of Temperate Floodplain Grasslands: Do Patch Size and Distance Affect the Richness of Characteristic Wet Meadow Plant Species?” Folia Geobotanica 50: 253–266. doi:10.1007/s12224-015-9220-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, J., R. Bommarco, M. Guardiola, R. K. Heikkinen, A. Helm, M. Kuussaari, R. Lindborg, et al. 2010. “Habitat Fragmentation Causes Immediate and Time-Delayed Biodiversity Loss at Different Trophic Levels”. Ecology Letters 13: 597–605. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01457.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamy, T., P. Jarne, F. Laroche, J. P. Pointier, G. Huth, A. Segard, and P. David. 2013. “Variation in Habitat Connectivity Generates Positive Correlations between Species and Genetic Diversity in a Metacommunity.” Molecular Ecology 22: 4445–4456. doi:10.1111/mec.12399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Corre, V., S. Bellanger, J. P. Guillemin, and H. Darmency. 2014. “Genetic Diversity of the Declining Arable Plant Centaurea cyanus: Population Fragmentation within an Agricultural Landscape Is Not Associated with Enhanced Spatial Genetic Structure.”.” Weed Research 54: 436–444. doi:10.1111/wre.12087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leimu, R., P. I. A. Mutikainen, J. Koricheva, and M. Fischer. 2006. “How General are Positive Relationships between Plant Population Size, Fitness and Genetic Variation?” Journal of Ecology 94: 942–952. doi:10.1111/jec.2006.94.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauger, S., L. Couceiro, and M. Valero. 2012. “A Simple and Cost-Effective Method to Synthesize an Internal Size Standard Amenable to Use with A 5-Dye System.” Prime Research on Biotgechnology 2: 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Menchari, Y., C. Délye, and V. Le Corre. 2007. “Genetic Variation and Population Structure in Black-Grass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.), A Successful, Herbicide‐Resistant, Annual Grass Weed of Winter Cereal Fields.” Molecular Ecology 16: 3161–3172. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03539.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peakall, R., and P. E. Smouse. 2012. “GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic Analysis in Excel. Population Genetic Software for Teaching and Research—An Update.” Bioinformatics 28: 2537–2539. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit, C., H. Arnal, and H. Darmency. 2015. “Effects of Fragmentation and Population Size on the Genetic Diversity of Centaurea cyanus (Asteraceae) Populations.” Plant Ecology and Evolution 148: 191–198. doi:10.5091/plecevo.2015.916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putz, C. M., C. Schmid, and C. Reisch. 2015. “Living in Isolation–Population Structure, Reproduction, and Genetic Variation of the Endangered Plant Species Dianthus gratianopolitanus (Cheddar Pink).” Ecology and Evolution 5: 3610–3621. doi:10.1002/ece3.1611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QGIS Development Team. 2017. “QGIS Geographic Information System.” Open Source Geospatial Foundation. http://qgis.osgeo.org
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reisch, C., S. Schmidkonz, K. Meier, Q. Schöpplein, C. Meyer, C. Hums, and C. Schmid. 2017. “Genetic Diversity of Calcareous Grassland Plant Species Depends on Historical Landscape Configuration.” BMC Ecology 17: 19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, Y., and H. H. Wagner. 2016. “Reduced Fine-Scale Spatial Genetic Structure in Grazed Populations of Dianthus carthusianorum.” Heredity 117: 367–374. doi:10.1038/hdy.2016.45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, Y., H. J. Boehmer, and H. H. Wagner. 2014. “Effect of Rotational Shepherding on Demographic and Genetic Connectivity of Calcareous Grassland Plants.” Conservation Biology 28: 467–477. doi:10.1111/cobi.12186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, Y., R. Holderegger, H. J. Boehmer, and H. H. Wagner. 2014. “Directed Dispersal by Rotational Shepherding Supports Landscape Genetic Connectivity in a Calcareous Grassland Plant.” Molecular Ecology 23: 832–842. doi:10.1111/mec.12639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rühl, A. T., R. L. Eckstein, A. Otte, and T. W. Donath. 2015. “Future Challenge for Endangered Arable Weed Species Facing Global Warming: Low Temperature Optima and Narrow Moisture Requirements.” Biological Conservation 182: 262–269. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saura, S., and L. Rubio. 2010. “A Common Currency for the Different Ways in Which Patches and Links Can Contribute to Habitat Availability and Connectivity in the Landscape.” Ecography 33: 523–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönswetter, P., and A. Tribsch. 2005. “Vicariance and Dispersal in the Alpine Perennial Bupleurum stellatum L. (Apiaceae).” Taxon 54: 725–732. doi:10.2307/25065429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilman, D., K. G. Cassman, P. A. Matson, R. Naylor, and S. Polasky. 2002. “Agricultural Sustainability and Intensive Production Practices.” Nature 418: 671. doi:10.1038/nature01014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tison, J. M., and B. de Foucault. 2014. Flora Gallica: Flore de France, 925. Mèze: Biotope.
   Google Scholar
• Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. Van de Lee, M. Hornes, A. Friters, et al. 1995. “AFLP: A New Technique for DNA Fingerprinting”. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 4407–4414. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.21.4407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesche, K., B. Krause, H. Culmsee, and C. Leuschner. 2012. “Fifty Years of Change in Central European Grassland Vegetation: Large Losses in Species Richness and Animal-Pollinated Plants.” Biological Conservation 150: 76–85. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, F. N. 1893. “A Monograph of the Genus Dianthus.” Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Botany 29: 346–478. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.1893.tb02037.x.
   Google Scholar
• Zeller, K. A., K. McGarigal, and A. R. Whiteley. 2012. “Estimating Landscape Resistance to Movement: A Review.” Landscape Ecology 27: 777–797. doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9737-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar