Speaking Power to “Post-Truth”: Critical Political Ecology and the New Authoritarianism

References

• Anthias, P. 2018. Limits to decolonization: Indigeneity, territory, and hydrocarbon politics in the Bolivian Chaco. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batterbury, S. P. J. 2016. Ecología política: Relevancia, activismo y posibilidades de cambio [Political ecology: Relevance, activism and possibilities for change]. Ecología Política 50:45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Benjaminsen, T. A., J. B. Aune, and D. Sidibé. 2010. A critical political ecology of cotton and soil fertility in Mali. Geoforum 41 (4):647–56. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant matter: The political life of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. A. [1975] 1997. A realist theory of science. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, P., and H. Brookfield. 1987. Land degradation and society. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blaser, M. 2013. Notes towards a political ontology of “environmental” conflicts. In Contested ecologies: Dialogues in the South on nature and knowledge, ed. L. Green, 13–27. Cape Town, South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brannstrom, C., and J. M. Vadjunec. 2013. Notes for avoiding a missed opportunity in sustainability science: Integrating land change science and political ecology. In Land change science, political ecology, and sustainability synergies and divergences, ed. C. Brannstrom and M. Vadjunec, 1–23. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., and P. Le Billon. 2017. Oil. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, R. L., ed. 2015. The international handbook of political ecology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, B. J., and N. Heynen. 2014. Transforming participatory science into socioecological praxis: Valuing marginalized environmental knowledges in the face of the neoliberalization of nature and science. Environment and Society 5 (1):7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Burman, A. 2017. The political ontology of climate change: Moral meteorology, climate justice, and the coloniality of reality in the Bolivian Andes. Journal of Political Ecology 24 (1):921–38. doi: 10.2458/v24i1.20974.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, B. C., and J. R. Veteto. 2015. Free seeds and food sovereignty: Anthropology and grassroots agrobiodiversity conservation strategies in the U.S. South. Journal of Political Ecology 22 (1):445–65.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N., and B. Braun. 2001. Social nature theory, practice, and politics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N., P. A. Chatterton, and N. Heynen, eds. 2010. The point is to change it: Geographies of hope and survival in an age of crisis. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, C., and T. A. Benjaminsen. 2017. Political ecology, variegated green economies, and the foreclosure of alternative sustainabilities. Journal of Political Ecology 24 (1):200–216. doi: 10.2458/v24i1.20800.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, W. C., T. P. Tomich, M. Van Noordwijk, D. Guston, D. Catacutan, N. M. Dickson, and E. McNie. 2016. Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (17):4615–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900231108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collingridge, D., and C. Reeve. 1986. Science speaks to power: The role of experts in policy making. New York: St. Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• D’Alisa, G., A. R. Germani, P. M. Falcone, and P. Morone. 2017. Political ecology of health in the land of fires: A hotspot of environmental crimes in the south of Italy. Journal of Political Ecology 24:59–86. doi: 10.2458/v24i1.20782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Cadena, M. 2010. Indigenous cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual reflections beyond politics. Cultural Anthropology 25 (2):334–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01061.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vrieze, J. 2017. “Science wars” veteran has a new mission. Science 358 (6360):159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, L., R. Lave, B. Mansfield, S. Wylie, N. Shapiro, A. S. Chan, and M. Murphy. 2019. Situating data in a Trumpian era: The environmental data and governance initiative. Annals of the American Association of Geographers. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1511410
   Google Scholar
• ENTITLE Fellows. 2016. Political ecology for civil society. Accessed January 15, 2016. http://www.politicalecology.eu/documents/events/94-entitle-manual-may-2016/file.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 1995. Imagining a post-development era. In Power of development, ed. J. Crush, 211–27. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2016. Thinking-feeling with the earth: Territorial struggles and the ontological dimension of the epistemologies of the South. AIBR, Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana 11 (1):11–32. doi: 10.11156/aibr.110102e.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhead, J., and M. Leach. 1996. Misreading the African landscape: Society and ecology in a forest–savanna mosaic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. 2017. Connection with nature is an oxymoron: A political ecology of nature-deficit disorder. The Journal of Environmental Education 48 (4):226–33. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2016.1139534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, T. J. 2003. Critical political ecology: The politics of environmental science. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, M. J., P. Nadasdy, and M. D. Turner, eds. 2011. Knowing nature: Conversations at the intersection of political ecology and science studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, ed. and trans. Q. Hoare and G. N. Smith New York: International.
   Google Scholar
• Guha, R. 1997. Dominance without hegemony: History and power in colonial India. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guthman, J., and B. Mansfield. 2013. The implications of environmental epigenetics: A new direction for geographic inquiry on health, space, and nature–society relations. Progress in Human Geography 37 (4):486–504. doi: 10.1177/0309132512463258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt, W., and L. L. Nelson, eds. 2015. Practicing feminist political ecologies: Moving beyond the “green economy.” London: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 2008. Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawthorne, C., and B. Meché. 2016. Making room for black feminist praxis in geography. Society and Space. Accessed January 15, 2017. http://societyandspace.org/2016/09/30/making-room-for-black-feminist-praxis-in-geography/.
   Google Scholar
• Hudgins, A., and A. Poole. 2014. Framing fracking: Private property, common resources, and regimes of governance. Journal of Political Ecology 21 (1):303–19. doi: 10.2458/v21i1.21138.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. 2010. Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge. Global Environmental Change 20 (4):558–64. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igoe, J., S. Sullivan, and D. Brockington. 2010. Problematizing neoliberal biodiversity conservation: Displaced and disobedient knowledge. Current Conservation 3 (3):4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2006. Just evidence: The limits of science in the legal process. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34 (2):328–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, B. 2010. Political ecologies of health. Progress in Human Geography 34 (1):38–55. doi: 10.1177/0309132509338642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosek, J. 2006. Understories: The political life of forests in northern New Mexico. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, J. 2017. Post-truth anthropology. Anthropology Today 33 (3):3–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier, J., I. Anguelovski, P. Bond, D. Del Bene, and F. Demaria. 2014. Between activism and science: Grassroots concepts for sustainability coined by environmental justice organizations. Journal of Political Ecology 21 (1):20–60.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier, J., L. Temper, D. Del Bene, and A. Scheidel. 2016. Is there a global environmental justice movement? The Journal of Peasant Studies 43 (3):731–55. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1141198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. 2002. First world political ecology: Lessons from the wise use movement. Environment and Planning A 34 (7):1281–1302. doi: 10.1068/a3526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meek, D., and T. Lloro-Bidart. 2017. Introduction: Synthesizing a political ecology of education. The Journal of Environmental Education 48 (4):213–25. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2017.1340054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, E., and F. Thompsett. 2017. Decolonizing study: Free universities in more-than-humanist accompliceships with Indigenous movements. The Journal of Environmental Education 48 (4):234–47. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2017.1336975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. 2011. The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2007. The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, A. 2017. Kill all normies: Online culture wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the alt-right. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Neimark, B. D., and S. Vermeylen. 2017. A human right to science?: Precarious labor and basic rights in science and bioprospecting. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (1):167–82. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1218749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. 2006. The nature of gender: Work, gender, and environment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24 (2):165–85. doi: 10.1068/d01k.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2017. Power and politics in climate change adaptation efforts: Struggles over authority and recognition in the context of political instability. Geoforum 84:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojha, H. R., N. S. Paudel, and B. K. Dipak. 2013. Can policy learning be catalyzed? Ban Chautari experiment in Nepal’s forestry sector. Journal of Forest and Livelihood 10 (1):1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, T. 2017. Public political ecology: A community of praxis for earth stewardship. Journal of Political Ecology 24 (1):843–60. doi: 10.2458/v24i1.20970.
   Google Scholar
• Peet, R., and M. Watts. 1996. Liberation ecologies: Environment, development, social movements. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peluso, N. L., and M. Watts, eds. 2001. Violent environments. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perreault, T., G. Bridge, and J. McCarthy, eds. 2015. The Routledge handbook of political ecology. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. 1971. The open society and its enemies. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, P. 2011. Political ecology: A critical introduction. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2015. The trickster science. In The Routledge handbook of political ecology, ed. T. Perreault, G. Bridge, and J. McCarthy, 89–101. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. M. 2006. The nature that capital can see: Science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24 (3):367–87. doi: 10.1068/d3304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocheleau, D. E. 2008. Political ecology in the key of policy: From chains of explanation to webs of relation. Geoforum 39 (2):716–27. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocheleau, D., B. Thomas-Slayter, and E. Wangari. 1996. Gender and environment: A feminist political ecology perspective. In Feminist political ecology: Global issues and local experiences, ed. D. Rocheleau, B. Thomas-Slayter, and E. Wangari, 3–26. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, K. A. 2017. Decolonizing political ecology: Ontology, technology and “critical” enchantment. Journal of Political Ecology 24 (1):125–43. doi: 10.2458/v24i1.20789.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., M. Edelman, S. M. Borras, Jr., R. Hall, W. Wolford, and B. White. 2017. Emancipatory rural politics: Confronting authoritarian populism. The Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (1):1–20. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2017.1339693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stott, P., and S. Sullivan. 2000. Political ecology: Science, myth and power. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. 2017. What’s ontology got to do with it? On nature and knowledge in a political ecology of “the green economy.” Journal of Political Ecology 24 (1):217–42. doi: 10.2458/v24i1.20802.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, J. 2010. Diabolic caminos in the desert and cat fights on the Río: A posthumanist political ecology of boundary enforcement in the United States–Mexico. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (2):318–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2014. Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies 21 (1):33–47. doi: 10.1177/1474474013486067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theriault, N. 2017. A forest of dreams: Ontological multiplicity and the fantasies of environmental government in the Philippines. Political Geography 58 (58):114–27.
   Google Scholar
• Valdivia, G. 2009. Indigenous bodies, indigenous minds? Towards an understanding of indigeneity in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Gender, Place & Culture 16 (5):535–51. doi: 10.1080/09663690903148416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Sant, L., and K. Bosworth. 2017. Intervention—Race, rurality, and radical geography in the U.S. Antipode Online. Accessed September 1, 2017. https://wp.me/p16RPC-1Da.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, M. 1983. Silent violence. Berkeley: University of California Press. doi: 10.1086/ahr/90.2.470-a.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. 2010. This land is ours now: Social mobilization and the meanings of land in Brazil. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar