3,693
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Urban Floods, Clientelism, and the Political Ecology of the State in Latin America

&
Pages 1301-1317 | Received 08 Jul 2019, Accepted 18 Sep 2019, Published online: 04 Feb 2020

References

  • Amoako, C. 2016. Brutal presence or convenient absence: The role of the state in the politics of flooding in informal Accra, Ghana. Geoforum 77:5–16. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.003.
  • Anand, N. 2017. Hydraulic city: Water & the infrastructures of citizenship in Mumbai. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Arefin, M. R. 2019. The state, sewers, and security: How does the Egyptian state reframe environmental disasters as terrorist threats. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (2):412–21. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1497474.
  • Auyero, J. 2012. Patients of the state: The politics of waiting in Argentina. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Auyero, J., and D. A. Swistun. 2009. Flammable: Environmental suffering in an Argentine shantytown. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Bakker, K. 2012. Water: Political, biopolitical, material. Social Studies of Science 42 (4):616–23. doi: 10.1177/0306312712441396.
  • Balls, J. N., and H. W. Fischer. 2019. Electricity-centered clientelism and the contradictions of private solar microgrids in India. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (2):465–75. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1535312.
  • Bridge, G. 2014. Resource geographies II: The resource–state nexus. Progress in Human Geography 38 (1):118–30. doi: 10.1177/0309132513493379.
  • Burawoy, M. 2009. The extended case method: Four countries, four decades, four great transformations, and one theoretical tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Caldeira, T. P. R. 2015. Social movements, cultural production, and protests: São Paulo’s shifting political landscape. Current Anthropology 56 (Suppl. 11):S126–S36. doi: 10.1086/681927.
  • Carvalho, J. M. 1997. Mandonismo, coronelismo, clientelismo: Uma discussão conceitual. [Mandonismo, coronelismo, clientelism]. Dados 40 (2):229–50. doi: 10.1590/S0011-52581997000200003.
  • Coates, R. 2019. Citizenship-in-nature? Exploring hazardous urbanization in Nova Friburgo, Brazil. Geoforum 99:63–73. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.12.001.
  • Coates, R., and J. Garmany. 2017. The ecology of citizenship: Understanding vulnerability in urban Brazil. International Development Planning Review 39 (1):37–56. doi: 10.3828/idpr.2017.3.
  • Collier, S. 2009. Topologies of power: Foucault’s analysis of political government beyond “governmentality.” Theory, Culture. Society 26 (6):78–108. doi: 10.1177/0263276409347694.
  • Collins, T. W. 2009. The production of unequal risk in hazardscapes: An explanatory frame applied to disaster at the US–Mexico border. Geoforum 40 (4):589–601. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.04.009.
  • Das, V. 2011. State, citizenship, and the urban poor. Citizenship Studies 15 (3–4):319–33. doi: 10.1080/13621025.2011.564781.
  • Diniz, E. 1982. Voto e máquina política: patronagem e clientelismo no Rio de Janeiro [Voting and the political machine: Patronage and clientelism in Rio de Janeiro]. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
  • Foucault, M. 2007. Security, territory, population. London: Palgrave.
  • Fox, J. 1994. The difficult transition from clientelism to citizenship: Lessons from Mexico. World Politics 46 (2):151–84. doi: 10.2307/2950671.
  • Gandy, M. 2008. Landscapes of disaster: Water, modernity, and urban fragmentation in Mumbai. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (1):108–30. doi: 10.1068/a3994.
  • García García, A. 2013. Las inundaciones fluviales históricas en la planicie tabasqueña [Historical floods in the Tabasco basin]. In Cuencas en Tabasco: Una visión a contracorriente, ed. E. Kauffer, 61–99. México: CIECAS.
  • Ghertner, D. A. 2011. Green evictions: Environmental discourses of a “slum free” Delhi. In Global political ecology, ed. R. Peet, P. Robbins, and M. Watts, 145–65. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Guarneros-Meza, V. 2009. Mexican urban governance: How old and new institutions coexist and interact. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33 (2):463–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00864.x.
  • Gupta, A. 2012. Red tape: Bureaucracy, structural violence, and poverty in India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Harris, L. M. 2012. State as socionatural effect: Variable and emergent geographies of the state in southeastern Turkey. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 32 (1):25–39. doi: 10.1215/1089201X-1545345.
  • Harris, L. M. 2017. Political ecologies of the state: Recent interventions and questions going forward. Political Geography 58:90–92. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.03.006.
  • Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Hilgers, T. 2011. Clientelism and conceptual stretching: Differentiating among concepts and among analytical levels. Theory and Society 40 (5):567–88. doi: 10.1007/s11186-011-9152-6.
  • Hilgers, T., ed. 2012. Clientelism in everyday Latin American politics. New York: Palgrave.
  • Holston, J. 2011. Contesting privilege with right: The transformation of differentiated citizenship in Brazil. Citizenship Studies 15 (3–4):335–52. doi: 10.1080/13621025.2011.565157.
  • Ioris, A. 2012. Applying the strategic-relational approach to urban political ecology: The water management problems of the Baixada Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Antipode 44 (1):122–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00848.x.
  • Janoschka, M., and J. Sequera. 2016. Gentrification in Latin America: Addressing the politics and geographies of displacement. Urban Geography 37 (8):1175–94. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2015.1103995.
  • Kelly-Richards, S. H., and J. M. Banister. 2017. A state of suspended animation: Urban sanitation and water access in Nogales, Sonora. Political Geography 58:104–13. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.04.002.
  • Leal, V. N. [1949] 1986. Coronelismo, enxada e voto (5th ed.) [Coronelismo: The municipality and representative government in Brazil]. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Alfa-Omega.
  • Li, T. 2018. After the land grab: Infrastructural violence and the “mafia system” in Indonesia’s oil palm plantation zones. Geoforum 96:328–37. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.10.012.
  • Little, P. E. 2007. Political ecology as ethnography: A theoretical and methodological guide. Horizontes Antropológicos 3 (SE):85–103.
  • Loftus, A. 2018. Political ecology II: Whither the state? Progress in Human Geography. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0309132518803421.
  • Lukes, S. 2011. In defense of “false consciousness.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 3:19–28.
  • Lund, C. 2016. Rule and rupture: State formation through the production of property and citizenship. Development and Change 47 (6):1199–28. doi: 10.1111/dech.12274.
  • Maricato, E. 2003. Metrópole, legislação e desigualdade [The metropole, legislation and inequality]. Estudos Avançados 17 (48):151–66.
  • McCarthy, J. 2019. Authoritarianism, populism, and the environment: Comparative experiences, insights, and perspectives. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (2):301–13. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1554393.
  • Meehan, K. 2013. Disciplining de facto development: Water theft and hydrosocial order in Tijuana. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31 (2):319–36. doi: 10.1068/d20610.
  • Meehan, K. 2014. Tool-power: Water infrastructure as wellsprings of state power. Geoforum 57:215–24. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.08.005.
  • Meehan, K., and O. C. Molden. 2015. Political ecologies of the state. In The Wiley Blackwell companion to political geography, ed. J. Agnew, V. Mamadouh, A. J. Secor, and J. Sharp, 438–50. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Ministério do Meia Ambiente (MMA) [Ministry of Environment, Government of Brazil]. 2011. Relatório de Inspeção, Área atingida pela tragédia das chuvas, Região Serrana do Rio de Janeiro: Áreas de Preservação Permanente & Áreas de Risco: O que uma coisa tem a ver com a outra? [Inspection report: Area affected by the rainfall tragedy, Rio de Janeiro uplands: Permanent preservation areas & areas at risk: What has one to do with the other?] Accessed December 23, 2019. https://www.mma.gov.br/estruturas/182/_arquivos/relatoriotragediarj_182.pdf.
  • Mullenite, J. 2019. Infrastructure and authoritarianism in the land of waters: A genealogy of flood control in Guyana. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (2):502–09. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1490635.
  • Mustafa, D. 2005. The production of an urban hazardscape in Pakistan: Modernity, vulnerability, and the range of choice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (3):566–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00475.x.
  • Müller, M.-M. 2016. The punitive city: Privatized policing and protection in neoliberal Mexico. London: Verso.
  • Nygren, A. 2016. Socially differentiated urban flood governance in Mexico: Ambiguous negotiations and fragmented contestations. Journal of Latin American Studies 48 (2):335–65. doi: 10.1017/S0022216X15001170.
  • Nygren, A. 2018. Inequality and interconnectivity: Urban spaces of justice in Mexico. Geoforum 89:145–54. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.015.
  • Nygren, A., and G. Wayessa. 2018. At the intersections of multiple marginalizations: Displacements and environmental justice in Mexico and Ethiopia. Environmental Sociology 4 (1):148–61. doi: 10.1080/23251042.2017.1419418.
  • Pelling, M. 2003. The vulnerability of cities: Natural disasters and social resilience. London: Earthscan.
  • Rademacher, A. 2015. Urban political ecology. Annual Review of Anthropology 44 (1):137–52. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014208.
  • Robbins, P. 2008. The state in political ecology: A postcard to political geography from the field. In The Sage handbook of political geography, ed. K. Cox, M. Low, and J. Robinson, 205–18. London: Sage.
  • Robertson, M. 2015. Political ecology and state theory. In Routledge handbook of political ecology, ed. T. Perreault, G. Bridge, and J. McCarthy, 457–66. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Rodina, L., and L. Harris. 2016. Water services, lived citizenship, and notions of the state in marginalised urban spaces: The case of Khayelitsha, South Africa. Water Alternatives 9 (2):336–55.
  • Roy, A. 2009. Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory 8 (1):76–87. doi: 10.1177/1473095208099299.
  • Saguin, K. 2017. Producing an urban hazardscape beyond the city. Environment and Planning A 49 (9):1968–85. doi: 10.1177/0308518X17718373.
  • Scott, J. 1972. Patron–client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Review 66 (1):91–113. doi: 10.2307/1959280.
  • Scott, J. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Shefner, J. 2012. What is politics for? Inequality, representation, and needs satisfaction under clientelism and democracy. In Clientelism in everyday Latin American politics, ed. T. Hilgers, 41–59. New York: Palgrave.
  • Sletto, B., and A. Nygren. 2015. Unsettling neoliberal rationalities: Engaged ethnography and the meanings of responsibility in the Dominican Republic and Mexico. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (5):965–83. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12315.
  • Smith, D. J. 2014. Corruption complaints, inequality and ethnic grievances in post-Biafra Nigeria. Third World Quarterly 35 (5):787–802. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2014.921430.
  • Sud, N. 2017. State, scale and networks in the liberalisation of India’s land. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 (1):76–93. doi: 10.1177/0263774X16655801.
  • Swyngedouw, E. 2015. Urbanization and environmental futures: Politicizing urban political ecologies. In Routledge handbook of political ecology, ed. T. Perreault, G. Bridge, and J. McCarthy, 609–19. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Taylor, L. 2004. Client-ship and citizenship in Latin America. Bulletin of Latin American Research 23 (2):213–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2004.00105.x.
  • Valencio, N. 2014. Dos desastres recorrentes aos desastres à espréita [From recurring to spectacular disasters]. In Ways of killing, dying and resisting: Boundaries in negotiating resolutions to environmental conflicts, ed. A. Zhouri and N. Valencio, 277–316. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: Editora UFMG.
  • Wiesel, I., and R. Freestone. 2019. Queue city: Authority and trust in the waiting line. Geoforum 100:229–35. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.01.015.
  • Wolf, E. R., and S. W. Mintz. 1957. Haciendas and plantations in Middle America and the Antilles. Social and Economic Studies 6 (3):380–412.
  • World Bank. 2019. World development indicators: Urbanization. Accessed February 20, 2019. http://wdi.worldbank.org/table/3.12.
  • Zeiderman, A. 2012. On shaky ground: The making of risk in Bogotá. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44 (7):1570–88. doi: 10.1068/a44283.