Destitution Economies: Circuits of Value in Asylum, Refugee, and Migration Control

References

• Ahmed, S. 2004. Affective economies. Social Text 22 (2):117–39. doi: 10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, R. 2014. Illegality, Inc.: Clandestine migration and the business of bordering Europe. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bales, K., and L. Mayblin. 2018. Unfree labor in immigration detention: Exploitation and coercion of a captive immigrant workforce. Economy and Society 47 (2):191–213. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2018.1484051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua, M. 2019. Animating capital: Work, commodities, circulation. Progress in Human Geography 43 (4):650–69. doi: 10.1177/0309132518819057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benenson, L. 2018. The math of U.S. detention, 2018 update: The costs continue to multiply. Accessed January 8, 2020. https://immigrationforum.org/article/math-immigration-detention-2018-update-costs-continue-multiply/.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, A. 2014. Living in fear: Rejected asylum seekers living as irregular migrants in England. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (10):1507–25. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2013.859070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, T. 2015. London’s “ghosts”: The capital and the UK policy of destitution of refused asylum-seekers. In London the promised land revisited: The changing face of the London migrant landscape in the early 21st century, ed. A. Kershen, 77–96. Abingdon, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Burridge, A., and N. Gill. 2017. Conveyor‐belt justice: Precarity, access to justice, and uneven geographies of legal aid in UK asylum appeals. Antipode 49 (1):23–42. doi: 10.1111/anti.12258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2009. Frames of war. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Carnet, P., C. Blanchard, and J. Ellis. 2014. The Azure payment card: The humanitarian cost of a cashless system. London: British Red Cross. Accessed January 8, 2020. https://www.redcross.org.uk/-/media/documents/about-us/research-publications/refugee-support/the-azure-payment-card-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, B., and E. Diaz. 2015. Payoff: How Congress ensures private prison profit with an immigrant detention quota. Austin, TX: Grassroots Leadership. Accessed January 8, 2020. https://grassrootsleadership.org/reports/payoff-how-congress-ensures-private-prison-profit-immigrant-detention-quota#1.
   Google Scholar
• Cholewinski, R. 1998. Enforced destitution of asylum seekers in the United Kingdom: The denial of fundamental human rights. International Journal of Refugee Law 10 (3):462–98. doi: 10.1093/ijrl/10.3.462.
   Google Scholar
• Coddington, K. 2017. The mobility of carceral logics: Enclosure tactics and violent consequences for Aboriginal communities and asylum seekers in Australia. In Carceral mobilities: Interrogating movement in incarceration, ed. J. Turner and K. Peters, 17–29. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coddington, K. 2018. Landscapes of refugee protection. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 43 (3):326–40. doi: 10.1111/tran.12224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coddington, K. 2019. The slow violence of life without cash: Borders, state restrictions, and exclusion in the U.K. and Australia. Geographical Review 109 (4):527–43. doi: 10.1111/gere.12332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlon, D., and N. Hiemstra. 2014. Examining the everyday micro-economies of migrant detention in the United States. Geographica Helvetica 69 (5):335–44. doi: 10.5194/gh-69-335-2014.
   Google Scholar
• Conlon, D., and Hiemstra, N., eds. 2017a. Intimate economies of immigration detention: Critical perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Conlon, D., and N. Hiemstra. 2017b. Mobility and materialization of the carceral: Examining immigration and immigration detention. In Carceral mobilities: Interrogating movement in incarceration, ed. J. Turner and K. Peters, 100–114. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. 2008. Life as surplus: Biotechnology and capitalism in the neoliberal era. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., and C. Waldby. 2014. Clinical labor: Tissue donors and research subjects in the global bioeconomy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coutin, S. B., S. M. Ashar, J. M. Chacón, and S. Lee. 2017. Deferred action and the discretionary state: Migration, precarity and resistance. Citizenship Studies 21 (8):951–68. doi: 10.1080/13621025.2017.1377153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawley, H., and D. Skleparis. 2018. Refugees, migrants, neither, both: Categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe’s “migration crisis.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (1):48–64. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1348224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, H. 2015. Finance, development, and remittances: Extending the scale of accumulation in migrant labor regimes. Globalizations 12 (3):305–21. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2015.1016302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuthill, F. 2017. Repositioning of “self”: Social recognition as a path to resilience for destitute asylum seekers in the United Kingdom. Social Theory & Health 15 (2):117–37. doi: 10.1057/s41285-016-0025-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling, J. 2014. Another letter from the Home Office: Reading the material politics of asylum. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32 (3):484–500. doi: 10.1068/d13067p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling, J. 2016. Asylum in austere times: Instability, privatization and experimentation within the UK asylum dispersal system. Journal of Refugee Studies 29 (4):483–505. doi: 10.1093/jrs/few038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Goede, M. 2005. Virtue, fortune, and faith: A geneaology of finance. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Goede, M. 2012. Speculative security: The politics of pursuing terrorist monies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doty, R. L., and E. S. Wheatley. 2013. Private detention and the immigration industrial complex. International Political Sociology 7 (4):426–43. doi: 10.1111/ips.12032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., V. Lawson, and E. Sheppard. 2017. Geographical relational poverty studies. Progress in Human Geography 41 (6):745–65. doi: 10.1177/0309132516659706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Encinas, J. 2017. Immigrant possessions disappear during deportation. Arizona Sonora News, March 17. Accessed June 16, 2018. http://arizonanewsservice.com.
   Google Scholar
• Ettlinger, N. 2007. Precarity unbound. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 32 (3):319–40. doi: 10.1177/030437540703200303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, W., and G. Cantor. 2016. Deported with no possessions: The mishandling of migrants’ personal belongings by CBP and ICE. Washington, DC: American Immigration Council.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, D. 2007. Targeted: Homeland security and the business of immigration. New York: Seven Stories Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., D. Leblang, and J. C. Teets. 2014. Defying the law of gravity: The political economy of international migration. World Politics 66 (3):406–45. doi: 10.1017/S0043887114000112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, M., and C. J. Cannon. 2009. The privatization of immigration detention: Towards a global view. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2344196.
   Google Scholar
• Gamlen, A. 2014. The new migration-and-development pessimism. Progress in Human Geography 38 (4):581–97. doi: 10.1177/0309132513512544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammeltoft-Hansen, T., and N. N. Sorensen. 2013. The migration industry and the commercialization of international migration. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2014. Rethinking the economy with thick description and weak theory. Current Anthropology 55 (Suppl. 9):S147–53. doi: 10.1086/676646.
   Google Scholar
• Gidwani, V., and R. N. Reddy. 2011. The afterlives of “waste”: Notes from India for a minor history of capitalist surplus. Antipode 43 (5):1625–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00902.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, N. 2009. Governmental mobility: The power effects of the movement of detained asylum seekers around Britain’s detention estate. Political Geography 28 (3):186–96. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, R. W. 2007. Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• GMS Secretariat. 2016. The role of special economic zones in improving effectiveness of GMS economic corridors. Asian Development Bank. Accessed January 8, 2020. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/214316/role-sez-gms.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Golash-Boza, T. 2009. The immigration industrial complex: Why we enforce immigration policies destined to fail. Sociology Compass 3 (2):295–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00193.x.
   Google Scholar
• Gopinath, D. 2014. Re-thinking destitution in the UK: Typologies, spaces and transitions. International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies 2 (4):341–47. doi: 10.1504/IJHRCS.2014.067881.
   Google Scholar
• Guentner, S., S. Lukes, R. Stanton, B. A. Vollmer, and J. Wilding. 2016. Bordering practices in the UK welfare system. Critical Social Policy 36 (3):391–411. doi: 10.1177/0261018315622609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hage, G. 2003. Searching for hope in a shrinking society. Sydney, Australia: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Harker, C. 2012. Precariousness, precarity, and family: Notes from Palestine. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44 (4):849–65. doi: 10.1068/a4478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiemstra, N. 2013. “You don’t even know where you are”: Chaotic geographies of U.S. migrant detention and deportation. In Carceral spaces: Mobility and agency in imprisonment and migrant detention, ed. D. Moran, N. Gill, and D. Conlon, 57–77. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hiemstra, N., and D. Conlon. 2017. Captive consumers and coerced labourers: Intimate economies and the expanding U.S. detention regime. In Intimate economies of immigration detention: Critical perspectives, ed. D. Conlon and N. Hiemstra, 123–39. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights First. 2019. Family incarceration continues to endanger children, impede access to legal information, and waste government resources. HRF Report, March. Accessed January 8, 2020. https://www.humanrightsfirst.org/resource/family-incarceration-continues-endanger-children-impede-access-legal-information-waste.
   Google Scholar
• Kar, S., and C. Schuster. 2016. Comparative projects and the limits of choice: Ethnography and microfinance in India and Paraguay. Journal of Cultural Economy 9 (4):347–63. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2016.1180632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, C. 2001. On the grounds of globalization: A topography for feminist engagement. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 26 (4):1213–34. doi: 10.1086/495653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, K. P. Y. 2016. Financial advisors, financial ecologies and the variegated financialisation of everyday investors. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41 (1):27–40. doi: 10.1111/tran.12101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, P. 2006. The making of investor subjects in Anglo-American pensions. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24 (6):919–34. doi: 10.1068/d405t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, P., and A. Leyshon. 2017. Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalisation of digital economic circulation. Finance and Society 3 (1):11–31. doi: 10.2218/finsoc.v3i1.1936.
   Google Scholar
• Larner, W. 2003. Neoliberalism? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21 (5):509–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Espiritu, Y. 2014. Body counts: The Vietnam War and militarized refugees. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, H., P. Dwyer, S. Hodkinson, and L. Waite. 2015. Hyper-precarious lives: Migrants, work and forced labor in the Global North. Progress in Human Geography 39 (5):580–600. doi: 10.1177/0309132514548303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmud, T. 2014. Precarious existence and capitalism: A permanent state of exception. Southwestern Law Review 44:699–726.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, D. L., and D. N. Slavin. 2012. A view through the looking glass: How crimes appear from the immigration court perspective. Fordham Urban Law Journal 39 (1):91–119.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. 2012. Governing through the family: Struggles over U.S. noncitizen family detention policy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44 (4):866–88. doi: 10.1068/a4477a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. 2015. Noncitizen detention: Spatial strategies of migrant precarity in U.S. immigration and border control. Annales de Géographie 702–703 (2):231–47. doi: 10.3917/ag.702.0231.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. 2017. Discretion, contracting, and commodification: Privatization of U.S. immigration detention as a technology of fovernment. In Intimate economies of immigration detention: Critical perspectives, ed. D. Conlon and N. Hiemstra, 32–50. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, D. E., and J. Slack. 2013. Bordering on criminal: The routine abuse of migrants in the removal system. Part II: Possessions taken and not returned. Washington, DC: Immigration Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Mayblin, L. 2017. Asylum after empire: Colonial legacies in the politics of asylum seeking. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Mezzadra, S., and B. Neilson. 2013. Border as method, or, the multiplication of labor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mezzadra, S., and B. Neilson. 2017. On the frontiers of extraction: Excavating contemporary capitalism. Cultural Studies 31 (2–3):185–204. doi: 10.1080/09502386.2017.1303425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J. 2017. Power, capital, and immigration detention rights: Making networked markets in global detention governance at UNHCR. Global Networks 17 (3):400–422. doi: 10.1111/glob.12124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountz, A. 2011. The enforcement archipelago: Detention, haunting, and asylum on islands. Political Geography 30 (3):118–28. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountz, A. 2015. Political geography II: Islands and archipelagos. Progress in Human Geography 39 (5):636–46. doi: 10.1177/0309132514560958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, A. W. 2009. Securitization and risk at the EU border: The origins of FRONTEX. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 47 (2):333–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.00807.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norum, R., M. Mostafanezhad, and T. Sebro. 2016. The chronopolitics of exile: Hope, heterotemporality and NGO economics along the Thai–Burma border. Critique of Anthropology 36 (1):61–83. doi: 10.1177/0308275X15617305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivius, E. 2017. Sites of repression and resistance: Political space in refugee camps in Thailand. Critical Asian Studies 49 (3):289–307. doi: 10.1080/14672715.2017.1333268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, A. 2006. Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pallister-Wilkins, P. 2015. The humanitarian politics of European border policing: Frontex and border police in Evros. International Political Sociology 9 (1):53–69. doi: 10.1111/ips.12076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard, J., and M. Samers. 2013. Governing Islamic finance: Territory, agency, and the making of cosmopolitan financial geographies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (3):710–26. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.628256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povinelli, E. 2011. Economies of abandonment: Social endurance and belonging in late liberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rajan, K. 2006. Biocapital: The constitution of postgenomic life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramadan, A. 2013. Spatialising the refugee camp. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38 (1):65–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00509.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryo, E., and I. Peacock. 2018. A national study of immigration detention in the United States. Accessed January 8, 2020. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3216865.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 2014. Expulsions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoler, A. L. 2016. Duress: Imperial durabilities in our times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, J. 2013. Prayer and promise along the migrant trail. Geographical Review 103 (2):230–33. doi: 10.1111/gere.12012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadiar, N. X. 2013. Life-times of disposability within global neoliberalism. Social Text 31 (2):19–48. doi: 10.1215/01642472-2081112.
   Google Scholar
• Tadiar, N. X. 2016. City everywhere. Theory, Culture & Society 33 (7–8):57–83. doi: 10.1177/0263276416675676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S. 2016. What is a refugee camp? Explorations of the limits and effects of the camp. Journal of Refugee Studies 29 (2):139–48. doi: 10.1093/jrs/fev024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unity Centre Glasgow. 2017. Note to all ASPEN card users! Accessed January 8, 2020. https://unitycentreglasgow.org/aspencard/.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 2018. FY 2019 budget in brief. Accessed July 18, 2018. https://www.dhs.gov/publication/fy-2019-budget-brief.
   Google Scholar
• Vaddhanaphuti, C. 2016. Policy alternatives for the refugees in temporary shelters along Thai-Burma border. SEATIDE: Integration in Southeast Asia: Trajectories of inclusion, dynamics of exclusion. Accessed January 8, 2020. http://seatide.eu/?content=activitiesandresults&group=4.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, L., and H. Lewis. 2017. Precarious irregular migrants and their sharing economies: A spectrum of transactional laboring experiences. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (4):964–78. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1270188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, W. 2006. Border/control. European Journal of Social Theory 9 (2):187–203. doi: 10.1177/1368431006063332.
   Google Scholar
• Wasem, R. E. 2018. Trump administration now has naturalized citizens in its sights. The Hill, July 17. Accessed July 18, 2018. http://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/396923-trump-administration-now-has-naturalized-citizens-in-its-sights.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, C., and S. Schreiber. 2019. DHS finalizes public charge rule. Silver Spring, MD: Catholic Legal Immigration Network. Accessed August 13, 2019. https://cliniclegal.org/resources/dhs-finalizes-public-charge-rule.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. 2004. From protests to politics: Sex work, women’s worth, and Ciudad Juarez modernity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (2):369–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402013.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zetter, R. 2007. More labels, fewer refugees: Remaking the refugee label in an era of globalization. Journal of Refugee Studies 20 (2):172–92. doi: 10.1093/jrs/fem011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar