Major field margin vegetation types in France and their relationships with climate, agricultural landscapes and management intensity

References

• Aavik T, Augenstein I, Bailey D, Herzog F, Zobel M, Liira J. 2008. What is the role of local landscape structure in the vegetation composition of field boundaries? Appl Veg Sci. 11(3):375–386. doi: 10.3170/2008-7-18486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aavik T, Liira J. 2009. Agrotolerant and high nature-value species—plant biodiversity indicator groups in agroecosystems. Ecol Indic. 9(5):892–901. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aavik T, Liira J. 2010. Quantifying the effect of organic farming, field boundary type and landscape structure on the vegetation of field boundaries. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 135(3):178–186. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alignier A. 2018. Two decades of change in a field margin vegetation metacommunity as a result of field margin structure and management practice changes. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 251:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alignier A, Baudry J. 2016. Is plant temporal beta diversity of field margins related to changes in management practices? Acta Oecol. 75:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2016.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alignier A, Le Cœur D, Lanoë E, Ferchaud F, Roche B, Thenail C. 2018. Ecobordure: a flora-based indicator to assess vegetation patterns of field margins and infer its local drivers. Design in Brittany (France). Des Brittany (France) Ecol Indic. 85:832–840. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.11.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alignier A, Solé-Senan XO, Robleño I, Baraibar B, Fahrig L, Giralt D, Gross N, Martin J-L, Recasens J, Sirami C, et al. 2020. Configurational crop heterogeneity increases within-field plant diversity. J Appl Ecol. 57(4):654–663. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade C, Villers A, Balent G, Bar-Hen A, Chadoeuf J, Cylly D, Cluzeau D, Fried G, Guillocheau S, Pillon O, et al. 2021. A real-world implementation of a nationwide, long-term monitoring program to assess the impact of agrochemicals and agricultural practices on biodiversity. Ecol Evol. 11(9):3771–3793. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassa M, Boutin C, Chamorro L, Sans FX. 2011. Effects of farming management and landscape heterogeneity on plant species composition of Mediterranean field boundaries. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 141(3–4):455–460. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassa M, Chamorro L, José-María L, Blanco-Moreno JM, Sans FX. 2012. Factors affecting plant species richness in field boundaries in the Mediterranean region. Biodivers Conserv. 21(4):1101–1114. doi: 10.1007/s10531-012-0245-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berquer A, Martin O, Gaba S. 2021. Landscape is the main driver of weed assemblages in field margins but is outperformed by crop competition in field cores. Plants. 10(10):2131. doi: 10.3390/plants10102131.
   Google Scholar
• Blaix C, Moonen AC, Smagghe G. 2020. Structural field margin characteristics affect the functional traits of herbaceous vegetation. PloS One. 15(9):e0238916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondel J, Aronson J. 1999. Biology and wildlife of the Mediterranean region. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnenblust EW, Vaudo AD, Egan JF, Mortensen DA, Tooker JF. 2016. Effects of the herbicide dicamba on nontarget plants and pollinator visitation. Environ Toxicol Chem. 35(1):144–151. doi: 10.1002/etc.3169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boinot S, Alignier A. 2022. On the restoration of hedgerow ground vegetation: local and landscape drivers of plant diversity and weed colonization. J Environ Manage. 307:114530. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boinot S, Alignier A. 2023. Discrepancies between the drivers of alpha and beta plant diversity in arable field margins. Proc R Soc Lond B. 290(1992):20222179. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgeois B, Munoz F, Fried G, Mahaut L, Armengot L, Denelle P, Storkey J, Gaba S, Violle C. 2019. What makes a weed a weed? A large-scale evaluation of arable weeds through a functional lens. Am J Bot. 106(1):90–100. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambecèdes J, Largier G, Lombard A. 2012. Plan national d’actions en faveur des plantes messicoles. Paris: Conservatoire botanique national des Pyrénées et de Midi‐Pyrénées–Fédération des Conservatoires botaniques nationaux–Ministère de l’Écologie, du Développement durable et de l’Énergie.
   Google Scholar
• Chase JM. 2010. Stochastic community assembly causes higher biodiversity in more productive environments. Sci. 328(5984):1388e–1391. doi: 10.1126/science.1187820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudron C, Perronne R, Bonnin P, Rattier T. 2020. An agro-environmental mowing regime favors the number of inflorescences and flower-visiting insects but not ground beetles of herbaceous boundaries of arable fields. Basic Appl Ecol. 48:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2020.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudron C, Perronne R, Bonthoux S, Di Pietro F, Ohlemuller R. 2016. Influence of management practices on plant assemblages of road–field boundaries in an agricultural landscape. Appl Veg Sci. 19(4):644–654. doi: 10.1111/avsc.12244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirujeda A, Pardo G, Marí AI, Aibar J, Pallavicini Y, González-Andújar JL, Recasens J, Solé-Senan XO, Moonen C. 2019. The structural classification of field boundaries in Mediterranean arable cropping systems allows the prediction of weed abundances in the boundary and in the adjacent crop. Weed Res. 59(4):300–311. doi: 10.1111/wre.12366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordeau S, Petit S, Reboud X, Chauvel B. 2012. Sown grass strips harbour high weed diversity but decrease weed richness in adjacent crops. Weed Res. 52(1):88–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2011.00892.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordeau S, Reboud X, Chauvel B. 2011. Farmers’ fears and agro-economic evaluation of sown grass strips in France. Agron Sustain Dev. 31(3):463–473. doi: 10.1007/s13593-011-0004-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis P, Fry GLA. 1992. Field margins: can they enhance natural enemy population densities and general arthropod diversity on farmland? Agric Ecosyst Environ. 40(1):95–115. doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(92)90086-Q.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufrêne M, Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr. 67(3):345–366. doi: 10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0345:SAAIST]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan JF, Bohnenblust E, Goslee S, Mortensen D, Tooker J. 2014. Herbicide drift can affect plant and arthropod communities. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 185:77–87. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.12.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L, Burel FG, Crist TO, Fuller RJ, Sirami C, Siriwardena GM, Martin JL. 2011. Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett. 14(2):101–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01559.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanfarillo E, Kasperski A, Giuliani A, Cicinelli E, Latini M, Abbate G. 2018. Assessing naturalness of arable weed communities: a new index applied to a case study in central Italy. Biol Agric Horti. 34:1–13. doi: 10.1080/01448765.2018.1434832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fick SE, Hijmans RJ. 2017. WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 37(12):4302–4315. doi: 10.1002/joc.5086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried G, Cordeau S, Metay A, Kazakou E. 2019. Relative importance of environmental factors and farming practices in shaping weed communities structure and composition in French vineyards. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 275:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2019.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried G, Le Corre V, Rakotoson T, Buchmann J, Germain T, Gounon R, Royer H, Biju‐Duval L, Felten E, Vieren E, et al. 2022. Impact of new management practices on arable and field margin plant communities in sunflower, with an emphasis on the abundance of ambrosia artemisiifolia (Asteraceae). Weed Res. 62(2):134–148. doi: 10.1111/wre.12522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried G, Norton LR, Reboud X. 2008. Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 128(1–2):68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried G, Petit S, Dessaint F, Reboud X. 2009. Arable weed decline in northern France: crop edges as refugia for weed conservation? Biol Conserv. 142(1):238–243. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried G, Plantureux C, Caillol P, Hénin S, Leroy C, André N. 2022. La flore des bords de champs en région méditerranéenne : diversité floristique et réponse aux pratiques agricoles. Carnets Botaniques. 90:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Fried G, Villers A, Porcher E. 2018. Assessing non-intended effects of farming practices on field margin vegetation with a functional approach. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 261:33–44. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.03.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greaves M, Marshall E. 1987. Field margins: definitions and statistics. Field Marg Monograp. 35:3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Grime JP. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat. 111(982):1169–1194. doi: 10.1086/283244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberg N. 1999. Indicators of resource use and environmental impact for use in a decision aid for Danish livestock farmers. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 76(1):17–30. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00055-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hengl T, Mendes de Jesus J, Heuvelink GBM, Ruiperez Gonzalez M, Kilibarda M, Blagotić A, Shangguan W, Wright MN, Geng X, Bauer-Marschallinger B, et al. 2017. SoilGrids250m: global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PloS One. 12(2):e0169748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill M, Smith A. 1976. Principal component analysis of taxonomic data with multistate discrete characters. Taxon. 25(2–3):249–255. doi: 10.2307/1219449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husson F, Le S, Pages J. 2010. Exploratory multivariate analysis by example using R. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• INPN. 2023. Liste des espèces végétales protégées sur l’ensemble du territoire français métropolitain. https://inpn.mnhn.fr/reglementation/protection/listeEspecesParArrete/731.
   Google Scholar
• Jauzein P. 1995. Flore des champs cultivés. Paris: Editions Quae.
   Google Scholar
• Julve P. 1998. Baseflor. Index botanique, écologique et chorologique de la flore de France. Lille: Institut Catholique de Lille.
   Google Scholar
• Kattge J, Díaz S, Lavorel S, Prentice IC, Leadley P, Bönisch G, Garnier E, Westoby M, Reich PB, Wright IJ, et al. 2011. TRY – a global database of plant traits. Glob Change Biol. 17(9):2905–2935. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijn D, Van Der Voort LAC. 1997. Conservation headlands for rare arable weeds: the effects of fertilizer application and light penetration on plant growth. Biol Conservat. 81(1–2):57–67. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00153-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lande R. 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos. 76(1):5–13. doi: 10.2307/3545743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM. 2000. Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annu Rev Entomol. 45(1):175–201. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Coeur D, Baudry J, Burel F. 1997. Field margins plant assemblages: variation partitioning between local and landscape factors. Landscap Urban Plann. 37(1–2):57–71. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00370-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall EJP. 2002. Introducing field margin ecology in Europe. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 89(1):1–4. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00314-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mkenda PA, Ndakidemi PA, Mbega E, Stevenson PC, Arnold SEJ, Gurr GM, Belmain SR. 2019. Multiple ecosystem services from field margin vegetation for ecological sustainability in agriculture: scientific evidence and knowledge gaps. PeerJ. 7:e8091. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz F, Fried G, Armengot L, Bourgeois B, Bretagnolle V, Chadoeuf J, Mahaut L, Plumejeaud C, Storkey J, Violle C, et al. 2020. Ecological specialization and rarity of arable weeds: insights from a comprehensive survey in France. Plants. 9(7):824. doi: 10.3390/plants9070824.
   Google Scholar
• Office français de la biodiversité. 2021. Carte des régions d’origine—Référentiel technique de la marque Végétal local—Version 2021. www.vegetal-local.fr.
   Google Scholar
• Olson DM, Wäckers FL. 2007. Management of field margins to maximize multiple ecological services. J Appl Ecol. 44(1):13–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01241.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poinas I, Fried G, Henckel L, Meynard C. 2023. Agricultural drivers of field margin plant communities are scale dependent. Basic Appl Ecol. 72:52–63. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2023.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poinas I, Meynard CN, Fried G. 2023. Functional trade-offs: exploring the effects of climate change and agricultural practices as drivers of field margin plant communities . bioRxiv.2023.2003.2003.530956.
   Google Scholar
• Pointereau P, Coulon F, Jiguet F, Doxa A, Paracchini M-L, Terres J-M. 2010. Les systèmes agricoles à haute valeur naturelle en France métropolitaine. Le Courrier de l’environ de l’INRA. 59(59):3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden MW, Menéndez R, Leather SR, Wäckers F. 2015. Optimizing field margins for biocontrol services: the relative role of aphid abundance, annual floral resources, and overwinter habitat in enhancing aphid natural enemies. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 199:94–104. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.08.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Reich PB, Walters M, Ellsworth D. 1992. Leaf life‐span in relation to leaf, plant, and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecol Monogr. 62(3):365–392. doi: 10.2307/2937116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricotta C, Podani J. 2017. On some properties of the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and their ecological meaning. Ecol Complex. 31:201–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2017.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J, Potts SG, Woodcock BA, Eggleton P. 2008. Can arable field margins be managed to enhance their biodiversity, conservation and functional value for soil macrofauna? J Appl Ecol. 45(1):269–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01433.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Society for Ecological Restoration, International Network for Seed Based Restoration, Kew RBG. 2023. Seed Information Database (SID); [ Accessed 2023 February]. https://ser-sid.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Tarmi S, Helenius J, Hyvönen T. 2009. Importance of edaphic, spatial and management factors for plant communities of field boundaries. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 131(3–4):201–206. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tichý L, Axmanová I, Dengler J, Guarino R, Jansen F, Midolo G, Nobis MP, Van Meerbeek K, Aćić S, Attorre F, et al. 2023. Ellenberg‐type indicator values for European vascular plant species. J Veg Sci. 34(1):e13168. doi: 10.1111/jvs.13168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tison JM, de Foucault B. 2014. Flora gallica. Flore de France. Mèze: Biotope.
   Google Scholar
• UICN France, FCBN, AFB, MNHN. 2018. La Liste rouge des espèces menacées en France – Chapitre Flore vasculaire de France métropolitaine. Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Vickery JA, Feber RE, Fuller RJ. 2009. Arable field margins managed for biodiversity conservation: a review of food resource provision for farmland birds. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 133(1–2):1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westoby M. 1998. A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant Soil. 199(2):213–227. doi: 10.1023/A:1004327224729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wietzke A, Albert K, Bergmeier E, Sutcliffe LM, van Waveren CS, Leuschner C. 2020. Flower strips, conservation field margins and fallows promote the arable flora in intensively farmed landscapes: results of a 4-year study. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 304:107142. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zobel M, Scheiner S. 2016. The species pool concept as a framework for studying patterns of plant diversity. J Veg Sci. 27(1):8–18. doi: 10.1111/jvs.12333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zollinger JL, Birrer S, Zbinden N, Korner-Nievergelt F, Sanchez‐Zapata JA. 2013. The optimal age of sown field margins for breeding farmland birds. Ibis (Lond 1859). 155(4):779–791. doi: 10.1111/ibi.12072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar