Putting Forests to Work? Enrolling Vegetal Labor in the Socioecological Fix of Bioenergy Resource Making

References

• Abt, K. L., R. C. Abt, C. S. Galik, and K. E. Skog. 2014. Effect of policies on pellet production and forests in the U.S. South. General Technical Report SRS-202, USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Albritton Jonsson, F. 2018. Abundance and scarcity in geological time, 1784–1844. In Nature, action and the future: Political thought and the environment, ed. K. Forrester and S. Smith, 70–93. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailis, R., and J. Baka. 2011. Constructing sustainable biofuels: Governance of the emerging biofuel economy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (4):827–38. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.568867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. B., and G. Langdon. 1990. Pinus taeda. In Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers; 2. Hardwoods, agriculture handbook 654, ed. R. M. Burns and B. H. Honkala, 497–512. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, K. 2009. Neoliberal nature, ecological fixes, and the pitfalls of comparative research. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41 (8):1781–87. doi: 10.1068/a4277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, K., and G. Bridge. 2006. Material worlds? Resource geographies and the “matter of nature.” Progress in Human Geography 30 (1):5–27. doi: 10.1191/0309132506ph588oa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua, M. 2017. Nonhuman labour, encounter value, spectacular accumulation: The geographies of a lively commodity. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42 (2):274–88. doi: 10.1111/tran.12170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua, M. 2019. Animating capital: Work, commodities, circulation. Progress in Human Geography 43 (4):650–69. doi: 10.1177/0309132518819057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battistoni, A. 2017. Bringing in the work of nature: From natural capital to hybrid labor. Political Theory 45 (1):5–31. doi: 10.1177/0090591716638389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S., and M. Mahony. 2018. The IPCC and the new map of science and politics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 9 (6):e547. doi: 10.1002/wcc.547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrsin, I. 2019. Rendering renewable: Technoscience and the political economy of waste-to-energy regulation in the European Union. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (5):1362–78. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1569492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEIS. 2019. UK energy statistics, Q1 2019. London: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. Accessed March 16, 2020. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/812626/Press_Notice_June_19.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bok, R. 2019. “By our metaphors you shall know us”: The “fix” of geographical political economy. Progress in Human Geography 43 (6):1087–108. doi: 10.1177/0309132518804352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, W., W. S. Prudham, and R. A. Schurman. 2001. Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature. Society & Natural Resources 14 (7):555–70. doi: 10.1080/08941920120686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, B. 2008. Environmental issues: Inventive life. Progress in Human Geography 32 (5):667–79. doi: 10.1177/0309132507088030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brice, J. 2014. Attending to grape vines: Perceptual practices, planty agencies and multiple temporalities in Australian viticulture. Social & Cultural Geography 15 (8):942–65. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2014.883637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., S. Bouzarovski, M. Bradshaw, and N. Eyre. 2013. Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy 53:331–40. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carton, W., and L. Andersson. 2017. Where forest carbon meets its maker: Forestry-based offsetting as the subsumption of nature. Society & Natural Resources 30 (7):829–43. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2017.1284291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2009. Researching neoliberal environmental governance: A reply to Karen Bakker. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41 (8):1788–94. doi: 10.1068/a42204.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., and C. Waldby. 2014. Clinical labor: Tissue donors and research subjects in the global bioeconomy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, K., J. Barry, and T. Walkingstick. 2008. Managing loblolly pine stands … from A to Z. Little Rock: University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture Cooperative Extension Service.
   Google Scholar
• Daggett, C. N. 2019. The birth of energy: Fossil fuels, thermodynamics, & the politics of work. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. 2019. UK energy statistics, Q1 2019. London: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. Accessed March 16, 2020. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/812626/Press_Notice_June_19.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Drax Group. 2016. 5 things you never knew about forests. Accessed March 16, 2020. https://www.drax.com/sustainability/5-things-you-never-knew-about-forests/.
   Google Scholar
• Drax Group. 2017. What is a working forest? Accessed March 16, 2020. https://www.drax.com/sustainability/what-is-a-working-forest/.
   Google Scholar
• Drax Group. 2019. Annual report and accounts 2018. Accessed March 16, 2020. https://www.drax.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Drax-Annual-report-accounts-2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ekers, M. 2015. A fix in the forests: Relief labor and the production of reforestation infrastructure in depression-era Canada. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 47 (12):2537–54. doi: 10.1177/0308518X15609211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekers, M., and S. Prudham. 2015. Towards the socio-ecological fix. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 47 (12):2438–45. doi: 10.1177/0308518X15617573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekers, M., and S. Prudham. 2017. The metabolism of socioecological fixes: Capital switching, spatial fixes, and the production of nature. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (6):1370–88. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1309962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekers, M., and S. Prudham. 2018. The socioecological fix: Fixed capital, metabolism, and hegemony. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (1):17–34. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1309963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernwein, M. 2019. Les natures de la ville néolibérale: Une écologie politique du végétal urbain [The natures of the neoliberal city: A vegetal urban political ecology]. Grenoble, France: UGA Éditions.
   Google Scholar
• Ernwein, M. 2020. From undead commodities to lively laborers: (Re)valuing vegetal life, reclaiming the power to design-with plants. In The Botanical City, ed. M. Gandy and S. Jasper, 237–42. Berlin, Germany: Jovis Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019. Brief on biomass for energy in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission’s Knowledge Centre for Bioeconomy.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2018. Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast). Official Journal of the European Union L328:82–209.
   Google Scholar
• Fanous, J., and W. R. Moomaw. 2018. A critical look at forest bioenergy: Exposing a high-carbon climate solution. Global Development and Environmental Institute Climate Policy Brief No. 8, Tufts University, Medford, MA.
   Google Scholar
• FitzSimmons, M. 1989. The matter of nature. Antipode 21 (2):106–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.1989.tb00183.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, J. 2017. Toward vegetal political ecology: Kyrgyzstan’s walnut–fruit forest and the politics of graftability. Geoforum 79:26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R., and A. Pratt. 2008. In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture and Society 25 (7–8):1–30. doi: 10.1177/0263276408097794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillon, S. 2010. Fields of dreams: Negotiating an ethanol agenda in the Midwest United States. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (4):723–48. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginn, F. 2008. Extension, subversion, containment: Eco-nationalism and (post) colonial nature in Aotearoa, New Zealand. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33 (3):335–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00307.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. C., P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S.V. Stehman, S.J. Goetz, T.R. Loveland, et al. 2013. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342 (6160):850–53. doi: 10.1126/science.1244693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1981. The spatial fix: Hegel, von Thunen and Marx. Antipode 13 (3):1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.1981.tb00312.x.
   Google Scholar
• Head, L., J. Atchison, C. Phillips, and K. Buckingham. 2014. Vegetal politics: Belonging, practices and places. Social & Cultural Geography 15 (8):861–70. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2014.973900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, D. 2015. Natural capital: Valuing the planet. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. 2003. The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hribal, J. 2003. “Animals are a part of the working class”: A challenge to labor history. Labor History 44 (4):435–53. doi: 10.1080/0023656032000170069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M. 2017. Value, nature, and labor: A defense of Marx. Capitalism Nature Socialism 28 (1):39–52. doi: 10.1080/10455752.2016.1271817.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M. 2018. Resource geographies I: Valuing nature (or not). Progress in Human Geography 42 (1):148–59. doi: 10.1177/0309132516670773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M., and J. McCarthy. 2017. Beyond the subterranean energy regime? Fuel, land use and the production of space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42 (4):655–68. doi: 10.1111/tran.12182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Renewable Energy Agency. 2014. Global bioenergy supply and demand projections. Abu Dhabi, UAE: International Renewable Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, G., and E. Swyngedouw. 2018. Do bees produce value? A conversation between an ecological economist and a Marxist geographer. Capitalism Nature Socialism 29 (3):36–50. doi: 10.1080/10455752.2017.1315830.
   Google Scholar
• Kama, K. 2020. Resource-making controversies: Knowledge, anticipatory politics and economization of unconventional fossil fuels. Progress in Human Geography 44 (2):333–56. doi: 10.1177/0309132519829223.
   Google Scholar
• Kareiva, P., H. Tallis, T. H. Ricketts, G. C. Daily, and S. Polasky, eds. 2011. Natural capital: Theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, S., and D. Mitchell. 2004. The nature of things: Dead labor, nonhuman actors, and the persistence of Marxism. Antipode 36 (4):687–705. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2004.00443.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. 2004. First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. doi: 10.1086/ahr/95.2.450-a.
   Google Scholar
• Koester, S., and S. Davis. 2018. Siting of wood pellet production facilities in environmental justice communities of the Southeastern United States. Environmental Justice 11 (2):64–70. doi: 10.1089/env.2017.0025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzywoszynska, A. 2020. Nonhuman labor and the making of resources: Making soils a resource through microbial labor. Environmental Humanities.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. L., C. E. Wheeler, E. T. A. Mitchard, and A. Koch. 2019. Regenerate natural forests to store carbon. Nature 568 (7750):25–28. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01026-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2010. To make live or let die? Rural dispossession and the protection of surplus populations. Antipode 41 (Suppl. 1):66–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00717.x.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. [1867] 1976. Capital, a critique of political economy. Vol. 1. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1875. Critique of the Gotha program. Accessed March 16, 2020. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1875/gotha//.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, R., N. Mortimer, J. P. Lesschen, T. J. Lindroos, L. Sokka, A. Morris, P. Henshall, C. Hatto, O. Mwabonje, J. Rix, et al. 2015. Carbon impacts of biomass consumed in the EU: Quantitative assessment. Farnham, UK: Forest Research. Accessed March 16, 2020. https://bit.ly/36AyujV.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. 2015. A socioecological fix to capitalist crisis and climate change? The possibilities and limits of renewable energy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 47 (12):2485–502. doi: 10.1177/0308518X15602491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeand, S. E., E. J. Jokela, D. A. Huber, T. D. Byram, H. L. Allen, B. Li, and T. J. Mullin. 2006. Performance of improved genotypes of loblolly pine across different soils, climates and silvicultural inputs. Forest Ecology and Management 227 (1–2):178–84. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2009. A food regime analysis of the “world food crisis.” Agriculture and Human Values 26 (4):281–95. doi: 10.1007/s10460-009-9218-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. 2009. Carbon democracy. Economy and Society 38 (3):399–432. doi: 10.1080/03085140903020598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moomaw, W. R., S. A. Masino, and E. K. Faison. 2019. Intact forests in the United States: Proforestation mitigates climate change and serves the greatest good. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 2:27. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2019.00027.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. 2011. Transcending the metabolic rift: A theory of crises in the capitalist world-ecology. Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (1):1–46. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.538579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nally, D. 2015. Governing precarious lives: Land grabs, geopolitics, and “food security.” The Geographical Journal 181 (4):340–49. doi: 10.1111/geoj.12063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent, J. P. 2015. Ontario’s infrastructure boom: A socioecological fix for air pollution, congestion, jobs, and profits. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 47 (12):2465–84. doi: 10.1068/a140176p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojha, H., T. Maraseni, A. Nightingale, B. Bhattarai, and D. Khatri. 2019. Rescuing forests from the carbon trap. Forest Policy and Economics 101:15–18. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswalt, S. N., and W. B. Smith. 2014. U.S. forest resource facts and historical trends. Report FS-1036, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Oswalt, S. N., W. B. Smith, P. D. Miles, and S. A. Pugh. 2019. Forest resources of the United States, 2017: A technical document supporting the Forest Service 2020 RPA assessment. General Technical Report WO-97, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, J. 2010. Stopping the unstoppable? A discursive-institutionalist analysis of renewable transport fuel policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28 (6):992–1010. doi: 10.1068/c09206j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, J. 2014. Biofuels and the politics of land-use change: Tracing the interactions of discourse and place in European policy making. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 46 (2):337–52. doi: 10.1068/a4684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxson, H. 2017. The naturalization of nature as working. Cultural Anthropology. Accessed March 16, 2020. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/the-naturalization-of-nature-as-working.
   Google Scholar
• Peltola, T., and J. Tuomisaari. 2015. Making a difference: Forest biodiversity, affective capacities, and the micro-politics of expert fieldwork. Geoforum 64:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, H. 2007. Ecologies of actor-networks and (non)social labor within the urban political economies of nature. Geoforum 38 (6):1152–62. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponte, S. 2014. The evolutionary dynamics of biofuel value chains: From unipolar and government-driven to multipolar governance. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 46 (2):353–72. doi: 10.1068/a46112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prudham, S. 2003. Taming trees: Capital, science, and nature in Pacific slope tree improvement. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 (3):636–56. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.9303007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prudham, S. 2005. Knock on wood: Nature as commodity in Douglas-fir country. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, T., and G. Weszkalnys. 2014. Introduction: Resource materialities. Anthropological Quarterly 87 (1):5–30. doi: 10.1353/anq.2014.0007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. M., and J. D. Wainwright. 2013. The value of nature to the state. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (4):890–905. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2013.765772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandbag. 2019. Playing with fire: An assessment of company plans to burn biomass in EU coal power stations. Accessed March 16, 2020. https://sandbag.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/2019-SB-Biomass-report-1.7b_DIGI.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, W. H. 2018. Are wood pellets a green fuel? Science 359 (6382):1328–29. doi: 10.1126/science.aat2305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searchinger, T. D., T. Beringer, B. Holtsmark, D. M. Kammen, E. F. Lambin, W. Lucht, P. Raven, and J.-P. van Ypersele. 2018. Europe’s renewable energy directive poised to harm global forests. Nature Communications 9 (1):3741. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06175-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sieferle, R. P. 2001. The subterranean forest: Energy systems and the industrial revolution. Cambridge, UK: White Horse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 1984. Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space. New York: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 2007. Nature as accumulation strategy. Socialist Register 43:16–36.
   Google Scholar
• Southern Environmental Law Center. 2019. Southeast U.S. wood pellet plants exporting to Europe. Accessed March 16, 2020. https://www.southernenvironment.org/uploads/maps/SELC_WoodPelletExportMap_2019_1126_map+table.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 2019. Form 8-K, Current report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Enviva Partners, LP. Accessed March 16, 2020. https://sec.report/Document/0001104659-19-054493/.
   Google Scholar
• UK Department for Energy and Climate Change. 2014. Life cycle impacts of biomass electricity in 2020, URN 14D/243. London: UK Department for Energy and Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. 2019. Global agricultural information network report: EU Biofuels Annual 2019. GAIN Report Number NL9022, USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, S., and L. Cotula. 2010. Over the heads of local people: Consultation, consent, and recompense in large-scale land deals for biofuel projects in Africa. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (4):899–916. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. 1989. Americans and their forests: A historical geography. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1086/ahr/96.4.1276-a.
   Google Scholar
• Winickoff, D., and M. Mondou. 2017. The problem of epistemic jurisdiction in global governance: The case of sustainability standards for biofuels. Social Studies of Science 47 (1):7–32. doi: 10.1177/0306312716667855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrigley, E. A. 1988. Continuity, chance and change: The character of the industrial revolution in England. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, J. Y. 2011. Forest biorefinery: The next century of innovation. Tappi Journal 10 (5):5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar