References
- Ahmed, S. 2004. Affective economies. Social Text 22 (2):117–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117.
- Asher, K. 2013. Latin American decolonial thought, or making the subaltern speak. Geography Compass 7 (12):832–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.111/gec3.12102.
- Bayón, M. J., and N. Torres. 2019. Geografía crítica para detener el despojo de los territorios [Critical geography to stop the dispossession of territories: Theories, experiences and work cases in Ecuador]. Quito, Ecuador: Abya Yala.
- Billo, E., and N. Hiemstra. 2013. Mediating messiness: Expanding ideas of flexibility, reflexivity, and embodiment in fieldwork. Gender, Place & Culture 20 (3):313–28.
- Cabezas, G. A. 2012. Mujeres Indígenas constructoras de región: Desde América Latina hasta Abya Yala [Indigenous women creators of region from Latin America to Abya Yala]. Scientific Journal of Humanistic Studies 4 (6):12–24.
- Cabnal, L. 2010. Acercamiento a la construcción de la propuesta de pensamiento epistémico de las mujeres indígenas feministas comunitarias de Abya Yala [Approaching the epistemic thought of indigenous communitarian feminists of Abya Yala]. In Feminismos diversos: El feminismo comunitario, ed. ACSUR, 11–25. Las Segovias: ASCUR. Accessed September 30, 2020. https://porunavidavivible.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/feminismos-comunitario-lorena-cabnal.pdf
- Cabnal, L. 2018. TZK´AT, Red de Sanadoras Ancestrales del Feminismo Comunitario desde Iximulew-Guatemala [Network of ancestral healers of communitarian feminism from Iximulew-Guatemala]. Ecologia Politica 54:98–102. https://www.ecologiapolitica.info/?p=10247.
- Caretta, M. A. 2018. Striving beyond epistemic authority: Results dissemination in smallholder irrigation farming research. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (3):884–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1261686.
- Caretta, M. A., and F. J. Cheptum. 2019. Feminist countertopographies of smallholder irrigation farming. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 18 (1):25–48. https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1626.
- Caretta, M. A., S. Zaragocin, B. Turley, and K. T. Orellana. 2020. Women’s organizing against extractivism: Toward a decolonial multisited analysis. Human Geography 13 (1):49–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1942778620910898.
- Colectiva Miradas Críticas del Territorio desde el Feminismo. 2017. Mapeando el cuerpo-territorio: Guía Metodológica para mujeres que defienden sus territorios [Mapping body-territory: Methodological guide for women defending their territories]. Accessed March 26, 2018. https://miradascriticasdelterritoriodesdeelfeminismo.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/mapeando-el-cuerpo-territorio.pdf.
- Cruz, D. T. 2017. A very other gaze at the territories-female bodies. Solar 12 (1):46. doi: https://doi.org/10.20939/solar.2016.12.0103.
- Curiel, O. 2007. Crítica poscolonial desde las practices políticas del feminismo antirracista [Postcolonial criticism from the political practices of anti-racist feminism]. Nómadas 26:92–101.
- Daigle, M. 2018. Embodying relations of accountability in settler colonial contexts. Political Geography 66:201–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.11.002.
- Daigle, M., and J. Sundberg. 2017. From where we stand: Unsettling geographical knowledges in classroom. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42 (3):338–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12201.
- de Jager, A., A. Tewson, B. Ludlow, and K. Boydell. 2016. Embodied ways of storying the self: A systematic review of body-mapping. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 17 (2). https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2526/3987
- Dixon, D. 2016. Feminist geopolitics: Material states. London and New York: Routledge.
- Domosh, M. 2015. President’s column: Why is our geography curriculum so white? AAG Newsletter. Accessed May 21, 2018. http://news.aag.org/2015/06/why-is-our-geography-curriculum-so-white/.
- Espinosa, Y., D. Gomez, and K. Muñoz. 2014. Tejiendo de otro modo: Feminismo, epistemología y apuestas descoloniales [Weaving differently: Feminism, epistemology and decolonial bets]. Popayán, Colombia: Universidad del Cauca.
- Esson, J., P. Noxolo, R. Baxter, P. Daley, and M. Byron. 2017. The 2017 RGS-IBG chair’s theme: Decolonizing geographical knowledges, or reproducing coloniality? Area 49 (3):384–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.111/area.12371.
- Fitzpatrick, K., and A. Longley. 2014. Embodiment and affect in research collaborations. Emotion, Space and Society 12:49–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2013.08.002.
- Gökarıksel, B., M. Hawkins, C. Neubert, and S. Smith. Forthcoming. Feminist geography unbound: Discomfort, bodies and prefigured futures. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.
- Halvorsen, S. 2019. Decolonising territory: Dialogues with Latin American knowledges and grassroots strategies. Progress in Human Geography 43 (5):790–814. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518777623.
- Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3):575–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
- Harding, S. 1987. The method question. Hypatia 2 (3):19–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01339.x.
- Harris, L. M. 2015. Hegemonic waters and rethinking natures otherwise. In Practising feminist political ecologies: Moving beyond “the green economy,” ed. W. Harcourt and I. Nelson, 157–81. London: Zed.
- Horne, F. 2011. Conquering AIDS through narrative: Long life positive HIV stories. English Studies in Africa 54 (2):71–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00138398.2011.626186.
- Hunt, S. 2014. Ontologies of indigeneity: The politics of embodying a concept. Cultural Geographies 21 (1):27–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474013500226.
- Huss, E., R. Kaufman, A. Avgar, and E. Shouker. 2015. Using arts-based research to help visualize community intervention in international aid. International Social Work 58 (5):673–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872815592686.
- Jazeel, T. 2017. Mainstreaming geography’s decolonial imperative. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42 (3):334–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12200.
- Jenkins, S., J. Verity, and D. Dixon. 2003. Thinking/doing the [F] word: On power in feminist methodologies. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 2 (1):57–63.
- Jokinen, J. C., and M. A. Caretta. 2016. When bodies do not fit: An analysis of postgraduate fieldwork. Gender, Place and Culture 23 (12):1665–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2016.1249343.
- Kindon, S., R. Pain, and M. Kesby. 2007. Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. London and New York: Routledge.
- Klein, M., and R. J. Milner. 2019. The use of body-mapping in interpretative phenomenological analyses: A methodological discussion. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 22 (5):533–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1593378.
- Knoblauch, A. 2012. Bodies of knowledge: Definitions, delineations, and implications of embodied writing in the academy. Composition Studies 40 (2):50–65.
- Kobayashi, A., and L. Peake. 2000. Racism out of place: Thoughts on Whiteness and antiracist geography in the new millennium. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90 (2):392–403. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00202.
- Koopman, S. 2011. Alter-geopolitics: Other securities are happening. Geoforum 42 (3):274–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.007.
- Longhurst, R. 1995. Viewpoint: The body and geography. Gender, Place & Culture 2 (1):97–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966399550022134.
- Longhurst, R., E. Ho, and L. Johnston. 2008. Using “the body” as an “instrument of research.” Area 40 (2):208–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00805.x.
- Lund, R. 2012. Researching crisis: Recognizing the unsettling experience of emotions. Emotion, Space and Society 5 (2):94–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2010.09.003.
- MacGregor, H. N. 2009. Mapping the body: Tracing the personal and the political dimensions of HIV/AIDS in Khayelitsha, South Africa. Anthropology & Medicine 16 (1):85–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470802426326.
- Massaro, V. A., and J. Williams. 2013. Feminist geopolitics. Geography Compass 7 (8):567–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12054.
- McDowell, L. 1992. Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 17 (4):399–416. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/622707.
- Mendoza, M. 2010. La epistemología del sur, la colonialidad del género y el feminismo Latinoamericano [The epistemology of the south, the coloniality of gender and Latin American feminism]. In Aproximaciones críticas a las prácticas teórico-políticas del feminismo Latinoamericano, ed. Y. Epinosa Miñoso, 19–36. Buenos Aires: La Frontera.
- Millán, M. 2014. Introducción más allá del feminismo, a manera de presentación. Más alla del feminismo: Caminos para andar [Introduction. Beyond feminism, for presentation]. Red de Feminismos Descoloniales 9–14.
- Millán, M. 2017. El cuerpo como territorio [Body as territory]. Bitácora Urbano Territorial 27 (3):155–60.
- Mollett, S., and C. Faria. 2013. Messing with gender in feminist political ecology. Geoforum 45:116–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.10.009.
- Moss, P. 2005. A bodily notion of research: Power, difference, and specificity in feminist methodology. In A companion to feminist geography, ed. L. Nelson and J. Seager, 41–59. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996898.
- Moss, P., and I. Dyck. 2003. Embodying social geography. In Handbook for cultural geography, ed. K. Anderson, M. Domosh, S. Pile, and N. Thrift, 58–73. London: Sage.
- Naylor, L., M. Daigle, S. Zaragocin, M. M. Ramírez, and M. Gilmartin. 2018. Interventions: Bringing the decolonial to political geography. Political Geography 66:199–209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.11.002.
- Nelson, L., and J. Seager. 2005. A companion to feminist geography. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996898.
- Ojeda, D., J. Petzl, C. Quiroga, A. C. Rodriguez, and J. G. Rojas. 2015. Paisajes del despojo cotidiano: Acaparamiento de tierra y agua en Montes de Maria [Landscapes of everyday dispossession: Land grabbing and water in Montes de Maria]. Revista de Estudios Sociales 54(35):107–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.7440/res54.2015.08.
- Oslender, U. 2019. Geographies of the pluriverse: Decolonial thinking and ontological conflict on Colombia’s Pacific coast. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (6):1691–705. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1572491.
- Pain, R., and S. J. Smith. 2008. Fear: Critical geopolitics and everyday life. In Fear: Critical geopolitics and everyday life, ed. R. Pain and S. Smith, 1–24. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
- Paredes, J. 2008. Hilando fino: Desde el feminismo comunitario [Spinning fine: From community feminism]. La Paz, Bolivia: Cooperativa El Rebozo.
- Perreault, T. 2013. Dispossession by accumulation? Mining, water and the nature of enclosure on the Bolivian Altiplano. Antipode 45 (5):1050–69.
- Perreault, T. 2018. Mining, meaning and memory in the Andes. The Geographical Journal 184 (3):229–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12239.
- Pile, S. 2010. Emotions and affect in recent human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35 (1):5–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j/1475-5661.2009.00368.x.
- Pulido, L. 2002. Reflections on a white discipline. The Professional Geographer 54 (1):42–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00313.
- Radcliffe, S. 2017a. Decolonizing geographical knowledges. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42 (3):329–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12195.
- Radcliffe, S. 2017b. Geography and indigeneity I: Indigeneity, coloniality and knowledge. Progress in Human Geography 41 (2):220–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515612952.
- Ramirez, M. M. 2018. Reckoning with decolonial praxis. Political Geography 66:204–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.11.002.
- Rice, C., E. Chandler, E. Harrison, K. Liddiard, and M. Ferrari. 2015. Project revision: Disability at the edges of representation. Disability & Society 30 (4):513–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1037950.
- Rivas-Quarneti, N., M. J. Movilla-Fernández, and L. Magalhães. 2018. Immigrant women’s occupational struggles during the socioeconomic crisis in Spain: Broadening occupational justice conceptualization. Journal of Occupational Science 25 (1):6–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1366355.
- Rocheleau, D., B. Thomas-Slayter, and E. Wangari. 1996. Feminist political ecology: Global issues and local experience. London and New York: Routledge.
- Rose, G. 1993. Feminism and geography: The limits of geographical knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
- Rose, G. 2001. Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: Sage.
- Rose, G., M. Degen, and B. Basdas. 2010. More on “big things”: Building events and feelings. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35 (3):334–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00388.x.
- Sharp, J. 2009. Geography and gender: What belongs to feminist geography? Emotion, power and change. Progress in Human Geography 33 (1):74–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508090440.
- Smith, S. 2012. Intimate geopolitics: Religion, marriage, and reproductive bodies in Leh. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (6):1511–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.660391.
- Spiegel, S. J. 2020. Visual storytelling and socioenvironmental change: Images, photographic encounters, and knowledge construction in resource frontiers. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (1):120–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1613953.
- Sultana, F. 2011. Suffering for water, suffering from water: Emotional geographies of resource access, control and conflict. Geoforum 42 (2):163–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum/2010.12.002.
- Sundberg, J. 2003. Masculinist epistemologies and the politics of fieldwork in Latin Americanist geography. The Professional Geographer 55:180–90.
- Sundberg, J. 2017. Feminist political ecology. In International encyclopedia of geography: People, the Earth, environment and technology, ed. D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu, and R. A. Marston, 1–12. Wiley. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0804.
- Sweet, E. L., and S. Ortiz Escalante. 2015. Bridging bodies into planning: Visceral methods, fear and gender violence. Urban Studies 52 (10):1826–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.117/0042098014541157.
- Sweet, E. L., and S. Ortiz Escalante. 2017. Engaging territorio cuerpo-tierra through body and community mapping: A methodology for making communities safer. Gender, Place & Culture 24 (4):594–606. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2016.1219325.
- Thien, D. 2005. After or beyond feeling? A consideration of affect and emotion in geography. Area 37 (4):450–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00643a.x.
- Tolia, K., and P. Divya. 2016. The landscape of cultural geography: Ideologies lost. Area 48 (3):371–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12288.
- Tuck, E., and K. W. Yang. 2012. Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1 (1):1–40.
- Ulloa, A. 2016. Feminismos territoriales en América Latina: Defensas de la vida frente a los extractivismos [Territorial feminisms in Latin America: Defenders of life in the face of extractivism]. Nómadas 45 (45):123–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.30578/nomadas.n45a8.
- Zaragocin, S. 2017. Feminismo decolonial y buen vivir [Decolonial feminism and good living]. In Feminismo y bueno vivir: Utpías decoloniales, ed. S. Zaragocin and S. Varea, 17–25. Cuenca, Ecuador: Paydlos.
- Zaragocin, S. 2018. Decolonized feminist geopolitics: Colonialty of gender and sexuality at the center of critical geopolitics. Political Geography 66:203–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.11.002.
- Zaragocin, S. 2019a. Feminist geography in Ecuador. Gender, Place and Culture 26 (7–9):1032–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1561426.
- Zaragocin, S. 2019b. Gendered geographies of elimination: Decolonial feminist geographies in Latin American settler contexts. Antipode 51 (1):373–92.
- Zaragocin, S. 2019c. Geografía Feminista Descolonial desde la colectividad [Decolonial feminist geography from the collectivity]. In Geografía Crítica para detener el despojo de los territorios, ed. M. Bayón and N. Torres, 49–58. Quito, Ecuador: Abya Yala.
- Zaragocin, S. Forthcoming. Challenging Anglophone feminist geography from Latin American debates on territory. In Feminist geography unbound: Intimacy, territory and embodied power, ed. B. Gokariskel, M. Hawkins, C. Neubert, and S. Smith. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.