Arrested Development? The Promises and Paradoxes of “Selling Nature to Save It”

References

• Ahmed, S., 2006. The nonperformativity of antiracism. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism 7:104–26.
   Google Scholar
• Angelson, A. 2013. REDD+ as performance-based aid. WIDER Working Paper No. 2013/135. https://www.wider.unu.edu/publication/redd-performance-based-aid (last accessed 23 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Arsel, M., and B. Büscher. 2012. Naturetm Inc.: Changes and continuities in neoliberal conservation and market-based environmental policy. Development and Change 43 (1): 53–78.
   Google Scholar
• Bayon, R., and M. Jenkins. 2010. The business of biodiversity. Nature 466:184–85.
   Google Scholar
• Beymer-Farris, B., and T. J. Bassett. 2012. The REDD menace: Resurgent protectionism in Tanzania's mangrove forests. Global Environmental Change 22 (2): 332–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J., S. Kapila, F. Hicks, P. Mitchell, and F. Vorhies. 2008. Building biodiversity business. https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/2008-002.pdf (last accessed 23 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Boisvert, V., P. Méral, and G. Froger. 2013. Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: Institutional innovation or renovation? Society & Natural Resources 26 (10): 1122–36.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, W., S. Prudham, and R. Schurman. 2001. Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature. Society and Natural Resources 14 (7): 555–70.
   Google Scholar
• Brockington, D., and R. Duffy. 2010. Capitalism and conservation: The production and reproduction of biodiversity conservation. Antipode 42 (3): 469–84.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2003. Neoliberalism and the end of liberal democracy. Theory and Event 7 (1): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2015. Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism's stealth revolution. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, A. G., R. E. Gullison, and A. Balmford. 2004. Financial costs and shortfalls of managing and expanding protected-area systems in developing countries. BioScience 54 (12): 1119–26.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, B. 2009. Letters of gold: Enabling primitive accumulation through neoliberal conservation. Human Geography 2 (3): 91–93.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., W. Dressler, and R. Fletcher. 2014. Nature Inc.: Environmental conservation in the neoliberal age. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., and R. Fletcher. 2015. Accumulation by conservation. New Political Economy 20 (2): 273–98.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., S. Sullivan, K. Neves, J. Igoe, and D. Brockington. 2012. Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 23 (2): 4–30.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2010. Performative agency. Journal of Cultural Economy 3 (2): 147–61.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2008. Neoliberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environment and Planning A 40:131–52.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, C., and T. A. Benjaminsen. 2014. Virtual nature, violent accumulation: The “spectacular failure” of carbon offsetting at a Ugandan National Park. Geoforum 56:55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Christophers, B. 2014. On the performativity of pill pricing: Theory and reality in the economics of global pharmaceuticalization. Antipode 46 (4): 1054–71.
   Google Scholar
• Conservation Finance Alliance (CFA). 2014. Supporting biodiversity conservation ventures: Assessing the impact investing sector for an investment strategy to support environmental entrepreneurism. http://apsocialfinance.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/arquivo20140521115214.pdf (last accessed 14 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Corbera, E. 2012. Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4 (6): 612–19.
   Google Scholar
• Corbera, E., and K. Brown. 2010. Offsetting benefits? Analyzing access to forest carbon. Environment and Planning A 42 (7): 1739–61.
   Google Scholar
• Corbera, E., N. Kosoy, and N. M. Tuna. 2007. Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: Case studies from Meso-America. Global Environmental Change 17:365–80.
   Google Scholar
• Corbera, E., and H. Schroeder. 2011. Governing and implementing REDD+. Environmental Science & Policy 14:89–99.
   Google Scholar
• Credit Suisse, World Wildlife Fund, and McKinsey & Company. 2014. Conservation finance: Moving beyond donor funding toward an investor-driven approach. https://www.credit-suisse.com/media/cc/docs/responsibility/conservation-finance-en.pdf (last accessed 23 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Dressler, W., B. Büscher, and R. Fletcher. 2014. The limits of Nature™ Inc. and the vital search for alternatives. In Nature Inc: Environmental conservation in the neoliberal age, ed. B. Büscher, W. Dressler, and R. Fletcher, 246–53. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB). 2010. Mainstreaming the economics of nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Malta: Progress Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ecosystem Marketplace. 2013. Innovative markets and market-like instruments for ecosystem services: The matrix 2013. http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/documents/acrobat/the_matrix.pdf (last accessed 23 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 1998. Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, conservation, and the political ecology of social movements. Journal of Political Ecology 5:53–82.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. 2013. How I learned to stop worrying and love the market: Virtualism, disavowal, and public secrecy in neoliberal environmental conservation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31 (5): 796–812.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2014. Taking the chocolate laxitive. In Nature Inc. environmental conservation in the neoliberal age, ed. B. Büscher, W. Dressler, and R. Fletcher, 85–107.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., and J. Breitling. 2012. Market mechanism or subsidy in disguise? Governing payment for environmental services in Costa Rica. Geoforum 43 (3): 402–11.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., W. Dressler, and B. Büscher, B. 2014. Nature Inc.: The new frontiers of environmental conservation. In Nature Inc.: Environmental conservation in the neoliberal age, ed. B. Büscher, W. Dressler, and R. Fletcher, 3–21. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2004a. The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France 1978–1979, ed. M. Senellart. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2004b. Security, territory, population: Lectures at the College de France 1977–1978, ed. M. Senellart. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2014. Behind Marx's hidden abode. New Left Review 86:55–72.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, A., and G. Gonzalez. 2014. Turning over a new leaf: State of the forest carbon markets 2014. Forest Trends' Ecosystem Marketplace.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun, E., and R. Muradian. 2015. In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of market-based instruments in ecosystem services governance. Ecological Economics 117:217–24.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2003. The new imperialism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, G. 2011. Conservation's friends in high places: Neoliberalism, networks, and the transnational conservation elite. Global Environmental Politics 11 (4): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Huwyler, B. F., J. Kaeppeli, K. Serafimova, and E. Swanson. 2014. Making conservation finance investable. http://www.ssireview.org/up_for_debate/article/making_conservation_finance_investable (last accessed 23 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Igoe, J., and D. Brockington. 2007. Neoliberal conservation: A brief introduction. Conservation & Society 5 (4): 432–49.
   Google Scholar
• Igoe, J., K. Neves, and D. Brockington. 2010. A spectacular eco-tour around the historic bloc: Theorising the convergence of biodiversity conservation and capitalist expansion. Antipode 42 (3): 486–512.
   Google Scholar
• International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). 2010. Saving biodiversity: An economic approach. Why invest? How much? Who pays? World Conservation 40 (1): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• James, A., K. Gaston, and A. Balmford. 2001. Can we afford to conserve biodiversity? BioScience 51 (1): 43.
   Google Scholar
• Kosoy, N., M. Martinez-Tuna, R. Muradian, and J. Martinez-Alier. 2007. Payments for environmental services in watersheds: Insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America. Ecological Economics 61:446–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lansing, D. M. 2010. Carbon's calculatory spaces: The emergence of carbon offsets in Costa Rica. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28:710–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lapeyre, R., and R. Pirard. 2013. Payments for environmental services and market-based instruments: Next of kin or false friends? http://www.iddri.org/Publications/Collections/Idees-pour-le-debat/WP1413_RLRP_PESandMBIs.pdf (last accessed 23 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., C. Reczek, and D. Brown. 2013. Assessing funding needs for biodiversity: Critical issues. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 54 (1): 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, K. I. 2010. The devil is in the (bio)diversity: Private sector “engagement” and the restructuring of biodiversity conservation. Antipode 42 (3): 513–50.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, K. I., and C. Corson. 2012. “TEEB begins now”: A virtual moment in the production of natural capital. Development and Change 43 (1): 159–84.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. A., F. Muniesa, and L. Siu. 2007. Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, B., N. Carroll, D. Kandy, and G. Bennett. 2011. Update: State of biodiversity markets. Washington, DC: Forest Trends. http://www. ecosystemmarketplace.com/reports/2011_update_sbdm (last accessed 14 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, K. 1999. Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17 (2): 133–54.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2012a. The contradictory logic of global ecosystem services markets. Development and Change 43 (1): 105–31.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2012b. Nature in the market-world: Ecosystem services and inequality. Development 55 (1): 25–33.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2015. The post- and future politics of green economy and REDD. In The politics of carbon markets, ed. B. Stephan and R. Lane, 237. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, K., and E. N. Shapiro. 2010. Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico: Nature, neoliberalism, social movements, and the state. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (3): 579–99.
   Google Scholar
• Mies, M. 1998. World economy, patriarchy and accumulation. In Women in the third world: An encyclopedia of contemporary issues, ed. N. P. Stromquist, 37–45. New York: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, S., and B. Adams. 2012. Market masquerades: Uncovering the politics of community-level payments for environmental services in Cambodia. Development and Change 43 (1): 133–58.
   Google Scholar
• Muradian, R., M. Arsel, L. Pellegrini, F. Adaman, B. Aguilar, B. Agarwal, E. Corbera, et al. 2013. Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win–win solutions. Conservation Letters 6 (4): 274–79.
   Google Scholar
• Muradian, R., and E. Gómez-Baggethun. 2013. The institutional dimension of “market-based instruments” for governing ecosystem services: Introduction to the special issue. Society & Natural Resources 26 (10): 1113–21.
   Google Scholar
• NatureVest and EKO Asset Management Partners. 2014. Investing in conservation: A landscape assessment of an emerging market. http://www.jpmorganchase.com/corporate/Corporate-Responsibility/document/InvestingInConservation_Report_r2.pdf (last accessed 23 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• O'Donohoe, N., C. Leijonhufvud, and Y. Saltuk. 2010. Impact investments: An emerging asset class.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, C., M. Cranford, N. Oakes, and M. Leggett. 2012. The little biodiversity finance book: A guide to proactive investment in natural capital. http://www.globalcanopy.org/materials/little-biodiversity-finance-book (last accessed 23 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Peters-Stanley, M., G. Gonzalez, and D. Yin. 2013. Covering new ground: State of the forest carbon markets 2013. Washington, DC: Ecosystem Marketplace. http://www.forest-trends.org/fcm2013.php (last accessed 23 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Peters-Stanley, M., K. Hamilton, and D. Yin. 2012. Leveraging the landscape: State of the forest carbon markets 2012. Washington, DC: Ecosystem Marketplace. http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/reports/forestcarbon2012 (last accessed 23 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Pirard, R. 2012. Market-based instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services: A lexicon. Environmental Science & Policy 19–20:59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Pirard, R., and R. Lapeyre. 2014. Classifying market-based instruments for ecosystem services: A guide to the literature jungle. Ecosystem Services 9:106–14.
   Google Scholar
• Rands, M. R. W., W. M. Adams, L. Bennun, S. H. M. Butchart, A. Clements, D. Coomes, A. Entwisle, et al. 2010. Biodiversity conservation: Challenges beyond 2010. Science 328:1298–1303.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. 2012. Measurement and alienation: Making a world of ecosystem services. Transactions 37:386–401.
   Google Scholar
• Rocheleau, D. E. 2015. Networked, rooted and territorial: Green grabbing and resistance in Chiapas. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (3–4): 695–723.
   Google Scholar
• Secretariat to the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2012. State of financing for biodiversity: Draft global monitoring report 2012 on the strategy for resource mobilization under the Convention. https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/cop/cop-11/information/cop-11-inf-16-en.pdf (last accessed 14 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, F., and A. Angelsen. 2012. Summary and conclusions: REDD+ without regrets. In Analyzing REDD+: Challenges and choices, ed. A. Angelson, M. Brockhaus, W. D. Sunderlin and L. V. Verchot, 317–34. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro-Garza, E. 2013. Contesting the market-based nature of Mexico's national payments for ecosystem services programs: Four sites of articulation and hybridization. Geoforum 46:5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 2007. Nature as accumulation strategy. Socialist Register 43:16–36.
   Google Scholar
• Soulé, M. 2014. The “new conservation.” In Keeping the wild: Against the domestication of earth, ed. G. Wuerthner, 66–80. Sausalito, CA: Foundation for Deep Ecology.
   Google Scholar
• Streck, C., and C. Parker. 2012. Financing REDD+. In Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices, ed. A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W. D. Sunderlin, and L.V. Verchot, 111–28. Bogor, Indonesia: Centre for International Forestry Research.
   Google Scholar
• Suarez, D. C., and C. Corson. 2013. Seizing center stage: Ecosystem services, live, at the Convention on Biological Diversity. Human Geography 6 (1): 64–79.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. 2010. “Ecosystem service commodities”—A new imperial ecology? Implications for animist immanent ecologies, with Deleuze and Guattari. New Formations 69 (1): 111–28.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2013. Banking nature? The spectacular financialisation of environmental conservation. Antipode 45 (1): 198–217.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2014. The natural capital myth; or will accounting save the world? Preliminary thoughts on nature, finance and values. Leverhulme Centre for the Study of Value, Working Paper Series No. 3. http://thestudyofvalue.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/WP3-Sullivan-2014-Natural-Capital-Myth.pdf (last accessed 23 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2011. Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy/Portals/88/documents/ger/ger_final_dec_2011/Green%20EconomyReport_Final_Dec2011.pdf (last accessed 23 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Vatn, A. 2014. Markets in environmental governance—From theory to practice. Ecological Economics 105:97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. E. M., N. Dudley, D. B. Segan, and M. Hockings. 2014. The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515 (7525): 67–73.
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Wildlife Fund. 2009. Guide to conservation finance: Sustainable financing for the planet.
   Google Scholar
• Wunder, S. 2005. Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper 42. http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf_files/OccPapers/OP-42.pdf (last accessed 24 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2015. Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 117:234–43.
   Google Scholar