945
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
People, Place, and Region

Land in Motion

&
Pages 932-956 | Received 01 Apr 2015, Accepted 01 Nov 2015, Published online: 06 Apr 2016

References

  • Bakker, K. 2010. The limits of “neoliberal natures”: Debating green neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography 34 (6): 715–35.
  • Baldos, U., and T. Hertel. 2012. Development of a GTAP Version 8 land use data base for years 2004 and 2007. GTAP Research Memorandum 23, Global Trade Analysis Project, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/res_display.asp?RecordID=3967 (last accessed 6 March 2016).
  • Barnes, T. J., and E. Sheppard. 2010. “Nothing includes everything”: Towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography 34 (2): 193–214.
  • Bergmann, L. 2013. Bound by chains of carbon: Ecological-economic geographies of globalization. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (6): 1348–70.
  • Blaikie, P., and H. Brookfield. 1987. Land degradation and society. London: Methuen.
  • Castree, N. 2014. The Anthropocene and Geography I: The back story. Geography Compass 8 (7): 436–49.
  • Cousins, J. J., and J. P. Newell. 2015. A political–industrial ecology of water supply infrastructure for Los Angeles. Geoforum 58:38–50.
  • Crampton, J. W., and S. Elden. 2006. Space, politics, calculation: An introduction. Social & Cultural Geography 7 (5): 681–85.
  • Davis, S. J., and K. Caldeira. 2010. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (12): 5687–92.
  • DeFries, R. S., T. Rudel, M. Uriarte, and M. Hansen. 2010. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nature Geoscience 3 (3): 178–81.
  • Deleuze, G. 1993. The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Erb, K.-H., V. Gaube, F. Krausmann, C. Plutzar, A. Bondeau, and H. Haberl. 2007. A comprehensive global 5 min resolution land-use data set for the year 2000 consistent with national census data. Journal of Land Use Science 2 (3): 191–224.
  • Erb, K.-H., F. Krausmann, W. Lucht, and H. Haberl. 2009. Embodied HANPP: Mapping the spatial disconnect between global biomass production and consumption. Ecological Economics 69 (2): 328–34.
  • Food and Agriculture Organization. 2011. Yearbook of forest products, 2009. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  • ———. 2015. FAOSTAT database. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat3.fao.org (last accessed 21 July 2015).
  • Foucault, M. 2009. Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. New York: Macmillan.
  • Freidberg, S. 2014. Footprint technopolitics. Geoforum 55:178–89.
  • Haberl, H., K.-H. Erb, F. Krausmann, S. Berecz, N. Ludwiczek, J. Martínez-Alier, A. Musel, and A. Schaffartzik. 2009. Using embodied HANPP to analyze teleconnections in the global land system: Conceptual considerations. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography 109 (2): 119–30.
  • Håkansson, N. T., and M. Widgren, eds. 2014. Landesque capital: The historical ecology of enduring landscape modifications. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  • Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–99.
  • Harvey, D. 1996. Justice, nature, and the geography of difference. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • ———. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Henders, S., and M. Ostwald. 2014. Accounting methods for international land-related leakage and distant deforestation drivers. Ecological Economics 99:21–28.
  • Heynen, N., J. McCarthy, S. Prudham, and P. Robbins. 2007. Neoliberal environments: False promises and unnatural consequences. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Hornborg, A. 2003. The unequal exchange of time and space: Toward a non-normative ecological theory of exploitation. Journal of Ecological Anthropology 7 (1): 4–10.
  • Inomata, S., and A. Owen. 2014. Comparative evaluation of MRIO databases. Economic Systems Research 26(3): 239–44.
  • Jarosz, L. 1993. Defining and explaining tropical deforestation: Shifting cultivation and population growth in colonial Madagascar (1896–1940). Economic Geography 69 (4): 366.
  • Jorgenson, A. K. 2006. Unequal ecological exchange and environmental degradation: A theoretical proposition and cross-national study of deforestation, 1990–2000. Rural Sociology 71 (4): 685–712.
  • Kuznets, S. 1941. National income and its composition, 1919–1938. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Lambin, E. F., and P. Meyfroidt. 2011. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (9): 3465–72.
  • Latour, B., P. Jensen, T. Venturini, S. Grauwin, and D. Boullier. 2012. “The whole is always smaller than its parts”—A digital test of Gabriel Tardes' Monads. The British Journal of Sociology 63 (4): 590–615.
  • Law, J. 2004. And if the global were small and noncoherent? Method, complexity, and the Baroque. Environment and Planning D 22 (1): 13–26.
  • Lee, H.-L., T. Hertel, B. Sohngen, and N. Ramankutty. 2005. Towards an integrated land use data base for assessing the potential for greenhouse gas mitigation. GTAP Technical Paper 26, Global Trade Analysis Project, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/2375.pdf (last accessed 6 March 2016).
  • Leibniz, G. W. 2012. Discourse on metaphysics and other writings. Peterborough, ON, Canada: Broadview.
  • Leontief, W. 1951. The structure of American economy, 1919–1939. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • ———. 1986. Input–output economics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Liu, J., V. Hull, M. Batistella, R. DeFries, T. Dietz, F. Fu, T. W. Hertel, et al. 2013. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society 18 (2): 26.
  • Lye, T.-P., W. De Jong, and K.-I. Abe, eds. 2003. The political ecology of tropical forests in Southeast Asia: Historical perspectives. North Victoria, Australia: Trans-Pacific Press.
  • McDonald, S., and K. Thierfelder. 2004. Deriving a global social accounting matrix from GTAP Versions 5 and 6 data. GTAP Technical Paper 22, Global Trade Analysis Project, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/res_display.asp?RecordID=1645 (last accessed 6 March 2016).
  • Meyfroidt, P., E. F. Lambin, K.-H. Erb, and T. W. Hertel. 2013. Globalization of land use: Distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5 (5): 438–44.
  • Miller, R. E., and P. D. Blair. 2009. Input–output analysis: Foundations and extensions. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Moore, J. W. 2011. Transcending the metabolic rift: A theory of crises in the capitalist world-ecology. Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (1): 1–46.
  • ———. 2015. Capitalism in the web of life: Ecology and the accumulation of capital. London: Verso.
  • Moran, D. D., M. C. Wackernagel, J. A. Kitzes, B. W. Heumann, D. Phan, and S. H. Goldfinger. 2009. Trading spaces: Calculating embodied ecological footprints in international trade using a product land use matrix (PLUM). Ecological Economics 68 (7): 1938–51.
  • Munroe, D. K., K. McSweeney, J. L. Olson, and B. Mansfield. 2014. Using economic geography to reinvigorate land-change science. Geoforum 52:12–21.
  • Narayanan, B., A. Aguiar, and R. McDougall, eds. 2012. Global trade, assistance, and production: The GTAP 8 data base. West Lafayette, IN: Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University. https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/databases/v8/v8_doco.asp (last accessed 6 March 2016).
  • National Research Council. 2010. Understanding the changing planet: Strategic directions for the geographical sciences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Newell, J. P., and J. J. Cousins. 2015. The boundaries of urban metabolism: Towards a political-industrial ecology. Human Geography 39 (6): 702–28.
  • Newell, J. P., and R. O. Vos. 2011. “Papering” over space and place: Product carbon footprint modeling in the global paper industry. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (4): 730–41.
  • Proctor, J. D. 2009. Environment after nature: Time for a new vision. In Envisioning nature, science, and religion, ed. J. D. Proctor, 293–311. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Press.
  • Rakotoarisoa, M., M. Iafrate, and M. Paschali. 2011. Why has Africa become a net food importer. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
  • Ramankutty, N. 2011. Global cropland and pasture data from 1700–2007. http://nelson.wisc.edu/sage/data-and-models/historic-croplands/index.php (last accessed 6 March 2016).
  • Ramankutty, N., and J. A. Foley. 1999. Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 13 (4): 997–1027.
  • Robbins, P. 2011. Political ecology: A critical introduction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Rocheleau, D., B. Thomas-Slayter, and E. Wangari, eds. 1996. Feminist political ecology: Global issues and local experience. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Rodrigues, J., T. Domingos, and A. P. S. Marques. 2011. Carbon responsibility and embodied emissions: Theory and measurement. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Schaffartzik, A., H. Haberl, T. Kastner, D. Wiedenhofer, N. Eisenmenger, and K.-H. Erb. 2015. Trading land: A review of approaches to accounting for upstream land requirements of traded products. Journal of Industrial Ecology 19 (5): 703–14.
  • Schneider, M., and P. McMichael. 2010. Deepening, and repairing, the metabolic rift. Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (3): 461–84.
  • Seto, K. C., A. Reenberg, C. G. Boone, M. Fragkias, D. Haase, T. Langanke, P. Marcotullio, D. K. Munroe, B. Olah, and D. Simon. 2012. Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (20): 7687–92.
  • Sheppard, E. 2011. Geographical political economy. Journal of Economic Geography 11 (2): 319–31.
  • Sheppard, E. S., and T. J. Barnes. 1990. The capitalist space economy: Geographical analysis after Ricardo, Marx, and Sraffa. London: Unwin Hyman.
  • Smith, N. 1984. Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Tarde, G. 2012. Monadology and sociology, trans. T. Lorenc. Melbourne, Australia: re.press.
  • Taylor, P. J., and F. H. Buttel. 1992. How do we know we have global environmental problems? Geoforum 23 (3): 405–16.
  • Turner, B. L., and P. Robbins. 2008. Land-change science and political ecology: Similarities, differences, and implications for sustainability science. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33 (1): 295–316.
  • Verburg, P. H., K.-H. Erb, O. Mertz, and G. Espindola. 2013. Land system science: Between global challenges and local realities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5 (5): 433–37.
  • Weinzettel, J., E. G. Hertwich, G. P. Peters, K. Steen-Olsen, and A. Galli. 2013. Affluence drives the global displacement of land use. Global Environmental Change 23 (2): 433–38.
  • Wiedmann, T. 2009. A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecological Economics 69 (2): 211–22.
  • Wildlife Conservation Society and Center for International Earth Science Information Network. 2005. Last of the Wild Project, Version 2, 2005 (LWP-2): Global human footprint dataset (geographic). NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). http://dx.doi.org/10.7927/H4M61H5F (last accessed 6 March 2016).
  • Wilting, H. C., and K. Vringer. 2009. Carbon and land use accounting from a producer's and a consumer's perspective—An empirical examination covering the world. Economic Systems Research 21 (3): 291–310.
  • Yu, Y., K. Feng, and K. Hubacek. 2013. Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Global Environmental Change 23 (5): 1178–86.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.