A Manifesto for a Progressive Land-Grant Mission in an Authoritarian Populist Era

References

• Akram-Lodhi, A. H., and C. Kay, eds. 2009. Peasants and globalization: Political economy, rural transformation and the agrarian question. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Antoniou, M. N., and C. J. Robinson. 2017. Cornell Alliance for Science evaluation of consensus on genetically modified food safety: Weaknesses in study design. Frontiers in Public Health 5:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arizona State University, New American University. 2015. Charter and goals. Accessed December 5, 2018. https://newamericanuniversity.asu.edu/about/asu-charter-mission-and-goals
   Google Scholar
• Barcus, H. R., and D. Trudeau. 2018. Introduction to focus section: Out in the world: Geography’s complex relationship with civic engagement. The Professional Geographer 70 (2):270–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, D. 2004. The scholarship of engagement: A taxonomy of five emerging practices. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 9 (2):123–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bomford, M. 2017. Yale’s land grant history. Paper presented at the AAG Annual Meeting, Boston, April 5.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnen, J. T. 1998. The land-grant idea and the evolving outreach university. In University-community collaborations for the twenty-first century, ed. R. M. Lerner and L. A. K. Simon, 25–70. New York: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. 1990. Scholarship reconsidered: The priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, H. E. 2018. The argument is wrong and the message is dangerous. British Journal of Sociology 69 (2):498–505.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. B. 2014. Climate science, populism, and the democracy of rejection. In Culture, politics and climate change: How information shapes our common future, ed. D. A. Crow and M. T. Boykoff, 129–45. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brubacher, J., and W. Rudy. 1997. Higher education in transition: A history of American colleges and universities. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 2017. Why populism? Theory and Society 46 (5):357–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, L. 2017. Knowledge for sale: The neoliberal takeover of higher education. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2017. Reflections on Trump. Accessed January 3, 2018. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/1032-reflections-on-trump.
   Google Scholar
• Buttel, F. H., and L. Busch. 1988. The public agricultural research system at the crossroads. Agricultural History 62 (2):303–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. R. 1995. Reclaiming a lost heritage: Land-grant and other higher education initiatives for the twenty-first century. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. 1999. Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies 47 (1):2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carravallah, L. A., L. A. Reynolds, and S. J. Woolford. 2017. Lessons for physicians from Flint’s water crisis. AMA Journal of Ethics 19 (10):1001–10.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, P. 2018. Self-interests, corporatization and rising educational inequality in public higher education: A review of the great mistake. The British Journal of Sociology 69 (2):493–98.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, W. W. 1979. The development of American agriculture: A historical analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, K. J. 2016. The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crehan, K. 2016. Gramsci’s common sense: Inequality and its narratives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, M. M., and W. B. Dabars. 2015. Designing the new American university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curry, J., and M. Kenney. 1990. Land-grant university–industry relationships in biotechnology: A comparison with the non-land-grant research universities. Rural Sociology 55 (1):44–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., T. Weis, A. Baviskar, S. M. Borras, Jr., E. Holt-Giménez, D. Kandiyoti, and W. Wolford. 2014. Introduction: Critical perspectives on food sovereignty. Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6):911–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J., A. Haugerud, and S. Parikh. 2017. The 2016 Brexit referendum and Trump election. American Ethnologist 44 (2):195–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formisano, R. P. 2008. For the people: American populist movements from the revolution to the 1850s. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, T. 2011. Expertise needs transparency not blind trust: A deliberative approach to integrating science and social participation. Critical Policy Studies 5 (3):317–22.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, H., and P. McMichael. 1989. Agriculture and the state system: The rise and decline of national agricultures, 1870 to the present. Sociologia Ruralis 29 (2):93–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galt, R. E., D. Parr, J. Van Soelen Kim, J. Beckett, M. Lickter, and H. Ballard. 2013. Transformative food systems education in a land-grant college of agriculture: The importance of learner-centered inquiries. Agriculture and Human Values 30 (1):129–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauchat, G. 2012. Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974–2010. American Sociological Review 77 (2):167–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelber, S. 2013. The populist vision for land-grant universities, 1880–1900. In The land-Grant colleges and the reshaping of American higher education, ed. R. L. Geiger and N. M. Sorber, 165–94. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glenna, L. L. 2017. The purpose-driven university: The role of university research in the era of science commercialization. Agriculture and Human Values 34 (4):1021–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J. E., and J. Yates. 2017. Introduction: Rending land investible. Geoforum 82:209–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodnough, A., M. Davey, and M. Smith. 2016. Fouled water and failed politics. The New York Times, January 24.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks. Moscow: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Guidotti, T. L. 2017. Between distrust of science and scientism. Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health 72 (5):247–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusterson, H. 2017. From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the rise of nationalist populism. American Ethnologist 44 (2):209–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1980. Popular-democratic vs. authoritarian populism: Two ways of “taking democracy seriously.” In Marxism and Democracy, ed. A. Hunt, 157–85. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1985. Authoritarian populism: A reply to Jessop et al. New Left Review 151:115–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorson, G. A. 2016. The role of a 1994 land grant college. Rangelands 38 (1):14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna-Attisha, M., J. LaChance, R. C. Sadler, and A. Champney Schnepp. 2016. Elevated blood levels in children associated with the Flint drinking water crisis: A spatial analysis of risk and public health response. American Journal of Public Health 106 (2):283–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, S. R., L. D. Patton, and O. S. Wooden. 2009. Access and equity for African American students in higher education: A critical race historical analysis of policy efforts. Journal of Higher Education 80 (4):389–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heynen, N., D. Aiello, C. Keegan, and N. Luke. 2018. The enduring struggle for social justice and the city. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (2):301–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hightower, J. 1972. Hard tomatoes, hard time: Failure of the land grant college complex. Society 10 (1):10–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isenberg, N. 2016. White trash: The 400-year untold history of class in America. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., K. Bonnett, S. Bromley, and T. Ling. 1984. Authoritarian populism, two nations, and Thatcherism. New Left Review I 147:32–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kellog Commission. 1999. Returning to our roots: The engaged institution. Third report of the Kellog Commission. Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.
   Google Scholar
• Kenney-Lazar, M., and K. Kay. 2017. Value in capitalist natures. Capitalism Nature Socialism 28 (1):33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, R. 2012. Neoliberalism and the production of environmental knowledge. Environment and Society: Advances in Research 3 (1):19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, R. 2015. The future of environmental expertise. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (2):244–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M. S. 1977. Agrarian political behavior in the United States. American Journal of Political Science 21 (3):543–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichter, D. T., and J. P. Ziliak. 2017. The rural–urban interface: New patterns of spatial interdependence and inequality in America. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 672 (1):6–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, E. A., and K. Stolarick. 2014. The gift that keeps on giving: Land-grant universities and regional prosperity. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32 (3):384–404.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, G. R. 2003. Engaged universities: Lessons from the land-grant universities and extension. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 585 (1):31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Michigan State University. 2017. MSU and Flint: Partnering for a healthier future. Accessed December 30, 2017. https://mispartanimpact.msu.edu/regional-stories-data/flint.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. 2011. Science mart: Privatizing American science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monnat, S. M., and D. L. Brown. 2017. More than a rural revolt: Landscapes of despair and the 2016 presidential election. Journal of Rural Studies 55:227–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council; Board on Agriculture; Committee on the Future of the Colleges of Agriculture in the Land Grant University System. 1997. Colleges of agriculture at the land grant universities: Public service and public policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94:1610–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newfield, C. 2016. The great mistake: How we wrecked public universities and how we can fix them. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. L., and T. M. Shapiro. 1997. Black wealth/white wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, T. 2017. Public political ecology: A community of praxis for earth stewardship. Journal of Political Ecology 24 (1):843–60.
   Google Scholar
• Paprocki, K. 2018. All that is solid melts into the bay: Anticipatory ruination and climate change adaptation. Antipode. doi:10.1111/anti.1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, S. J. 2006. Every farmer should be awakened: Liberty Hyde Bailey’s vision of agricultural extension work. Agricultural History 80 (2):190–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, S. J., T. R. Alter, and N. Schwartzbach. 2008. Unsettling a settled discourse: Faculty views of the meaning and significance of the land-grant mission. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 12 (2):33–65.
   Google Scholar
• Public Political Ecology Lab. 2015. Home page. Accessed July 30, 2018. http://ppel.arizona.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Putsche, L., L. Hormel, J. Mihelich, and D. Storrs. 2017. “You end up feeling like the rest of the world is kind of picking on you”: Perceptions of regulatory science’s threats to economic livelihoods and Idahoans’ collective identity. Science Communication 39 (6):687–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranganathan, M. 2016. Thinking with Flint: Racial liberalism and the roots of an American water tragedy. Capitalism Nature Socialism 27 (3):17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Reston, L. 2015. Donald Trump isn’t the first Know Nothing to capture American hearts. The New Republic, July 30.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. C., and A. R. Highsmith. 2016. Rethinking Tiebouth: The contribution of political fragmentation and racial/economic segregation to the Flint water crisis. Environmental Justice 9 (5):143–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiff, J. 2009. When Yale was a farming school. Yale Alumni Magazine 72:4. Accessed December 5, 2018. https://yalealumnimagazine.com/articles/2405-when-yale-was-a-farming-school
   Google Scholar
• Schnurr, M. A. 2015. GMO 2.0: Genetically modified crops and the push for Africa’s green revolution. Canadian Food Studies/La Revue Canadienne Des Études Sur L'alimentation 2 (2):201–8.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., M. Edelman, S. M. Borras, Jr., R. Hall, W. Wolford, and B. White. 2018. Emancipatory rural politics: Confronting authoritarian populism. Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (1):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, G. 2005. The politics of method in the human science: Positivism and its epistemological others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trudeau, D., L. Smith, and H. R. Barcus. 2018. Coda: Making geography relevant. The Professional Geographer 70 (2):333–37.https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2017.1366790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich-Schad, J. D., and C. M. Duncan. 2018. People and places left behind: Work, culture and politics in the rural United States. Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (1):59–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, T. T., and H. Williamson, Jr. 1988. Teaching, research, and extension programs at historically black (1890) land-grant institutions. Agricultural History 62 (2):244–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar