Small-Area Estimations from Survey Data for High-Resolution Maps of Urban Flood Risk Perception and Evacuation Behavior

References

• Aerts, J. C. J. H., W. J. Botzen, K. C. Clarke, S. L. Cutter, J. W. Hall, B. Merz, E. Michel-Kerjan, J. Mysiak, S. Surminski, and H. Kunreuther. 2018. Integrating human behaviour dynamics into flood disaster risk assessment. Nature Climate Change 8 (3):193–99. doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0085-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, J. N., J. T. Ripberger, W. Wehde, M. Krocak, C. L. Silva, and H. C. Jenkins‐Smith. 2020. Geographic distributions of extreme weather risk perceptions in the United States. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 40 (12):2498–2508. doi: 10.1111/risa.13569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S., T. Masson, K. Brewitt, and N. Nemetschek. 2017. Threat, coping and flood prevention—A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 54:116–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., M. Maechler, B. Bolker, S. Walker, R. H. B. Christensen, H. Singmann, and B. Dai. 2014. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (1.1-7) [Computer software]. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Baubion, C. 2015. Losing memory—The risk of a major flood in the Paris region: Improving prevention policies. Water Policy 17 (Suppl. 1):156–79. doi: 10.2166/wp.2015.008.
   Google Scholar
• Beccari, B. 2016. A comparative analysis of disaster risk, vulnerability and resilience composite indicators. PLOS Currents Disasters 8. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.453df025e34b682e9737f95070f9b970.
   Google Scholar
• Begg, C., M. Ueberham, T. Masson, and C. Kuhlicke. 2017. Interactions between citizen responsibilization, flood experience and household resilience: Insights from the 2013 flood in Germany. International Journal of Water Resources Development 33 (4):591–608. doi: 10.1080/07900627.2016.1200961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkholz, S., M. Muro, P. Jeffrey, and H. M. Smith. 2014. Rethinking the relationship between flood risk perception and flood management. The Science of the Total Environment 478:12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blöschl, G., J. Hall, A. Viglione, R. A. Perdigão, J. Parajka, B. Merz, and M. Bohãč. 2019. Changing climate both increases and decreases European river floods. Nature 573 (7772):108–11. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1495-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botzen, W., H. Kunreuther, and E. Michel-Kerjan. 2015. Divergence between individual perceptions and objective indicators of tail risks: Evidence from floodplain residents in New York City. Judgment and Decision Making 10 (4):365–85. doi: http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15415/jdm15415.html.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttice, M. K., and B. Highton. 2013. How does multilevel regression and poststratification perform with conventional national surveys? Political Analysis 21 (4):449–67. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpt017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughey, D., and C. Warshaw. 2019. Public opinion in subnational politics. The Journal of Politics 81 (1):352–63. doi: 10.1086/700723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronese, M., F. Lamperti, K. Keller, F. Chiaromonte, and A. Roventini. 2019. Evidence for sharp increase in the economic damages of extreme natural disasters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116 (43): 21450–55. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907826116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutter, S. L., B. J. Boruff, and W. L. Shirley. 2003. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly 84 (2):242–61. doi: 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debionne, S., I. Ruin, S. Shabou, C. Lutoff, and J.-D. Creutin. 2016. Assessment of commuters’ daily exposure to flash flooding over the roads of the Gard region, France. Journal of Hydrology 541:636–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dominicis, S., F. Fornara, U. Ganucci Cancellieri, C. Twigger-Ross, and M. Bonaiuto. 2015. We are at risk, and so what? Place attachment, environmental risk perceptions and preventive coping behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology 43:66–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuth, J. L., R. E. Morss, J. K. Lazo, and C. Trumbo. 2016. The effects of past hurricane experiences on evacuation intentions through risk perception and efficacy beliefs: A mediation analysis. Weather, Climate, and Society 8 (4):327–44. doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-15-0074.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Sherbinin, A., A. Bukvic, G. Rohat, M. Gall, B. McCusker, B. Preston, A. Apotsos, C. Fish, S. Kienberger, P. Muhonda, et al. 2019. Climate vulnerability mapping: A systematic review and future prospects. WIREs Climate Change 10 (5):e600. doi: 10.1002/wcc.600.
   Google Scholar
• Downes, M., L. C. Gurrin, D. R. English, J. Pirkis, D. Currier, M. J. Spittal, and J. B. Carlin. 2018. Multilevel regression and poststratification: A modeling approach to estimating population quantities from highly selected survey samples. American Journal of Epidemiology 187 (8):1780–90. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fekete, A., and F. Fiedrich, eds. 2018. Urban disaster resilience and security: Addressing risks in societies. New York: Springer International. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, L. 2016. The states of public opinion on the environment. Environmental Politics 25 (2):315–37. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2015.1102351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, S., and T. Thaler, eds. 2018. Vulnerability and resilience to natural hazards. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ge, Y., G. Yang, X. Wang, W. Dou, X. Lu, and J. Mao. 2021. Understanding risk perception from floods: A case study from China. Natural Hazards 105 (3):3119–40. doi: 10.1007/s11069-020-04458-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, R. M., F. J. Fowler, M. P. Couper, J. M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2004. Survey methodology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Haer, T., W. W. Botzen, H. de Moel, and J. C. Aerts. 2017. Integrating household risk mitigation behavior in flood risk analysis: An agent‐based model approach. Risk Analysis 37 (10): 1977–92. doi: 10.1111/risa.12740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, K., D. Demant, A. E. Peden, and M. S. Hagger. 2020. A systematic review of human behaviour in and around floodwater. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 47:101561. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. C., J. Hartter, and T. G. Safford. 2015. Validity of county-level estimates of climate change beliefs. Nature Climate Change 5 (8):704. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., and P. Driessen. 2017. The flood risk management plan: Towards spatial water governance. Journal of Flood Risk Management 10 (2):145–54. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höppner, C., R. Whittle, M. Bründl, and M. Buchecker. 2012. Linking social capacities and risk communication in Europe: A gap between theory and practice? Natural Hazards 64 (2):1753–78. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0356-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, P. D. 2018. Modeling geographic variation in household disaster preparedness across U.S. states and metropolitan areas. The Professional Geographer 70 (3):491–503. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2017.1416301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, P. D., J. R. Marlon, X. Wang, and A. Leiserowitz. 2019. Public perceptions of the health risks of extreme heat across US states, counties, and neighborhoods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116 (14):6743–48. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1813145116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, P. D., M. Mildenberger, J. R. Marlon, and A. Leiserowitz. 2015. Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nature Climate Change 5 (6):596–603. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, P., and W. J. W. Botzen. 2019. Cost–benefit analysis of flood‐zoning policies: A review of current practice. WIREs Water 6 (6):e1387. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1387.
   Google Scholar
• Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE). 2015. Données Carroyées 200m Filosofi 2015. Fichier Localisé Social et Fiscal [Filosofi 2015 200m grid data. Localized social and fiscal database]. Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques, France. Accessed May 5, 2018. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/4176305.
   Google Scholar
• Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE). 2017a. Recensement de la Population 2017. Base Infracommunale IRIS [2017 population census: Infra-municipal IRIS database]. Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques, France. Accessed April 21, 2021. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/4799309.
   Google Scholar
• Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE). 2017b. Revenus, pauvreté et niveau de vie en 2017. Base Infracommunale Filosofi [Income, poverty and living standards in 2017: Infra-municipal Filosofi database]. Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques, France. Accessed April 21, 2021. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/4479212.
   Google Scholar
• Institution Interdépartementale des Barrages Réservoirs du Bassin de la Seine (IIBRBS). 2013. Crues de reference et zones inondables [Reference floods and flood zones]. Institution Interdépartementale des Barrages Réservoirs du Bassin de la Seine, Hydratec, France. Accessed May 5, 2018. https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/crues-de-references-idf/.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2021. AR6 Climate Change 2021: The physical science basis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Accessed December 9, 2021. https://www.ipcc.ch/.
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). 2018. World Disasters Report 2018. Leaving no one behind. Accessed January 19, 2021. https://media.ifrc.org/ifrc/world-disaster-report-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Kellens, W., T. Terpstra, and P. De Maeyer. 2013. Perception and communication of flood risks: A systematic review of empirical research. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 33 (1):24–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., and S. S. Oh. 2015. Confidence, knowledge, and compliance with emergency evacuation. Journal of Risk Research 18 (1):111–26. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2014.880728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreibich, H., M. Müller, K. Schröter, and A. H. Thieken. 2017. New insights into flood warning reception and emergency response by affected parties. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 17 (12):2075–92. doi: 10.5194/nhess-17-2075-2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlicke, C. 2019. Risk and resilience in the management and governance of natural hazards. In Oxford research encyclopedia of natural hazard science, ed. C. Kuhlicke. New York: Oxford University Press. Accessed April 21, 2021. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.013.299.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlicke, C., S. Seebauer, P. Hudson, C. Begg, P. Bubeck, C. Dittmer, T. Grothmann, A. Heidenreich, H. Kreibich, D. F. Lorenz, et al. 2020. The behavioral turn in flood risk management, its assumptions and potential implications. WIREs Water 7 (3):e1418. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1418.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M. P. 2018. The neighborhood effect averaging problem (NEAP): An elusive confounder of the neighborhood effect. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15 (9):1841. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lax, J. R., and J. H. Phillips. 2009. How should we estimate public opinion in the states? American Journal of Political Science 53 (1):107–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00360.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazrus, H., R. E. Morss, J. L. Demuth, J. K. Lazo, and A. Bostrom. 2016. “Know what to do if you encounter a flash flood”: Mental models analysis for improving flash flood risk communication and public decision making. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 36 (2):411–27. doi: 10.1111/risa.12480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechowska, E. 2018. What determines flood risk perception? A review of factors of flood risk perception and relations between its basic elements. Natural Hazards 94 (3):1341–66. doi: 10.1007/s11069-018-3480-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. M., E. M. Markowitz, P. D. Howe, C.-Y. Ko, and A. A. Leiserowitz. 2015. Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nature Climate Change 5 (11):1014–20. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leemann, L., and F. Wasserfallen. 2017. Extending the use and prediction precision of subnational public opinion estimation: Extending use and precision of MRP. American Journal of Political Science 61 (4):1003–22. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., J. E. Kang, and C. S. Prater. 2011. The logistics of household hurricane evacuation. Natural Hazards 58 (3):1093–1109. doi: 10.1007/s11069-011-9715-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., P. M. Murray-Tuite, M. K. Lindell, P. B. Wolshon, and E. J. Baker. 2019. Large-scale evacuation: The analysis, modeling, and management of emergency relocation from hazardous areas. London and New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Marlon, J., P. D. Howe, M. Mildenberger, A. Leiserowitz, and X. Wang. 2020. Yale climate opinion maps—U.S. 2020. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. Accessed April 21, 2021. http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/ycom-us/.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, J., G. Johnson, K. Klima, R. Steratore, S. Cohen, G. Kirkwood, L. Dixon, J. L. Hastings, and P. S. Steinberg. 2021. Developing metrics and scoring procedures to support mitigation grant program decisionmaking. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Accessed December 9, 2021. https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA377-1
   Google Scholar
• Michel-Kerjan, E. 2015. We must build resilience into our communities. Nature 524 (7566):389. doi: 10.1038/524389a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mildenberger, M., P. Howe, E. Lachapelle, L. Stokes, J. Marlon, and T. Gravelle. 2016. The distribution of climate change public opinion in Canada. PLoS ONE 11 (8):e0159774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, E., M. Brennan, F. Brereton, and H. Shahumyan. 2015. Exploring a spatial statistical approach to quantify flood risk perception using cognitive maps. Natural Hazards 76 (3):1573–1601. doi: 10.1007/s11069-014-1559-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2018. Preventing the flooding of the Seine in the Paris–Ile de France region: Progress made and future challenges. Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/governance/risk/preventing-the-flooding-of-the-seine-2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco, J. 2011. Using national surveys to measure dynamic US state public opinion: A guideline for scholars and an application. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11 (4):415–39. doi: 10.1177/1532440011419287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, D. K., A. Gelman, and J. Bafumi. 2004. Bayesian multilevel estimation with poststratification: State-level estimates from national polls. Political Analysis 12 (4):375–85. doi: 10.1093/pan/mph024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poussin, J. K., W. J. W. Botzen, and J. C. J. H. Aerts. 2014. Factors of influence on flood damage mitigation behaviour by households. Environmental Science & Policy 40:69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poussin, J. K., W. J. Wouter Botzen, and J. C. J. H. Aerts. 2015. Effectiveness of flood damage mitigation measures: Empirical evidence from French flood disasters. Global Environmental Change 31:74–84. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reghezza-Zitt, M. 2019. Crisis management, uncertainty and the unthinkable. How to anticipate and prepare for a systemic crisis in case of major flooding of the Parisian metropolitan area. Annales de Geographie 726 (2):5–30. doi: 10.3917/ag.726.0005.
   Google Scholar
• Reghezza-Zitt, M., and S. Rufat. 2015. Resilience imperative: Uncertainty, risks and disasters. London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Reghezza-Zitt, M., and S. Rufat. 2019. Disentangling the range of responses to threats, hazards and disasters. Vulnerability, resilience and adaptation in question. Cybergeo: art. 916. doi: 10.4000/cybergeo.32917.
   Google Scholar
• Richert, C., K. Erdlenbruch, and C. Figuières. 2017. The determinants of households’ flood mitigation decisions in France—On the possibility of feedback effects from past investments. Ecological Economics 131:342–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rufat, S. 2013. Spectroscopy of urban vulnerability. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (3):505–25. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2012.702485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rufat, S. 2015. Towards a social and spatial risk perception framework. Cybergeo: art. 725. doi: 10.4000/cybergeo.27010.
   Google Scholar
• Rufat, S., and W. W. Botzen. 2022. Drivers and dimensions of flood risk perceptions: Revealing an implicit selection bias and lessons for communication policies. Global Environmental Change 73:102465. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rufat, S., A. Fekete, I. Armaş, T. Hartmann, C. Kuhlicke, T. Prior, T. Thaler, and B. Wisner. 2020. Swimming alone? Why linking flood risk perception and behavior requires more than “it’s the individual, stupid.” WIREs Water 7 (5):e1462. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1462.
   Google Scholar
• Rufat, S., E. Tate, C. G. Burton, and A. S. Maroof. 2015. Social vulnerability to floods: Review of case studies and implications for measurement. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 14:470–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rufat, S., E. Tate, C. T. Emrich, and F. Antolini. 2019. How valid are social vulnerability models? Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (4):1131–53. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1535887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruin, I., J. C. Gaillard, and C. Lutoff. 2007. How to get there? Assessing motorists’ flash flood risk perception on daily itineraries. Environmental Hazards 7 (3):235–44. doi: 10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.07.005.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., and J. Árvai. 2020. Risk perception: Reflections on 40 years of research. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 40 (Suppl. 1):2191–2206. doi: 10.1111/risa.13599.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slavikova, L. 2018. Effects of government flood expenditures: The problem of crowding-out. Journal of Flood Risk Management 11:95–104. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tausanovitch, C., and C. Warshaw. 2013. Measuring constituent policy preferences in congress, state legislatures, and cities. The Journal of Politics 75 (2):330–42. doi: 10.1017/S0022381613000042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachinger, G., O. Renn, C. Begg, and C. Kuhlicke. 2013. The risk perception paradox—Implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 33 (6):1049–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., D. Rothschild, S. Goel, and A. Gelman. 2015. Forecasting elections with non-representative polls. International Journal of Forecasting 31 (3):980–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., M. Kyriakidis, and V. N. Dang. 2021. Incorporating human factors in emergency evacuation—An overview of behavioral factors and models. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 60:102254. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., N. S. N. Lam, N. Obradovich, and X. Ye. 2019. Are vulnerable communities digitally left behind in social responses to natural disasters? Evidence from Hurricane Sandy with Twitter data. Applied Geography 108:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, P. J., V. Blauhut, N. Bloemendaal, J. E. Daniell, M. C. de Ruiter, M. J. Duncan, R. Emberson, S. F. Jenkins, D. Kirschbaum, M. Kunz, et al. 2020. Review article: Natural hazard risk assessments at the global scale. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 20 (4):1069–96. doi: 10.5194/nhess-20-1069-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshaw, C., and J. Rodden. 2012. How should we measure district-level public opinion on individual issues? The Journal of Politics 74 (1):203–19. doi: 10.1017/S0022381611001204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., J. B. Holt, H. Lu, A. G. Wheaton, E. S. Ford, K. J. Greenlund, and J. B. Croft. 2014. Multilevel regression and poststratification for small-area estimation of population health outcomes: A case study of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevalence using the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. American Journal of Epidemiology 179 (8):1025–33. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., J. B. Holt, S. Yun, H. Lu, K. J. Greenlund, and J. B. Croft. 2015. Validation of multilevel regression and poststratification methodology for small area estimation of health indicators from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. American Journal of Epidemiology 182 (2):127–37. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, L., N. S. N. Lam, H. Cai, and Y. Qiang. 2018. Mining Twitter data for improved understanding of disaster resilience. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (5):1422–41. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1421897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar