References
- Anderson, B., and P. Harrison. 2010. The promise of non-representational theories. In Taking-place: Non-representational theories and geography, ed. B. Anderson and P. Harrison, 1–36. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
- Bondi, L. 2008. On the relational dynamics of caring. Gender, Place and Culture 15 (3):249–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690801996262.
- Bondi, L. 2014. Feeling insecure: A personal account in a psychoanalytic voice. Social & Cultural Geography 15 (3):332–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2013.864783.
- Borenstein, J., and Y. Pearson. 2012. Robot caregivers: Ethical issues across the human lifespan. In Robot ethics: Ethical and social implications of robotics, ed. P. Lin, K. Abney, and G. Bekey, 251–65. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Brown, S. D. 2013. In praise of the parasite. Informática na Educação: Teoria & Prática 16 (1):83–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-1654.36928.
- Bruun, M. H., S. Hanghøj, C. Hasse, and the Philosophy Documentation Center. 2015. Studying social robots in practiced places. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 19 (2):143–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/techne20159833.
- Cockayne, D., A. Leszczynski, and M. Zook. 2017. #HotForBots: Sex, the non-human and digitally mediated spaces of intimate encounter. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35 (6):1115–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817709018.
- Coeckelbergh, M. 2010. Health care, capabilities, and AI assistive technologies. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (2):181–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-009-9186-2.
- Coeckelbergh, M. 2015. Artificial agents, good care, and modernity. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36 (4):265–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-015-9331-y.
- Damiano, L., P. Dumouchel, and H. Lehmann. 2015. Towards human–robot affective co-evolution. International Journal of Social Robotics 7 (1):7–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0258-7.
- DeFalco, A. 2020. Towards a theory of posthuman care. Body & Society 26 (3):31–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X20917450.
- Elwood, S., and A. Leszczynski. 2018. Feminist digital geographies. Gender, Place & Culture 25 (5):629–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1465396.
- Feil-Seifer, D., and M. Matarić. 2011. Socially assistive robotics. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 18 (1):24–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2010.940150.
- Folbre, N. 2006. Nursebots to the rescue? Globalizations 3 (3):349–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747730600870217.
- Hasse, C. 2019. The Vitruvian robot. AI & Society 34 (1):91–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0701-z.
- Koch, R., and S. Miles. 2020. Inviting the stranger in. Progress in Human Geography. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520961881.
- Kozima, H., C. Nakagawa, and Y. Yasuda. 2007. Children–robot interaction. Progress in Brain Research 164:385–400.
- Lawson, V. 2007. Geographies of care and responsibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 97 (1):1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00520.x.
- Lin, P., K. Abney, and G. Bekey. 2011. Robot ethics: Mapping the issues for a mechanized world. Artificial Intelligence 175 (5–6):942–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2010.11.026.
- Lupton, D. 2013. The digitally engaged patient. Social Theory & Health 11 (3):256–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2013.10.
- LuxAI. 2019a. QTrobot—Robot teaching emotional skills to children with autism—A success story! YouTube. Accessed August 11, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lhzx9qo4sN4&t=4s.
- LuxAI. 2019b. QTrobot—Robot teaching emotions to children with autism spectrum disorder—A success story. YouTube. Accessed August 11, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgspU4QV_7M.
- Lynch, C. R. 2021. Critical geographies of social robotics. Digital Geography and Society 2:100010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2021.100010.
- Lynch, C. R., and V. J. Del Casino, Jr. 2020. Smart spaces, information processing, and the question of intelligence. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (2):382–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1617103.
- MacLeavy, J. 2021. Care work, gender inequality and technological advancement in the age of COVID-19. Gender, Work & Organization 28 (1):138–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12534.
- Manning, E. 2016. The minor gesture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Massumi, B. 2015. Politics of affect. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
- Ormond, M., and N. Lunt. 2020. Transnational medical travel. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46 (20):4179–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1597465.
- Parks, J. 2010. Lifting the burden of women’s care work: Should robots replace the “human touch”? Hypatia 25 (1):100–120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01086.x.
- Parr, H. 2003. Medical geography: Care and caring. Progress in Human Geography 27 (2):212–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph423pr.
- Ponder, C. S., A. Longhurst, and M. McGregor. 2021. Contracting-out care. Environment and Planning C. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420960489.
- Pratt, G. 2012. Families apart: Migrant mothers and the conflicts of labor and love. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2011. Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science 41 (1):85–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301.
- Raddawi, K. 2019. QTrobot enhances learning opportunities for children with autism. Accessed August 11, 2020. https://www.medgadget.com/2019/02/qtrobot-enhances-learning-opportunities-for-children-with-autism.html.
- Reardon, S. 2019. Rise of robot radiologists. Nature 576 (7787):S54–S58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03847-z.
- Rose, G. 2017. Posthuman agency in the digitally mediated city. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (4):779–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1270195.
- Savransky, M., A. Wilkie, and M. Rosengarten. 2017. The lure of possible futures: On speculative research. In Speculative research, ed. A. Wilkie, M. Savransky, and M. Rosengarten, 1–17. London and New York: Routledge.
- Schwiter, K., and J. Steiner. 2020. Geographies of care work. Geography Compass 14 (12):e12546.
- Serres, M. [1982] 2013. The parasite, Vol. 1. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Sharkey, A., and N. Sharkey. 2020. We need to talk about deception in social robotics! Ethics and Information Technology. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09573-9.
- Smith, N., and A. Snider. 2019. ASMR, affect and digitally-mediated intimacy. Emotion, Space and Society 30:41–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2018.11.002.
- Stephens, J. 2015. Reconfiguring care and family in the era of the “outsourced self.” Journal of Family Studies 21 (3):208–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2015.1058847.
- Stiegler, B. 2016. Automatic society, Vol. 1. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
- Suchman, L. 2011. Subject objects. Feminist Theory 12 (2):119–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700111404205.
- Sullivan, R. 1979. The burn-out syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 9 (1):112–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531298.
- Sumartojo, S., and D. Lugli. 2021. Lively robots: Robotic technologies in COVID-19. Social & Cultural Geography. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2021.1921245.
- Thrift, N. 2003. Closer to the machine? Cultural Geographies 10 (4):389–407. doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/1474474003eu282oaa.
- Weingarten, E. 2017. The last human job. Accessed August 11, 2020. https://slate.com/technology/2017/10/could-mass-automation-make-us-revalue-care-work.html.
- Wilson, E. 2010. Affect & artificial intelligence. Seattle: University of Washington Press.