What’s in a Name? Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Geography, Environment, and Sustainability Key Words and Program Names

References

• Alexander, J. W. 1959. Geography: As some others see it. The Professional Geographer 11 (4):2–5. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1959.114_2.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of Geographers. 2017. Guide to geography programs in the Americas 2016—2017. Washington, DC: American Association of Geographers.
   Google Scholar
• Ancker, J. S., and D. Kaufman. 2007. Rethinking health numeracy: A multidisciplinary literature review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA 14 (6):713–21. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, P. C., M. Escobar, and J. A. Kopec. 2000. The use of the Tobit model for analyzing measures of health status. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation 9 (8):901–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. 2011. This is like déjà vu all over again. The Professional Geographer 63 (3):332–36. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2011.566514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchert, J. R. 1960. A statement favoring support of the term geography. The Professional Geographer 12 (4):14–16. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1960.124_14.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysch, C. P. 2014. Status of geography education in the United States. National Geographic Society Education Foundation Report, 77. Washington, DC. https://gato-docs.its.txstate.edu/jcr:42d98ff7-42d2-418c-b14a-55f288f9d99c/State_of_Geography_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carter, J., A. Desikan, and G. Goldman. 2019. The Trump administration has attacked science 100 times … and counting. Scientific American. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-trump-administration-has-attacked-science-100-times-and-counting/
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R. L., and J. E. Steinbrink. 1974. Geography: From the product concept to the marketing concept. The Professional Geographer 26 (1):1–4. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1974.00001.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, K. C. 2011. Exploring the past and future of our planet: Not bit-by-bit but all at once. The Professional Geographer 63 (3):320–24. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2011.566512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crozier, M. 2006. Restoring the name of geography at Victoria University of Wellington. New Zealand Geographer 62 (3):223. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7939.2006.074_2.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, W. M. 1932. A retrospect of geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 22 (4):211–30. doi: 10.1080/00045603209357106.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J., and R. Hebden. 1984. Beyond 1984: The image of geography. Area 16 (3):254–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Blij, H. 2005. Why geography matters. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Blij, H. 2012. Why geography matters: More than ever. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, S. D. 1960. Geography: What to call it. The Professional Geographer 12 (4):13–14. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1960.124_13.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, J. G., O. A. Cherkasky, Q. Li, N. Chin, and P. J. Veazie. 2016. Should health numeracy be assessed objectively or subjectively? Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 36 (7):868–75. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15584332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domosh, M. 2014. Geography and STEM. AAG Newsletter. doi: 10.14433/2014.0021.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, R. A. 2012. Geography and the changing landscape of higher education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 36 (1):9–24. doi: 10.1080/03098265.2012.651350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estaville, L. E., F. A. Akiwumi, and E. J. Montalvo. 2009. Ethnic diversity in geography undergraduate programs. Journal of Geography 107 (6):211–19. doi: 10.1080/00221340802619984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estaville, L. E., B. J. Brown, and S. Caldwell. 2006. Geography undergraduate program essentials: Recruitment. Journal of Geography 105 (1):3–12. doi: 10.1080/00221340608978654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenneman, N. M. 1919. The circumference of geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 9 (1):3–11. doi: 10.1080/00045601909357060.
   Google Scholar
• Flaherty, C. 2018. New analysis of history-major data says the field is at a “new low.” Can it be saved? http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/11/27/new-analysis-history-major-data-says-field-new-low-can-it-be-saved
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, A. E., and T. A. Wikle. 2017. Renaming and rebranding within U.S. and Canadian geography departments, 1990–2014. The Professional Geographer 69 (1):12–21. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2015.1135404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, R. 2010. The state of geographical education in countries around the world. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 10 (4):349–62. doi: 10.1080/10382040108667450.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, B., D. Nicholas, P. Huntington, and P. Williams. 2002. Online versus offline research: Implications for evaluating digital media. Aslib Proceedings 54 (4):229–39. doi: 10.1108/00012530210443339.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T., P. Toms, M. McGuinness, C. Parker, and N. Roberts. 2015. Where’s the geography department? The changing administrative place of geography in UK higher education. Area 47 (1):56–64. doi: 10.1111/area.12154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazen, H. D., and H. C. Alberts. 2013. Introduction. In International students and scholars in the United States: Coming from abroad, ed. H. C. Alberts and H. D. Hazen, 1–24. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Helburn, N. 1998. The High School Geography Project: A retrospective view. The Social Studies 89 (5):212–18. doi: 10.1080/00377999809599854.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. 2006. Geography (or geographers) and earth system science. Geoforum 37 (1):7–11. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. 2011. Promoting geography (or part of it)—Yet again! The Professional Geographer 63 (3):325–31. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2011.566513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. H. 2019a. A golden opportunity for geography or how can we harness the growth in AP Human Geography? AAG Newsletter. doi: 10.14433/2017.0061.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. H. 2019b. Should we be worried? Or how to maintain and expand the number of geographers in our schools. AAG Newsletter. doi: 10.14433/2017.0056.
   Google Scholar
• Kenreich, T. W. 2004. Beliefs, classroom practices, and professional development activities of teacher consultants. Journal of Geography 103 (4):153–60. doi: 10.1080/00221340408978593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, D. 1960. In defense of the name geography. The Professional Geographer 12 (4):11–12. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1960.124_11.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukermann, F. 1964. Geography as a formal intellectual discipline and the way in which it contributes to human knowledge. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 8 (4):167–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0064.1964.tb00605.x.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Y. 2009. Family socioeconomic status, parental involvement, and college major choices—Gender, race/ethnic, and nativity patterns. Sociological Perspectives 52 (2):211–34. doi: 10.1525/sop.2009.52.2.211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, C. D., K. L. Cavanaugh, S. Kripalani, R. L. Rothman, and K. A. Wallston. 2015. Validation of a short, 3-item version of the Subjective Numeracy Scale. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 35 (8):932–36. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15581800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. B. 2007. Geography’s place in higher education in the United States. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 31 (1):121–41. doi: 10.1080/03098260601033068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. B. 2011. Putting understanding the changing planet in context: A response. The Professional Geographer 63 (3):337–42. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2011.566515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, R. E. 1960. Geography: How adequate is the term? The Professional Geographer 12 (4):8–10. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1960.124_8.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1965. The science of geography. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1997. Rediscovering geography: New relevance for science and society. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2010. Understanding the changing planet: Strategic directions for the geographical sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nellis, M. D. 2017. Transitions in U.S. higher education: Implications for geography learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 41 (2):155–65. doi: 10.1080/03098265.2017.1293018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattison, W. D. 1964. The four traditions of geography. Journal of Geography 63 (5):211–16. doi: 10.1080/00221346408985265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, J., B. Carswelle, R. J. Helhern, and G. Kurfman. 1970. From geographic discipline to inquiring student: Final report on the High School Geography Project, Association of American Geographers, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, P. 2011. Asking even more from grand geographic strategy. The Professional Geographer 63 (3):310–13. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2011.566510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, F. K. 1953. Exceptionalism in geography: A methodological examination. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 43 (3):226–49. doi: 10.1080/00045605309352114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seemiller, C., and M. Grace. 2017. Generation Z: Educating and engaging the next generation of students. About Campus 22 (3):21–26. doi: 10.1002/abc.21293.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 1987. “Academic war over the field of geography”: The elimination of geography at Harvard, 1947–1951. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77 (2):155–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00151.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. 2006. Geography at the University of Auckland. New Zealand Geographer 62 (3):222. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7939.2006.074_1.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, T. D., C. de Brey, and S. A. Dillow. 2019. Digest of Education Statistics 2017 NCES 2018-070, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Sui, D. Z. 2011. Introduction: Strategic directions for the geographical sciences in the next decade. The Professional Geographer 63 (3):305–9. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2011.566508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, K., R. Caslow, and L. Conrad. 2018. Perceptions & knowledge of geography on an American college campus. San Diego: San Diego State University.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, K. 1960. Geography—A problem in nomenclature. The Professional Geographer 12 (2):4–7. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1960.122_4.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, R. F. 1968. A geographic information system for regional planning. In Symposium on Land Evaluation, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, ed. G. A. Stewart, 200–210. Melbourne: Macmillan of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbanks, T. J., and M. Libbee. 1979. Avoiding the demise of geography in the United States. The Professional Geographer 31 (1):1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1979.00001.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, J. A. 2011. Geographical sciences versus geography: How and why? The Professional Geographer 63 (3):314–19. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2011.566511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, J. A. 2014. What’s in a name? AAG Newsletter. doi: 10.14433/2014.0006.
   Google Scholar
• Zafar, B. 2013. College major choice and the gender gap. Journal of Human Resources 48 (3):545–95. doi: 10.1353/jhr.2013.0022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., D. M. Smith, P. A. Ubel, and A. Fagerlin. 2007. Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: Effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 27 (5):663–71. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07303824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar