567
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Reinvestment, Resource “Rushes,” and the Inalienability of Place: Land’s Active Layerings in Mozambique

Pages 1969-1992 | Received 15 Oct 2018, Accepted 09 Oct 2019, Published online: 30 Apr 2020

References

  • Abrantes, M. L. C. M., M. P. Miguel, J. F. Nascimento, and C. A. F. da Silva. 1989. Concessões de terrenos Moçambique: Catálogo [Mozambique land concessions: Catalog]. Lisbon, Portugal: Ministério da Educação, Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical.
  • Alden Wily, L. 2012. Looking back to see forward: The legal niceties of land theft in land rushes. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (3–4):751–75. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.674033.
  • Allina, E. 2012. Slavery by any other name: African life under company rule in colonial Mozambique. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
  • Amin, A., and P. Howell. 2016. Releasing the commons: Rethinking the futures of the commons. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Baglioni, E., and P. Gibbon. 2013. Land grabbing, large- and small-scale farming: What can evidence and policy from 20th century Africa contribute to the debate? Third World Quarterly 34 (9):1558–81. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843838.
  • Blunt, A., and C. McEwan. 2002. Postcolonial geographies. New York: Continuum.
  • Borras, S. M. J., D. Fig, and S. M. Suárez. 2011. The politics of agrofuels and mega-land and water deals: Insights from the ProCana case, Mozambique. Review of African Political Economy 38 (128):215–34. doi: 10.1080/03056244.2011.582758.
  • Borras, S. M. J., R. Hall, I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2011. Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: An editorial introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (2):209–16. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559005.
  • Bowen, M. 2000. The state against the peasantry: Rural struggles in colonial and postcolonial Mozambique. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
  • Burr, K. 2005. The evolution of the international law of alienability: The 1997 land law of Mozambique as a case study. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 43 (3):961–98.
  • Buur, L., C. Mondlane, and O. Baloi. 2011. Strategic privatisation: Rehabilitating the Mozambican sugar industry. Review of African Political Economy 38 (128):235–56. doi: 10.1080/03056244.2011.582762.
  • Club of Mozambique. 2018. Nyusi inaugurates white sugar refinery. November 30. Accessed February 3, 2019. https://clubofmozambique.com/news/nyusi-inaugurates-white-sugar-refinery/.
  • Cosgrove, D. 1984. Social formation and symbolic landscape. London: Croom Helm.
  • Cosgrove, D., and S. Daniels. 1988. The iconography of landscape. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Costa, A. 1943. Açúcar de Moçambique (Mozambican sugar): Incomati Estates, Limited. Moçambique: Documentário Trimestral 9 (34):91–103.
  • Darby, H. C. 2002. The relations of history and geography: Studies in England, France, and the United States. Exeter, UK: University of Exeter Press.
  • Duncan, J. 1990. The city as text: The politics of landscape interpretation in the Kandyan kingdom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Duncan, J., and N. Duncan. 1988. (Re)reading the landscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 6 (2):117–26. doi: 10.1068/d060117.
  • Edelman, M., and A. León. 2013. Cycles of land grabbing in Central America: An argument for history and a case study in the Bajo Aguán, Honduras. Third World Quarterly 34 (9):1697–722. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843848.
  • Edelman, M., C. Oya, and S. M. J. Borras. 2013. Global land grabs: Historical processes, theoretical and methodological implications and current trajectories. Third World Quarterly 34 (9):1517–31. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.850190.
  • Edelman, M., and W. Wolford. 2017. Introduction: Critical agrarian studies in theory and practice. Antipode 49 (4):959–76. doi: 10.1111/anti.12326.
  • Fairbairn, M. 2013. Indirect dispossession: Domestic power imbalances and foreign access to land in Mozambique. Development and Change 44 (2):335–56. doi: 10.1111/dech.12013.
  • Fairbairn, M., J. Fox, S. R. Isakson, M. Levien, N. Peluso, S. Razavi, I. Scoones, and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 2014. Introduction: New directions in agrarian political economy. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (5):653–66. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.953490.
  • Gengenbach, H. 2005. Binding memories: Women as makers and tellers of history in Magude, Mozambique. ACLS Humanities E-Book Electronic ed. Gutenberg-e (Series). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Goldstein, J. E., and J. S. Yates. 2017. Introduction: Rendering land investable. Geoforum 82:209–11. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.03.004.
  • Gregory, D. 2004. The colonial present. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Hall, D. 2013. Primitive accumulation, accumulation by dispossession and the global land grab. Third World Quarterly 34 (9):1582–604. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843854.
  • Hall, R. 2011. Land grabbing in southern Africa: The many faces of the investor rush. Review of African Political Economy 38 (128):193–214. doi: 10.1080/03056244.2011.582753.
  • Hall, R., M. Edelman, S. M. J. Borras, I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2015. Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions from below. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (3–4):467–88. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1036746.
  • Harries, P. 1994. Work, culture, and identity: Migrant laborers in Mozambique and South Africa, c. 1860–1910. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Head, J. 1980. State, capital, and migrant labor in Zambezia, Mozambique: A study of the labor force of Sena Sugar Estates Limited. PhD diss., Durham University.
  • Heffernan, M. 2009. Historical geography. In Dictionary of human geography, 5th ed., ed. D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. Watts and S. Whatmore, 332–35. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Incomati Estates Limited. 1920. Companies Registration. IE-IC. The National Archives, Kew
  • Jeffrey, A., C. McFarlane, and A. Vasudevan. 2012. Rethinking enclosure: Space, subjectivity and the commons. Antipode 44 (4):1247–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00954.x.
  • Jelsma, I., A. Bolding, and M. Slingerland. 2010. Smallholder sugarcane production systems in Xinavane, Mozambique: Report from the field. Wageningen: Wageningen University Report.
  • Kagan-Guthrie, Z. 2018. Bound for work: Labor, mobility, and colonial rule in central Mozambique, 1940–1965. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
  • Lazzarini, A. H. 2017. Gendered labour, migratory labour: Reforming sugar regimes in Xinavane, Mozambique. Journal of Southern African Studies 43 (3):605–23. doi: 10.1080/03057070.2016.1197695.
  • Legg, S. 2011. Assemblage/apparatus: Using Deleuze and Foucault. Area 43 (2):128–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01010.x.
  • Lester, A. 2000. Historical geographies of imperialism. In Modern historical geographies, ed. B. Graham and C. Nash, 100–120. Essex, UK: Pearson Education.
  • Lester, A. 2003. Historical geographies of Southern Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies 29 (3):595–613.
  • Li, T. M. 2014. What is land? Assembling a resource for global investment. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39 (4):589–602. doi: 10.1111/tran.12065.
  • Lunstrom, E. 2008. Mozambique, neoliberal land reform, and the Limpopo National Park. Geographical Review 98 (3):339–55.
  • Lunstrom, E. 2014. Green grabs, land grabs and the spatiality of displacement: Eviction from Mozambique’s Limpopo National Park. Area 48 (2):142–52.
  • Mandamule, U. 2018. Modelos de parceria entre comunidades e investidores no sector do açúcar [Partnership models between communities and investors in the sugar sector]. Paper presented at Workshop Transformations of Rural Space in Mozambique, Maputo, Mozambique, May 29.
  • Mapas antes e depois das concessões [Maps before and after concessions]. 1966. Mapas antes e depois das concessões da S.A.I. e do Alfredo Luiz Lda [Maps before and after the SAI and Alfredo Luiz concessions]. Inspecção dos Serviços Administrativos [Inspection of Administrative Services], Mozambican Historical Archive, Maputo.
  • Mapas de mão de obra indigena [Indigenous labor reports]. 1959. Mapas de mão de obra indígena, Patrão Sociedade Agrícola de Incomati [Indigenous labor reports, employer Incomati Agricultural Society]. Trabalho e Acção Social, Inventario Sumãrio de Fundo da Administração do Concelho da Manhiça [Social Work and Action, Background Summary of the Administration of the County of Manhiça], box 167. Mozambican Historical Archive, Maputo.
  • Massey, D. [1984] 1995. Spatial divisions of labor: Social structures and the geography of production. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Matless, D. 2003. Landscape. In Pile handbook of cultural geography, ed. K. Anderson and M. Domosh, 227–32. London: Sage.
  • Mbembe, A. 2001. On the postcolony. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • McDonagh, B., and C. J. Griffin. 2016. Occupy! Historical geographies of property, protest and the commons, 1500–1850. Journal of Historical Geography 53:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhg.2016.03.002.
  • McGregor, J. 2005. Landscape, politics and the historical geography of southern Africa. Journal of Historical Geography 31 (2):205–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jhg.2004.12.021.
  • McKittrick, K. 2011. On plantations, prisons, and a black sense of place. Social & Cultural Geography 12 (8):947–63. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2011.624280.
  • Mignolo, W. 2001. Coloniality of power and subalternity. In The Latin American subaltern studies reader, ed. I. Rodríguez, 424–44. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Milgroom, J. 2015. Policy processes of a land grab: At the interface of politics “in the air” and politics “on the ground” in Massingir, Mozambique. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (3–4):585–606. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.991721.
  • Milgroom, J., and M. Spierenburg. 2008. Induced volition: Resettlement from the Limpopo National Park, Mozambique. Journal of Contemporary African Studies 26 (4):435–48. doi: 10.1080/02589000802482021.
  • Mitchell, D. 1996. The lie of the land: Migrant workers and the California landscape. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Moore, D. S. 2005. Suffering for territory: Race, place, and power in Zimbabwe. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Morrissey, J., D. Nally, U. Strohmayer, and Y. Whelan. 2014. Key concepts in historical geography. London: Sage.
  • Mozambique: Sugar expansion project launched. 2007. Africa News. Accessed April 20, 2018. https://advancelexis-com.ezproxy.bucknell.edu/api/document?collection=news&id=urn:contentItem:4NJ6-9110-TX2JN2JD-00000-00&context=1516831.
  • Mozambique News Agency. 2008. Strike at Xinavane continues. Accessed February 19, 2018. https://advance-lexis-com.ezproxy.bucknell.edu/api/document?collection=news&id=urn:contentItem:7VWD-3XJ0-YC0M-T0RF-00000-00&context=1516831.
  • Mozambique News Agency. 2011. Persiste paralisação laboral na açucareira de Xinavane [Labor stoppage persists at the Xinavane Sugar Mill]. Accessed November 4, 2018. Retrieved from https://advance-lexis-com.ezproxy.bucknell.edu/api/document?collection=news&id=urn:contentItem:545V-K1D1-JDNB-70MS-00000-00&context=1516831.
  • Myers, G. 1994. Competitive rights, competitive claims: Land access in post-war Mozambique. Journal of Southern African Studies 20 (4):603–32. doi: 10.1080/03057079408708424.
  • National Directorate of Land and Forestry (DNTF). 1910–2006. Land Cadaster Files – Xinavane. National Land Cadaster, Maputo, Mozambique.
  • Neil-Tomlinson, B. 1987. The Mozambique Chartered Company 1892 to 1910. PhD diss., University of London.
  • Newitt, M. 1973. Portuguese settlement on the Zambezi: Exploration, land tenure and colonial rule in East Africa. New York: Africana.
  • Norfolk, S., and C. Tanner. 2007. Improving tenure security for the rural poor: Mozambique—Country case study. LEP Working Paper, Food and Agriculture Organization, UK.
  • Ogborn, M. 1999. The relations between geography and history: Work in historical geography in 1997. Progress in Human Geography 23 (1):97–108. doi: 10.1191/030913299672557598.
  • O’Laughlin, B. 2000. Class and the customary: The ambiguous legacy of the Indigenato in Mozambique. African Affairs 99:5–42.
  • O’Laughlin, B. 2017. Consuming bodies: Health and work in the cane fields in Xinavane, Mozambique. Journal of Southern African Studies 43 (3):625–41.
  • O’Laughlin, B., and Y. Ibraimo. 2013. The expansion of sugar production and the well-being of agricultural workers and rural communities in Xinavane and Magude. Cadernos IESE No. 12E, IESE, Maputo, Mozambique.
  • Order of Expulsion for Correctional Prison. 1959. Desterro e expulsa, administrativos de indígenas [Exile and expulsion, administration of natives] 1944–1959. Trabalho e Acção Social, Inventario Sumário de Fundo da Administração do Concelho da Manhiça [Social Work and Action, Background Summary of the Administration of the County of Manhiça], box 144. Mozambican Historical Archive, Maputo.
  • Otsuki, K., D. Achá, and J. D. Wijnhoud. 2016. After the consent: Re-imagining participatory land governance in Massingir, Mozambique. Geoforum :1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.09.011.
  • The Party in Mozambique. 1982. Vanguard workers, interview with Armando Guebuza. People’s Power in Mozambique, Angola, and Guinea Bissau 19:15–23.
  • Peluso, N., and C. Lund. 2011. New frontiers of land control: Introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (4):667–81. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.607692.
  • Penvenne, J. 1989. “We are all Portuguese!” Challenging the political economy of assimilation: Lourenco Marques, 1870–1933. In The creation of tribalism in southern Africa, ed. L. Vail, 256–81. London: James Currey.
  • Pitcher, A. 2002. Transforming Mozambique: The politics of privatization, 1975–2000. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pulido, L., L. Barraclough, and W. Cheng. 2015. A people’s guide to Los Angeles. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Quijano, A. 2008. Coloniality of power, eurocentrism, and social classification. In Coloniality at Large: Latin America and the postcolonial debate, ed. M. Moraña, E. Dussel, and C. A. Jáuregui, 181–224. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Sauer, C. [1925] 1963. Land and life: A selection from the writings of Carl Ortwin Sauer. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Scoones, I., R. Hall, S. M. J. Borras, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2013. The politics of evidence: Methodologies for understanding the global land rush. Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (3):469–83. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.801341.
  • Serra, A. 1966. ISANI: Inspecção dos Serviços Administrativos (e Negócios Indígenas) [Inspection of Administrative Services (and Indigenous Business)]. Maputo, Mozambique: Mozambican Historical Archive.
  • Sevilla-Buitrago, A. 2015. Capitalist formations of enclosure: Space and the extinction of the commons. Antipode 47 (4):999–1020. doi: 10.1111/anti.12143.
  • Sizemore, C. 2012. Africa: The last investment frontier. Forbes, August 8. Accessed December 15, 2014. https://www.forbes.com/sites/moneybuilder/2012/08/08/africa-the-last-investment-frontier/#6ee0bf7e4f91.
  • Smith, N. [1984] 1990. Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space. Oxon, UK: Blackwell.
  • Spivak, G. C. 1988. Subaltern studies: Deconstructing historiography. In In other worlds: Essays in cultural politics. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Stoler, A. L. 2016. Duress: Imperial durabilities in our times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Summary of Share Capital and Shares of Incomati Estates, Limited. 1920, 1923. Form E of the Companies Acts, 1908–1917. IE-IC. National Archives, Kew.
  • Tanner, C. 2010. Land rights and enclosures: Implementing the Mozambican land law in practice. In The struggle over land in Africa: Conflicts, politics & change, ed. W. Anseeuw and C. Alden, 105–30. Cape Town, Cape Town: HSRC Press.
  • Thompson, E. P. 1993. Customs in common: Studies in traditional popular culture. New York: New Press.
  • Tongaat Hulett. 2018. 2018 integrated annual report. Accessed February 3, 2019. http://www.tongaat.com/annual_reports/ar_2018/downloads/AR-2018-FULL.pdf.
  • Vail, L., and L. White. 1981. Capitalism and colonialism in Mozambique: A study of Quelimane District. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. doi: 10.1086/ahr/87.2.516-a.
  • Van Sant, L., E. Hennessy, M. Domosh, M. R. Arefin, E. Hennessy, N. McClintock, and S. Mollett. 2020. Historical geographies of, and for, the present. Progress in Human Geography 44 (1):168–88.
  • Veldwisch, G. J. 2015. Contract farming and the reorganisation of agricultural production within the Chókwè Irrigation System, Mozambique. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (5):1003–28. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.991722.
  • Werner, M. 2016. Global displacements: The making of uneven development in the Caribbean. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
  • White, B., S. M. J. Borras, R. Hall, I. Scoones, and W. Wolford. 2012. The new enclosures: Critical perspectives on corporate land deals. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (3–4):619–47. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.691879.
  • Wolford, W., S. M. J. Borras, R. Hall, I. Scoones, and B. White. 2013. Governing global land deals: The role of the state in the rush for land. In Governing global land deals: The role of the state in the rush for land, ed. W. Wolford, S. M. J. Borras, R. Hall, I. Scoones, and B. White, 1–22. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Wolford, W., and R. Nehring. 2015. Constructing parallels: Brazilian expertise and the commodification of land, labour and money in Mozambique. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D'études du Développement 36 (2):208–23. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2015.1036010.
  • Wylie, J. 2011. Landscape. In Sage handbook of geographical knowledge, ed. J. Agnew and D. Livingstone, 300–15. London: Sage.
  • Zamparoni, V. 2004. Da escravatura ao trabalho forçado: Teorias e práticas [From slavery to forced labor: Theories and practices]. Africana Studia 7:299–325.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.