For geographical imagination systems

References

• Agarwal, P., and A. Skupin. 2008. Self-organising maps: Applications in geographic information science. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, L. 2016. Toward speculative data: “Geographic information” for situated knowledges, vibrant matter, and relational spaces. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (6):971–89. doi: 10.1177/0263775816665118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunge, W. W. 1966. Theoretical geography. 2nd ed. Lund, Sweden: Gleerup.
   Google Scholar
• Buttimer, A. 1976. Grasping the dynamism of lifeworld. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 66 (2):277–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1976.tb01090.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloud, J. 2002. American cartographic transformations during the cold war. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 29 (3):261–82. doi: 10.1559/152304002782008422.
   Google Scholar
• Codd, E. F. 1970. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Communications of the ACM 13 (6):377–87. doi: 10.1145/362384.362685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope, M., and S. Elwood, eds. 2009. Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1994. What is philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ignazio, C., and L. Klein. 2020. Data feminism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, J. 2009. SpecLab: Digital aesthetics and projects in speculative computing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, J. 2011. Humanities approaches to graphical display. Digital Humanities Quarterly 5 (1). Accessed April 28, 2020. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html.
   Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M. J., and J. Herring. 1991. Categorizing binary topological relations between regions, lines, and points in geographic databases. Technical report, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, University of California, Santa Barbara.
   Google Scholar
• Gahegan, M. 1999. Guest editorial: What is geocomputation? Transactions in GIS 3 (3):203–06. doi: 10.1111/1467-9671.00017.
   Google Scholar
• Gahegan, M. 2018. Our GIS is too small. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien 62 (1):15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, S., K. Janowicz, G. McKenzie, and L. Li. 2013. Towards platial joins and buffers in place-based GIS. In Proceedings of The First ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Models of Place, ed. S. Scheider, B. Adams, K. Janowicz, M. Vasardani, and S. Winter 42–49. Orlando, FL: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gatrell, A. C. 1983. Distance and space: A geographical perspective. Contemporary problems in geography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghose, R. 2017. Public-participation GIS. In International encyclopedia of geography, ed. D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu, and R. A. Marston, 1–11. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg1155.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, R. W. 2007. Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. 1992. Geographical information science. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 6 (1):31–45. doi: 10.1080/02693799208901893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. 2011. Formalizing place in geographic information systems. In Communities, neighborhoods, and health: Expanding the boundaries of place, ed. L. M. Burton, S. A. Matthews, M. C. Leung, S. P. Kemp, and D. T. Takeuchi, 21–33. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7482-2_2.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. 2018. Reimagining the history of GIS. Annals of GIS 24 (1):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, D. 2011. From a view to a kill: Drones and late modern war. Theory, Culture & Society 28 (7–8):188–215. doi: 10.1177/0263276411423027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, G., and C. Dolbear. 2013. Linked data: A geographic perspective. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1969. Explanation in geography. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. [1973] 1988. Social justice and the city. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Iosifescu Enescu, C. M., J. Montangero, and L. Hurni. 2015. Toward dream cartography: Mapping dream space and content. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 50 (4):224–37. doi: 10.3138/cart.50.4.3137.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J.-K. 2015. Community through the eyes of children: Blending child-centered research and qualitative geovisulization. Children’s Geographies 13 (6):722–40. doi: 10.1080/14733285.2014.964666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P. 2002. Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92 (4):645–61. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P., and L. Knigge. 2006. Doing qualitative research using GIS: An oxymoronic endeavor? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 38 (11):1999–2002. doi: 10.1068/a38462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lally, N., and L. Bergmann. Forthcoming. enfolding: An experimental geographical imagination system (gis). In A place more void, ed. P. Kingsbury and A. Secor, 1–13. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, G. W., and S. Clarke. 1998. The Leibniz–Clarke correspondence. New York: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. E., and N. Schuurman. 2017. Area-based topic modeling and visualization of social media for qualitative GIS. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (5):1028–39. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1293499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1867. Capital: A critique of political economy. Vol. I. London and New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 1993. Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place. In Mapping the futures, ed. J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam, G. Robertson, and L. Tickner, 59–69. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2005. For space. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peuquet, D. J. 1988. Representations of geographic space: Toward a conceptual synthesis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 78 (3):375–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1988.tb00214.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radil, S. M., and M. B. Anderson. 2019. Rethinking PGIS: Participatory or (post)political GIS? Progress in Human Geography 43 (2):195–213. doi: 10.1177/0309132517750774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, K. 2008. A call for agonism: GIS and the politics of collaboration. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (10):2346–63. doi: 10.1068/a4028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, I., J. Webber, and E. Eifrem. 2015. Graph databases: New opportunities for connected data. 2nd ed. Beijing: O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 1993. Feminism and geography: The limits of geographical knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Secor, A. 2013. 2012 Urban Geography plenary lecture: Topological city. Urban Geography 34 (4):430–44. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2013.778698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabazz, R. 2015. Spatializing blackness: Architectures of confinement and black masculinity in Chicago. New black studies series. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. 2002. The spaces and times of globalization: Place, scale, networks, and positionality. Economic Geography 78 (3):307–30. doi: 10.2307/4140812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. 2005. Knowledge production through critical GIS: Genealogy and prospects. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 40 (4):5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, R. 2004. Rewiring for a GIS/2. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 39 (1):25–39. doi: 10.3138/T6U8-171M-452W-516R.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, J., L. Bergmann, B. Ricker, R. Rose-Redwood, D. O’Sullivan, T. J. Barnes, L. R. Barnesmoore, L. Beltz Imaoka, R. Burns, J. Cinnamon, et al. 2016. Revisiting critical GIS. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48 (5):815–24. doi: 10.1177/0308518X15622208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. 1961. Map transformations of geographic space. PhD diss., University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 46 (Supp1. 1):234–40.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. 2000. The development of analytical cartography: A personal note. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 27 (3):189–94.
   Google Scholar
• Wardrip-Fruin, N. 2012. Expressive processing: Digital fictions, computer games, and software studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, L. 2018. Topological data analysis. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 5 (1):501–32. doi: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100045.
   Google Scholar
• Westerholt, R., F.-B. Mocnik, and A. Zipf. 2018. Introduction to the PLATIAL’18 workshop on platial analysis. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Platial Analysis (PLATIAL’18), 1–5. Heidelberg, Germany: Heidelberg University GIScience Research Group Institute of Geography. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1475267.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. 1978. Introducing the cartography of reality. In Humanistic geography: Prospects and problems, ed. M. Samuels and D. Ley, 207–19. Chicago: Maaroufa Press.
   Google Scholar