Pluralizing Debates on the Anthropocene Requires Engaging with the Diversity of Existing Scholarship

References

• Álvarez, L., and B. Coolsaet. 2020. Decolonizing environmental justice studies: A Latin American perspective. Capitalism Nature Socialism 31 (2):50–69. doi: 10.1080/10455752.2018.1558272.
   Google Scholar
• Baerwald, T. J. 2010. Prospects for geography as an interdisciplinary discipline. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (3):493–501. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2010.485443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. J., and E. Sheppard. 2010. Nothing includes everything: Towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography 34 (2):193–214. doi: 10.1177/0309132509343728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendik-Keymer, J. 2020. Involving anthroponomy in the Anthropocene: On decoloniality. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., X. Bai, N. Bondre, W. Broadgate, C.-T. Arthur Chen, O. P. Dube, J. W. Erisman, M. Glaser, S. van der Hel, M. C. Lemos, et al. 2016. Down to Earth: Contextualizing the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change 39:341–50. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., M. M. Betsill, S. Burch, J. Dryzek, C. Gordon, A. Gupta, J. Gupta, C. Inoue, A. Kalfagianni, N. Kanie, et al. 2019. The Earth System Governance Project as a network organization: A critical assessment after ten years. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 39:17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., and E. Lövbrand, eds. 2019. Anthropocene encounters: New directions in green political thinking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, S., A. Gupta, C. Y. A. Inoue, A. Kalfagianni, Å. Persson, A. K. Gerlak, A. Ishii, J. Patterson, J. Pickering, M. Scobie, et al. 2019. New directions in earth system governance research. Earth System Governance 1:100006. doi: 10.1016/j.esg.2019.100006.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, A., and S. Fishel. 2019. Power, world politics, and thing-systems in the Anthropocene. In Anthropocene encounters: New directions in green political thinking, ed. E. Lövbrand and F. Biermann, 87–108. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. R. 2021. The Anthropocene: A special issue. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111 (3):633–37. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1859312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., and J. Pickering. 2017. Deliberation as a catalyst for reflexive environmental governance. Ecological Economics 131:353–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., and J. Pickering. 2019. The politics of the Anthropocene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earth System Governance Project. 2018. Earth system governance: Science and implementation plan of the Earth System Governance Project 2018. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Earth System Governance Project.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, L. 2015. Human security/environmental security. Contemporary Politics 21 (1):11–24. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2014.993905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. 2020. Is climate change the most important challenge of our times? No, because we cannot address climate change without addressing inequality. In Contemporary climate change debates, ed. M. Hulme, 12–20. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Hickmann, T., L. Partzsch, P. Pattberg, and S. Weiland. 2019. The Anthropocene debate and political science. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Inoue, C. Y. A. 2018. Worlding the study of global environmental politics in the Anthropocene: Indigenous voices from the Amazon. Global Environmental Politics 18 (4):25–42. doi: 10.1162/glep_a_00479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue, C. Y. A., and P. F. Moreira. 2016. Many worlds, many nature(s), one planet: Indigenous knowledge in the Anthropocene. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 59 (2):e009. doi: 10.1590/0034-7329201600209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. 2021. On decolonizing the Anthropocene: Disobedience via plural constitutions. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111 (3):698–708. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1779645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashwan, P., F. Biermann, A. Gupta, and C. Okereke. 2020. Planetary justice: Prioritizing the poor in earth system governance. Earth System Governance 6:100075. doi: 10.1016/j.esg.2020.100075.
   Google Scholar
• Lövbrand, E., S. Beck, J. Chilvers, T. Forsyth, J. Hedrén, M. Hulme, R. Lidskog, and E. Vasileiadou. 2015. Who speaks for the future of Earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change 32:211–18. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mert, A. 2019a. Democracy in the Anthropocene: A new scale. In Anthropocene encounters: New directions in green political thinking, ed. F. Biermann and E. Lövbrand, 128–49. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mert, A. 2019b. Participation(s) in transnational environmental governance: Green values versus instrumental use. Environmental Values 28 (1):101–21. doi: 10.3197/096327119X15445433913596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, J., C. Wyborn, L. Westman, M. C. Brisbois, M. Milkoreit, and D. Jayaram. 2021. The political effects of emergency frames in sustainability. Nature Sustainability 4 (10):841–50. doi: 10.1038/s41893-021-00749-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, J., B. Coolsaet, N. Dawson, K. M. Suiseeya, C. Y. A. Inoue, and M. Lim. 2022. Rethinking and upholding justice and equity in transformative biodiversity governance. In Transforming biodiversity governance, ed. I. Visseren-Hamakers and M. Kok, 155–78. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108856348.009.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H., and N. C. González. 2019. Bridging knowledge divides: The case of indigenous ontologies of territoriality and REDD+. Forest Policy and Economics 100:198–206. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sénit, C.-A. 2020. Leaving no one behind? The influence of civil society participation on the Sustainable Development Goals. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 38 (4):693–712. doi: 10.1177/2399654419884330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar