688
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Killing One Trout to Save Another: A Hegemonic Political Ecology with Its Biopolitical Basis in Yellowstone’s Native Fish Conservation Plan

Pages 1559-1576 | Received 08 Jan 2018, Accepted 09 Dec 2019, Published online: 16 Mar 2020

References

  • Al-Chokhachy, R., B. Shepard, J. Burckhardt, S. Opitz, D. Garren, T. Koel, and M. Nelson. 2017. Status and conservation of Yellowstone cutthroat trout in the Greater Yellowstone Area. Yellowstone Science 25 (1):13–17.
  • Arnold, J., C. Detjens, B. Ertel, M. Rhul, and T. Koel. 2017. Westslope cutthroat trout and fluvial Arctic grayling restoration. Yellowstone Science 25 (1):18–25.
  • Atchison, J. 2015. Experiments in co-existence: The science and practices of biocontrol in invasive species management. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 47 (8):1697–712. doi:10.1177/0308518X15597106.
  • Bardsley, D., and G. Edward-Jones. 2007. Invasive species policy and climate change: Social perceptions of environmental change in the Mediterranean. Environmental Science & Policy 10 (3):230–42. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.12.002.
  • Bartkowski, B., N. Lienhoop, and B. Hansjurgens. 2015. Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: A critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity. Ecological Economics 113:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.023.
  • Benediktsson, K. 2015. Floral hazards: Nootka lupin in Iceland and the complex politics of invasive life. Geografiska Annaler: Series B 97 (2):139–54. doi:10.1111/geob.12070.
  • Biermann, C. 2016. Securing forests from the ccourge of chestnut blight: The biopolitics of nature and nation. Geoforum 75:210–19. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.07.007.
  • Biermann, C., and R. Anderson. 2017. Conservation, biopolitics, and the governance of life and death. Geography Compass 11 (10):e12329. doi:10.1111/gec3.12329.
  • Biermann, C., and B. Mansfield. 2014. Biodiversity, purity, and death: Conservation biology as biopolitics. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32 (2):257–73. doi:10.1068/d13047p.
  • Braun, B. 2007. Biopolitics and the molecularization of life. Cultural Geographies 14 (1):6–18.
  • Braun, B. 2013. Power over life: Biosecurity as biopolitics. In Biosecurity: The socio-politics of invasive species and infectious diseases, ed. A. Dobson, K. Barker, and S. Taylor, 45–57. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Brown, J. 2015. Trout culture: How fly fishing forever changed the Rocky Mountain West. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Brown, J., and D. Sax. 2004. An essay on some topics concerning invasive species. Austral Ecology 29 (5):530–36. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2004.01340.x.
  • Castree, N. 2003. Environmental issues: Relational ontologies and hybrid politics. Progress in Human Geography 27 (2):203–11. doi:10.1191/0309132503ph422pr.
  • Cavanagh, C. 2018. Political ecologies of biopower: Diversity, debates, and new frontiers of inquiry. Journal of Political Ecology 25 (1):402–25. doi:10.2458/v25i1.23047.
  • Cisney, V., and N. Morar. 2015. Biopower: Foucault and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Coates, P. 2006. American perceptions of immigrant and invasive species: Strangers on the land. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Colautti, R., and H. MacIsaac. 2004. A neutral terminology to define “invasive” species. Diversity and Distributions 10 (2):135–41. doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00061.x.
  • Collard, R. 2012. Cougar-human entanglements and the biopolitical un/making of safe space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30 (1):23–42. doi:10.1068/d19110.
  • Crifasi, R. 2005. Reflections in a stock pond: Are anthropogenically derived freshwater ecosystems natural, artificial, or something else? Environmental Management 36 (5):625–69. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0147-1.
  • Crist, E. 2004. Against the social construction of nature and wilderness. Environmental Ethics 26 (1):5–24. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200426138.
  • Daldal, A. 2014. Power and ideology in Michel Foucault and Antonio Gramsci: A comparative analysis. Review of History and Political Science 2 (2):149–67.
  • Dowler, L. 2001. Fieldwork in the trenches: Participant observation in a conflict area. In Qualitative methodologies for geographers: Issues and debates, ed. M. Limb and C. Dwyer, 153–64. London: Arnold.
  • Dunn, K. 2010. Interviewing. In Qualitative research methods in human geography, ed. I. Hay, 3rd ed., 101–37. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ekers, M., and A. Loftus. 2008. The power of water: Developing dialogues between Foucault and Gramsci. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26:698–718. doi:10.1068/d5907.
  • Eden, S., and C. Bear. 2011. Models of equilibrium, natural agency, and environmental change: Lay ecologies in UK recreational angling. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36 (3):393–407. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00438.x.
  • Emerson, R., R. Fretz, and L. Shaw. 1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ernwein, M., and J. Fall. 2015. Communicating invasion: Understanding social anxieties around mobile species. Geografiska Annaler: Series B 97 (2):155–67. doi:10.1111/geob.12071.
  • Eskridge, A., and D. Alderman. 2010. Alien invaders, plant thugs, and the southern curse: Framing kudzu as environmental other through discourses of fear. Southeastern Geographer 50 (1):110–29.
  • Esposito, R. 2008. Bios: Biopolitics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Everts, J., and K. Benediktsson. 2015. Pangaea’s return: Towards an ontology of invasive life. Geografiska Annaler: Series B 97 (2):131–38. doi:10.1111/geob.12069.
  • Fall, J. 2014. Biosecurity and ecology: Beyond the nativist debate. In Biosecurity: The socio-politics of invasive species and infectious diseases, ed. B. Kezia, A. Dobson, and S. Taylor, 167–181. London and New York: Earthscan/Routledge.
  • Fine, G., and L. Christoforides. 1991. Dirty birds, filthy immigrants, and the English sparrow war: Metaphorical linkage in constructing social problems. Symbolic Interaction 14 (4):375–93. doi:10.1525/si.1991.14.4.375.
  • Fischer, A., S. Selge, R. van der Wal, and B. Larson. 2014. The public and professionals reason similarly about the management of non-native species. PLoS ONE 9 (8):e105495. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105495.
  • Foucault, M. 2004. Society must be defended. London: Penguin. doi:10.2307/27515985.
  • Foucault, M. 2007. Security, territory, population: Lectures at the College de France 1977–1978. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gibbs, L., J. Atchison, and I. Macfarlane. 2015. Camel country: Assemblage, belonging, and scale in invasive species geographies. Geoforum 58:56–67. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.10.013.
  • Gresswell, B. 2009. Scientific Review Panel Evaluation of the National Park Service Lake Trout Suppression Program in Yellowstone Lake, 25–29 August 2008. Final Report, YCR-2009-05, U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Bozeman, MT.
  • Gresswell, B., P. Budy, C. Guy, M. Hansen, M. Jones, P. Martinez, C. Suski, and J. Williams. 2012. Confronting a lake trout invasion of Yellowstone Lake: An interim scientific assessment, June 14–16, 2011. A report to the Superintendent of Yellowstone National Park, U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Bozeman, MT.
  • Gresswell, B., N. Heredia, J. Romine, L. Gutowsky, P. Sandstrom, M. Parsley, P. Bigelow, C. Suski, and B. Ertel. 2017. Identifying movement patterns and spawning areas of lake trout in Yellowstone Lake. Yellowstone Science 25 (1):66–69.
  • Hannah, M. 2011. Biopower, life and left politics. Antipode 43 (4):1034–55. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00840.x.
  • Head, L. 2012. Decentering 1788: Beyond biotic nativeness. Geographical Research 50 (2):166–78. doi:10.1111/j.1745-5871.2011.00746.x.
  • Head, L., J. Atchison, and C. Phillips. 2015. The distinctive capacities of plants: Re-thinking difference via invasive species. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 40 (3):399–413. doi:10.1111/tran.12077.
  • Head, L., and P. Muir. 2004. Nativeness, invasiveness, and nation in Australian plants. Geographical Review 94 (2):199–217. doi:10.1111/j.1931-0846.2004.tb00167.x.
  • Heink, U., A. Van Herzele, G. Bela, A. Kaloczkai, and K. Jax. 2018. Different arguments, same conclusions: How is action against invasive alien species justified in the context of European policy? Biodiversity and Conservation 27 (7):1659–77. doi:10.1007/s10531-016-1170-2.
  • Hettinger, N. 2001. Exotic species, naturalisation, and biological nativism. Environmental Values 10 (2):193–224. doi:10.3197/096327101129340804.
  • Hill, A., and E. Hadly. 2018. Rethinking “native” in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Earth Science 6 (96):1–4. doi:10.3389/feart.2018.00096.
  • Hobbs, R., E. Higgs, and J. Harris. 2009. Novel ecosystems: Implications for conservation and restoration. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24 (11):599–605. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.012.
  • Hodgetts, T. 2017. Wildlife conservation, multiple biopolitics and animal subjectification: Three mammals’ tales. Geoforum 79:17–25. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.12.003.
  • Holling, C., and L. Gunderson. 2002. Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island.
  • Holloway, L., C. Morris, B. Gilna, and D. Gibbs. 2009. Biopower, genetics, and livestock breeding: (Re)constituting animal populations and heterogenous biosocial collectivities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 34 (3):394–407. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00347.x.
  • Hourdequin, M., and D. G. Havlick. 2013. Restoration and authenticity revisited. Environmental Ethics 35 (1):79–93. doi:10.5840/enviroethics20133517.
  • Hsieh, H., and S. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15 (9):1277–88. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
  • Instone, L. 2014. Unruly grasses: Affective attunements in the ecological restoration of urban native grasslands in Australia. Emotion, Space and Society 10:79–86. doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2013.12.013.
  • Jackiw, R., G. Mandil, and H. Hager. 2015. A framework to guide the conservation of species hybrids based on ethical and ecological considerations. Conservation Biology 29 (4):1040–51. doi:10.1111/cobi.12526.
  • Johnson, K. 2011. In Yellowstone, killing one kind of trout to save another. New York Times, August 24. Accessed December 8, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/24/us/24trout.html.
  • Koel, T., P. White, M. Ruhl, J. Arnold, P. Bigelow, C. Detjens, P. Doepke, and B. Ertel. 2017. An approach to conservation of native fish in Yellowstone. Yellowstone Science 25 (1):4–12.
  • Kreps, D. 2016. Gramsci and Foucault: A reassessment. Routledge and New York: London.
  • Larson, B. 2005. The war of the roses: Demilitarizing invasion biology. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 3 (9):495–500. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0495:TWOTRD.2.0.CO;2]
  • Lidstrom, S., S. West, T. Katzschner, M. Perez-Ramos, and H. Twidle. 2015. Invasive narratives and the inverse of slow violence: Alien species in science and society. Environmental Humanities 7:1–40. doi:10.1215/22011919-3616317.
  • Lodge, D., and K. Shrader-Frechette. 2003. Nonindigenous species: Ecological explanation, environmental ethics, and public policy. Conservation Biology 17 (1):31–37. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02366.x.
  • Lorimer, J. 2012. Multinatural geographies for the Anthropocene. Progress in Human Geography 36 (5):593–612. doi:10.1177/0309132511435352.
  • McIntyre, J. 1995. Review and assessment of possibilities for protecting the cutthroat trout of Yellowstone Lake from introduced lake trout. In The Yellowstone Lake crisis: Confronting a lake trout invasion, ed. J. Varley and P. Schullery, 28–33. Yellowstone, WY: NPS Yellowstone Center for Resources.
  • McKiernan, S., and L. Instone. 2016. From pest to partner: Rethinking the Australian white ibis in the more-than-human city. Cultural Geographies 23 (3):475–94. doi:10.1177/1474474015609159.
  • Mohammad, R. 2001. “Insiders” and/or “outsiders”: Positionality, theory, and praxis. In Qualitative methodologies for geographers: Issues and debates, ed. M. Limb and C. Dwyer, 101–20. London: Arnold.
  • Montgomery, W., M. Lundy, and N. Reid. 2012. “Invasional meltdown”: Evidence for unexpected consequences and cumulative impacts of multispecies invasions. Biological Invasions 14 (6):1111–25. doi:10.1007/s10530-011-0142-4.
  • Munro, A., T. McMahon, and J. Ruzycki. 2006. Where did they come from: Natural chemical markers identify source and date of lake trout invasion in Yellowstone Lake. Yellowstone Science 14 (2):4–10.
  • National Park Service. 2010. Native Fish Conservation Plan environmental assessment. Yellowstone, WY: U.S. Department of the Interior.
  • National Park Service. 2019. Lake trout. Accessed September 27, 2019. https://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/nature/lake-trout.htm.
  • Peretti, J. 1998. Nativism and nature: Rethinking biological invasion. Environmental Values 7 (2):183–92. doi:10.3197/096327198129341537.
  • Pfeiffer, J., and R. Voeks. 2008. Biological invasions and biocultural diversity: Linking ecological and cultural systems. Environmental Conservation 35 (4):281–93. doi:10.1017/S0376892908005146.
  • Pimental, D. 2007. Environmental and economic costs of managing vertebrate species invasions into the United States. Managing Vertebrate Invasive Species 38:1–8.
  • Potts, A. 2009. Kiwis against possums: A critical analysis of anti-possum rhetoric in Aotearoa New Zealand. Society & Animals 1:1–20. doi:10.1163/156853009X393738.
  • Preston, C. 2009. The terms “native” and “alien”—A biogeographical perspective. Progress in Human Geography 33 (5):702–13. doi:10.1177/0309132508105002.
  • Rabinow, P., and N. Rose. 2006. Biopower today. BioSocieties 1 (2):195–217. doi:10.1017/S1745855206040014.
  • Repanshek, K. 2019. Lake trout at Yellowstone National Park impacting terrestrial ecosystems. National Parks Traveler. Accessed August 19, 2019. https://www.nationalparkstraveler.org/2019/03/lake-trout-invasion-yellowstone-national-park-impacting-terrestrial-ecosystem.
  • Richardson, D., P. Pysek, D. Simberloff, M. Rejmanek, and A. Mader. 2008. Biological invasions: The widening debate: A response to Charles Warren. Progress in Human Geography 32 (2):295–98. doi:10.1177/0309132507088313.
  • Robbins, P. 2001. Tracking invasive land covers in India, or why our landscapes have never been modern. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91 (4):637–59.
  • Robbins, P., and S. Moore. 2004. Comparing invasive networks: Cultural and political biogeographies of invasive species. Geographical Review 94 (2):139–56.
  • Robbins, P., and S. Moore. 2012. Ecological anxiety disorder: Diagnosing the politics of the Anthropocene. Cultural Geographies 20 (1):3–19. doi:10.1177/1474474012469887.
  • Rutherford, P., and S. Rutherford. 2013. The confusions and exuberances of biopolitics. Geography Compass 7 (6):412–22. doi:10.1111/gec3.12046.
  • Rutherford, S., and P. Rutherford. 2013. Geography and biopolitics. Geography Compass 7 (6):423–34. doi:10.1111/gec3.12047.
  • Schullery, P. 2006. Cowboy trout: Western fly fishing as if it matters. Helena: Montana Historical Society Press.
  • Schuttler, E., R. Rozzi, and K. Jax. 2011. Towards a societal discourse on invasive species management: A case study of public perceptions of mind and beavers in Cape Horn. Journal for Nature Conservation 19:175–84. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2010.12.001.
  • Selge, S., A. Fischer, and R. van der Wal. 2011. Public and professional views on invasive non-native species—A qualitative social scientific investigation. Biological Conservation 144 (12):3089–97. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.014.
  • Seymour, M. 2013. “Support your local invasive species”: Animal protection rhetoric and nonnative species. Society & Animals 21:54–73. doi:10.1163/15685306-12341269.
  • Shackleford, N., R. Hobbs, N. Heller, L. Hallett, and T. Seastedt. 2013. Finding a middle-ground: The native/non-native debate. Biological Conservation 158:55–62. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.020.
  • Shackleton, C., D. McGarry, S. Fourie, J. Gambiza, S. Shackleton, and C. Fabricius. 2007. Assessing the effects of invasive alien species on rural livelihoods: Case examples and a framework from South Africa. Human Ecology 35 (1):113–27. doi:10.1007/s10745-006-9095-0.
  • Simberloff, D. 2003. Confronting introduced species: A form of xenophobia? Biological Invasions 5 (3):179–92.
  • Skaar, D., J. Arnold, T. Koel, M. Rhul, J. Skorupski, and H. Treanor. 2017. Effects of rotenone on amphibians and macroinvertebrates in Yellowstone. Yellowstone Science 25 (1):28–34.
  • Smart, B. 1986. The politics of truth and the problem of hegemony. In Foucault: A critical reader, ed. D. Hoy, 157–73. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
  • Sprugel, D. 1991. Disturbance, equilibrium, and environmental variability: What is “natural” vegetation in a changing environment? Biological Conservation 58 (1):1–18. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(91)90041-7.
  • Srinivasan, K. 2014. Caring for the collective: Biopower and agential subjectification in wildlife conservation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32 (3):501–17. doi:10.1068/d13101p.
  • Stoett, P. 2007. Counter-bioinvasion: Conceptual and governance challenges. Environmental Politics 16 (3):433–52. doi:10.1080/09644010701251672.
  • Tassin, J., and C. Kull. 2015. Facing the broader dimensions of biological invasions. Land Use Policy 42:165–69. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.014.
  • Trigger, D., J. Mulcock, A. Gaynor, and Y. Toussaint. 2008. Ecological restoration, cultural preferences and the negotiation of “nativeness” in Australia. Geoforum 39 (3):1273–83. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.05.010.
  • Van Der Wal, R., A. Fischer, S. Selge, and B. M. H. Larson. 2015. Neither the public nor experts judge species primarily on their origins. Environmental Conservation 42 (4):349–55. doi:10.1017/S0376892915000053.
  • van Dooren, T. 2011. Invasive species in penguin worlds: An ethical taxonomy of killing for conservation. Conservation and Society 9 (4):286–98. doi:10.4103/0972-4923.92140.
  • Varley, J., and P. Schullery. 1998. Yellowstone fishes: Ecology, history, and angling in the park. Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books.
  • Verbrugge, L., R. Leuven, and H. Zwart. 2016. Metaphors in invasion biology: Implications for risk assessment and management of non-native species. Ethics, Policy & Environment 19 (3):273–84. doi:10.1080/21550085.2016.1226234.
  • Warren, C. A. B. 2002. Qualitative interviewing. In Handbook of interview research: Content and method, ed. J. F. Gubrium and J. A. Holstein, 83–101. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Warren, C. R. 2007. Perspectives on the “alien” versus “native” species debate: A critique of concepts, language, and practice. Progress in Human Geography 31 (4):427–46. doi:10.1177/0309132507079499.
  • Whatmore, S. 2002. Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces. London: Sage.
  • White, A. 2019. Public comments on mountain goat management plan accepted through February 15. Accessed October 19, 2019. https://www.nps.gov/grte/learn/news/public-comments-on-mountain-goat-management-plan-accepted-through-february-15.htm.
  • Woods, M., and P. Moriarty. 2001. Strangers in a strange land: The problem of exotic species. Environmental Values 10 (2):163–91. doi:10.3197/096327101129340796.
  • Youatt, R. 2008. Counting species: Biopower and the global diversity census. Environmental Values 17 (3):393–417. doi:10.3197/096327108X343149.
  • Zimmerer, C. 2000. The reworking of conservation geographies: Nonequilibrium landscapes and nature–society hybrids. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90 (2):356–69. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00199.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.