Information Consistency-Based Measures for Spatial Stratified Heterogeneity

References

• Anselin, L. 1988. Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. 1995. Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis 27 (2):93–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., L. Syabri, and Y. Kho. 2006. Geoda: An introduction to spatial data analysis. Geographical Analysis 38 (1):5–22. doi: 10.1111/j.0016-7363.2005.00671.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, H., D. Li, Y. Ge, and J. Wang. 2016. Detecting nominal variables spatial associations using conditional probabilities of neighboring surface objects’ categories. Information Sciences 329:701–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2015.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M. S. 1937. Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 160 (901):268–82.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M. 1974. Spatial entropy. Geographical Analysis 6 (1):1–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1974.tb01014.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, M. 2010. Space, scale, and scaling in entropy maximizing. Geographical Analysis 42 (4):395–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2010.00800.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boots, B. 2003. Developing local measures of spatial association for categorical data. Journal of Geographical Systems 5 (2):139–60. doi: 10.1007/s10109-003-0110-3.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Y. Liu, E. M. Bakker, and M. S. Lew. 2021. Integrating information theory and adversarial learning for cross-modal retrieval. Pattern Recognition 117:107983. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2021.107983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliff, A. D., and J. K. Ord. 1973. Spatial autocorrelation. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Cliff, A. D., and J. K. Ord. 1981. Spatial processes: Models and applications. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Costanzo, C. M. 1983. Statistical inference in geography: Modern approaches spell better times ahead. The Professional Geographer 35 (2):158–65. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1983.00158.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cover, T. M., and J. A. Thomas. 2006. Elements of information theory. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Dutilleul, P. 2011. Spatio-temporal heterogeneity: Concepts and analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dutilleul, P., and P. Legendre. 1993. Spatial heterogeneity against heteroscedasticity: An ecological paradigm versus a statistical concept. Oikos 66 (1):152–71. doi: 10.2307/3545210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, J. T. 1993. Use of the average mutual information index in evaluating classification error and consistency. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 7 (4):349–66. doi: 10.1080/02693799308901966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foithong, S., O. Pinngern, and B. Attachoo. 2012. Feature subset selection wrapper based on mutual information and rough sets. Expert Systems with Applications 39 (1):574–84. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, A. S., M. E. Charlton, and C. Brunsdon. 1998. Geographically weighted regression: A natural evolution of the expansion method for spatial data analysis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 30 (11):1905–27. doi: 10.1068/a301905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, Y., J. Yan, A. Stein, Y. Chen, J. Wang, J. Wang, Q. Cheng, H. Bai, M. Liu, and P. M. Atkinson. 2019. Principles and methods of scaling geospatial earth science data. Earth-Science Reviews 197:102897. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getis, A., and J. K. Ord. 1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis 24 (3):189–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. 2003. The fundamental laws of GIScience. Paper presented at the Summer Assembly of the University Consortium for Geographic Information Science, Pacific Grove, CA. Accessed May 7, 2023. http://csiss.ncgia.ucsb.edu/aboutus/presentations/files/goodchild_ucgis_jun03.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Goovaerts, P. 1997. Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, D. A. 2000. A linear regression solution to the spatial autocorrelation problem. Journal of Geographical Systems 2 (2):141–56. doi: 10.1007/PL00011451.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, D. A. 2005. Effective geographic sample size in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (4):740–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00484.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, D. A., Y. Chun, and J. Hauke. 2022. A Moran eigenvector spatial filtering specification of entropy measures. Papers in Regional Science 101 (1):259–79. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, D., and J. Paelinck. 2011. Non-standard spatial statistics and spatial econometrics. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, D. A., and R. E. Plant. 2022. Statistical analysis in the presence of spatial autocorrelation: Selected sampling strategy effects. Stats 5 (4):1334–53. doi: 10.3390/stats5040081.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, E. J. 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: What is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1 (2):143–56. doi: 10.1007/s100219900011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkila, E. J., and L. Hu. 2006. Adjusting spatial-entropy measures for scale and resolution effects. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33 (6):845–61. doi: 10.1068/b31126.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., J. Gao, L. Yang, S. Wu, and E. Dai. 2021. The interactive effects of elevation, precipitation and lithology on karst rainfall and runoff erosivity. Catena 207:105588. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabos, S., and F. Csillag. 2002. The analysis of spatial association on a regular lattice by join-count statistics without the assumption of first-order homogeneity. Computers & Geosciences 28 (8):901–10. doi: 10.1016/S0098-3004(02)00007-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuper, M., and T. Brox. 2016. Point-wise mutual information-based video segmentation with high temporal consistency. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016 workshops, ed. G. Hua and H. Jégou, 789–803. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyzanowski, B., and S. Manson. 2022. Regionalization with self-organizing maps for sharing higher resolution protected health information. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 112 (7):1866–89. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2021.2020617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiri, S. N. 2003. Scope of resampling methods for dependent data. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Levene, H. 1960. Robust tests for equality of variances. In Contributions to probability and statistics, ed. I. Olkin, 278–92. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., and J. F. Reynolds. 1995. On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos 73 (2):280–84. doi: 10.2307/3545921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., F. Zhang, F. Wu, Y. Chen, and K. Qin. 2022. Coupling coordination degree spatial analysis and driving factor between socio-economic and eco-environment in northern China. Ecological Indicators 135:108555. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longley, P. A., and C. Tobón. 2004. Spatial dependence and heterogeneity in patterns of hardship: An intra-urban analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (3):503–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.00411.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, L., K. Mei, L. Qu, C. Zhang, H. Chen, S. Wang, D. Di, H. Huang, Z. Wang, F. Xia, et al. 2019. Assessment of the geographical detector method for investigating heavy metal source apportionment in an urban watershed of eastern China. The Science of the Total Environment 653:714–22. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRoberts, R. E., D. G. Wendt, M. D. Nelson, and M. H. Hansen. 2002. Using a land cover classification based on satellite imagery to improve the precision of forest inventory area estimates. Remote Sensing of Environment 81 (1):36–44. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00330-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobley, L. R., T. M. Kuo, M. Urato, S. Subramanian, L. Watson, and L. Anselin. 2012. Spatial heterogeneity in cancer control planning and cancer screening behavior. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (5):1113–24. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2012.657494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, P. A. P. 1948. The interpretation of statistical maps. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 10 (2):243–51. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1948.tb00012.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedregosa, F., G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, et al. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12:2825–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanghart, W., J. Beck, and N. Kuhn. 2008. Measuring population densities in a heterogeneous world. Global Ecology and Biogeography 17 (4):566–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00390.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver, G. 2005. Spatial heterogeneity: Past, present, and future. In Ecosystem function in heterogeneous landscapes, ed. G. Lovett, M. Turner, C. Jones, and K. Weathers, 443–49. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sokal, R. R., and N. L. Oden. 2008a. Spatial autocorrelation in biology: 1. Methodology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 10 (2):199–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1978.tb00013.x.
   Google Scholar
• Sokal, R. R., and N. L. Oden. 2008b. Spatial autocorrelation in biology: 2. Some biological implications and four applications of evolutionary and ecological interest. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 10 (2):229–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1978.tb00014.x.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, D. L., and A. R. Olsen. 2004. Spatially balanced sampling of natural resources. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99 (465):262–78. doi: 10.1198/016214504000000250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodoridis, S. 2020. Machine learning: A Bayesian and optimization perspective. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, J., Q. Wang, B. Yu, and D. Yu. 2013. A rough set algorithm for attribute reduction via mutual information and conditional entropy. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), ed. J. Chen, X. Wang, L. Wang, J. Sun, and X. Meng, 567–71. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 46 (2):234–40. doi: 10.2307/143141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trepanier, K. E., B. D. Pinno, and R. C. Errington. 2021. Dominant drivers of plant community assembly vary by soil type and time in reclaimed forests. Plant Ecology 222 (2):159–71. doi: 10.1007/s11258-020-01096-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen, P., R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, et al. 2020. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nature Methods 17 (3):261–72. doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-0772-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., X. Wang, and Z. Chen. 2012. Spatial entropy based mutual information in hyperspectral band selection for supervised classification. International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling 9 (2):181–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., L. Feng, X. Meng, Z. Chen, L. Yu, and H. Zhang. 2017. Multi-view metric learning based on kl-divergence for similarity measurement. Neurocomputing 238 (C):269–76. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.01.062.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., X. Li, G. Christakos, T. Liao, T. Zhang, X. Gu, and X. Zheng. 2010. Geographical detectors-based health risk assessment and its application in the neural tube defects study of the Heshun region, China. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 24 (1):107–27. doi: 10.1080/13658810802443457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. F., T. L. Zhang, and B. J. Fu. 2016. A measure of spatial stratified heterogeneity. Ecological Indicators 67 (Suppl. C):250–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.052.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, L. 2010. All of statistics: A concise course in statistical inference. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Womble, W. 1951. Differential systematics. Science 114 (2961):315–22. doi: 10.1126/science.114.2961.315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, J. 2021. Spatial aggregation entropy: A heterogeneity and uncertainty metric of spatial aggregation. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111 (4):1236–52. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1807309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, X., Q. Shen, H. Li, W. J. O’Brien, and Z. Ren. 2009. Improving agent-based negotiation efficiency in construction supply chains: A relative entropy method. Automation in Construction 18 (7):975–82. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, S., S. Ren, C. Song, C. Cheng, S. Shen, J. Yang, and D. Zhu. 2022. Spatial patterns of county-level arable land productive-capacity and its coordination with land-use intensity in mainland China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 326:107757. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, X., H. Chen, Y. Song, X. Zhao, Z. Ding, Z. He, and B. Long. 2021. Improving sequential recommendation consistency with self-supervised imitation. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-21), ed. Z. Zhou, 3321–27. Montreal, Canada: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Y. Ge, H. Bai, Y. Jin, A. Stein, and P. Atkinson. 2023. Spatial association from the perspective of mutual information. Annals of the American Association of Geographers. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2023.2209629.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, D., H. Lang, X. Zhang, J. Meng, and Laiquan. 2015. Sea clutter modelling by statistical majority consistency for ship detection in SAR imagery. In 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), ed. K. Sarabandi, V. Pascazio, and S. B. Serpico, 3695–98. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Zolnik, E. 2021. Geographically weighted regression models of residential property transactions: Walkability and value uplift. Journal of Transport Geography 92:103029. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar