Precarious (Dis)Placement: Temporality and the Legal Rewriting of Refugee Protection in Denmark

References

• Abrego, L. J., and S. M. Lakhani. 2015. Incomplete inclusion: Legal violence and immigrants in liminal legal statuses. Law & Policy 37 (4):265–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashutosh, I., and A. Mountz. 2012. The geopolitics of migrant mobility: Tracing state relations through refugee claims, boats, and discourses. Geopolitics 17 (2):335–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2011.567315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axster, S., I. Danewid, A. Goldstein, M. Mahmoudi, C. B. Tansel, and L. Wilcox. 2021. Colonial lives of the Carceral archipelago: Rethinking the neoliberal security state. International Political Sociology 15 (3):415–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olab013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. J., R. A. Wright, A. Mountz, and I. M. Miyares. 2002. (Re)Producing Salvadoran transnational geographies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92 (1):125–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastaki, J. 2018. Temporary protection regimes and refugees: What works? comparing the Kuwaiti, Bosnian, and Syrian refugee protection regimes. Refuge 34 (2):73–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.7202/1055578ar.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belliveau, L. B., and R. Ferguson. 2021. Normalising the exceptional: The use of temporary protection in transit countries to externalise borders and responsibilities. Geopolitics. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1907350.
   Google Scholar
• Berlingske. 2021. Hvis Danmark sender syrere hjem: Østrig lader sig gerne inspirere [If Denmark sends Syrians home: Austria would take inspiration]. Berlingske, June 16. Accessed September 26, 2021. https://www.berlingske.dk/politik/hvis-danmark-sender-syrere-hjem-oestrig-lader-sig-gerne-inspirere.
   Google Scholar
• Bialasiewicz, L. 2012. Off-shoring and out-sourcing the borders of EUrope: Libya and EU border work in the Mediterranean. Geopolitics 17 (4):843–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2012.660579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickell, K., and D. Cuomo. 2019. Feminist geolegality. Progress in Human Geography 43 (1):104–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517735706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burridge, A., and N. Gill. 2017. Conveyor-belt justice: Precarity, access to justice, and uneven geographies of legal aid in UK asylum appeals. Antipode 49 (1):23–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burridge, A., N. Gill, A. Kocher, and L. Martin. 2017. Polymorphic borders. Territory, Politics, Governance 5 (3):239–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2017.1297253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian, J., L. Dowler, and D. Cuomo. 2016. Fear, feminist geopolitics and the hot and banal. Political Geography 54 (September):64–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coddington, K. 2018. Landscapes of refugee protection. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 43 (3):326–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. 2008. Between public policy and foreign policy: U.S. immigration law reform and the undocumented migrant. Urban Geography 29 (1):4–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.29.1.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, M., and A. Kocher. 2019. Rethinking the “gold standard” of racial profiling: §287(g), secure communities and racially discrepant police power. American Behavioral Scientist 63 (9):1185–1220. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219835275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlon, D. 2011. Waiting: Feminist perspectives on the spacings/timings of migrant (im)mobility. Gender, Place & Culture 18 (3):353–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2011.566320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutin, S. B. 2011. Falling outside: Excavating the history of central American Asylum seekers. Law & Social Inquiry 36 (3):569–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2011.01243.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danewid, I. 2021. Policing the (migrant) crisis: Stuart Hall and the defence of whiteness. Security Dialogue. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010621994074.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrkamp, P. 2017. Geographies of migration I: Refugees. Progress in Human Geography 41 (6):813–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516663061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Enany, N. 2020. Bordering Britain: Law, race and empire. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Folketinget. 2014a. Bemaerkninger til lovforslaget L 72 [Explanatory memorandum to bill L72]. Accessed December 6, 2020. https://www.ft.dk/ripdf/samling/20141/lovforslag/l72/20141_l72_som_fremsat.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Folketinget. 2014b. Skiftlig fremsaettelse af L 72 [Written proposal of L72]. Accessed December 6, 2020. https://www.ft.dk/ripdf/samling/20141/lovforslag/l72/20141_l72_fremsaettelsestale.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Folketinget. 2019. Loven som vedtaget af Folketinget [The law as passed by the Parliamant]. Accessed December 4, 2020. https://www.ft.dk/ripdf/samling/20181/lovforslag/l140/20181_l140_som_vedtaget.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, E. 2019. Elasticity at the Canada–U.S. border: Jurisdiction, rights, accountability. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37 (3):424–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418787190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, N. 2009. Governmental mobility: The power effects of the movement of detained asylum seekers around Britain’s detention estate. Political Geography 28 (3):186–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, C. S. 2017. Redefining refugees: Interpretive control and the bordering work of legal categorization in U.S. asylum law. Political Geography 58 (May):36–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, C. S. 2019a. Feminist legal archeology, domestic violence and the raced-gendered juridical boundaries of U.S. asylum law. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 51 (5):1050–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18757507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, C. S. 2019b. Singled out: Scaling violence and social groups as legal borderwork in U.S. asylum law. Geographical Review 109 (4):487–506. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/gere.12311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, C. S. 2021. Defined by the flood: Alarmism and the legal thresholds of U.S. political asylum. Geopolitics 26 (1):215–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2018.1556642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, C. S., and B. R. Wilson. 2021. After the raid: Feminist geolegality and the spaces of encounters in a U.S. poultry town. Gender, Place & Culture. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2021.1873745.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, J. 2000. Managing displacement: Refugees and the politics of humanitarianism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jepson, W. 2012. Claiming space, claiming water: Contested legal geographies of water in South Texas. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (3):614–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.641897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justitsministeriet. 2014. Regeringen vil indføre tidsbegraenset ophold til flygtninge [The government will introduce temporary residence to refugees] [Press release, September 19]. Accessed December 4, 2020. https://www.justitsministeriet.dk/pressemeddelelse/regeringen-vil-indfoere-tidsbegraenset-ophold-til-flygtninge/.
   Google Scholar
• Kanstroom, D. 2010. Deportation nation: Outsiders in American history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luibheid, E. 2002. Entry denied: Controlling sexuality at the border. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maillet, P., A. Mountz, and K. Williams. 2018. Exclusion through imperio: Entanglements of law and geography in the waiting zone, excised territory and search and rescue region. Social & Legal Studies 27 (2):142–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663917746487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayblin, L. 2018. Asylum after empire: Colonial legacies in the politics of asylum seeking. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Miyares, I., R. Wright, A. Mountz, and A. Bailey. 2019. Truncated transnationalism, the tenuousness of temporary protected status, and Trump. Journal of Latin American Geography 18 (1):210–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/lag.2019.0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountz, A. 2010. Seeking asylum: Human smuggling and bureaucracy at the border. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mountz, A. 2011. The enforcement archipelago: Detention, haunting, and asylum on islands. Political Geography 30 (3):118–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountz, A. 2020. The death of asylum: Hidden geographies of the enforcement archipelago. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, Z. 2018. “Living liminality”: Everyday experiences of asylum seekers in the “direct provision” system in Ireland. Gender, Place & Culture 25 (6):821–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1473345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pain, R. 2009. Globalized fear? Towards an emotional geopolitics. Progress in Human Geography 33 (4):466–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508104994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pain, R., and S. J. Smith, eds. 2008. Fear: Critical geopolitics and everyday life. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Pain, R., and L. Staeheli. 2014. Introduction: Intimacy-geopolitics and violence. Area 46 (4):344–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pull, E., J. Lind, I. W. Tsoni, and G. Baeten. 2020. Introduction to the themed issue “Narratives of displacements.” ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 19 (1):330–38.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay, G. 2019. Impossible refuge: The control and constraint of refugee futures. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, N. F. 2021. The end of protection: The Danish “paradigm shift” and the law of cessation. Nordic Journal of International Law 90 (1):60–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-bja10009.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, E. 2015. Unsettled: Cambodian refugees in the New York City hyperghetto. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Udlaendinge- og Integrationsministeriet 2018. Evaluering af reglerne om en midlertidig beskyttelsesstatus for visse udlændinge i medfør af udlændingelovens §7, stk. 3. [Evaluation of the rules for temporary protection status for foreigners in pursuance of the Danish Aliens Act’s §7.3] Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Udlaendinge- og Integrationsministeriet. 2020. Regeringen saetter gang i genvurdering af syriske flygtninges behov for beskyttelse [The government starts the reevaluation of Syrian refugees’ need for protection]. Accessed June 28, 2020. https://www.regeringen.dk/nyheder/2020/regeringen-saetter-gang-i-genvurdering-af-syriske-flygtninges-behov-for-beskyttelse/.
   Google Scholar
• Udlaendingeloven. 2014. Bekendtgørelse af udlaendingeloven [The Danish Aliens Act] (No. 1021 of 19/9/2014). Accessed November 30, 2020. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2014/1021.
   Google Scholar
• Udlaendingestyrelsen. 2019a. Tal og fakta på udlaendingeområdet 2018 [Figures and facts on aliens 2018]. Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Udlaendingestyrelsen. 2019b. Udlaendingestyrelsen aendrer praksis i sager vedrørende de generalle forhold i Syrien [Immigration Service changes its practice in cases concerning the general conditions in Syria]. https://www.nyidanmark.dk/da/News%20Front%20Page/2019/02/us_aendrer_praksis_i_sager_vedr_syrien.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K., and A. Mountz. 2018. Between enforcement and precarity: Externalization and migrant deaths at sea. International Migration 56 (5):74–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar