Attack the Data: Agency, Power, and Technopolitics in South African Data Activism

References

• Accelerate Cape Town. 2016. AfricaCom—Big data & roadmap to smart Cape Town. Accessed January 12, 2018. http://acceleratecapetown.co.za/smart-cape-town/.
   Google Scholar
• Achmat, Z. 2014. Apartheid geography and murder in Cape Town. GroundUp. Accessed November 14, 2018. https://www.groundup.org.za/article/apartheid-geography-and-murder-cape-town_2297/.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. 2008. The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired Magazine. Accessed January 2, 2019. https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.
   Google Scholar
• The Archival Platform. 2015. State of the archives: An analysis of South Africa’s National Archival System, 2014. Cape Town, South Africa: The Archival Platform.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, J. 2012. Technology, technicity, and emerging practices of temporal sensitivity in videogames. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44 (1):187–203. doi:10.1068/a44171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baack, S. 2018. Civic tech at mySociety: How the imagined affordances of data shape data activism. Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy 2018 (1):44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. J. 2013. Big data, little history. Dialogues in Human Geography 3 (3):297–302. doi:10.1177/2043820613514323.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, C. 2018. Geography and the priority of injustice. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (2):317–26. doi:10.1080/24694452.2017.1365581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, D. 2019. The data gaze: Capitalism, power and perception. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bénit-Gbaffou, C. 2015a. Introduction: Politicising and politicking community participation in urban governance. In Popular politics in South African cities: Unpacking community participation, ed. C. Bénit-Gbaffou, 1–17. Cape Town, South Africa: HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bénit-Gbaffou, C., ed. 2015b. Popular politics in South African cities: Unpacking community participation. Cape Town, South Africa: HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2004. The force of things: Steps toward an ecology of matter. Political Theory 32 (3):347–72. doi:10.1177/0090591703260853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2009. Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A., and N. Swartbooi. 2016. Why governments must listen to social audits. Accessed September 5, 2018. https://equaleducation.org.za/2016/07/22/why-government-must-listen-to-social-audits/.
   Google Scholar
• Breckenridge, K. 2005. The biometric state: The promise and peril of digital government in the new South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies 31 (2):267–82. doi:10.1080/03057070500109458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breckenridge, K. 2008. The elusive panopticon: The HANIS project and the politics of standards in South Africa. In Playing the identity card: Surveillance, security and identification in global perspective, ed. C. J. Bennett and D. Lyon, 39–56. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Breckenridge, K. 2014. Biometric state: The global politics of identification and surveillance in South Africa, 1850 to the present. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. 2017. The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary effects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 20 (1):30–44. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, R. 2018. Datafying disaster: Institutional framings of data production following Superstorm Sandy. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (2):569–78. doi:10.1080/24694452.2017.1402673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1991. Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination, ed. J. Law, 132–61. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, I. 2017. The techno-politics of data and smart devolution in city-regions: Comparing Glasgow, Bristol, Barcelona, and Bilbao. Systems 5 (1):18. doi:10.3390/systems5010018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardullo, P., and R. Kitchin. 2018. Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of “citizen-focused” smart cities in Europe. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37 (5):813–30. doi:10.1177/0263774X18806508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinnamon, J. 2017. Social injustice in surveillance capitalism. Surveillance & Society 15 (5):609–25. doi:10.24908/ss.v15i5.6433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coole, D. 2013. Agentic capacities and capacious historical materialism: Thinking with new materialisms in the political sciences. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41 (3):451–69. doi:10.1177/0305829813481006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coole, D., and S. Frost. 2010. Introducing the new materialisms. In New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics, ed. D. Coole and S. Frost, 1–43. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., and A. Hepp. 2018. The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., and A. Powell. 2014. Big data from the bottom up. Big Data & Society 1 (2):1–5. doi:10.1177/2053951714539277.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, M., B. S. Paris, I. Pasquetto, and J. Pierre. 2016. The conundrum of police officer-involved homicides: Counter-data in Los Angeles County. Big Data & Society 3 (2):1–14. doi:10.1177/2053951716663566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, C. M., L. Taylor, and J. Thatcher. 2016. Critical data studies: A dialog on data and space. Big Data & Society 3 (1):1–9. doi:10.1177/2053951716648346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, A. 2015. New urban utopias of postcolonial India: “Entrepreneurial urbanization” in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography 5 (1):3–22. doi:10.1177/2043820614565748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dencik, L., A. Hintz, and J. Cable. 2016. Towards data justice? The ambiguity of anti-surveillance resistance in political activism. Big Data & Society 3 (2):1–12. doi:10.1177/2053951716679678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, J., and D. Pontille. 2015. Material ordering and the care of things. Science, Technology, & Human Values 40 (3):338–67. doi:10.1177/0162243914553129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, K. P. 2015. The biometric imaginary: Bureaucratic technopolitics in post-apartheid welfare. Journal of Southern African Studies 41 (4):815–33. doi:10.1080/03057070.2015.1049485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. N., and G. Hecht. 2010. History and the technopolitics of identity: The case of apartheid South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies 36 (3):619–39. doi:10.1080/03057070.2010.507568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Equal Education. 2015. Gauteng schools social audit report. Johannesburg, South Africa: Equal Education.
   Google Scholar
• Equal Education. 2016. Of “loose papers and vague allegations”: A social audit report on the safety and sanitation crisis in Western Cape Schools. Cape Town, South Africa: Equal Education.
   Google Scholar
• Freidberg, S. 2014. Footprint technopolitics. Geoforum 55:178–89. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardone, I. 2014. “A country in order”: Technopolitics, nation building, and the development of ICT in Ethiopia. Information Technologies & International Development 10 (1):3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., and P. N. Edwards. 2007. Revolutionary secrets: Technology’s role in the South African anti-apartheid movement. Social Science Computer Review 25 (1):13–26. doi:10.1177/0894439306289556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrib, A., K. Herbst, L. Dlamini, A. McKenzie, N. Stoops, T. Govender, and J. Rohde. 2008. An evaluation of the District Health Information System in rural South Africa. South African Medical Journal 98:549–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitelman, L., ed. 2013. “Raw data” is an oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, M., and S. Milan. 2018. Technopolitics in the age of big data: The rise of proactive data activism in Latin America. In Networks, movements and technopolitics in Latin America: Critical analysis and current chalenges, ed. F. S. Cabellero and T. Gravante, 95–109. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. 2001. Technology, politics, and national identity in France. In Technologies of power: Essays in honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes, ed. M. T. Allen and G. Hecht, 253–93. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. 2009. The radiance of France: Nuclear power and national identity after World War II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hepp, A., A. Breiter, and U. Hasebrink, eds. 2017. Communicative figurations: Transforming communications in times of deep mediatization. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2015. Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power, ed. S. Jasanoff and S.-H. Kim, 1–47. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jooste, F., and A. H. Tshangana. 2012. Engaging with government budgets: An activists guide to South African government budgets at local, provincial and national level. Cape Town, South Africa: Ndifuna Ukwazi and the Social Justice Coalition.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H. 2018. Living with data: Aligning data studies and data activism through a focus on everyday experiences of datafication. Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy 1:18–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H., and J. Bates. 2017. Data power in material contexts: Introduction. Television & New Media 18 (8):701–5. doi:10.1177/1527476417720034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H., and G. Moss. 2015. Known or knowing publics? Social media data mining and the question of public agency. Big Data & Society 2 (2):1–11. doi:10.1177/2053951715611145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H., T. Poell, and J. van Dijck. 2015. Data and agency. Big Data & Society 2 (2):1–7. doi:10.1177/2053951715621569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsley, S. 2014. The matter of “virtual” geographies. Progress in Human Geography 38 (3):364–84. doi:10.1177/0309132513506270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2014a. The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2014b. The real-time city? big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79 (1):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., and M. Dodge. 2011. Code/space: Software and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurban, C., I. Peña-López, and M. Haberer. 2017. What is technopolitics? A conceptual schema for understanding politics in the digital age. IDP - Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política 24:3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. 2011. The city as assemblage: Dwelling and urban space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29 (4):649–71. doi:10.1068/d4710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C., and J. Silver. 2017. The political city: “Seeing sanitation” and making the urban political in Cape Town. Antipode 49 (1):125–48. doi:10.1111/anti.12264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan, S., and L. van der Velden. 2016. The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Digital Culture & Society 2 (2):57–74. doi:10.14361/dcs-2016-0205.
   Google Scholar
• Miraftab, F., and S. Wills. 2005. Insurgency and spaces of active citizenship: The story of Western Cape anti-eviction campaign in South Africa. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25 (2):200–217. doi:10.1177/0739456X05282182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, H., and N. Odendaal. 2015. From the fringes: South Africa’s smart township citizens. In Citizen’s right to the digital city: Urban interfaces, activism, and placemaking, ed. M. Foth, M. Brynskov, and T. Ojala, 137–59. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, P., and G. Neff. 2015. Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media + Society 1 (2):1–9. doi:10.1177/2056305115603385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neff, G., and P. Nagy. 2016. Talking to bots: Symbiotic agency and the case of Tay. International Journal of Communication 10:4915–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngoepe, M., and P. Ngulube. 2013. An exploration of the role of records management in corporate governance in South Africa. SA Journal of Information Management 15 (2):1–8. doi:10.4102/sajim.v15i2.575.
   Google Scholar
• Odendaal, N. 2006. Towards the digital city in South Africa: Issues and constraints. Journal of Urban Technology 13 (3):29–48. doi:10.1080/10630730601145997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odendaal, N. 2015. Getting smart about smart cities in Cape Town: Beyond the rhetoric. In Smart urbanism: Utopian vision or false dawn?, ed. S. Marvin, A. Luque-Ayala, and C. McFarlane, 87–103. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parnell, S., and E. Pieterse. 2010. The “right to the city”: Institutional imperatives of a developmental state. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 34 (1):146–62. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00954.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnell, S., and J. Robinson. 2012. (Re)theorizing cities from the Global South: Looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geography 33 (4):593–617. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.33.4.593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planact. 2017. Wattville social audit report. Johannesburg, South Africa: Planact.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, S. 2014. The 2011 Toilet Wars in South Africa: Justice and transition between the exceptional and the everyday after apartheid. Development and Change 45 (3):479–501. doi:10.1111/dech.12091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2017. Posthuman agency in the digitally mediated city: Exteriorization, individuation, reinvention. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (4):779–93. doi:10.1080/24694452.2016.1270195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossouw, J. 2015. “True, reliable and valid?” Data and community experience in the case of the janitorial service social audit. Master of Philosophy in the Department of Development Studies, University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiters, G. 2007. Contradictions in municipal services in contemporary South Africa: Disciplinary commodification and self-disconnections. Critical Social Policy 27 (4):487–508. doi:10.1177/0261018307081809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppert, E., E. Isin, and D. Bigo. 2017. Data politics. Big Data & Society 4 (2):1–7. doi:10.1177/2053951717717749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J., and R. Bendor. 2018. Selling smartness: Corporate narratives and the smart city as a sociotechnical imaginary. Science, Technology, & Human Values 44 (3):540–63. doi:10.1177/0162243918806061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, D. 2016. Equal Education put safety of schools at risk. Accessed August 23, 2018. http://www.politicsweb.co.za/news-and-analysis/equal-education-put-safety-of-schools-at-risk-deb.
   Google Scholar
• Schaver, Z. 2016. Audit finds serious problems with Western Cape schools. Accessed November 14, 2018. https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2016-09-21-audit-finds-serious-problems-with-western-cape-schools/.
   Google Scholar
• Schrock, A. R. 2016. Civic hacking as data activism and advocacy: A history from publicity to open government data. New Media & Society 18 (4):581–99. doi:10.1177/1461444816629469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrock, A. R. 2017. What communication can contribute to data studies: Three lenses on communication and data. International Journal of Communication 11:701–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serlin, D. 2017. Confronting African histories of technology: A conversation with Keith Breckenridge and Gabrielle Hecht. Radical History Review 127:87–102. doi:10.1215/01636545-3690870.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, T. 2017. The urban geographical imagination in the age of Big Data. Big Data & Society 4 (1):1–14. doi:10.1177/2053951716665129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S. 2010. The South African “Information Society”, 1994–2008: Problems with policy, legislation, rhetoric and implementation. Journal of Southern African Studies 36 (1):209–27. doi:10.1080/03057071003607444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneddon, C., and C. Fox. 2011. The Cold War, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, and the technopolitics of river basin development, 1950–1970. Political Geography 30 (8):450–60. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Audit Network. 2016. About Social Audit Network. Accessed September 12, 2018. http://socialaudits.org.za/about/.
   Google Scholar
• Social Justice Coalition. 2013a. The power of data as evidence. Cape Town, South Africa: Social Justice Coalition.
   Google Scholar
• Social Justice Coalition. 2013b. Report of the Khayelitsha “Mshengu” toilet social audit. Cape Town, South Africa: Social Justice Coalition.
   Google Scholar
• Social Justice Coalition, Ndifuna Ukwazi, and International Budget Partnership. 2015. A guide to conducting social audits in South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: The Social Justice Coalition (SJC), Ndifuna Ukwazi (NU), and the International Budget Partnership. https://www.internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/social-audits-in-south-africa-guide-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Söderström, O., T. Paasche, and F. Klauser. 2014. Smart cities as corporate storytelling. City 18 (3):307–20. doi:10.1080/13604813.2014.906716.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, J., M. Finn, and M. Ames. 2017. Information determinism: The consequences of the faith in information. The Information Society 33 (1):13–22. doi:10.1080/01972243.2016.1248613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staeheli, L. A., and D. Hammett. 2013. “For the future of the nation”: Citizenship, nation, and education in South Africa. Political Geography 32:32–41. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 2010. This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (5):601–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19 (3):387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey, A. 2014. Making experience legible: Spaces of participation and the construction of knowledge in Khayelitsha. Politikon 41 (3):403–20. doi:10.1080/02589346.2014.975935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Super, G. 2016. Volatile sovereignty: Governing crime through the community in Khayelitsha. Law & Society Review 50 (2):450–83. doi:10.1111/lasr.12198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. 2017. What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data & Society 4 (2):1–14. doi:10.1177/2053951717736335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., and D. Broeders. 2015. In the name of development: Power, profit and the datafication of the Global South. Geoforum 64:229–37. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornham, H., and E. Gómez Cruz. 2016. Hackathons, data and discourse: Convolutions of the data (logical). Big Data & Society 3 (2):1–11. doi:10.1177/2053951716679675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treré, E., and A. B. Carretero. 2018. Tracing the roots of technopolitics: Towards a North–South dialogue. In Networks, movements and technopolitics in Latin America: Critical analysis and current challenges, ed. F. S. Caballero and T. Gravante, 43–63. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. 2014. Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society 12 (2):197–208. doi:10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776.
   Google Scholar
• Vanolo, A. 2014. Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies 51 (5):883–98. doi:10.1177/0042098013494427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Schnitzler, A. 2008. Citizenship prepaid: Water, calculability, and techno-politics in South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies 34 (4):899–917. doi:10.1080/03057070802456821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Schnitzler, A. 2013. Traveling technologies: Infrastructure, ethical regimes, and the materiality of politics in South Africa. Cultural Anthropology 28 (4):670–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Schnitzler, A. 2016. Democracy’s infrastructure: Techno-politics and protest after apartheid. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiig, A. 2015. IBM’s smart city as techno-utopian policy mobility. City 19 (2–3):258–73. doi:10.1080/13604813.2015.1016275.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. W. 2011. Data matter(s): Legitimacy, coding, and qualifications-of-life. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29 (5):857–72. doi:10.1068/d7910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zook, M. A., and J. Blankenship. 2018. New spaces of disruption? The failures of Bitcoin and the rhetorical power of algorithmic governance. Geoforum 96:248–55. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar