726
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Precarious Participation: Assessing Inequality and Risk in the Carbon Credit Commodity Chain

Pages 187-201 | Received 01 Mar 2017, Accepted 01 May 2018, Published online: 20 Dec 2018

References

  • Bacon, C. 2005. Confronting the coffee crisis: Can fair trade, organic, and specialty coffees reduce small-scale farmer vulnerability in northern Nicaragua? World Development 33 (3):497–511.
  • Bakker, K. 2005. Neoliberalizing nature? Market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (3):542–65.
  • Benítez, P. C., I. McCallum, M. Obersteiner, and Y. Yamagata. 2007. Global potential for carbon sequestration: Geographical distribution, country risk and policy implications. Ecological Economics 60 (3):572–83.
  • Beymer-Farris, B. A., and T. J. Bassett. 2012. The REDD menace: Resurgent protectionism in Tanzania’s mangrove forests. Global Environmental Change 22 (2):332–41.
  • Brown, K., and E. Corbera. 2003. Exploring equity and sustainability in the new carbon economy. Climate Policy 3 (Suppl. 1):S41–S56.
  • Bumpus, A. G., and D. M. Liverman. 2011. Carbon colonialism? Offsets, greenhouse gas reductions, and sustainable development. In Global political ecology, ed. R. Peet, P. Robbins, and M. Watts, 203–24. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Coe, N. M., M. Hess, H. Wai-Chung Yeung, P. Dicken, and J. Henderson. 2004. Globalizing regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29 (4):468–84.
  • Collier, G. A., and E. L. Quaratiello. 1999. Basta!: Land and the Zapatista rebellion in Chiapas. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.
  • Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social (CONEVAL). 2014. Porcentaje, numero de personas y carencias promedio por indicador de pobreaza: Chiapas 2014 [Percent, number of people and average scarcity levels for various poverty indicators: Chiapas 2014]. Mexico City, Mexico: Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social.
  • Cooperativa AMBIO Sociedad Civil de Responsabilidad Limitada [SC de RL]. 2012. Annual report reporting period: March 2011 to March 2012: The Scolel’te Programme. San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico: Cooperativa AMBIO.
  • Cooperativa AMBIO Sociedad Civil de Responsabilidad Limitada [SC de RL]. 2014. Annual report reporting period: March 2013 to March 2014: The Scolel’te Programme. San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico: Cooperativa AMBIO.
  • Eakin, H., C. Tucker, and E. Castellanos. 2006. Responding to the coffee crisis: A pilot study of farmers’ adaptations in Mexico, Guatemala and Honduras. The Geographical Journal 172 (2):156–71.
  • Esquivel Bazán, E., and S. Quechulpa Montalvo. 2008. Scolel’te report 2008. San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico: Cooperativa AMBIO.
  • ———. 2010. Scolel’te programme plan vivo annual report 2009. San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico: Cooperativa AMBIO.
  • Fox, J., and L. Haight. 2010. Subsidios para la desigualdad: Las políticas públicas del maíz en México a partir del libre comercio [Subsidies for inequality: The public politics of corn in Mexico since the beginning of free trade]. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
  • Frank, J. 2004. Coffee and state authority in Colombia. Counterpunch, January 6. Accessed March 12, 2017. http://www.counterpunch.org/2004/01/06/coffee-and-state-authority-in-colombia/.
  • Franz, M., and M. Hassler. 2010. The value of commodity biographies: Integrating tribal farmers in India into a global organic agro-food network. Area 42 (1):25–34.
  • Gereffi, G. 1994. The organization of buyer-driven global commodity chains: How U.S. retailers shape overseas production networks. In Commodity chains and global capitalism, ed. G. Gereffi and M. Korzeniewicz, 95–122. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • ———. 1995. Global production systems and third world development. In Global change, regional response: The new international context of development, ed. B. Stallings, 100–142. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gereffi, G., J. Humphrey, and T. Sturgeon. 2005. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy 12 (1):78–104.
  • Gereffi, G., and M. Korzeniewicz. 1994. Commodity chains and global capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Gereffi, G., and X. Luo. 2015. Risks and opportunities of participation in global value chains. Journal of Banking and Financial Economics 2 (4):51–63.
  • Gibbon, P. 2001. Upgrading primary production: A commodity chain approach. World Development 29 (2):345–63.
  • The Gold Standard 2018. What we do | The Gold Standard. Accessed February 20, 2018. https://www.goldstandard.org/our-work/what-we-do.
  • Goldstein, A., and F. Ruef. 2016. View from the understory: State of forest carbon finance 2016. Washington, DC: Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace.
  • Hamrick, K., and A. Goldstein. 2016. Raising ambition: State of the voluntary carbon markets 2016. Washington, DC: Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace.
  • Hawkins, S., M. Nowlin, D. Ribeiro, R. Stoa, R. Longest, and J. Salzman. 2010. Contracting for forest carbon: Elements of a forest carbon purchase agreement. Washington, DC: Forest Trends and the Katoomba Group.
  • Henderson, J., P. Dicken, M. Hess, N. Coe, and H. W. C. Yeung. 2002. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy 9 (3):436–46.
  • Hopkins, T. K., and I. Wallerstein. 1977. Patterns of development of the modern world-system. Review 1 (2):111–45.
  • Humphrey, J., and H. Schmitz. 2000. Governance and upgrading: Linking industrial cluster and global value chain research. IDS Working Paper 120, Institute of Development Studies, East Sussex, UK.
  • ———. 2001. Governance in global value chains. IDS Bulletin 32 (3):19–29.
  • ———. 2002. How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies 36 (9):1017–27.
  • Hurteau, M. D., B. A. Hungate, and G. W. Koch. 2009. Accounting for risk in valuing forest carbon offsets. Carbon Balance and Management 4:1.
  • Kelly, E. C., and M. B. Schmitz. 2016. Forest offsets and the California compliance market: Bringing an abstract ecosystem good to market. Geoforum 75 (October):99–109.
  • Knox-Hayes, J. 2010. Constructing carbon market spacetime: Climate change and the onset of neo-modernity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (4):953–62.
  • Kossoy, A., and P. Ambrosi. 2010. State and trends of the carbon market 2010. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  • Lessard, D. 2013. Uncertainty and risk in global supply chain. In Global value chains in a changing world, ed. D. K. Elms and P. Low, 195–220. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
  • Mansfield, B. 2004. Rules of privatization: Contradictions in neoliberal regulation of North Pacific fisheries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (3):565–84.
  • McAfee, K., and E. N. Shapiro. 2010. Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico: Nature, neoliberalism, social movements and the state. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (3):579–99.
  • Osborne, T. 2013. Fixing carbon, losing ground: Payments for environmental services and land (in)security in Mexico. Human Geography 6 (1):119–33.
  • Otto, J. 2014. Pursuing climate change mitigation and poverty alleviation through market-based forest carbon schemes in Chiapas, Mexico. PhD dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Kentucky.
  • ———. 2016. Participation constrained: Generating buy-in and rationalizing carbon forestry labor through participatory mapping in southern Mexico. Geoforum 76 (November):28–37.
  • Peters-Stanley, M., K. Hamilton, T. Marcello, and M. Sjardin. 2011. Back to the future: State of the voluntary carbon markets 2011. Washington, DC: Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace and Bloomberg New Energy Finance.
  • Peters-Stanley, M., and D. Yin. 2013. Maneuvering the mosaic: State of the voluntary carbon markets 2013. Washington, DC: Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace and Bloomberg New Energy Finance.
  • Plan Vivo Foundation 2018. Why support Plan Vivo projects? Accessed February 20, 2018. http://www.planvivo.org/plan-vivo-certificates/.
  • Ponte, S., and T. Sturgeon. 2014. Explaining governance in global value chains: A modular theory-building effort. Review of International Political Economy 21 (1):195–223.
  • Quechulpa Montalvo, S., E. Esquivel Bazán, and S. Fournier. 2011. Plan Vivo annual report 2010. San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico: Cooperativa AMBIO.
  • Raikes, P., M. F. Jensen, and S. Ponte. 2000. Global commodity chain analysis and the French filière approach: Comparison and critique. Economy and Society 29 (3):390–417.
  • Rocheleau, D. E. 2015. Networked, rooted and territorial: Green grabbing and resistance in Chiapas. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (3–4):695–723.
  • Valatin, G. 2011. Forests and carbon: Valuation, discounting and risk management. Edinburgh, UK: Forestry Commission.
  • Vargas Guillén, A., C. Tapia Velázquez, J. M. Trujillo Sánchez, J. C. de La Cruz Osorio, L. A. Mendoza Velázquez, M. A. Hernández Vázquez, S. Fournier, M. D. Ramírez, and S. Quechulpa Montalvo. 2011. Fortalecimiento y expansión de proyectos de captura de carbono forestal en comunidades cafetaleras de la Sierra Madre [Strengthening and expanding carbon forestry projects in coffee producing communities in the Sierra Madre of Chiapas]. San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico: Cooperativa AMBIO.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.