Populism, Instability, and Rupture in Sustainability Transformations

References

• Affolderbach, J., and C. Schulz. 2016. Mobile transitions: Exploring synergies for urban sustainability research. Urban Studies 53 (9):1942–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015583784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlborg, H. 2017. Towards a conceptualization of power in energy transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 25:122–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken, M. 2010. Why we still don’t understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy 38 (4):1834–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F. 2017. Power in sustainability transitions: Analysing power and (Dis)empowerment in transformative change towards sustainability. Environmental Policy and Governance 27 (6):505–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, S. 2011. Energy, property, and the industrial revolution narrative. Ecological Economics 70 (7):1309–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batel, S., and P. Devine-Wright. 2018. Populism, identities and responses to energy infrastructures at different scales in the United Kingdom: A post-Brexit reflection. Energy Research & Social Science 43:41–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen Municipality. 2016. Grønn strategi: Klima-og energihandlingsplan for Bergen 2016 [Green strategy: Climate and energy action plan for Bergen 2016]. Bergen, Norway: Bergen Municipality. https://www.bergen.kommune.no/publisering/api/filer/T537340703.
   Google Scholar
• Block, F. 2008. Polanyi’s double movement and the reconstruction of critical theory. Interventions Économiques 38 (December):1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/interventionseconomiques.274.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. 2018. The map is not the territory: A sympathetic critique of energy research’s spatial turn. Energy Research & Social Science 36:11–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. 1999. Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies 47 (1):2–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castán Broto, V. 2015. Contradiction, intervention, and urban low carbon transitions. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33 (3):460–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappin, E. J. L., and A. Ligtvoet. 2014. Transition and transformation: A bibliometric analysis of two scientific networks researching socio-technical change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 30:715–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., and N. Longhurst. 2016. Participation in transition(s): Reconceiving public engagements in energy transitions as co-produced, emergent and diverse. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18 (5):585–607. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1110483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culp, A. 2016. Dark Deleuze. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, A. C. 2020. Radical mobilities. Progress in Human Geography 45 (1):25–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519899472.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. 2006. A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. 2016. Assemblage theory. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 2004. Desert islands and other texts, 1953-1974. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and C. Parnet. 2007. Dialogues II. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. 2013. Explaining “Nimby” objections to a power line: The role of personal, place attachment and project-related factors. Environment and Behavior 45 (6):761–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512440435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, J. E. 1980. Marx and Schumpeter on capitalism’s creative destruction: A comparative restatement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 95:45–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feola, G. 2015. Societal transformation in response to global environmental change: A review of emerging concepts. Ambio 44 (5):376–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0582-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figenbaum, E. 2017. Perspectives on Norway’s supercharged electric vehicle policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 25:14–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 1998. Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraune, C., and M. Knodt. 2018. Sustainable energy transformation in an age of populism, post-truth politics and local resistance. Energy Research & Social Science 43:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., and J. R. Ravetz. 1993. The emergence of post-normal science. In Science, politics and morality, ed. R. von Schomberg, 85–122. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science + Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31 (8–9):1257–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2014. Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society 31 (5):21–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414531627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillard, R., A. Gouldson, J. Paavola, and J. Van Alstine. 2016. Transformational responses to climate change: Beyond a systems perspective of social change in mitigation and adaptation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 7 (2):251–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. 2011. The triumph of the city. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Government for Norway. 2017. Parliament Proposition 11 S (2017–2018). Oslo: Parliament of Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Haarstad, H., S. Sareen, T. I. Wanvik, J. Grandin, K. Kjaerås, S. E. Oseland, H. Kvamsås, K. Lillevold, and M. Wathne. 2018. Transformative social science? Modes of engagement in climate and energy solutions. Energy Research & Social Science 42:193–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haarstad, H., and T. Wanvik. 2017. Carbonscapes and beyond: Conceptualizing the instabilities of oil landscapes. Progress in Human Geography 41 (4):432–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516648007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannisdal, O. H., H. V. Malvi, and G. B. Wensaas. 2013. The future is electric! The EV revolution in Norway—Explanations and lessons learned. Paper presented at the World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS27), Barcelona, Spain, November 17.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1989. The condition of postmodernity. Vol. 14. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, M., T. Ylä-Anttila, and S. Juhola. 2019. Incremental, reformistic or transformational: What kind of change do C40 cities advocate to deal with climate change? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21 (1):90–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, A. 2019. Bompenger og vindmøller ble de største debattsakene I 2019 [Toll roads and wind mills became the biggest debate topics in 2019]. Aftenposten, January 3. https://www.aftenposten.no/kultur/i/LAB39J/bompenger-og-vindmoeller-ble-de-stoerste-debattsakene-i-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. J. 2014. Sustainability transitions: A political coalition perspective. Research Policy 43 (2):278–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtsmark, B., and A. Skonhoft. 2014. The Norwegian support and subsidy policy of electric cars. Should it be adopted by other countries? Environmental Science & Policy 42:160–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M. T. 2013. Lifeblood: Oil, freedom, and the forces of capital. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, W., and G. Stoker. 2019. The divergent dynamics of cities and towns: Geographical polarisation and Brexit. The Political Quarterly 90 (Suppl. 2):155–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12612.
   Google Scholar
• Jupskas, A. R., E. Ivarsflaten, B. Kalsnes, and T. Aalberg. 2016. Norway: Populism from anti-tax movement to government party. In Populist political communication in Europe, ed. T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Stromback, and C. De Vreese, 54–67. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kinniburgh, C. 2019. Climate politics after the yellow vests. Dissent 66 (2):115–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/dss.2019.0037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., F. W. Geels, F. Kern, J. Markard, E. Onsongo, A. Wieczorek, F. Alkemade, F. Avelino, A. Bergek, F. Boons, et al. 2019. An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31:1–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 2001. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. 2nd ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, D. J., A. Wiek, and H. von Wehrden. 2017. Bridging divides in sustainability science. Sustainability Science 12 (6):875–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0497-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, D. 2016. Bildeling Som et bidrag til et baerekraftig transportsystem—En studie av bildeleringen I Bergen [Car sharing as a contribution to a sustainable transport system - A study of the car sharing ring in Bergen]. Master’s thesis, University of Bergen, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. 2018. Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: Exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics 27 (4):712–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., and K. Ward. 2012. Assembling urbanisms: Following policies and “studying through” the sites and situation of policy making. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44 (1):42–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/a44178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. 2009. What about politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences 42 (4):323–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. 2011. Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 (1):70–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 1993. The return of the political. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2005. On the political. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39 (4):541–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. 2016. What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolaeva, A., P. Adey, T. Cresswell, J. Y. Lee, A. Nóvoa, and C. Temenos. 2019. Commoning mobility: Towards a new politics of mobility transitions. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44 (2):346–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Transport. 2016. National transport plan 2018–2029. Oslo: Government of Norway.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K. 2012. Global environmental change II: From adaptation to deliberate transformation. Progress in Human Geography 36 (5):667–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasqualetti, M. 2011. Opposing wind energy landscapes: A search for common cause. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (4):907–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.568879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peet, R., P. Robbins, and M. Watts. 2010. Global political ecology. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pelling, M. 2011. Adaptation to climate change: From resilience to transformation. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perreault, T., G. Bridge, and J. McCarthy. 2015. The Routledge handbook of political ecology. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. [1944] 2001. The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, R. 2010. Policy transfer as policy assemblage: Making policy for the creative industries in New Zealand. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 42 (1):169–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/a4224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinert, H., and E. S. Reinert. 2006. Creative destruction in economics: Nietzsche, Sombart, Schumpeter. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900). In Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900). The European heritage in economics and the social sciences, ed. J. G. Backhaus and W. Drechsler, 55–85. Boston: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reusswig, F., F. Braun, I. Heger, T. Ludewig, E. Eichenauer, and W. Lass. 2016. Against the wind: Local opposition to the German energiewende. Utilities Policy 41:214–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and R. Kemp. 1998. Technological change. In Human choice and climate change, ed. S. Rayner and E. L. Malone, 327–99. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2018. The revenge of places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (1):189–209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. [1950] 2008. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. 3rd ed. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., M. Leach, and P. Newell. 2015. The politics of green transformations. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., and G. Walker. 2007. Caution! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 39 (4):763–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/a39310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and A. Stirling. 2017. Innovation, sustainability and democracy: An analysis of grassroots contributions. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 6 (1):64–97.
   Google Scholar
• Steinhilber, S., P. Wells, and S. Thankappan. 2013. Socio-technical inertia: Understanding the barriers to electric vehicles. Energy Policy 60:531–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steyaert, P., and J. Jiggins. 2007. Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: A synthesis of Slim’s lessons for research, policy and practice. Environmental Science & Policy 10 (6):575–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2010. Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change. Theory, Culture & Society 27 (2–3):213–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409358728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temenos, C. 2017. Everyday proper politics: Rereading the post-political through mobilities of drug policy activism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42 (4):584–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanvik, T. I. 2018. Contested energy spaces: Disassembling energyscapes of the Canadian North. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wathne, M., H. Haarstad, and T. Kopperud. 2017. Kollektive ladeløsninger og delt mobilitet [Public charging points and shared mobility]. SpaceLab report 2/2017, University of Bergen.
   Google Scholar