369
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Wind–Human Resonance in a Polluted City: The Case of Dalinpu in Kaohsiung, Taiwan

&
Pages 1135-1152 | Received 02 Apr 2022, Accepted 24 Dec 2022, Published online: 15 Mar 2023

References

  • Adey, P. 2010. Aerial views: Bodies, borders and biopolitics. In Aerial life: Spaces, mobilities, affects, 85–113. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Adey, P. 2013. Air/atmospheres of the megacity. Theory, Culture & Society 30 (7–8):291–308. doi: 10.1177/0263276413501541.
  • Adey, P. 2015. Air’s affinities: Geopolitics, chemical affect and the force of the elemental. Dialogues in Human Geography 5 (1):54–75. doi: 10.1177/2043820614565871.
  • Adey, P., and B. Anderson. 2011. Anticipation, materiality, event: The Icelandic ash cloud disruption and the security of mobility. Mobilities 6 (1):11–20. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2011.532919.
  • Anderson, B. 2009. Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society 2 (2):77–81. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2009.08.005.
  • Barry, K., M. Borovnik, and T. Edensor. 2021. Weather: Spaces, mobilities and affects. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Berland, J. 1994. On reading “The weather.” Cultural Studies 8 (1):99–114. doi: 10.1080/09502389400490061.
  • Bhat, H. 2021. Becoming the monsoon forest—Emergence in the breakdown of categories. GeoHumanities 7 (1):6–23. doi: 10.1080/2373566X.2021.1904786.
  • Chang, Y.-T., and S.-S. Chien. 2021. 量體流動與風的時空政治-以大林蒲的空氣污染為例 [Fluid volume thinking and politics of air/wind: Case of Dalinpu, Taiwan]. Taiwan Journal of Anthropology 19 (2):147–88.
  • Chen, G.-D. 2005. 臺灣的山海經驗 [The experience of Taiwan’s mountains and seas]. Taipei: Yuanliu.
  • Chien, S.-S., and Y.-T. Chang. 2021. Explosion, subterranean infrastructure and the elemental of earth in the contemporary city: The case of Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Geoforum 127:424–34. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.03.005.
  • Corton, C. 2015. London fog—The biography. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • CPC Corporation. 2019. 2018年中油公司簡介手冊 [2018 CNPC company profile brochure]. Accessed June 23, 2021. https://ws.cpc.com.tw/cpcannual/2018/chinese/files/basic-html/page1.html.
  • Cullen, B. 2021. Intuiting a monsoonal ethnography in three Bay of Bengal cities. GeoHumanities 7 (1):148–63. doi: 10.1080/2373566X.2020.1798800.
  • Davies, T. 2018. Toxic space and time: Slow violence, necropolitics, and petrochemical pollution. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (6):1537–53. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1470924.
  • Davies, T. 2019. Slow violence and toxic geographies: “Out of sight” to whom? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 40 (2):409–27.
  • de Larrinaga, M. 2016. (Non)-lethality and war: Tear gas as a weapon of governmental intervention. Critical Studies on Terrorism 9 (3):522–40. doi: 10.1080/17539153.2016.1197626.
  • DeLoughrey, E., and T. Flores. 2020. Submerged bodies: The tidalectics of representability and the sea in Caribbean art. Environmental Humanities 12 (1):132–66. doi: 10.1215/22011919-8142242.
  • Dennis, S. 2016. Smokefree: A social, moral and political atmosphere. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Dodds, K. 2021. Geopolitics and ice humanities: Elemental, metaphorical and volumetric reverberations. Geopolitics 26 (4):1121–49. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2019.1697240.
  • Elden, S. 2013. Secure the volume: Vertical geopolitics and the depth of power. Political Geography 34:35–51. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.12.009.
  • Elden, S. 2021. Terrain, politics, history. Dialogues in Human Geography 11 (2):170–89. doi: 10.1177/2043820620951353.
  • Engelmann, S. 2015. Toward a poetics of air: Sequencing and surfacing breath. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 40 (3):430–44. doi: 10.1111/tran.12084.
  • Environmental Protection Administration. 2019. Health risk assessment results of 107-year survey in Kaohsiung-Dalinpu Area. Accessed May 16, 2022. https://enews.epa.gov.tw/Page/3B3C62C78849F32F/83b6a99a-6a2b-487e-a83f-bbf8ae81f233.
  • Eriksen, C., and J. Turnbull. 2022. Insure the volume? Sensing air, atmospheres, and radiation in the Chernobyl exclusion zone. In Climate, society and elemental insurance: Capacities and limitations, ed. K. Booth, C. Lucas, and S. French, 167–82. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Fish, A. 2022. Blue governmentality: Elemental activism with conservation technologies on plundered seas. Political Geography 93:102528. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102528.
  • Fortun, K. 2009. Advocacy after Bhopal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gabrys, J. 2016. Program earth: Environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press.
  • Garnett, E. 2017. Enacting toxicity: Epidemiology and the study of air pollution for public health. Critical Public Health 27 (3):325–36. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2017.1302562.
  • Geros, C. L. 2021. Drinking the winds: Monsoon as atmospheric spring. GeoHumanities 7 (1):65–88. doi: 10.1080/2373566X.2021.1929384.
  • Hoskins, G. 2021. Making the Santa Ana wind legible: The Aeolian production of Los Angeles. In Weather: Spaces, mobilities and affects, ed. K. Barry, M. Borovnik, and T. Edensor, 130–44. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Hsu, E. 2008. The experience of wind in early and medieval Chinese medicine. In Wind, life, health: Anthropological and historical perspectives, ed. E. Hsu and C. Low, 111–28. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Hsu, E., and C. Low, eds. 2008. Wind, life, health: Anthropological and historical perspectives. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Ingold, T. 2008. Bindings against boundaries: Entanglements of life in an open world. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (8):1796–1810. doi: 10.1068/a40156.
  • Ingold, T. 2011. Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Jackman, A., and R. Squire. 2021. Forging volumetric methods. Area 53 (3):492–500. doi: 10.1111/area.12712.
  • Jankovic, V. 2008. Gruff boreas, deadly calms: A medical perspective on winds and the Victorians. In Wind, life, health: Anthropological and historical perspectives, ed. E. Hsu and C. Low, 141–57. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Jiaqing. 2013. 西南風的味 [The taste of the southwest wind]. 西南風地方報 [Southwest Wind Local News], September 13. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://issuu.com/southeastwind/docs/0916.
  • Kuriyama, S. 1999. The expressiveness of the body and the divergence of Greek and Chinese medicine. New York: Zone Books.
  • Landau, F., and A. Toland. 2021. Towards a sensory politics of the Anthropocene: Exploring activist-artistic approaches to politicizing air pollution. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 40 (3):629–47.
  • Marston, S. A., J. P. Jones, and K. Woodward. 2005. Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 (4):416–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00180.x.
  • Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the virtual. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • McCormack, D. P. 2008. Engineering affective atmospheres on the moving geographies of the 1897 Andrée expedition. Cultural geographies 15 (4):413–30. doi: 10.1177/1474474008094314.
  • McCormack, D. P. 2017. Elemental infrastructures for atmospheric media: On stratospheric variations, value and the commons. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35 (3):418–37. doi: 10.1177/0263775816677292.
  • National Statistics. n.d. 2016年工業及服務業普查——縣市別報告:高雄市普查結果提要分析 [Census of industry and services of 2016 – County and city report: Summary analysis of Kaohsiung City census results]. Accessed February 24, 2022. https://www.stat.gov.tw/public/Attachment/9430141529GEYIEZG4.pdf.
  • Nieuwenhuis, M. 2016. Breathing materiality: Aerial violence at a time of atmospheric politics. Critical Studies on Terrorism 9 (3):499–521. doi: 10.1080/17539153.2016.1199420.
  • Nixon, R. 2011. Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • O’Grady, N. 2018. Communication and the elemental: Capacities, force and excess in emergency information sharing. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37 (1):158–76.
  • Ottinger, G. 2010. Constructing empowerment through interpretations of environmental surveillance data. Surveillance & Society 8 (2):221–34. doi: 10.24908/ss.v8i2.3487.
  • Paiva, D., and I. Sánchez-Fuarros. 2021. The territoriality of atmosphere: Rethinking affective urbanism through the collateral atmospheres of Lisbon’s tourism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 46 (2):392–405. doi: 10.1111/tran.12425.
  • Pandya, V. 2008. Time to move: Winds and the political economy of space in Andamanese culture. In Wind, life, health: Anthropological and historical perspectives, ed. E. Hsu and C. Low, 85–97. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Pérez, M. A. 2015. Exploring the vertical: Science and sociality in the field among cavers in Venezuela. Social & Cultural Geography 16 (2):226–47. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2014.973438.
  • Peters, K., and P. Steinberg. 2019. The ocean in excess: Towards a more-than-wet ontology. Dialogues in Human Geography 9 (3):293–307. doi: 10.1177/2043820619872886.
  • Peters, K. A., P. E. Steinberg, and E. Stratford. 2018. Territory beyond terra. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
  • Peters, K., and J. Turner. 2018. Unlock the volume: Towards a politics of capacity. Antipode 50 (4):1037–56. doi: 10.1111/anti.12397.
  • Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. 2014. Spatial justice: Body, lawscape, atmosphere. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Singer, M. 2011. Down cancer alley: The lived experience of health and environmental suffering in Louisiana’s chemical corridor. Medical anthropology Quarterly 25 (2):141–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1387.2011.01154.x.
  • Sloterdijk, P. 2009. Terror from the air, trans. A. Patton and S. Corcoran. Los Angeles: Semiotexte.
  • Sloterdijk, P. 2016. Spheres: Vol. 3. Foams: Plural spherology. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • Steinberg, P., and K. Peters. 2015. Wet ontologies, fluid spaces: Giving depth to volume through oceanic thinking. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33 (2):247–64. doi: 10.1068/d14148p.
  • Stevenson, F. 2008. The question of the wind in Zhuangzi. In China-west interculture: Toward the philosophy of world integration: Essays on Wu Kuang-Ming’s thinking, ed. J. Goulding, 73–100. Global Scholarly Publications.
  • Strauss, S. 2008. An ill wind: The Foehn in Leukerbad and beyond. In Wind, life, health: Anthropological and historical perspectives, ed. E. Hsu and C. Low, 159–74. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Wright, S., and M. Tofa. 2021. Weather geographies: Talking about the weather, considering diverse sovereignties. Progress in Human Geography 45 (5):1126–46. doi: 10.1177/0309132520982949.
  • Wu, K.-M. 1990. The butterfly as companion: Meditations on the first three chapters of the Chuang-Tzu. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Xiaogang Household Registration Office, Kaohsiung City. n.d. 月各里年齡層統計 [Monthly age group statistics]. Accessed July 18, 2021. https://siaogang-house.kcg.gov.tw/News.aspx?n=5BC851F56C003F6B&sms=F92A1D141047D0C3.
  • Xu Shunliang. 2013. 關於西南風 [About southwest wind]. 西南風地方報 (Southwest Wind Local News), September 13. Accessed January 13, 2020. https://issuu.com/southeastwind/docs/0916.
  • Yoeli-Tlalim, R. 2010. Tibetan “wind” and “wind” illnesses: Towards a multicultural approach to health and illness. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (4):318–24. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.10.005.
  • Yu, S.-J. 2019. Can affective atmospheres justify megaprojects? A case study of the “Asia New Bay Area” in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Emotion, Space and Society 31:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2019.01.003.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.