Living with Touchscreens: Haptic Geographies of Home in the Digital Context

References

• Anderson, B. 2009. Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society 2 (2):77–81. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2009.08.005.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., M. Kearnes, C. McFarlane, and D. Swanton. 2012. On assemblages and geography. Dialogues in Human Geography 2 (2):171–89. doi: 10.1177/2043820612449261.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., and C. McFarlane. 2011. Assemblage and geography. Area 43 (2):124–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01004.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J. 2009. Emerging spatialities of the screen: Video games and the reconfiguration of spatial awareness. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41 (9):2105–24. doi: 10.1068/a41250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J. 2010. Architectures of affect: Anticipating and manipulating the event in processes of videogame design and testing. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (4):653–71. doi: 10.1068/d9309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J., B. Anderson, R. Gordon, and P. Langley. 2018. Unit, vibration, tone: A Post-phenomenological method for researching digital interfaces. Cultural Geographies 25 (1):165–81. doi: 10.1177/1474474017726556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J., and L. A. Gallacher. 2011. Cultural geography and videogames. Geography Compass 5 (6):351–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00427.x.
   Google Scholar
• Barns, S. 2019. Platform urbanism: Negotiating platform ecosystems in connected cities. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2004. The force of things: Steps toward an ecology of matter. Political Theory 32 (3):347–72. doi: 10.1177/0090591703260853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissell, D. 2020. Affective platform urbanism: Changing habits of digital on-demand consumption. Geoforum 115:102–10. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.06.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunt, A., and R. Dowling. 2006. Home. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, G. 1993. Atmosphere as the fundamental concept of a new aesthetics. Thesis Eleven 36 (1):113–26. doi: 10.1177/072551369303600107.
   Google Scholar
• Bonner-Thompson, C. 2021. Anticipating touch: Haptic geographies of Grindr encounters in Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 46 (2):449–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickell, K. 2012. “Mapping” and “doing” critical geographies of home. Progress in Human Geography 36 (2):225–44. doi: 10.1177/0309132511418708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. 2021. On pragmatism, assemblage and ANT: Assembling reason. Progress in Human Geography 45 (3):417–35. doi: 10.1177/0309132520924710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, C. 2017. Maintenance and repair beyond the perimeter of the plant: Linking industrial labour and the home. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42 (4):642–54. doi: 10.1111/tran.12183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., and C. Liu. 2021. Takeaway food consumption and its geographies of responsibility in urban Guangzhou. Food, Culture & Society. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/15528014.2021.1882790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus, trans. B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, D. P., and J. P. Jones. 2015. The tactile topologies of contagion. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 40 (2):223–34. doi: 10.1111/tran.12071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, D. P., and E. R. Straughan. 2010. Geographies of touch/touched by geography. Geography Compass 4 (5):449–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00299.x.
   Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. 2012. Illuminated atmospheres: Anticipating and reproducing the flow of affective experience in Blackpool. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30 (6):1103–22. doi: 10.1068/d12211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., and A. Leszczynski. 2018. Feminist digital geographies. Gender, Place & Culture 25 (5):629–44. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2018.1465396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enevold, J. 2014. Digital materialities and family practices: The gendered, practical, aesthetical and technological domestication of play. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association 1 (2). doi: 10.26503/todigra.v1i2.12.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. 2010. Walks, home visits and atmospheres: Risk and the everyday practices and mobilities of social work and child protection. British Journal of Social Work 40 (4):1100–17. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, A. 2019. Curating digital geographies in an era of data colonialism. Geoforum 104:193–200. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.04.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M. 2011. Time machines and virtual portals: The spatialities of the digital divide. Progress in Development Studies 11 (3):211–27. doi: 10.1177/146499341001100303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. 2014. Automated repair and backup systems. In Globalization in practice, ed. N. J. Thrift, A. Tickell, S. Woolgar, and W. H. Rupp, 75–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hind, S., and S. Lammes. 2016. Digital mapping as double-tap: Cartographic modes, calculations and failures. Global Discourse 6 (1–2):79–97. doi: 10.1080/23269995.2015.1019732.
   Google Scholar
• Horst, H. A., and D. Miller. 2020. Digital anthropology. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D., and C. Classen. 2013. Ways of sensing: Understanding the senses in society. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, W., and E. H. W. Chan. 2020. Between users, functions, and evaluations: Exploring the social acceptance of smart energy homes in China. Energy Research & Social Science 69:101637. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsley, S. 2013. Beyond the screen: Methods for investigating geographies of life “online.” Geography Compass 7 (8):540–55. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12062.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsley, S. 2014. The matter of “virtual” geographies. Progress in Human Geography 38 (3):364–84. doi: 10.1177/0309132513506270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kücklich, J. 2005. Precarious playbour: Modders and the digital games industry. Accessed June 10, 2021. https://five.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-025-precarious-playbour-modders-and-the-digital-games-industry/.
   Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. 2019. Platform affects of geolocation. Geoforum 107:207–15. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. 2020. Digital methods III: The digital mundane. Progress in Human Geography 44 (6):1194–1201. doi: 10.1177/0309132519888687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. 2021. Rethinking the timescape of home: Domestic practices in time and space. Progress in Human Geography 45 (2):343–61. doi: 10.1177/0309132520923138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., and J. Chen. 2021. Consuming takeaway food: Convenience, waste and Chinese young people’s urban lifestyle. Journal of Consumer Culture 21 (4):848–66. doi: 10.1177/1469540519882487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhurst, R. 2016. Skype: Bodies, screens, space. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. 2017. Feeling your data: Touch and making sense of personal digital data. New Media & Society 19 (10):1599–1614. doi: 10.1177/1461444817717515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. 2019. The thing-power of the human-app health assemblage: Thinking with vital materialism. Social Theory & Health 17 (2):125–39. doi: 10.1057/s41285-019-00096-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maalsen, S. 2020. “Generation share”: Digitalized geographies of shared housing. Social & Cultural Geography 21 (1):105–13. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2018.1466355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J., and K. Davies. 2009. Coming to our senses? A critical approach to sensory methodology. Qualitative Research 9 (5):587–603. doi: 10.1177/1468794109343628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., J. Sinanan, X. Wang, T. McDonald, N. Haynes, E. Costa, J. Spyer, S. Venkatraman, and R. Nicolescu. 2016. How the world changed social media. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M. 2015. Assemblages and actor-networks: Rethinking socio-material power, politics and space. Geography Compass 9 (1):27–41. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, L., and Y. Strengers. 2019. Robotic vacuum cleaners save energy? Raising cleanliness conventions and energy demand in Australian households with smart home technologies. Energy Research & Social Science 50:73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obrador-Pons, P. 2007. A haptic geography of the beach: Naked bodies, vision and touch. Social & Cultural Geography 8 (1):123–41. doi: 10.1080/14649360701251866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisi, D., M. Paterson, and J. E. Archer. 2017. Haptic media studies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Parreñas, R. S., and E. Boris. 2010. Intimate labors: Cultures, technologies, and the politics of care. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. 2006. Feel the presence: Technologies of touch and distance. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24 (5):691–708. doi: 10.1068/d394t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. 2007. The senses of touch: Haptics, affects and technologies. Oxford, UK: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. 2009. Haptic geographies: Ethnography, haptic knowledges and sensuous dispositions. Progress in Human Geography 33 (6):766–88. doi: 10.1177/0309132509103155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickren, G. 2018. ‘The global assemblage of digital flow’ Critical data studies and the infrastructures of computing. Progress in Human Geography 42 (2):225–43. doi: 10.1177/0309132516673241.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2006. The future of visual anthropology: Engaging the senses. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2015. Doing sensory ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2016. Digital ethnography. In Innovative methods in media and communication research, ed. S. Kubitschko and A. Kaun, 161–66. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2020. Home truths: Gender, domestic objects and everyday life. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., E. Ardèvol, and D. Lanzeni. 2020. Digital materiality. In Digital materialities, ed. S. Pink, E. Ardèvol, and D. Lanzeni, 1–26. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., and V. Fors. 2017. Self-tracking and mobile media: New digital materialities. Mobile Media & Communication 5 (3):219–38. doi: 10.1177/2050157917695578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S., L. Hjorth, H. Horst, J. Nettheim, and G. Bell. 2018. Digital work and play: Mobile technologies and new ways of feeling at home. European Journal of Cultural Studies 21 (1):26–38. doi: 10.1177/1367549417705602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S., and K. Leder Mackley. 2016. Moving, making and atmosphere: Routines of home as sites for mundane improvisation. Mobilities 11 (2):171–87. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2014.957066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S., J. Sinanan, L. Hjorth, and H. Horst. 2016. Tactile digital ethnography: Researching mobile media through the hand. Mobile Media & Communication 4 (2):237–51. doi: 10.1177/2050157915619958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, G. 2012. Families apart: Migrant mothers and the conflicts of labor and love. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, F. 2020. Unravelling material/digital shopping space: An assemblage approach. Geography Compass 14 (11):e12539. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2012. Affective spaces: A praxeological outlook. Rethinking History 16 (2):241–58. doi: 10.1080/13642529.2012.681193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, I., and L. Hjorth. 2017. Mobile media, domestic play and haptic ethnography. New Media & Society 19 (10):1653–67. doi: 10.1177/1461444817717516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. 2018. Feminist geographies of digital work. Progress in Human Geography 42 (2):244–63. doi: 10.1177/0309132516677177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., and D. Bissell. 2019. Geographies of digital skill. Geoforum 99:278–86. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2017. Posthuman agency in the digitally mediated city: Exteriorization, individuation, reinvention. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (4):779–93. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1270195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossetto, T. 2019. The skin of the map: Viewing cartography through tactile empathy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37 (1):83–103. doi: 10.1177/0263775818786251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saville, S. J. 2008. Playing with fear: Parkour and the mobility of emotion. Social & Cultural Geography 9 (8):891–914. doi: 10.1080/14649360802441440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. G. R., and B. Warf. 2009. Worlds of affect: Virtual geographies of video games. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41 (6):1332–43. doi: 10.1068/a41284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., M. Watson, M. Hand, and J. Ingram. 2007. The design of everyday life. Oxford, UK: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Strengers, Y. 2013. Smart energy technologies in everyday life: Smart Utopia? Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Strengers, Y. 2020. Envisioning the smart home: Reimagining a smart energy future. In Digital materialities, ed. S. Pink, E. Ardèvol, and D. Lanzeni, 61–76. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strengers, Y., and L. Nicholls. 2018. Aesthetic pleasures and gendered tech-work in the 21st-century smart home. Media International Australia 166 (1):70–80. doi: 10.1177/1329878X17737661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumartojo, S., and M. Graves. 2021. Feeling through the screen: Memory sites, affective entanglements, and digital materialities. Social & Cultural Geography 22 (2):231–49. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2018.1563711.
   Google Scholar
• Thulin, E., B. Vilhelmson, and T. Schwanen. 2020. Absent friends? Smartphones, mediated presence, and the recoupling of online social contact in everyday life. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (1):166–83. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1629868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Werning, S. 2015. Swipe to unlock: How the materiality of the touchscreen frames media use and corresponding perceptions of media content. Digital Culture & Society 1 (1):55–72. doi: 10.14361/dcs-2015-0105.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. 2017. Drinking in the dark: Shedding light on young people’s alcohol consumption experiences. Social & Cultural Geography 18 (6):739–57. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2016.1227872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. W. 2014. Continuous connectivity, handheld computers, and mobile spatial knowledge. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32 (3):535–55. doi: 10.1068/d14112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar