Doing Public Participation on the Geospatial Web

References

• Arnstein, S. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35:216–24.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. 2003. Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, J. 2014. The strategic importance of information policy for the contemporary neoliberal state: The case of Open Government Data in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly 31 (3): 388–95.
   Google Scholar
• Beaudreau, P., P. Johnson, and R. Sieber. 2012. Strategic choices in developing a geospatial Web 2.0 application for rural economic development. Journal of Rural and Community Development 7:95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brandusescu, A., R. E. Sieber, and S. Jochems. 2015. Confronting the hype: The use of crisis mapping for community development. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1354856515584320
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, S. S. 2012. Burning questions: Examining the role of the Geoweb in understanding the human impacts of the Okanagan Mountain Park Fire. Master's thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, S.S., and J. M. Corbett. 2013. A hot topic: The role of the Geoweb after wildfire. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 79 (10): 955–64.
   Google Scholar
• Britten, N., R. Campbell, C. Pope, J. Donovan, M. Morgan, and R. Pill. 2002. Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: A worked example. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 7 (4): 209–15.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., and M. Kyttä. 2014. Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography 46:122–36.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., and D. Weber. 2013. Using public participation GIS (PPGIS) on the Geoweb to monitor tourism development preferences. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 21 (2): 192–211.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2015. Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism's stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. 2008. Blogs, Wikipedia, second life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Budhathoki, N. R., Z. Nedovic-Budic, and B. Bruce. 2010. An interdisciplinary frame for understanding volunteered geographic information. Geomatica: The Journal of Geospatial Information Science, Technology and Practice 64 (1): 11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, C., and N. Pidgeon. 2011. From flood defence “to flood risk management”: Exploring governance, responsibility, and blame. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29 (3): 533–47.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. 2009. Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S: Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 5 (1): 9–41.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. 2006. Participatory mapping and geographic information systems: Whose map? Who is empowered and who disempowered? Who gains and who loses? Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 25 (2): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, D., Y. Georgiandou, and J. Labont. 2009. Volunteered geographic information: The nature and motivation of produsers. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 4:332–58.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, D. M. 1988. A new ladder of citizen participation. National Civic Review 77 (3): 249–57.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. 2014. A Faustian dilemma: Identifying the challenges and opportunities of designing and implementing Geoweb projects within academic institutions. Paper presented at Spatial Knowledge and Information–Canada (SKI–Canada) 2014, Banff, AB, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. 2008. Unpacking “participation”: Models, meanings and practice. Community Development Journal 43 (3): 269–83.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, K. R. 1998. Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics. Political Geography 17 (1): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. W., M. Graham, A. Poorthuis, T. Shelton, M. Stephens, M. W. Wilson, and M. Zook. 2013. Beyond the geotag: Situating “big data” and leveraging the potential of the Geoweb. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 40 (2): 130–39.
   Google Scholar
• Devillers, R., A. Stein, Y. Bédard, N. Chrisman, P. Fisher, and W. Shi. 2010. Thirty years of research on spatial data quality: Achievements, failures, and opportunities. Transactions in GIS 14 (4): 387–400.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., and E. Hargittai. 2001. From the “digital divide” to “digital inequality”: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Working Paper 15, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, C. 2007. Participatory GIS: A people's GIS? Progress in Human Geography 31 (5): 617–38.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. 2006a. Beyond cooptation or resistance: Urban spatial politics, community organizations, and GIS-based spatial narratives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96:323–41.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2006b. Critical issues in participatory GIS: Deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions. Transactions in GIS 10 (5): 693–708.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2008. Volunteered geographic information: Future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal 72 (3–4): 173–83.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2010. Geographic information science: Emerging research on the societal implications of the geospatial web. Progress in Human Geography 34:349–57.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2014. New spatial technologies, new social practices: A critical theory of the Geoweb. Mitteilungen der Fränkischen Geographischen Gesellschaft Band 60:1–6. http://fgg-erlangen.de/fgg/ojs/index.php/mfgg/article/viewFile/335/304 (last accessed 18 December 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., and R. Ghose. 2004. PPGIS in community development planning: Framing the organizational context. Cartographica 38 (3): 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., M. Goodchild, and D. Sui. 2012. Researching volunteered geographic information: Spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (3): 571–90.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., and A. Leszczynski. 2013. New spatial media, new knowledge politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38 (4): 544–59.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. 2000. Is face-to-face citizen deliberation a luxury or a necessity? Political Communication 17:357–61.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. 2007. Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69:211–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, E. 2013. Beyond participation: Designing for the civic Web. Journal of Digital and Media Literacy 1 (1). http://www.jodml.org/2013/02/01/design-for-civic-web/ (last accessed 12 June 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Gurstein, M. 2000. Community informatics: Enabling communities with information and communications technologies. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. 2010. How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey data sets. Environment and Planning B 37 (4): 682–703.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2013. Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation. In Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice, ed. D. Sui, S. Elwood, and M. Goodchild, 105–22. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2015. AAG 2015 notes: Day 2. Public participation GIS symposium. https://povesham.wordpress.com/2015/04/23/aag-2015-notes-day-2-public-participation-gis-symposium/ (last accessed 18 December 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Han, S. 2010. Theorizing new media: Reflexivity, knowledge, and the Web 2.0. Sociological Inquiry 80 (2): 200–13.
   Google Scholar
• Haneef, N. 2013. Empirical research consolidation: A generic overview and a classification scheme for methods. Quality and Quantity 47 (1): 383–410.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, T., and D. Weiner. 1998. Empowerment, marginalization, and “community-integrated” GIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 25 (2): 67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. A., J. Corbett, C. Gore, P. Robinson, P. Allen, and R. E. Sieber. 2015. A web of expectations: Evolving relationships in community participatory Geoweb projects. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 14 (3): 791–826.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. A., and R. E. Sieber. 2012a. Increasing access to and use of geospatial data by municipal government and citizens: The process of “geomatization” in rural Québec. URISA Journal 25:53–60.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2012b. Motivations driving government adoption of the Geoweb. GeoJournal 77 (5): 667–80.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2012c. Situating the adoption of VGI by government. In Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice, ed. D. Sui, S. Elwood, and M. Goodchild, 65–81. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kavanaugh, A. L., E. A. Fox, S. D. Sheetz, S. Yang, L. T. Li, D. J. Shoemaker, A. Natsev, and L. Xie. 2012. Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical. Government Information Quarterly 29 (4): 480–91.
   Google Scholar
• Keen, A. 2007. The cult of the amateur: How today's Internet is killing our culture. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, R., and J. Farley. 2007. Infrastructure for the geospatial Web. In The geospatial Web: How geobrowsers, social software and the Web 2.0 are shaping the network society, ed. A. Scharl, and K. Tochtermann, 15–26. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A. 2006. “No personal motive?” Volunteers, biodiversity, and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics, Place & Environment: A Journal of Philosophy & Geography 9 (3): 279–98.
   Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. 2012. Situating the Geoweb in political economy. Progress in Human Geography 36:72–89.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2014. On the neo in neogeography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 104 (1): 60–79.
   Google Scholar
• Lukyanenko, R., J. Parsons, and Y. Wiersma. 2011. Citizen science 2.0: Data management principles to harness the power of the crowd. Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6629:465–73.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2014. The IQ of the crowd: Understanding and improving information quality in structured user-generated content. Information Systems Research 25 (4): 669–89.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, M. 2015. What does PGIS have to learn from VGI/Crowd Sourcing, so that we survive and prosper? Paper presented at the Association of American Geographers annual meeting, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• McConchie, A., and B. Klinkenberg. 2010. Social implications of the participatory Geoweb. Paper presented at the Association of American Geographers annual meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. 2013. The meme hustler. The Baffler 22:66–72, 125. http://thebaffler.com/articles/the-meme-hustler (last accessed 12 June 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J., E. O'Brien, B. Ambrose-Oji, A. Lawrence, C. Carter, and A. Peace. 2011. Access for all? Barriers to accessing woodlands and forests in Britain. Local Environment 16 (4): 375–96.
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, T. 2011. Government as platform. Innovations 6 (1): 13–40.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, J., R. Lukyanenko, and Y. Wiersma. 2011. Easier citizen science is better. Nature 471:37.
   Google Scholar
• Pretty, J. 1995. Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development 23 (8): 1247–63.
   Google Scholar
• Raddick, M. J., G. Bracey, P. L. Gay, C. J. Lintott, P. Murray, K. Schawinski, A. S. Szalay, and J. Vandenberg. 2010. Galaxy zoo: Exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Astronomy Education Review 9:1.
   Google Scholar
• Rambaldi, G. 2005. Who owns the map legend? URISA Journal 17 (1): 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ratto, M., and M. Boler, eds. 2014. DIY citizenship: Critical making and social media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rinner, C., and M. Bird. 2009. Evaluating community engagement through argumentation maps—A public participation GIS case study. Environment and Planning B 36 (4): 588–601.
   Google Scholar
• Rinner, C., J. Kumari, and S. Mavedati. 2011. A geospatial web application to map observations and opinions in environmental planning. In Advances in WebGIS, mapping services and applications, ed. S. Li, S. Dragicevic, and B. Veenendaal, 277–91. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. J., and M. Dereuyter. 2016. Bigger nets and faster stamps: The potential vs. the reality of social media deployment in municipal land use planning activities. In Planning Canada: A case study approach, ed. R. Thomas. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha, E. M. 1997. A ladder of empowerment. Journal of Planning Education and Research 17 (1): 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Roche, S., E. Propeck-Zimmermann, and B. Mericskay. 2013. GeoWeb and crisis management: Issues and perspectives of volunteered geographic information. Geojournal 78 (1): 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, H. E., M. J. O. Pocock, C. D. Preston, D. B. Roy, J. Savage, J. C. Tweddle, and L. D. Robinson. 2012. Understanding citizen science & environmental monitoring: Final report on behalf of UK-EOF. NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology and Natural History Museum. https://www.ceh.ac.uk/sites/default/files/citizensciencereview.pdf (last accessed 18 December 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Sidlar, C., and C. Rinner. 2009. Utility assessment of a map-based online geo-collaboration tool. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (6): 2020–26.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, R. E. 2006. Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96 (3): 491–507.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, R. E., and M. Haklay. 2015. The epistemology(s) of volunteered geographic information: A critique. Geo: Geography and Environment 2 (2): 122–36.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, R., A. Lussier, P. Quinn, and P. Johnson. 2012. Community activism, watershed management, and the geospatial Web 2.0. Paper presented at the Association of American Geographers annual meeting, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, M. 2013. Gender and the Geoweb: Divisions in the production of user-generated cartographic information. GeoJournal 78 (6): 981–96.
   Google Scholar
• Sui, D. Z. 2008. The wikification of GIS and its consequences: Or Angelina Jolie's new tattoo and the future of GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 32 (1): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, B. L., C. L. Wood, M. J. Iliff, R. E. Bonney, D. Fink, and S. Kelling. 2009. eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biological Conservation 14 (2): 2282–92.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, J. 2013 Avoiding the ghetto through hope and fear: An analysis of immanent technology using ideal types. GeoJournal 78 (6): 967–80.
   Google Scholar
• Time Magazine's Person of the Year is … You. 2006. NBC News.com. http://www.nbcnews.com/id/16242528/ns/us_news-life/t/time-magazines-person-year-you/ (last accessed 24 May 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. 2013. Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Tudge, P. 2010. Cultivating change: Using the Geoweb to map the food system in the North Okanagan. Master's thesis, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, BC.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2011. “Let the young ones do it”: How digital divides influence the use of the Geoweb by farmers and food advocates in rural Canada. In Proceedings of Spatial Knowledge and Information Canada, ed. R. E. Sieber, 21–22. Baniff, Canada: Spatial Knowledge and Information Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Tudge, P., and R. Sieber. 2010. Connecting rural and remote communities through the GeoWeb. Workshop report, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Tudge, P., R. Sieber, Y. Wiersma, J. Corbett, S. Chung, P. Allen, and P. Robinson. 2012. Collaborating towards innovation: Lessons from the participatory GeoWeb GEOIDE Network. In The added value of scientific networking, ed. N. Chrisman, and M. Wachowicz, 103–18. Quebec City, PQ: GEOIDE Network.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. 2014. Social movements and governments in the digital age: Evaluating a complex landscape. Journal of International Affairs 68 (1): 1–XVI.
   Google Scholar
• Tulloch, D. 2003. What PPGIS really needs is. … In Proceedings of the Second Annual Public Participation GIS Conference, 208–14. Park Ridge, IL: URISA.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. 2011. Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Philadelphia: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A. 2006. Introduction to neogeography. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B. B., and C. Rinner. 2013. A qualitative framework for evaluating participation on the Geoweb. URISA Journal 25 (2): 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Warf, B., and D. Sui. 2010. From GIS to neogeography: Ontological implications and theories of truth. Annals of GIS 16 (4): 197–209.
   Google Scholar