Natural Gas Production Networks: Resource Making and Interfirm Dynamics in Peru and Bolivia

References

• Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos. 2013. Interconexiones gasistas internacionales en Bolivia (Gasoductos de exportación) [International natural gas connections in Bolivia]. Las Paz: Presentation of Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos.
   Google Scholar
• Agencia Nacional de Hidrocarburos. 2019. Producción: Información de la actividad de producción en Bolivia (2000–2017) [Production: Information on production activity in Bolivia (2000–2017)]. Accessed July 12, 2018. https://www.anh.gob.bo/w2019/contenido.php?s=10.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, M., and N. Phillips. 2018. The political economy of state governance in global production networks: Change, crisis and contestation in the South African fruit sector. Review of International Political Economy 25 (1):98–121. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2017.1423367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreucci, D. 2017. Resources, regulation and the state: Struggles over gas extraction and passive revolution in Evo Morales’s Bolivia. Political Geography 61 (November):170–80. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.09.003.
   Google Scholar
• Andreucci, D. 2018. Populism, hegemony, and the politics of natural resource extraction in Evo Morales’s Bolivia. Antipode 50 (4):825–45. doi: 10.1111/anti.12373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, E., and J. McCarthy. 2014. Scale, shale, and the state: Political ecologies and legal geographies of shale gas development in Pennsylvania. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 4 (1):7–16. doi: 10.1007/s13412-013-0146-8.
   Google Scholar
• Anthias, P. 2018. Limits to decolonization: Indigeneity, territory, and hydrocarbon politics in the Bolivian Chaco. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atienza, M., M. Lufin, and J. Soto. 2018. Mining linkages in the Chilean copper supply network and regional economic development. Resources Policy, March. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baglioni, E., and L. Campling. 2017. Natural resource industries as global value chains: Frontiers, fetishism, labour and the state. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49 (11):2437–56. doi: 10.1177/0308518X17728517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baglioni, E., L. Campling, and E. Havice. 2017. The nature of the firm in global value chains. In The corporation: A critical, multi-disciplinary handbook, ed. G Baars and A. Spicer, 314–25. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker Hughes. 2019. Worldwide Rig Counts—Current & Historical Data. Accessed June 25, 2019. https://rigcount.bakerhughes.com/intl-rig-count/.
   Google Scholar
• Baker Hughes. 2020. FAQs - Baker Hughes Rig Count. Accessed June 25, 2020. https://bakerhughesrigcount.gcs-web.com/rig-count-faqs/.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, K. 2009. Neoliberal nature, ecological fixes, and the pitfalls of comparative research. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41 (8):1781–87. doi: 10.1068/a4277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, K. 2012. The “matter of nature” in economic geography. In The Wiley-Blackwell companion to economic geography, ed. T. J. Barnes, J. Peck, and E. Sheppard, 104–17. New York: Wiley. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118384497.ch6/summary.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, K., and G. Bridge. 2006. Material worlds? Resource geographies and the “matter of nature.” Progress in Human Geography 30 (1):5–27. doi: 10.1191/0309132506ph588oa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barratt, T., and B. Ellem. 2019. Temporality and the evolution of GPNs: Remaking BHP’s Pilbara iron ore network. Regional Studies 53 (11):1555–64. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1590542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A Barrel Full (2020a) Camisea Gas Field. Accessed June 25, 2020. http://abarrelfull.wikidot.com/camisea-gas-field
   Google Scholar
• A Barrel Full (2020b) Kinteroni Gas Field. Accessed June 25, 2020. http://abarrelfull.wikidot.com/kinteroni-gas-field
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A., A.-G. Abdulai, D. H. Bebbington, M. Hinfelaar, and C. Sanborn. 2018. Governing extractive industries: Politics, histories, ideas. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BP. 2018. BP statistical review of world energy 2018. London: BP.
   Google Scholar
• BP. 2019. Statistical review of world energy–All data, 1965–2019. Accessed June 25, 2020. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html
   Google Scholar
• Breul, M., J. Revilla Diez, and M. T. Sambodo. 2019. Filtering strategic coupling: Territorial intermediaries in oil and gas global production networks in Southeast Asia. Journal of Economic Geography 19 (4):829–51. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lby063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. 2004. Gas, and how to get it. Geoforum 35 (4):395–97. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. 2008. Global production networks and the extractive sector: Governing resource-based development. Journal of Economic Geography 8 (3):389–419. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbn009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. 2009. Material worlds: Natural resources, resource geography and the material economy. Geography Compass 3 (3):1217–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00233.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. 2011. Resource geographies I: Making carbon economies, old and new. Progress in Human Geography 35 (6):820–34. doi: 10.1177/0309132510385524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., and M. Bradshaw. 2017. Making a global gas market: Territoriality and production networks in liquefied natural gas. Economic Geography 93 (3):215–40. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1283212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campodónico, H. 2007. Gestión mixta y privada en la industria de hidrocarburos [Mixed and private management in the hydrocarbon industry]. CEPAL. Santiago de Chile: ECLAC. Accessed July 12, 2018. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/6319.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2008. Neoliberalising nature: The logics of reregulation and reregulation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (1):131–52. doi: 10.1068/a3999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, N., M. Hess, H. Wai-Chung Yeung, P. Dicken, and J. Henderson. 2004. “Globalizing” regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29 (4):468–84. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00142.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, N., and H. W.-C. Yeung. 2015. Global production networks: Theorizing economic development in an interconnected world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dicken, P. 2014. Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy. 7th rev. ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F. 2016. Cuando el poder extractivo captura el Estado: Lobbies, puertas giratorias y paquetazo ambiental en Peru [When the extractive power captures the State: Lobbies, revolving doors and an environmental package in Peru]. Lima, Peru: Oxfam. https://peru.oxfam.org/policy_paper/cuando-el-poder-extractivo-captura-el-estado.
   Google Scholar
• Ekers, M., and A. Loftus. 2013. Revitalizing the production of nature thesis: A Gramscian turn? Progress in Human Geography 37 (2):234–52. doi: 10.1177/0309132512448831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emel, J., M. T. Huber, and M. H. Makene. 2011. Extracting sovereignty: Capital, territory, and gold mining in Tanzania. Political Geography 30 (2):70–79. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Energy Information Administration. 2016. International energy outlook 2016. Washington, DC: U.S. Energy Information Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Equipetrol. 2020. Servicio de Slickline. Accessed June 25, 2020. http://www.equipetrol.com/servicios-y-productos/servicio-de-slickline/
   Google Scholar
• Fry, M., and E. Delgado. 2018. Petro-geographies and hydrocarbon realities in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Geography 17 (3):10–14. doi: 10.1353/lag.2018.0039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fundación Jubileo. 2012. Contratos de exploración y explotación de hidrocarburos [Hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation contracts]. La Paz: Fundación Jubileo.
   Google Scholar
• Gandarillas, M., M. Tahbub, and G. Rodríguez. 2008. Nacionalización de los hidrocarburos en Bolivia: La lucha de un pueblo por sus recursos naturales [Hydrocarbons nationalization in Bolivia: The people’s struggle for their natural resources]. Madrid: Icaria Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgis, A. J. J. 2014. Estado y petróleo en Bolivia: 1921–2010 [State and Oil in Bolivia: 1921–2010]. PhD thesis, FLACSO, Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• Hilyard, J. 2012. The oil & gas industry: A nontechnical guide. Tulsa, OK: PennWell.
   Google Scholar
• Hindery, D. 2013. From Enron to Evo: Pipeline politics, global environmentalism, and indigenous rights in Bolivia. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honoré, A. 2016. South American gas markets and the role of LNG. Oxford, UK: The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Oxford University. Accessed July 12, 2018. https://www.oxfordenergy.org/publications/south-american-gas-markets-role-lng/.
   Google Scholar
• Horner, R. 2014. Strategic decoupling, recoupling and global production networks: India’s pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Economic Geography 14 (6):1117–40. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbt022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, R. 2017. Beyond facilitator? State roles in global value chains and global production networks. Geography Compass 11 (2):e12307. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M. 2019. Resource geography II: What makes resources political? Progress in Human Geography 43 (3):553–64. doi: 10.1177/0309132518768604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkpen, A., and M. H. Moffett. 2011. The global oil & gas industry: Management, strategy and finance. Tulsa, OK: PennWell.
   Google Scholar
• Irarrázaval, F. 2018. Metano-territorialidades: La “Era del gas natural” en Peru y Bolivia [Methane-territorialities: The age of natural gas in Peru and Bolivia]. Journal of Latin American Geography 17 (3):153–82. doi: 10.1353/lag.2018.0045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irarrazaval, F. 2020. Contesting uneven development: The political geography of natural gas rents in Peru and Bolivia. Political Geography 79 (May). doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102161.
   Google Scholar
• Kama, K. 2020. Resource-making controversies: Knowledge, anticipatory politics and economization of unconventional fossil fuels. Progress in Human Geography 44 (2):333–56. doi: 10.1177/0309132519829223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaup, B. Z. 2008. Negotiating through nature: The resistant materiality and materiality of resistance in Bolivia’s natural gas sector. Geoforum 39 (5):1734–42. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaup, B. Z. 2010. A neoliberal nationalization? The constraints on natural-gas-led development in Bolivia. Latin American Perspectives 37 (3):123–38. doi: 10.1177/0094582X10366534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifsen, E., M.-T. Gustafsson, M. A. Guzmán-Gallegos, and A. Schilling-Vacaflor. 2017. New mechanisms of participation in extractive governance: Between technologies of governance and resistance work. Third World Quarterly 38 (5):1043–57. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2017.1302329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2014. What is land? Assembling a resource for global investment. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39 (4):589–602. doi: 10.1111/tran.12065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. 2012. Beyond strategic coupling: Reassessing the firm-region nexus in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography 12 (1):227–45. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbr009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. 2013. Strategic coupling and regional development in resource economies: The case of the Pilbara. Australian Geographer 44 (3):305–21. doi: 10.1080/00049182.2013.817039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., and S. Prudham. 2004. Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum 35 (3):275–83. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medinacelli, M. 2007. La nacionalización del nuevo mileno: Cuando el precio fue un aliado [The nationalization of the new millennium: When price was an ally]. La Paz, Bolivia: Fundemos.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M., R. Kaplinsky, and D. Kaplan. 2012. “One thing leads to another”—Commodities, linkages and industrial development. Resources Policy 37 (4):408–16. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. T. 2012. Global production networks, relational proximity, and the sociospatial dynamics of market internationalization in Bolivia’s wood products sector. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (1):208–33. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.596384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. 2002. The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Orihuela, J. C., and R. Thorp. 2012. The political economy of managing extractives in Bolivia, Ecuador and Peru. In Social conflict, economic development and extractive industry: Evidence from South America, ed. A. Bebbington, 27–45. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OSINERGMIN. 2020. OSINERGMIN Gas Natural - Lote 88 - Yacimiento Cashiriari. Accessed June 25, 2020. http://gasnatural.osinerg.gob.pe/contenidos/ciudadania/avance_proyectos-explotacion_lote88_yacimiento_cashiriari.html
   Google Scholar
• Pagina Siete. 2019. Repsol aún mantendrá por un tiempo su equipo en Boyuy X2 - Diario Pagina Siete. Accessed June 25, 2020. https://www.paginasiete.bo/economia/2019/5/12/repsol-aun-mantendra-por-un-tiempo-su-equipo-en-boyuy-x2-217746.html
   Google Scholar
• Parenti, C. 2015. The 2013 ANTIPODE AAG Lecture: The environment making state: Territory, nature, and value. Antipode 47 (4):829–48. doi: 10.1111/anti.12134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perreault, T. 2018. Energy, extractivism and hydrocarbon geographies in contemporary Latin America. Journal of Latin American Geography 17 (3):235–52. doi: 10.1353/lag.2018.0048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perupetro. 2020. Natural gas production 2010–January 2020. Accessed January 10, 2020. https://www.perupetro.com.pe/wps/portal/corporativo/PerupetroSite/estadisticas/producci%C3%B3n%20hidrocarburos/gas%20natural/!ut/p/z1/04_Sj9CPykssy0xPLMnMz0vMAfIjo8zi_YxcTTw8TAy93AN8LQwCTUJcvEKAjCB_E_1wsAIDHMDRQD8Kt35DH5h-HAoCjcwo0g9SEEWM-_EoiMLvvXD9KEJKovC5wczfFL8CUBgU5IaGhkYYZHo6KioCAOUOVzI!/dz/d5/L2dBISEvZ0FBIS9nQSEh/.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A., M. Atienza, and M. Arias. 2015. Encore for the enclave: The changing nature of the industry enclave with illustrations from the mining industry in Chile. Economic Geography 91 (2):119–46. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietrobelli, C., A. Marin, and J. Olivari. 2018. Innovation in mining value chains: New evidence from Latin America. Resources Policy 58 (October):1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.05.010.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, B. 2013. The Camisea gas project. In Social conflict, economic development and extractive industry: Evidence from South America, ed. A. Bebbington, 172–86. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prudham, S. 2004. Knock on wood: Nature as commodity in Douglas-fir country. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, T., and G. Weszkalnys. 2014. Introduction: Resource materialities. Anthropological Quarterly 87 (1):5–30. doi: 10.1353/anq.2014.0007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, R. S. P., and B. Milanez. 2015. The global production network for iron ore: Materiality, corporate strategies, and social contestation in Brazil. The Extractive Industries and Society 2 (4):756–65. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2015.07.002.
   Google Scholar
• Santos Françoso, M., and C. Hiratuka. 2017. Da exploração a prestação de serviços: A organização espacial das atividades upstream da indústria de petróleo e gás Na América Do Sul [From expoloration to service provision: The spatial organization of upstream activities in the oil and gas industry in South America]. USP Sao Paulo: International Congress of Latin American and Caribbean Regional Science Associacion.
   Google Scholar
• Scholvin, S., M. Breul, and J. R. Diez. 2019. Revisiting gateway cities: Connecting hubs in global networks to their hinterlands. Urban Geography 40 (9):1291–319. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2019.1585137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 1984. Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, M., and A. Underthun. 2011. Upgrading the “petropolis” of the north? Resource peripheries, global production networks, and local access to the Snøhvit natural gas complex. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography 65 (4):212–25. doi: 10.1080/00291951.2011.623307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, S. R., and J. A. Agnew. 2016. The work of networks: Embedding firms, transport, and the state in the Russian Arctic oil and gas sector. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48 (3):558–76. doi: 10.1177/0308518X15617755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamayo, J., A. Vásquez, and R. Garcia. 2017. La industria del gas natural en Perú: A diez años del proyecto Camisea. Lima: OSINERGEMIN.
   Google Scholar
• Urteaga-Crovetto, P. 2016. On environment: The “broker state,” Peruvian hydrocarbons policy, and the Camisea gas project. In Up, down, and sideways: Anthropologists trace the pathways of power, ed. R. Stryker and R. Gon, 127–48. Oxford, UK: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, H. W-C. 2015. Regional development in the global economy: A dynamic perspective of strategic coupling in global production networks. Regional Science Policy & Practice 7 (1):1–23. doi: 10.1111/rsp3.12055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, E. W. 1951. World resources and industries: A functional appraisal of availability of agricultural and industrial resources. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar