Legal Rights for Whose Nature?

References

• Alexander, M. 2010. The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allard-Tremblay, Y., and E. Coburn. 2021. The flying heads of settler colonialism; or the ideological erasures of Indigenous peoples in political theorizing. Political Studies: 003232172110181. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/00323217211018127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, E., and J. McCarthy. 2014. Scale, shale, and the state: Political ecologies and legal geographies of shale gas development in Pennsylvania. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 4 (1):7–16. doi: 10.1007/s13412-013-0146-8. November 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Athens Community Bill of Rights and Water Supply Ordinance No. 0-08-18.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, K. 2003. An uncooperative commodity: Privatizing water in England and Wales. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barkan, J. 2013. Corporate sovereignty: Law and government under capitalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, T. 1999. The great work: Our way into the future. New York: Bell Tower.
   Google Scholar
• Bigger, P., and J. Dempsey. 2018. The ins and outs of neoliberal natures. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 1:25–75.
   Google Scholar
• Borrows, J. 2019. Law’s Indigenous ethics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Botts, T. F. 2018. For equals only: Race, equality, and the equal protection clause. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. R. 2017. The rights of nature: A legal revolution that could save the world. Toronto: ECW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B. 2000. Producing vertical territory: Geology and governmentality in late Victorian Canada. Ecumene 7 (1):7–46. doi: 10.1177/096746080000700102.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., and T. Perrault. 2009. Environmental governance. In A companion to environmental geography, ed. N. Castree, D. Demeritt, D. Liverman, and B. Rhoads, 475–97. West Sussex, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Brockington, D. 2002. Fortress conservation: The preservation of the Mkomazi Game Reserve, Tanzania. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, R. 1994. Critical race theory: A proposed structure and application to federal pleading. Harvard Blackletter Law Journal 11:85–114.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2000. Suffering rights as paradoxes. Constellations 7 (2):208–29. doi: 10.1111/1467-8675.00183.
   Google Scholar
• Bullard, R. ed. 2007. The Black metropolis in the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Cantor, A. 2016. The public trust doctrine and critical legal geographies of water in California. Geoforum 72:49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor, A., K. Kay, and C. Knudson. 2020. Legal geographies and political ecologies of water allocation in Maui, Hawai’i. Geoforum 110:168–79. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2008. Neo-liberalizing nature 2: Processes, outcomes, and effects. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (1):131–52. doi: 10.1068/a3999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrashekeran, S. 2020. From responsibilization to responsiveness through metrics: Smart meter deployment in Australia. Geoforum 116:110–18. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. 558 U.S. 310 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Collard, R., J. Dempsey, and J. Rowe. 2016. Re-regulating socioecologies under neoliberalism. In The handbook of neoliberalism, ed. J. MacLeavy, S. Springer, and K. Birch, 469. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF). 2021. National Community Rights Network. Accessed August 20, 2021. https://celdf.org/where-we-work/community-rights-networks/.
   Google Scholar
• Cullinan, C. 2002. Wild law: A manifesto for earth justice. Devon, UK: Green Books.
   Google Scholar
• Daigle, M. 2016. Awawanenitakik: The spatial politics of recognition and relational geographies of Indigenous self-determination. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 60 (2):259–69. doi: 10.1111/cag.12260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, D. 2017. Legal geography III: New worlds, new convergences. Progress in Human Geography 41 (5):667–75. doi: 10.1177/0309132516650354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leeuw, S., and S. Hunt. 2018. Unsettling decolonizing geographies. Geography Compass 12 (7):e12376–14. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, J. 2018. Enterprising nature: Dominant, marginal, reactionary and radical? Dialogues in Human Geography 8 (3):366–69. doi: 10.1177/2043820618764195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dred Scott v. Sanford. 60 U.S. 393 (1856).
   Google Scholar
• D’Souza, R. 2018. What’s wrong with rights? Social movements, law and liberal imaginations. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Earls, F. 2011. Children: From rights to citizenship. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 633 (1):6–16. doi: 10.1177/0002716210383637.
   Google Scholar
• Einhorn, R. L. 2008. Slavery. Enterprise and Society 9 (3):491–506. doi: 10.1093/es/khn043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney, C. 2014. Black faces, White spaces. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, L. 2013. Homogenizing community, homogenizing nature: An analysis of conflicting rights in the rights of nature debate. Stanford Undergraduate Research Journal 12:6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Forkosch, M. D. 1968. Who are the people in the preamble to the constitution? Case Western Reserve Law Review 19:644–712.
   Google Scholar
• Gifford, L. 2018. See the carbon through the trees: Market-based climate change mitigation, forest carbon offsets, and the uneven power of carbon accounting. PhD dissertation, University of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C. 2004. How did colonialism dispossess? Comments from an edge of empire. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (1):165–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09401009.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. 2014. Ontologies of indigeneity: The politics of embodying a concept. Cultural Geographies 21 (1):27–32. doi: 10.1177/1474474013500226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Invisible Hand. 2020. Dir. J. Pribanic and M. Troutman. Public Herald Studies Production.
   Google Scholar
• Jago, R. 2017. Canada’s national parks are colonial crime scenes. The Walrus. Accessed August 20, 2021. https://thewalrus.ca/canadas-national-parks-are-colonial-crime-scenes/.
   Google Scholar
• Jepson, W. 2012. Claiming space, claiming water: Contested legal geographies of water in South Texas. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (3):614–31. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.641897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, C. 2020. Mapping transnational rights of nature networks & laws: New global governance structures for more sustainable development. Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Conference, Toronto, Canada, March 29.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, K. 2016. Breaking the bundle of rights: Conservation easements and the legal geographies of individuating nature. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48 (3):504–22. doi: 10.1177/0308518X15609318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D. 2002. The critique of rights in critical legal studies. In Left legalism/left critique, ed. W. Brown and J. Halley, 178–228. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinkaid, E. 2019. “Rights of nature” in translation: Assemblage geographies, boundary objects, and translocal social movements. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44 (3):555–70. doi: 10.1111/tran.12303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafayette Climate Bill of Rights. 2017. Ordinance No. 2, Series.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. M. 2018. Town of Crestone, Colorado, takes bold step by recognizing the inherent rights of nature. Mother Earth News. Accessed February 16, 2022. https://www.motherearthnews.com/nature-and-environment/crestone-colorado-recognizing-the-rights-of-nature-zbcz1808.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsitz, G. 2019. The white possessive and whiteness studies. Kalfou 6 (1):42–51. doi: 10.15367/kf.v6i1.229.
   Google Scholar
• Liverman, D. 2004. Who governs, at what scale and at what price? Geography, environmental governance, and the commodification of nature. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 94 (4):734–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, J. 1690/2020. Two treaties of government. New York: Classic Books International.
   Google Scholar
• Loo, T. 2006. States of nature: Conserving Canada’s wildlife in the 20th century. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Losurdo, D. 2014. Liberalism: A counter-history. London: Verso Trade.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, L. 2015. The intimacies of four continents. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, Ohio Community Bill of Rights Municipal Ordinance. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Margill, M. 2018. Introduction. Presentation at the Rights of Nature Symposium, New Orleans, LA, October 27.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., ed. 2020. Environmental governance in a populist/authoritarian era. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, M. 2020. A critical legal examination of liberalism and liberal rights. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S. E. 2000. Colonizing Hawai’i: The cultural power of law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. 2011. The political economy of personhood. OpenDemocracy, June 16. Accessed July 16, 2021. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/beyond-trafficking-and-slavery/political-economy-of-personhood/.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. 2017. Black rights/white wrongs: The critique of racial liberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morten-Robinson, A. 2015. White possessive: Property, power, and Indigenous sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mountain Lake Park MD Ordinance No. 2011-01. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, R. F. 1989. The rights of nature: A history of environmental ethics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, M., and J. Stripple. 2010. My space: Governing individuals’ carbon emissions. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (2):341–52. doi: 10.1068/d4109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, J. 2009. A turn to empire: The rise of imperial liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plymouth, New Hampshire Freedom from Chemical Trespass Rights-Based Ordinance. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Public Health Law Center. 2020. Dillon’s rule, home rule, and preemption. Public Health Law Center at Mitchell Hamline School of Law. Accessed November 3, 2021. https://publichealthlawcenter.org/sites/default/files/resources/Dillons-Rule-Home-Rule-Preemption.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pulido, L. 2015. Geographies of race and ethnicity 1: White supremacy vs. white privilege in environmental racism research. Progress in Human Geography 39 (6):809–17. doi: 10.1177/0309132514563008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy, J. 2015. Environmentalism’s racist history. The New Yorker, April. Accessed October 16 2021. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/environmentalisms-racist-history
   Google Scholar
• Rawson, A., and B. Mansfield. 2018. Producing juridical knowledge: “Rights of nature” or the naturalization of rights? Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 1 (1–2):99–119. doi: 10.1177/2514848618763807.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, P. 2007. Lawn people: How grasses, weeds and chemicals make us who we are. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, R. 2017. The color of law: How our government segregated America. New York: Liveright.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, H. 2015. Home rule: Households, manhood, and national expansion on the eighteenth-century Kentucky frontier. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company, 118 U.S. 394 (1886).
   Google Scholar
• Santa Monica CA Ordinance Establishing Sustainability Rights. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Scotch, R. K. 2009. “Nothing about us without us”: Disability rights in America. OAH Magazine of History 23 (3):17–22. doi: 10.1093/maghis/23.3.17.
   Google Scholar
• Sierra Club v. Morton. 405 U.S. 727 (1972).
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. 1999. A critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stammers, N. 2015. Human rights and social movements: Theoretical perspectives. Revue Interdisciplinaire D'études Juridiques 73 (2):67–89. doi: 10.3917/riej.075.0067.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. D. 1972. Should trees have standing—Toward legal rights for natural objects. Southern California Law Review 45:450–501.
   Google Scholar
• Tamaqua Borough PA Ordinance No. 612. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. 2014. The state of diversity in environmental organizations. Green 2.0, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Tevis, M. 1981. The status of women: The path toward legal personhood. Educational Horizons 60 (1):11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Tola, M. 2018. Between Pachamama and Mother Earth: Gender, political ontology and the rights of nature in contemporary Bolivia. Feminist Review 118 (1):25–40. doi: 10.1057/s41305-018-0100-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., and K. W. Yang. 2012. Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education and Society 1 (1):1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Universal Declaration of Rights of Mother Earth. 2010. World People’s Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth. Cochabamba, Bolivia, April 22.
   Google Scholar
• Weheliye, A. G. 2014. Habeas viscus: Racializing assemblages, biopolitics, and black feminist theories of the human. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, P. 2018. Opinion: NH towns act to protect community rights. InDepthNH.org. Accessed August 20, 2021. http://indepthnh.org/2018/03/05/opinion-nh-towns-act-to-protect-community-rights/.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, K. 2018. Settler colonialism, ecology, and environmental injustice. Environment and Society 9 (1):125–44. doi: 10.3167/ares.2018.090109.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, I. 2020. Caste: The origins of our discontents. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. 2018. The legal foundations of white supremacy. DePaul Journal for Social Justice 11 (2):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, A. 2018. We the corporations: How American businesses won their civil rights. New York: Liveright.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, S. M. 2010. Legal personhood and the nonhuman rights project. Animal Law Review 17 (1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wynter, S. 1995. 1492: A new world view. In Race, discourse, and the origin of the Americans: A new world view, ed. V. Lawrence and R. Nettleford, 5–57. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wynter, S., and K. McKittrick. 2015. Unparalleled catastrophe for our species? Or, to give humanness a different future: Conversations. In Sylvia Wynter: On being human as praxis, ed. K. McKittrick, 9–89. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yancy, G. 2016. Black bodies, white gazes: The continuing significance of race in America. Washington, DC: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, K. 2010. Retrospective on nature–society geography: Tracing trajectories (1911–2010) and reflecting on translations. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (5):1076–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar