1,521
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Exploring Segregation and Sharing in Belfast: A PGIS Approach

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 223-241 | Received 01 Dec 2017, Accepted 01 Apr 2018, Published online: 13 Nov 2018

References

  • Augé, M. 2008. Non-places: An introduction to supermodernity. London: Verso.
  • Ballatore, A. 2012. Prolegomena for an ontology of place. In Advancing geographic information science: The past and next twenty years, ed. H. Onsrud and W. Kuhn, 91–103. Needham, MA: GSDI Association Press.
  • Belfast Interface Project. 2017. Interface barriers, peacelines and defensive architecture. Accessed October 12, 2017. https://www.belfastinterfaceproject.org/sites/default/files/publications/Interfaces%20PDF.pdf.
  • Boal, F. W. 1971. Territoriality and class: A study of two residential areas in Belfast. Irish Geography 6 (3):229–48.
  • Boal, F. W. 1978. Territoriality on the Shankill-Falls divide, Belfast: The perspective from 1976. An Invitation to Geography 6 (3):58–77.
  • Boal, F. W. 1996. Integration and division: Sharing and segregating in Belfast. Planning Practice & Research 11 (2):151–58.
  • Brown, G. 2017. A review of sampling effects and response bias in Internet participatory mapping (PPGIS/PGIS/VGI). Transactions in GIS 21 (1):39–56.
  • Brown, G. G., and D. V. Pullar. 2012. An evaluation of the use of points versus polygons in public participation geographic information systems using quasi-experimental design and Monte Carlo simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 26 (2):231–46.
  • Bryan, D., and C. Stevenson. 2009. Flagging peace: Struggles over symbolic landscape in the new Northern Ireland. In Culture and belonging in divided societies, ed. M. H. Ross, 68–84. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Buchanan, I. 1999. Non-places: Space in the age of supermodernity. Social Semiotics 9 (3):393–98.
  • Clementini, E., and P. Di Felice. 1996. An algebraic model for spatial objects with indeterminate boundaries. In Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries, ed. P. A. Burrough and A. U. Frank, 155–69. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Cohn, M. J., and S. P. Jackman. 2011. A comparison of aspatial and spatial measures of segregation. Transactions in GIS 15 (Suppl. 1):47–66.
  • de Certeau, M. 1984. The practice of everyday life. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Dixon, J., C. Tredoux, K. Durrheim, G. Finchilescu, and B. Clack. 2008. The inner citadels of the color line: Mapping the micro‐ecology of racial segregation in everyday life spaces. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2 (4):1547–69.
  • Duckham, M. 2009. Keynote paper: Representation of the natural environment. In Representing, modeling, and visualizing the natural environment, ed N. Mount, G. Harvey, P. Aplin, and G. Priestnall, 11–20. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
  • Evans, A. J., and T. Waters. 2007. Mapping vernacular geography: Web-based GIS tools for capturing “fuzzy” or “vague” entities. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management 7 (2):134–50.
  • Executive Office. 2013. Together: Building a united community strategy. Accessed September 1, 2017. https://www.executiveoffice-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/ofmdfm_dev/together-building-a-united-community-strategy.pdf.
  • Farber, S., A. Páez, and C. Morency. 2012. Activity spaces and the measurement of clustering and exposure: A case study of linguistic groups in Montreal. Environment and Planning A 44 (2):315–32.
  • Farley, P., and M. S. Roberts. 2012. Edgelands: Journeys into England’s true wilderness. London: Random House.
  • Fisher, P. 2000. Sorites paradox and vague geographies. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 113 (1):7–18.
  • Goldblatt, R., and I. Omer. 2016. Perceived “neighbourhood” and tolerance relations: The case of Arabs and Jews in Jaffa, Israel. Local Environment 21 (5):555–72.
  • Goodchild, M. F. 2011. Formalizing place in geographic information systems. In Communities, neighborhoods, and health, ed. L. Burton, S. Matthews, M. Leung, S. Kemp, and D. Takeuchi, 21–33. New York: Springer.
  • Grannis, R. 1998. The importance of trivial streets: Residential streets and residential segregation. American Journal of Sociology 103 (6):1530–64.
  • Grannis, R. 2005. T‐communities: Pedestrian street networks and residential segregation in Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York. City and Community 4 (3):295–321.
  • Hadzilacos, T. 1996. On layer-based systems for undetermined boundaries. In Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries, ed. P. A. Burrough and A. U. Frank, 141–52. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Hamilton, J., U. Hansson, J. Bell, and S. Toucas. 2008. Segregated lives, social division, sectarianism and everyday life in Northern Ireland. Belfast, Northern Ireland: Institute for Conflict Research.
  • Hasanzadeh, K., A. Broberg, and M. Kyttä. 2017. Where is my neighborhood? A dynamic individual-based definition of home ranges and implementation of multiple evaluation criteria. Applied Geography 84:1–10.
  • Hasanzadeh, K., T. Laatikainen, and M. Kyttä. 2018. A place-based model of local activity spaces: Individual place exposure and characteristics. Journal of Geographical Systems 20 (3):227–52.
  • Hobel, H., P. Fogliaroni, and A. U. Frank. 2016. Deriving the geographic footprint of cognitive regions. In Geospatial data in a changing world, ed. T. Sarjakoski, M. Santos, and L. Sarjakoski, 67–84. New York: Springer International.
  • Hollenstein, L., and R. Purves. 2010. Exploring place through user-generated content: Using Flickr tags to describe city cores. Journal of Spatial Information Science 2010 (1):21–48.
  • Huck, J. J., J. D. Whyatt, and P. Coulton. 2014. Spraycan: A PPGIS for capturing imprecise notions of place. Applied Geography 55:229–37.
  • Kaminska, O., A. McCutcheon, and J. Billiet. 2010. Satisficing among reluctant respondents in a cross-national context. Public Opinion Quarterly 74:956–84.
  • Kraak, M. J. 2011. Is there a need for neo-cartography? Cartography and Geographic Information Science 38 (2):73–78.
  • Krosnick, J. A. 1991. Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology 5:213–36.
  • Kwan, M. P. 2009. From place-based to people-based exposure measures. Social Science & Medicine 69 (9):1311–13.
  • Leonard, M. 2007. Trapped in space? Children’s accounts of risky environments. Children & Society 21 (6):432–45.
  • Leonard, M., and M. McKnight. 2015. Traditions and transitions: Teenagers’ perceptions of parading in Belfast. Children’s Geographies 13 (4):398–412.
  • MacGinty, R., O. T. Muldoon, and N. Ferguson. 2007. No war, no peace: Northern Ireland after the agreement. Political Psychology 28 (1):1–11.
  • Mackaness, W. A., and O. Chaudhry. 2013. Assessing the veracity of methods for extracting place semantics from Flickr tags. Transactions in GIS 17 (4):544–62.
  • Maslow, A. H. 1966. The psychology of science: A reconnaissance. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Massey, D. S., and N. A. Denton. 1988. The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces 67 (2):281–315.
  • Massey, D. S., and N. A. Denton. 1993. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Massey, D. S., and M. J. Fischer. 2000. How segregation concentrates poverty. Ethnic and Racial Studies 23 (4):670–91.
  • Merrilees, C. E., L. K. Taylor, R. Baird, M. C. Goeke-Morey, P. Shirlow, and E. M. Cummings. 2018. Neighborhood effects of intergroup contact on change in youth intergroup bias. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 47 (1):77–87.
  • Mitchell, A., and L. Kelly. 2010. Walking with de Certeau in North Belfast: Agency and resistance in a conflicted city, divided cities/contested states. Working Paper 17. Cambridge, UK: Conflict in Cities. Accessed August 20, 2018. http://www.conflictincities.org/workingpapers.html
  • Montello, D. R., M. F. Goodchild, J. Gottsegen, and P. Fohl. 2003. Where's downtown? Behavioral methods for determining referents of vague spatial queries. Spatial Cognition & Computation 3 (2–3): 185–204.
  • Murtagh, B. 2010. Personal interview with Audra Mitchell. Queen's University of Belfast, 9 February. In Walking with de Certeau in North Belfast: Agency and resistance in a conflicted city, divided cities/contested states. Working Paper 17. Cambridge, UK: Conflict in Cities.
  • Northern Ireland Department of Education. 2017. Integrated schools. Accessed August 12, 2017. https://www.education-ni.gov.uk/articles/integrated-schools.
  • Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency. 2017. Northern Ireland small areas. Accessed July 5, 2017. https://www.nisra.gov.uk/support/geography/northern-ireland-small-areas.
  • Openshaw, S. 1984. The modifiable areal unit problem. Geo Abstracts, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
  • Perkins, C. 2017. Hybrid clubs? Playing with golf mapping. In Theory on Demand 21: Playful mapping in the Digital Age, ed. C. Wilmott, C. Perkins, S. Lammes, S. Hind, A. Gekker, E. Fraser, and D. Evans, 56–77. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
  • Peuquet, D. J. 2002. Representations of space and time. New York: Guilford.
  • Radford, K. 2017. Extra-mural activities and trauma tourism: Public and community sector re-imaging of street art in Belfast. In Visiting murals, heritage, politics and identity, ed. J. Skinner and L. Jolliffe, 254–70. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Raanan, M. G., and N. Shoval. 2014. Mental maps compared to actual spatial behavior using GPS data: A new method for investigating segregation in cities. Cities 36:28–40.
  • Roulston, S., U. Hansson, S. Cook, and P. McKenzie. 2017. If you are not one of them you feel out of place: Understanding divisions in a Northern Irish town. Children's Geographies 15 (4):452–65.
  • Roulston, S., and O. Young. 2013. GPS tracking of some Northern Ireland students—Patterns of shared and separated space: Divided we stand? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 22 (3):241–58.
  • Schneider, M. 1996. Modelling spatial objects with undetermined boundaries using the Realm/ROSE approach. In Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries, ed. P. A. Burrough and A. U. Frank, 141–52. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Shirlow, P. 2003. “Who fears to speak?” Fear, mobility, and ethno-sectarianism in the two “Ardoynes.” The Global Review of Ethnopolitics 3 (1):76–91.
  • Silván‐Cárdenas, J. L., L. Wang, and F. B. Zhan. 2009. Representing geographical objects with scale‐induced indeterminate boundaries: A neural network‐based data model. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 23 (3):295–318.
  • Tangestani, M. H., and F. Moore. 2002. The use of Dempster–Shafer model and GIS in integration of geoscientific data for porphyry copper potential mapping, north of Shahr-e-Babak, Iran. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 4 (1):65–74.
  • Usery, L. 1996. A conceptual framework and fuzzy set implementation for geographic features. In Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries, ed. P. A. Burrough and A. U. Frank, 71–85. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Varzi, A. C. 2001. Vagueness in geography. Philosophy & Geography 4 (1):49–65.
  • Wong, D. W. 2003. Implementing spatial segregation measures in GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 27 (1):53–70.
  • Wong, D. W., and S. L. Shaw. 2011. Measuring segregation: An activity space approach. Journal of Geographical Systems 13 (2):127–45.
  • Wood, D. 2011. Everything sings. Places Journal (October). Accessed August 29, 2018. https://doi.org/10.22269/111013.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.