Forests of Fear: Illegal Logging, Criminalization, and Violence in the Carpathian Mountains

References

• Afroz, S., R. Cramb, and C. Grünbühel. 2016. Ideals and institutions: Systemic reasons for the failure of a social forestry program in south-west Bangladesh. Geoforum 77:161–73. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albulescu, A.-C., M. Manton, D. Larion, and P. Angelstam. 2022. The winding road towards sustainable forest management in Romania, 1989–2022. Land 11 (8):1198. doi: 10.3390/land11081198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bager, S., M. Persson, and T. Reis. 2020. Reducing commodity driven tropical deforestation: Political feasibility and “theories of change” for EU policy options. In Reducing commodity-driven deforestation, ed. S. Bager, 1–39. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3624073.
   Google Scholar
• Blavascunas, E. 2020. Foresters, borders and bark beetles: The future of Europe’s last primeval forest. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouriaud, L. 2005. Causes of illegal logging in central and Eastern Europe. Small-Scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy 4 (3):269–91. doi: 10.1007/s11842-005-0017-6.
   Google Scholar
• Buliga, B., and L. Nichiforel. 2019. Voluntary forest certification vs stringent legal frameworks: Romania as a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production 207 (January):329–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.021.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, C., P. O. Vedeld, and L. T. Trædal. 2015. Securitizing REDD+? Problematising the emerging illegal timber trade and forest carbon interface in East Africa. Geoforum 60:72–82. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtea de Conturi a Romaniei. 2013. Situatia patrimoniala a fondului forestier din Romania 1990–2012 [Romanian Court of Accounts. 2013. Report on the value of Romania’s forestlands between 1990–2012].
   Google Scholar
• Davidescu, S., and A. Buzogany. 2021. Cutting deals: Transnational advocacy networks and the European Union timber regulation at the eastern border. The International Spectator 56 (3):105–18. doi: 10.1080/03932729.2021.1935680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorondel, S. 2009. “They should be killed”: Forest restitution, ethnic groups, and patronage in postsocialist Romania. In The rights and wrongs of land restitution: “Restoring what was ours,” ed. F. Derick and D. James, 43–65. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dorondel, S. 2016. Disrupted landscapes: State, peasants and the politics of land in postsocialist Romania. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Drăgoi, M., and V. Toza. 2019. Did forestland restitution facilitate institutional amnesia? Some evidence from Romanian forest policy. Land 8 (6):99. doi: 10.3390/land8060099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, R. 2016. War, by conservation. Geoforum 69:238–48. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, A. 2020. Forest becomes frontline: Conservation and counter-insurgency in a space of violent conflict in Assam, Northeast India. Political Geography 77:102117. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forcoș, G. 2019. Cum văd prelucratorii din industria lemnului problema defrișărilor ilegale [How do wood processors see the problem of illegal deforestation]. B1TV, December 5. Accessed April 20, 2022. https://www.b1tv.ro/eveniment/exclusiv-cum-vad-prelucratorii-din-industria-lemnului-problema-defrisarilor-ilegale-combaterea-prin-implicarea-cetatenilor-nu-are-un-impact-semnificativ-se-creeaza-numai-o-isterie-nationala-si-o-vanat-309374.html.
   Google Scholar
• Fordaq Romania. 2017. Press release on the National Day of Forests. Fordaq, March 29. Accessed April 20, 2022. https://lemn.fordaq.com/news/COMUNICAT_DE_PRES%C4%82_-_Reprezentan%C8%9Bii_51506.html.
   Google Scholar
• Grajales, J. 2015. Land grabbing, legal contention and institutional change in Colombia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (3–4):541–60. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.992883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, H., and P. Le Billon. 2021. Unrooted responses: Addressing violence against environmental and land defenders. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 39 (1):132–51. doi: 10.1177/2399654420941518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herţa, A. S. 2016. Pădureni—Un experiment neoliberal [Pădureni—A neoliberal experiment]. Anuarul Institutului de Istorie “George Baritiu” 14:53–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. 2020. The illegal, the illicit and new geographies of uneven development. Territory, Politics, Governance 8 (2):161–76. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2018.1535998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institutul Naţional de Statistică. 2020. Statistica activităţilor din silvicultură [Statistic records on forestry industry]. Accessed April 22, 2022. https://insse.ro/cms/ro/content/statistica-activit%C4%83%C5%A3ilor-din-silvicultur%C4%83-%C3%AEn-anul-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ioras, F., and I. V. Abrudan. 2006. The Romanian forestry sector: Privatisation facts. International Forestry Review 8 (3):361–67. doi: 10.1505/ifor.8.3.361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iordăchescu, G. 2021. Becoming a virgin forest: From remote sensing to erasing environmental history. Environment & Society Portal Arcadia Spring:10. doi: 10.5282/rcc/9254.
   Google Scholar
• Iordăchescu, G. 2022. Convivial conservation prospects in Europe—From wilderness protection to reclaiming the commons. Conservation and Society 20 (2):156–66. doi: 10.4103/cs.cs_35_21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, K. 2014. Crimes against nature: Squatters, poachers, thieves, and the hidden history of American conservation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A., and A. Szabo. 2005. Ethics and culture in the forestry profession: Emergent changes in Romania. Silva Carelica 49:303–14.
   Google Scholar
• Le Billon, P. 2018. Peacebuilding and white-collar crime in post-war natural resource sectors. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 3 (1):80–97. doi: 10.1080/23802014.2017.1365626.
   Google Scholar
• Le Billon, P., and P. Lujala. 2020. Environmental and land defenders: Global patterns and determinants of repression. Global Environmental Change 65:102163. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahanty, S. 2019. Shadow economies and the state: A comparison of cassava and timber networks on the Cambodia-Vietnam frontier. Journal of Contemporary Asia 49 (2):193–215. doi: 10.1080/00472336.2018.1545917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margulies, J. D., F. Massé, and B. VandeBerg. 2023. Illicit geographies and contested environments: An introduction. Political Geography 101:102818. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marijnen, E., and J. Verweijen. 2020. Pluralising political forests: Unpacking “the state” by tracing Virunga’s charcoal chain. Antipode 52 (4):996–1017. doi: 10.1111/anti.12492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, I. 2016. Nu mai rezistam! Lemnul e mai scump ca-n Occident! [We had enough! The timber is more expensive than in the West!]. PressOne, January 27. Accessed April 20, 2022. https://pressone.ro/nu-mai-rezistam-a-ajuns-lemnul-mai-scump-ca-n-occident.
   Google Scholar
• Massé, F. 2020. Conservation law enforcement: Policing protected areas. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (3):758–73. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1630249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massé, F. 2022. Police power in green: Furthering political ecologies of the state. Political Geography 97:102627. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massé, F., and E. Lunstrum. 2016. Accumulation by securitisation: Commercial poaching, neoliberal conservation, and the creation of new wildlife frontiers. Geoforum 69:227–37. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. F. 2002. Power and interest on Sumatra’s rainforest frontier: Clientelist coalitions, illegal logging and conservation in the Alas Valley. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 33 (1):77–106. doi: 10.1017/S0022463402000048.
   Google Scholar
• McElwee, P. 2004. You say illegal, I say legal: The relationship between “illegal” logging and land tenure, poverty, and forest use rights in Vietnam. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 19 (1–3):97–135. doi: 10.1300/J091v19n01_06.
   Google Scholar
• McSweeney, K. 2023. Prohibition geographies: Afterword to special issue on “Illicit geographies and contested environments.” Political Geography 101:102835. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.102835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, S. 2015. Cambodia’s unofficial regime of extraction: Illicit logging in the shadow of transnational governance and investment. Critical Asian Studies 47 (2):200–28. doi: 10.1080/14672715.2015.1041275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerul Apelor si Padurilor. 2018. Rezultatele Inventarului Forestier National - Ciclul II [Ministry of Waters and Forests. 2018. Results of the National Forest Inventory, 2nd Cycle]. Accessed April 20, 2022. http://apepaduri.gov.ro/rezultatele-inventarului-forestier-national-ciclul-ii/.
   Google Scholar
• Miu, I. V., L. Rozylowicz, V. D. Popescu, and P. Anastasiu. 2020. Identification of areas of very high biodiversity value to achieve the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 key commitments. PeerJ 8:E10067. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munteanu, C., M. D. Nita, I. V. Abrudan, and V. C. Radeloff. 2016. Historical forest management in Romania is imposing strong legacies on contemporary forests and their management. Forest Ecology and Management 361:179–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedea, A. 2019. La o zi după crima din Maramureș, un pădurar care apare în investigaţia Recorder a fost bătut și ameninţat cu moartea [One day after the Maramureș crime, a forester that was featured in the recorder investigation was beated and received death threats]. Recorder, October 18. Accessed April 20, 2022. https://recorder.ro/la-o-zi-dupa-crima-din-maramures-un-padurar-care-apare-in-investigatia-recorder-a-fost-batut-si-amenintat-cu-moartea/.
   Google Scholar
• Nedea, A., and D. Muntean. 2019. Pe urmele hoţilor de lemn [Chasing the timber thieves]. Recorder, October 3. Accessed April 20, 2022. https://recorder.ro/pe-urmele-hotilor-de-lemn-cum-functioneaza-sistemul-de-spagi-care-decimeaza-padurile-romaniei/.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. P. 2004. Moral and discursive geographies in the war for biodiversity in Africa. Political Geography 23 (7):813–37. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon, R. 2013. Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Opincaru, I. 2021. Elements of the institutionalization process of the forest and pasture commons in Romania as particular forms of social economy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 92 (1):101–18. doi: 10.1111/apce.12294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palaghianu, C., and L. Nichiforel. 2016. Intre perceptii si precepte in dialogul despre padurile Romaniei [Between perceptions and dogma in the dialogue about Romania’s forests]. Bucovina Forestiera 16 (1):3–8. doi: 10.4316/bf.2016.001.
   Google Scholar
• Peluso, N. L., and P. Vandergeest. 2011. Political ecologies of war and forests: Counterinsurgencies and the making of national natures. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (3):587–608. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.560064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peluso, N. L., and P. Vandergeest. 2020. Writing political forests. Antipode 52 (4):1083–1103. doi: 10.1111/anti.12636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peluso, N. L., and M. Watts, eds. 2001. Violent environments. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petrova, S. 2014. Contesting forest neoliberalization: Recombinant geographies of “illegal” logging in the Balkans. Geoforum 55:13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlingemann, L., I. de Bortoli, F. Favilli, H. Egerer, E. Musco, T. Lucas, and I. Lucius. 2017. Combating wildlife and forest crime in the Danube-Carpathian region. A UN Environment–Eurac Research–WWF report, UN Environment, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Scriban, R. E., L. Nichiforel, L. G. Bouriaud, I. Barnoaiea, V. C. Cosofret, and C. O. Barbu. 2019. Governance of the forest restitution process in Romania: An application of the DPSIR model. Forest Policy and Economics 99:59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikor, T., and P. X. To. 2011. Illegal logging in Vietnam: Lam Tac (forest hijackers) in practice and talk. Society & Natural Resources 24 (7):688–701. doi: 10.1080/08941920903573057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, S., and P. Le Billon. 2016. Violence and space: An introduction to the geographies of violence. Political Geography 52:1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, J. 2010. The rents of illegal logging: The mechanisms behind the rush on forest resources in southeast Albania. Conservation and Society 8 (2):140–50. doi: 10.4103/0972-4923.68916.
   Google Scholar
• To, P. X. 2015. State territorialization and illegal logging: The dynamic relationships between practices and images of the state in Vietnam. Critical Asian Studies 47 (2):229–52. doi: 10.1080/14672715.2015.1041278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To, P. X., and S. Mahanty. 2019. Vietnam’s cross-border timber crackdown and the quest for state legitimacy. Political Geography 75:102066. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. L. 2005. Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Schendel, W., and I. Abraham. 2006. Introduction: The making of illicitness. In Illicit flows and criminal things, ed. W. Van Schendel and I. Abraham, 1–37. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vasile, M. 2019. Fiefdom forests and authoritarianism: Timber barons and the limits of resistance in the Carpathian Mountains. Geoforum 106:155–66. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasile, M. 2020a. The other frontier: Forest rush and small-scale timbermen of postsocialist Transylvania. The Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (2):429–54. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2020.1803286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasile, M. 2020b. The rise and fall of a timber baron: Political forests and unruly coalitions in the Carpathian Mountains of Romania. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (6):1952–68. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1723399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasile, M., and G. Iordăchescu. 2022. Forest crisis narratives: Illegal logging, datafication and the conservation frontier in the Romanian Carpathian Mountains. Political Geography 96:102600. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veen, P., J. Fanta, I. Raev, I.-A. Biriş, J. de Smidt, and B. Maes. 2010. Virgin forests in Romania and Bulgaria: Results of two national inventory projects and their implications for protection. Biodiversity and Conservation 19 (6):1805–19. doi: 10.1007/s10531-010-9804-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdery, K. 2003. The vanishing hectare: Property and value in postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voicu, S., and M. Vasile. 2022. Grabbing the commons: Forest rights, capital and legal struggle in the Carpathian Mountains. Political Geography 98:102718. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, M. 2018. Frontiers: Authority, precarity, and insurgency at the edge of the state. World Development 101:477–88. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, L., and R. Boratto. 2020. Conservation, wildlife crime, and tough-on-crime policies: Lessons from the criminological literature. Biological Conservation 251:108810. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, G. Y., M. Moeliono, I. W. Bong, T. T. Pham, M. A. Sahide, D. Naito, and M. Brockhaus. 2020. Social forestry in Southeast Asia: Evolving interests, discourses and the many notions of equity. Geoforum 117:246–58. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, K. M., and J. Naimark. 2020. Conservation as counterinsurgency: A case of ceasefire in a rebel forest in southeast Myanmar. Political Geography 83:102251. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar