643
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Space of Compromise: Border Control and the Limited Inclusion of Burmese Migrants in China

&
Pages 847-863 | Received 26 Apr 2018, Accepted 13 Jun 2019, Published online: 16 Sep 2019

References

  • Agnew, J. 2005. Sovereignty regimes: Territoriality and state authority in contemporary world politics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (2):437–61. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00468.x.
  • Agnew, J. 2008. Borders on the mind: Re-framing border thinking. Ethics & Global Politics 1 (4):175–91.
  • Anderson, J., and L. O’Dowd. 1999. Borders, border regions and territoriality: Contradictory meanings, changing significance. Regional Studies 33 (7):593–604. doi:10.1080/00343409950078648.
  • Appadurai, A. 2002. Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Public Culture 14 (1):21–47. doi:10.1215/08992363-14-1-21.
  • Aung Myoe, M. 2011. In the name of Pauk-Phaw: Myanmar’s China policy since 1948. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  • Baird, I. G., and C. Li. 2017. Variegated borderlands governance in Dehong Dai-Jingpo Autonomous prefecture along the China–Myanmar border. Geoforum 85:214–24. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.07.026.
  • Barabantseva, E. 2015. When borders lie within: Ethnic marriages and illegality on the Sino-Vietnamese border. International Political Sociology 9 (4):352–68. doi:10.1111/ips.12102.
  • Benjamin, M. 1990. Splitting the difference: Compromise and integrity in ethics and politics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
  • Borjas, G. J. 2017. The labor supply of undocumented immigrants. Labour Economics 46:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2017.02.004.
  • Boyce, G. A. 2016. The rugged border: Surveillance, policing and the dynamic materiality of the U.S./Mexico frontier. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (2):245–62. doi:10.1177/0263775815611423.
  • Brown, W. 2010. Walled states, waning sovereignty. Brooklyn, NY: Zone.
  • Burawoy, M. 2003. For a sociological Marxism: The complementary convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi. Politics & Society 31 (2):193–261. doi:10.1177/0032329203252270.
  • Burridge, A., N. Gill, A. Kocher, and L. Martin. 2017. Polymorphic borders. Territory, Politics, Governance 5 (3):239–51. doi:10.1080/21622671.2017.1297253.
  • Casas-Cortes, M., S. Cobarrubias, and J. Pickles. 2015. Riding routes and itinerant borders: Autonomy of migration and border externalization. Antipode 47 (4):894–914. doi:10.1111/anti.12148.
  • Chang, W.-C. 2014. Beyond borders: Stories of Yunnanese Chinese migrants of Burma. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Chavez, L. R. 2012. Shadowed lives: Undocumented immigrants in American society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Coleman, M. 2005. U.S. statecraft and the U.S.–Mexico border as security/economy nexus. Political Geography 24 (2):185–209. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.09.016.
  • Coleman, M., and A. Stuesse. 2016. The disappearing state and the quasi-event of immigration control. Antipode 48 (3):524–43. doi:10.1111/anti.12209.
  • Collins, F. L. 2009. Transnationalism unbound: Detailing new subjects, registers and spatialities of cross-border lives. Geography Compass 3 (1):434–58. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00187.x.
  • Davies, T., A. Isakjee, and S. Dhesi. 2017. Violent inaction: The necropolitical experience of refugees in Europe. Antipode 49 (5):1263–84. doi:10.1111/anti.12325.
  • De Genova, N. P. 2002. Migrant “illegality” and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology 31 (1):419–47. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085432.
  • Dehong—The new land of border opening. 2017. China Pictorial August 3. Accessed January 1, 2019. http://www.rmhb.com.cn/zt/ydyl/201708/t20170803_800101681.html
  • Doevenspeck, M. 2011. Constructing the border from below: Narratives from the Congolese–Rwandan state boundary. Political Geography 30 (3):129–42. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.03.003.
  • Hall, S. 1987. Gramsci and us. Marxism Today June:16–21.
  • Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
  • Ho, E. L. E. 2017. Mobilising affinity ties: Kachin internal displacement and the geographies of humanitarianism at the China–Myanmar border. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42 (1):84–97. doi:10.1111/tran.12148.
  • Homosombat, W., A. K. Ng, and X. Fu. 2016. Regional transformation and port cluster competition: The case of the Pearl River Delta in South China. Growth and Change 47 (3):349–62. doi:10.1111/grow.12128.
  • Hu, Z., and V. Konrad. 2018. In the space between exception and integration: The Kokang borderlands on the periphery of China and Myanmar. Geopolitics 23 (1):147–79. doi:10.1080/14650045.2017.1306777.
  • Jessop, B. 2016. Territory, politics, governance and multispatial metagovernance. Territory, Politics, Governance 4 (1):8–32. doi:10.1080/21622671.2015.1123173.
  • Jones, R. 2012. Spaces of refusal: Rethinking sovereign power and resistance at the border. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (3):685–99. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.600193.
  • Jones, R., and C. Johnson. 2016. Border militarisation and the re-articulation of sovereignty. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41 (2):187–200. doi:10.1111/tran.12115.
  • Marglin, S. A., and J. B. Schor. 1990. The golden age of capitalism: Reinterpreting the postwar experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Massey, D. S., K. A. Pren, and J. Durand. 2016. Why border enforcement backfired. American Journal of Sociology 121 (5):1557–1600. doi:10.1086/684200.
  • Mayblin, L. 2019. Imagining asylum, governing asylum seekers: Complexity reduction and policy making in the UK Home Office. Migration Studies 7 (1):1–20. doi:10.1093/migration/mnx060.
  • Mezzadra, S., and B. Neilson. 2013. Border as method, or, the multiplication of labor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Mountz, A. 2010. Seeking asylum: Human smuggling and bureaucracy at the border. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Mountz, A., and N. Hiemstra. 2014. Chaos and crisis: Dissecting the spatiotemporal logics of contemporary migrations and state practices. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 104 (2):382–90. doi:10.1080/00045608.2013.857547.
  • Nathan, A. 2003. Authoritarian resilience: China’s changing of the guard. Journal of Democracy 14 (1):6–17. doi:10.1353/jod.2003.0019.
  • Ngai, M. M. 2014. Impossible subjects: Illegal aliens and the making of modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • One-stop service for foreigners in Ruili center for migration service. 2017. Yunnan Daily. Accessed May 26, 2017. http://dehong.yunnan.cn/html/2017-05/26/content_4836704.htm.
  • Ong, A. 2006. Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Perry, E. J. 2007. Studying Chinese politics: Farewell to revolution? The China Journal 57:1–23. doi:10.1086/tcj.57.20066239.
  • Ruili Police Department. 2017. Crackdown campaigns in Ruili. Accessed April 25, 2018. http://www.ga.yn.gov.cn/jwxw/difangjingwu/dehongjingxun/201708/t20170825_602503.html.
  • Sack, R. D. 1986. Human territoriality: The theory and history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/94.1.103.
  • Sassen, S. 1990. The mobility of labor and capital: A study in international investment and labor flow. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Slack, J., D. E. Martinez, A. E. Lee, and S. Whiteford. 2016. The geography of border militarization: Violence, death and health in Mexico and the United States. Journal of Latin American Geography 15 (1):7–32. doi:10.1353/lag.2016.0009.
  • Sturgeon, J. C. 2010. Governing minorities and development in Xishuangbanna, China: Akha and Dai rubber farmers as entrepreneurs. Geoforum 41 (2):318–28. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.10.010.
  • Swyngedouw, E. 1997. Neither global nor local: “Glocalization” and the politics of scale. In Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local, ed. K. Cox, 137–66. New York: Guilford.
  • Troops approved to use force at the border, but Mattis says the mission hasn’t changed. 2018. The Washington Post. Accessed November 21, 2018. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/troops-approved-to-use-force-at-the-border-but-mattis-says-the-mission-hasnt-changed/2018/11/21/7b9e5e34-edbc-11e8-96d4-0d23f2aaad09_story.html?utm_term=.14422deb44f7.
  • Turner, S., C. Bonnin, and J. Michaud. 2015. Frontier livelihoods: Hmong in the Sino-Vietnamese borderlands. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Van Houtum, H. 2010. Human blacklisting: The global apartheid of the EU’s external border regime. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (6):957–76. doi:10.1068/d1909.
  • Van Houtum, H., and R. Pijpers. 2007. The European Union as a gated community: The two-faced border and immigration regime of the EU. Antipode 39 (2):291–309. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00522.x.
  • Walters, W. 2016. The flight of the deported: Aircraft, deportation, and politics. Geopolitics 21 (2):435–58. doi:10.1080/14650045.2015.1089234.
  • Webster, E., and G. Adler. 1999. Toward a class compromise in South Africa’s “double transition”: Bargained liberalization and the consolidation of democracy. Politics & Society 27 (3):347–85. doi:10.1177/0032329299027003003.
  • Wright, E. O. 2000. Working-class power, capitalist-class interests, and class compromise. American Journal of Sociology 105 (4):957–1002. doi:10.1086/210397.
  • Wright, M. W. 2019. Border thinking, borderland diversity, and Trump’s wall. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (2):511–19. doi:10.1080/24694452.2018.1542290.
  • Xia, Y., and Y. Jiang. 2015. Research report on foreign migrants in Ruili. In Ruili Yearbook 2015, ed. J. Yang, 496–511. Ruili, China: Ruili Office of Historic Records.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.