Evolving Coagency between Artists and AI in the Spatial Cocreative Process of Artmaking

References

• Allen, J. 2011. Topological twists: Power’s shifting geographies. Dialogues in Human Geography 1 (3):283–98. doi: 10.1177/2043820611421546.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. 2016. Topologies of power. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A., and N. J. Thrift. 2002. Cities: Reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, J. 2012. Technology, technicity, and emerging practices of temporal sensitivity in videogames. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44 (1):187–203. doi: 10.1068/a44171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J. 2013. Technologies of captivation: Videogames and the attunement of affect. Body & Society 19 (1):27–51. doi: 10.1177/1357034X11411737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J., B. Anderson, R. Gordon, and P. Langley. 2018. Digital interface design and power. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 36 (6):1136–53. doi: 10.1177/0263775818767426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J., R. Kitchin, and A. Leszczynski. 2018. Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography 42 (1):25–43. doi: 10.1177/0309132516664800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avdeeff, M. 2019. Artificial intelligence & popular music. Arts 8 (4):130. doi: 10.3390/arts8040130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2003. Posthumanist performativity. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3):801–31. doi: 10.1086/345321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2012. Interview with Karen Barad. In New materialism: Interviews and cartographies, 48–70. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2015. On touching—The inhuman that therefore I am (version 1.1). https://www.academia.edu/7375696/On_Touching_The_Inhuman_That_Therefore_I_Am_v1_1_
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K., and D. Gandorfer. 2021. Political desirings: Yearnings for mattering (,) differently. Theory & Event 24 (1):14–66. doi: 10.1353/tae.2021.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M. 2018. Artificial intelligence and smart cities. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 45 (1):3–6. doi: 10.1177/2399808317751169.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, D. 2015. The philosophy of software. 2nd ed. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Birtchnell, T., and A. Elliott. 2018. Automating the black art. Geoforum 96:77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissell, D. 2018. Automation interrupted: How autonomous vehicle accidents transform the material politics of automation. Political Geography 65:57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissell, D. 2020. Affective platform urbanism: Changing habits of digital on-demand consumption. Geoforum 115:102–10. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.06.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissell, D. 2021. Encountering automation: Redefining bodies through stories of technological change. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 39 (2):366–84. doi: 10.1177/0263775820963128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissell, D., and V. Del Casino. 2017. Whither labor geography and the rise of the robots? Social & Cultural Geography 18 (3):435–42. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2016.1273380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boden, M. A. 2009. Computer models of creativity. AI Magazine 30 (3):23. doi: 10.1609/aimag.v30i3.2254.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, N. 2017. Superintelligence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boulton, A., and M. Zook. 2013. Landscape, locative media, and the duplicity of code. In The Wiley-Blackwell companion to cultural geography, ed. N. C. Johnson, R. H. Schein, and J. Winders, 437–51. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, K. 2022. Researching posthumanizing creativity. Qualitative Inquiry 28 (5):496–506. doi: 10.1177/10778004211065802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B., S. Marvin, and A. While. 2020. Containing COVID-19 in China: AI and the robotic restructuring of future cities. Dialogues in Human Geography 10 (2):238–41. doi: 10.1177/2043820620934267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockayne, D., and L. Richardson. 2017. Queering code/space: The co-production of socio-sexual codes and digital technologies. Gender, Place & Culture 24 (11):1642–58. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2017.1339672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton, S., and G. Wiggins. 2012. Computational creativity: The final frontier? In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), 21–26. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cugurullo, F. 2020. Urban artificial intelligence: From automation to autonomy in the smart city. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 2(38):1–14. doi: 10.3389/frsc.2020.00038.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, N. 2013. Human–computer co-creativity. In The doctoral consortium at AIIDE, ed. G. Smith and A. Smith, 9–12. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Del Casino, V. 2016. Social geographies II: Robots. Progress in Human Geography 40 (6):846–55. doi: 10.1177/0309132515618807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Casino, V. J., Jr., L. House-Peters, J. W. Crampton, and H. Gerhardt. 2020. The social life of robots. Antipode 52 (3):605–18. doi: 10.1111/anti.12616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, K. 2020. You never fake alone. Creative AI in action. Information, Communication & Society 23 (14):2110–27. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1754877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, M., and R. Kitchin. 2005a. Code and the transduction of space. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (1):162–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00454.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, M., and R. Kitchin. 2005b. Codes of life. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23 (6):851–81. doi: 10.1068/d378t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, M., and R. Kitchin. 2007. The automatic management of drivers and driving spaces. Geoforum 38 (2):264–75. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, M., and R. Kitchin. 2009. Software, objects, and home space. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41 (6):1344–65. doi: 10.1068/a4138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draude, C. 2020. “Boundaries do not sit still”: From interaction to agential intra-action in HCI. In Human–computer interaction, ed. M. Kurosu, Vol. 12181, 20–32. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, S. 2017. Co-creation: Human and AI collaboration in creative expression. Proceedings of EVA, UK, 422–29. doi: 10.14236/ewic/EVA2017.84.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, A. 2020. Creative AI: From expressive mimicry to critical inquiry. Artnodes 26 (26):1–10. doi: 10.7238/a.v0i26.3370.
   Google Scholar
• Gandy, M. 2005. Cyborg urbanization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (1):26–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00568.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, B. 2011. Videographic geographies. Progress in Human Geography 35 (4):521–41. doi: 10.1177/0309132510388337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemeinboeck, P., and R. Saunders. 2022. Moving beyond the mirror: Relational and performative meaning making in human–robot communication. AI & Society 37 (2):549–63. doi: 10.1007/s00146-021-01212-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M., M. Zook, and A. Boulton. 2013. Augmented reality in urban places: Contested content and the duplicity of code. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38 (3):464–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00539.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. D. N. 2005. Software-sorted geographies. Progress in Human Geography 29 (5):562–80. doi: 10.1191/0309132505ph568oa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and S. Marvin. 2001. Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guzman, A., and S. Lewis. 2020. Artificial intelligence and communication. New Media & Society 22 (1):70–86. doi: 10.1177/1461444819858691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, cyborgs and women. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. 2018. Creative agency/creative ecologies. In Creativity policy, partnerships and practice in education, ed. K. Snepvangers, P. Thomson and A. Harris, 65–87. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. 2021. Creative agency. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D., and S. Holman Jones. 2022. A manifesto for posthuman creativity studies. Qualitative Inquiry 28 (5):522–30. doi: 10.1177/10778004211066632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasse, C. 2022. Humanism, posthumanism, and new humanism. In The Palgrave handbook of the anthropology of technology, ed. M. Hojer Bruun, A. Walhberg, R. Douglas-Jones, C. Hasse, K. Hoeyer, D. B. Kristensen, and B. R. Winthereik, 145–64. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, H. 2017a. Creativity. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, H. 2017b. Foreword: Art works: Art worlds—Scales, spaces, spaces. In Art and the city, ed. J. Luger and J. Ren, xvi–ix. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, H. 2021. Cultural geography I: Mediums. Progress in Human Geography 45 (6):1709–20. doi: 10.1177/03091325211000827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayles, K. 2017. Unthought: The power of the cognitive nonconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, V., J. Davidson, K. Hemsworth, and S. Edwards. 2014. Hacking the master code: Cyborg stories and the boundaries of autism. Social & Cultural Geography 15 (5):504–24. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2014.898781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H., and S. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15 (9):1277–88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagodzinski, J. 2022. Quantum creativity. Qualitative Inquiry 28 (5):586–95. doi: 10.1177/10778004211066633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janowicz, K., S. Gao, G. McKenzie, Y. Hu, and B. Bhaduri. 2020. GeoAI: Spatially explicit artificial intelligence techniques for geographic knowledge discovery and beyond. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 34 (4):625–36. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2019.1684500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantosalo, A., and H. Toivonen. 2016. Modes for creative human–computer collaboration. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on computational creativity, ed. F. Pachet, A. Cardoso, V. Corruble, and F. Ghedini, 77–84. Paris: Sony CSL.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, P., J. Rezwana, S. Siddiqui, M. Maher, and N. Dehbozorgi. 2020. Creative sketching partner: An analysis of human–AI co-creativity. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on intelligent user interfaces, ed. F. Paternò and N. Oliver, 221–30. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Karras, T., S. Laine, and T. Aila. 2020. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 43:4217–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 1998. Towards geographies of cyberspace. Progress in Human Geography 223 (3):385–406. doi: 10.1191/030913298668331585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2017. Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 20 (1):14–29. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., and M. Dodge. 2011. Code/space: Software and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Łapińska, J. 2020. Creativity of human and non-human matter interwoven: Autonomous sensory meridian response videos in a posthuman perspective. Creativity Studies 13 (2):336–50. doi: 10.3846/cs.2020.11703.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1994. On technical mediation. Common Knowledge 3:29–64.
   Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. 2015. Spatial media/tion. Progress in Human Geography 39 (6):729–51. doi: 10.1177/0309132514558443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. 2019. Platform affects of geolocation. Geoforum 107:207–15. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. 2020. Glitchy vignettes of platform urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38 (2):189–208. doi: 10.1177/0263775819878721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipp, B., and S. Dickel. 2022. Interfacing the human/machine. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2021.2012709.
   Google Scholar
• Lundman, R., and P. Nordström. 2023. Creative geographies in the age of AI: Co-creative spatiality and the emerging techno-material relations between artists and artificial intelligence. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. doi: 10.1111/tran.12608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, C. 2021. Critical geographies of social robotics. Digital Geography and Society 2:100010. doi: 10.1016/j.diggeo.2021.100010.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, C. R. 2022. Glitch epistemology and the question of (artificial) intelligence. Dialogues in Human Geography 12 (3):379–83. doi: 10.1177/20438206221102952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, C., and V. Del Casino. 2020. Smart spaces, information processing, and the question of intelligence. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (2):382–90. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1617103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysgård, H. K., and S. Rye. 2017. Between striated and smooth space: Exploring the topology of transnational student mobility. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49 (9):2116–34. doi: 10.1177/0308518X17711945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, M., and T. Ward. 2002. Modeling the creative process. Creativity Research Journal 14 (2):179–92. doi: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A. 2002. Transductions: Bodies and machines at speed. London: Continuum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macrorie, R., S. Marvin, and A. While. 2021. Robotics and automation in the city. Urban Geography 42 (2):197–217. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2019.1698868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2005. For space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzone, M., and A. Elgammal. 2019. Art, creativity, and the potential of artificial intelligence. Arts 8 (1):26. doi: 10.3390/arts8010026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, J. 2019. Creative systems. In Computational creativity, ed. T. Veale and F. Cardoso, 327–52. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McDuie‐Ra, D., and K. Gulson. 2020. The backroads of AI: The uneven geographies of artificial intelligence and development. Area 52 (3):626–33. doi: 10.1111/area.12602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, J. 2020. Changing digital geographies. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. I. 2019. The artist in the machine: The world of AI-powered creativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. M. 1997. Machine learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Nordström, P. 2018. Creative landscapes: Events at the sites of encounter. Doctoral diss., University of Turku.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., and V. Fors. 2017. Being in a mediated world. Cultural Geographies 24 (3):375–88. doi: 10.1177/1474474016684127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S., and S. Sumartojo. 2018. The lit world: Living with everyday urban automation. Social and Cultural Geography 19 (7):833–52. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2017.1312698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2016. Rethinking the geographies of cultural “objects” through digital technologies. Progress in Human Geography 40 (3):334–51. doi: 10.1177/0309132515580493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2017. Posthuman agency in the digitally mediated city. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (4):779–93. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1270195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roudavski, S., and J. McCormack. 2016. Post-anthropocentric creativity. Digital Creativity 27 (1):3–6. doi: 10.1080/14626268.2016.1151442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, S. J., and P. Norvig. 2020. Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. 4th ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, I., L. Castro, N. Rodriguez-Fernandez, Á. Torrente-Patiño, and A. Carballal. 2021. Artificial neural networks and deep learning in the visual arts: A review. Neural Computing and Applications 33 (1):121–57. doi: 10.1007/s00521-020-05565-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurman, N. 2002. Women and technology in geography: A cyborg manifesto for GIS. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 46 (3):258–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2002.tb00748.x.
   Google Scholar
• Schuurman, N. 2004. Databases and bodies: A cyborg update. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 36 (8):1337–40. doi: 10.1068/a3608_b.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. 2017. Robot wars: US empire and geopolitics in the robotic age. Security Dialogue 48 (5):451–70. doi: 10.1177/0967010617713157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simondon, G. 2016. On the mode of existence of technical objects. Vol. 39. Minneapolis: Univocal Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, K. 2013. In quest of a new humanism. Progress in Human Geography 37 (1):10–26. doi: 10.1177/0309132512467573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparke, M. 2017. Situated cyborg knowledge in not so borderless online global education. Geopolitics 22 (1):51–72. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2016.1204601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiegler, B. 1998. Technics and time I. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• St-Louis, A., and R. Vallerand. 2015. A successful creative process. Creativity Research Journal 27 (2):175–87. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2015.1030314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 2004. Movement-space: The changing domain of thinking resulting from the development of new kinds of spatial awareness. Economy and Society 33 (4):582–604. doi: 10.1080/0308514042000285305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, N., and S. French. 2002. The automatic production of space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 27 (3):309–35. doi: 10.1111/1475-5661.00057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thulin, E., B. Vilhelmson, and T. Schwanen. 2020. Absent friends? Smartphones, mediated presence, and the recoupling of online social contact in everyday life. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (1):166–83. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1629868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P. P. 2005. Artifacts and attachment: A post-script philosophy of mediation. In Inside the politics of technology: Agency and normativity in the co-production of technology and society, ed. H. Harbers, 126–46. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• While, A., S. Marvin, and M. Kovacic. 2021. Urban robotic experimentation. Urban Studies 58 (4):769–86. doi: 10.1177/0042098020917790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, N. 2016. Creative processes: From interventions in art to intervallic experiments through Bergson. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48 (8):1549–64. doi: 10.1177/0308518X16642769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. 2009. Cyborg geographies: Towards hybrid epistemologies. Gender, Place and Culture 16 (5):499–516. doi: 10.1080/09663690903148390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. W. 2011. Data matter(s): Legitimacy, coding, and qualifications-of-life. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29 (5):857–72. doi: 10.1068/d7910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingström, R., J. Hautala, and R. Lundman. 2022. Redefining creativity in the era of AI? Creativity Research Journal. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2022.2107850.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, K., J. P. Jones, L. Vigdor, S. Marston, H. Hawkins, and D. Dixon. 2015. One sinister hurricane: Simondon and collaborative visualization. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (3):496–511. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2015.1018788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar