The Chemical Geographies of Misoprostol: Spatializing Abortion Access from the Biochemical to the Global

References

• Agard-Jones, V. 2013. Bodies in the system. Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism 17 (3):182–92. doi: 10.1215/07990537-2378991.
   Google Scholar
• Atukunda, E. C., P. Brhlikova, A. G. Agaba, and A. M. Pollock. 2015. Civil society organizations and medicines policy change: A case study of registration, procurement, distribution and use of misoprostol in Uganda. Social Science & Medicine 130:242–49. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa, R. M., and M. Arilha. 1993. The Brazilian experience with cytotec. Studies in Family Planning 24 (4):236–40. doi: 10.2307/2939191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A. 2005. Pharmaceutical matters: The invention of informed materials. Theory, Culture & Society 22 (1):51–69. doi: 10.1177/0263276405048433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A. 2017. Manifesto for a chemical geography. Inaugural lecture presented at University College London. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/anthropocene/sites/anthropocene/files/andrew_barry_manifesto_for_a_chemical_geography.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bearak, J., A. Popinchalk, B. Ganatra, A. B. Moller, Ö. Tunçalp, C. Beavin, L. Kwok, and L. Alkema. 2020. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: Estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019. The Lancet Global Health 8 (9):e1152–e1161. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30315-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belfrage, M. 2022. Cuerpo-territorio y aborto: Propuesta teórica para cuestionar la gobernanza reproductiva violenta [Body-territory and abortion: A theoretical approach to question Violent Reproductive Governance]. Iberoforum: Revista de Ciencias Sociales 2 (1):1–19. doi: 10.48102/if.2022.v2.n1.194.
   Google Scholar
• Belfrage, M. Forthcoming. Revolutionary pills? Feminist abortion, pharmaceutalization, and reproductive governance. International Feminist Journal of Politics 25 (1):6–29. doi: 10.1080/14616742.2022.2154688.
   Google Scholar
• Bernabé Ortiz, A., P. J. White, C. P. Carcamo, J. P. Hughes, M. A. Gonzales, P. J. Garcia, G. P. Garnett, and K. K. Holmes. 2009. Clandestine induced abortion: Prevalence, incidence, and risk factors among women in a Latin American country. Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal de l’Association medicale canadienne 180 (3):298–304. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings, D. L. 2004. Misoprostol alone for early medical abortion in a Latin American clinic setting. Reproductive Health Matters 12 (24, Suppl.):57–64. doi: 10.1016/s0968-8080(04)24010-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings, D. L., D. Walker, G. M. del Paso, K. A. Clark, and I. Dayananda. 2009. Pharmacy worker practices related to use of misoprostol for abortion in one Mexican state. Contraception 79 (6):445–51. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.12.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, J. 2017a. De la comisión al socorro: Trazos de militancia feminista por el derecho al aborto en Argentina. Descentrada 1 (2):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, J. 2017b. Prácticas feministas en torno al derecho al aborto en Argentina: Aproximaciones a las acciones colectivas de Socorristas en Red [Feminist practices around abortion right in Argentina: Approaches to the collective actions of Socorristas en Red]. Revista Punto Género 7 (7):91–111. doi: 10.5354/2735-7473.2017.46268.
   Google Scholar
• Calkin, S. 2021. Transnational abortion pill flows and the political geography of abortion in Ireland. Territory, Politics, Governance 9 (2):163–79. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2019.1704854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkin, S., and C. Freeman. 2019. Trails and technology: Social and cultural geographies of abortion access. Social & Cultural Geography 20 (9):1325–32. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2018.1509114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkin, S., C. Freeman, and F. Moore. 2022. The geography of abortion: Discourse, spatiality and mobility. Progress in Human Geography 46 (6):1413–30. doi: 10.1177/03091325221128885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, H. L., A. C. Teixeira, M. D. F. Cruz, S. L. Gonzaga, P. S. Arrais, L. Luchini, C. La Vecchia, and G. Tognoni. 1994. Misoprostol: The experience of women in Fortaleza, Brazil. Contraception 49 (2):101–10. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(94)90084-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., O. Ortiz, S. E. Llaguno, L. Goodyear, D. Billings, and I. Martinez. 2005. Reaching women with instructions on misoprostol use in a Latin American country. Reproductive Health Matters 13 (26):84–92. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(05)26202-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, S. H., and M. P. Vessey. 1993. Misoprostol and illegal abortion in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Lancet 341 (8855):1258–61. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91156-g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crookes, P., and S. Davies. 1998. Research into practice: Essential skills for reading and applying research. London: Balliere Tindall.
   Google Scholar
• De Zordo, S. 2016. The biomedicalisation of illegal abortion: The double life of misoprostol in Brazil. Historia, Ciencias, saude-Manguinhos 23 (1):19–36. doi: 10.1590/S0104-59702016000100003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drovetta, R. I. 2015. Safe abortion information hotlines: An effective strategy for increasing women’s access to safe abortions in Latin America. Reproductive Health Matters 23 (45):47–57. doi: 10.1016/j.rhm.2015.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drovetta, R. I., C. Freeman, and A. Rúa. 2023. Self-care for abortion activists and providers: Lessons of law and risk from Argentina. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health 2023:847. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-201847.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, D., C. Freeman, and S. Rodríguez. 2023. Beyond the state: Abortion care activism in Peru. Signs 48 (3):585–608. doi: 10.1086/723296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzuba, I. G., B. Winikoff, and M. Peña. 2013. Medical abortion: A path to safe, high-quality abortion care in Latin America and the Caribbean. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 18 (6):441–50. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2013.824564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elati, A., and A. D. Weeks. 2009. The use of misoprostol in obstetrics and gynaecology. An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 116 (Suppl. 1):61–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02329.x.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, O. 2022. Abortion mobilities. Geography Compass 16 (9):e12656. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández Vázquez, S., and S. L. Szwarc. 2018. Aborto medicamentoso: Transferencias militantes y transnacionalización de saberes en Argentina y América Latina [Medical abortion: Activist transfers and knowledge transnationalization in Argentina and Latin America]. RevIISE-Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas 12 (12):163–77.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. 2017. The crime of choice: Abortion border crossings from Chile to Peru. Gender, Place & Culture 24 (6):851–68. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2017.1339020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. 2020. Viapolitics and the emancipatory possibilities of abortion mobilities. Mobilities 15 (6):896–910. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2020.1803588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geest, S. V. D., S. R. Whyte, and A. Hardon. 1996. The anthropology of pharmaceuticals: A biographical approach. Annual Review of Anthropology 25 (1):153–78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.153.
   Google Scholar
• Gemzell-Danielsson, K., C. Fiala, and A. Weeks. 2007. Misoprostol: First-line therapy for incomplete miscarriage in the developing world. An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 114 (11):1337–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01491.x.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, D., S. E. Baum, D. Andjelic, C. Tatum, G. Torres, L. Fuentes, and J. Friedman. 2018. A harm-reduction model of abortion counseling about misoprostol use in Peru with telephone and in-person follow-up: A cohort study. PLoS ONE 13 (1):e0189195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gynuity Health Projects. 2007. Choices for medical abortion introduction in Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. New York: Gynuity. https://gynuity.org/assets/resources/workpap_ma_lac_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 2009. Postcolonial and feminist philosophies of science and technology: Convergences and dissonances. Postcolonial Studies 12 (4):401–21. doi: 10.1080/13688790903350658.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 2014. Beyond postcolonial theory: Two undertheorized perspectives on science and technology. In Women, science, and technology, 3rd ed., ed. M. Wyer, M. Barbercheck, D. Cookmeyer, H. Ozturk, and M. Wayne, 431–54. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hardon, A., and E. Sanabria. 2017. Fluid drugs: Revisiting the anthropology of pharmaceuticals. Annual Review of Anthropology 46 (1):117–32. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041539.
   Google Scholar
• Jayaweera, R. T., H. Moseson, and C. Gerdts. 2020. Misoprostol in the era of COVID-19: A love letter to the original medical abortion pill. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 28 (1):1829406. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1829406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kapp, N., and P. A. Lohr. 2020. Modern methods to induce abortion: Safety, efficacy and choice. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 63:37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knopes, J. 2019. Science, technology, and human health: The value of STS in medical and health humanities pedagogy. The Journal of Medical Humanities 40 (4):461–71. doi: 10.1007/s10912-019-09551-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara, D., K. Abuabara, D. Grossman, and C. Díaz-Olavarrieta. 2006. Pharmacy provision of medical abortifacients in a Latin American city. Contraception 74 (5):394–99. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.05.068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara, D., S. G. García, K. S. Wilson, and F. Paz. 2011. How often and under which circumstances do Mexican pharmacy vendors recommend misoprostol to induce an abortion? International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 37 (2):75–83. doi: 10.1363/3707511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M. 2016. Redefining pollution and action: The matter of plastics. Journal of Material Culture 21 (1):87–110. doi: 10.1177/1359183515622966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M. 2021. Pollution is colonialism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M., M. Tironi, and N. Calvillo. 2018. Toxic politics: Acting in a permanently polluted world. Social Studies of Science 48 (3):331–49. doi: 10.1177/0306312718783087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linneberg, M. S., and S. Korsgaard. 2019. Coding qualitative data. Qualitative Research Journal 19 (3):259–70. doi: 10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löwy, I., and M. C. Dias Villela Corrêa. 2020. The “abortion pill” misoprostol in Brazil: Women’s empowerment in a conservative and repressive political environment. American Journal of Public Health 110 (5):677–84. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. E. 2021. Misoprostol: The social life of a life-saving drug in global maternal health. Science, Technology, & Human Values 46 (2):376–401. doi: 10.1177/0162243920916781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, B. 2012. Gendered biopolitics of public health: Regulation and discipline in seafood consumption advisories. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30 (4):588–602. doi: 10.1068/d11110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, B. 2017. Folded futurity: Epigenetic plasticity, temporality, and new thresholds of fetal life. Science as Culture 26 (3):355–79. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2017.1294575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McReynolds-Pérez, J. 2017. No doctors required: Lay activist expertise and pharmaceutical abortion in Argentina. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 42 (2):349–75. doi: 10.1086/688183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta Ochoa, A., and X. Salazar Lostaunau. 2019. Así el bebé esté sin cabeza, ese bebé no se puede abortar [Even if the baby has no head, it cannot be aborted]. Discursos del Sur, revista de teoría crítica en Ciencias Sociales 2019(4):45–61. doi: 10.15381/dds.v0i4.16996.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 2013. Chemical infrastructures of the St. Clair River. In Toxicants, health and regulation since 1945, ed. N. Jas and S. Boudia, 103–16. London: Pickering and Chato.
   Google Scholar
• Nations, M. K., C. Misago, W. Fonseca, L. L. Correia, and O. M. Campbell. 1997. Women’s hidden transcripts about abortion in Brazil. Social Science & Medicine 44 (12):1833–45. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00293-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pain, R., and S. J. Smith. 2008. Fear: Critical geopolitics and everyday life. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Patchin, P. M. 2020. Thresholds of empire: Women, biosecurity, and the Zika chemical vector program in Puerto Rico. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (4):967–82. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1655386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, E. G., M. S. Harrison, and M. A. Weaver. 2019. Efficacy of misoprostol alone for first-trimester medical abortion: A systematic review. Obstetrics and Gynecology 133 (1):137–47. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, A. M., J. Guthman, R. E. Galt, M. Huber, B. Mansfield, and S. Sawyer. 2017. Chemical geographies. GeoHumanities 3 (1):158–77. doi: 10.1080/2373566X.2017.1298972.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L., and R. Solinger. 2017. Reproductive justice: An introduction. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roulston, K., and M. Choi. 2018. Qualitative interviews. In The Sage handbook of qualitative data collection, ed. U. Flick, 233–49. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, S. 2007. Las políticas de salud reproductiva en el Perú: Reformas sociales y derechos ciudadanos [Reproductive health policies in Peru: Social reforms and citizenship rights]. Revista Estudos Feministas 15 (2):309–31. doi: 10.1590/S0104-026X2007000200003.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, S. 2012. Abortion pills: Under whose control? The Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care 38 (2):117–22. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-100232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schiebinger, L. 2004. Plants and empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, E. O. 2018. Lawful sinners: Reproductive governance and moral agency around abortion in Mexico. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 42 (1):11–31. doi: 10.1007/s11013-017-9550-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, E. O. 2019. Realizing abortion rights at the margins of legality in Mexico. Medical Anthropology 38 (2):167–81. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2018.1474213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodero, S. 2019. Vital mobilities: Circulating blood via fictionalized vignettes. Cultural Geographies 26 (1):109–25. doi: 10.1177/1474474018792656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solinger, R. 1994. The abortionist: A woman against the law. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, M., and D. Wing. 2015. Misoprostol for induction of labor. Seminars in Perinatology 39 (6):459–62. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajer, D. 2019. El aborto como problema de salud colectiva [Abortion as a public health problem]. In Salud Feminista, ed. D. Barrancos, 75–85. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Tinta Limón.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, O. S., and P. C. Ho. 2006. The pharmacokinetics and different regimens of misoprostol in early first-trimester medical abortion. Contraception 74 (1):26–30. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taype Rondan, A., and N. M. Garcia. 2016. Hospitalizaciones y muertes por aborto clandestino en Perú:¿qué dicen los números? [Hospital admissions and deaths due to clandestine abortion in Peru: What do the numbers reveal?] Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública 33 (4):829–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsing, A. 2005. Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, J. G. 1981. History of pharmacokinetics. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 12 (3):537–62. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(81)90097-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, S. R., S. Van der Geest, and A. Hardon. 2002. Social lives of medicines. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zamberlin, N., and S. Raiher. 2009. Revisión del conocimiento disponible sobre experiencia de las mujeres con el uso del misoprostol en América Latina [Review of available knowledge on women’s experience with misoprostol use in Latin America]. CLACAI and CEDES Report. http://clacaidigital.info:8080/bitstream/handle/123456789/25/Revisioncon.disp.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• Zamberlin, N., M. Romero, and S. Ramos. 2012. Latin American women’s experiences with medical abortion in settings where abortion is legally restricted. Reproductive Health 9 (1):34. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-9-34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zurbriggen, R. 2019. Abortar y acompañar a abortar: Armándonos vidas activistas feministas afectadas [Abortion and accompanying abortion: Empowering affected feminist activist lives]. In Salud feminista, ed. D. Barrancos, 199–218. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Tinta Limón.
   Google Scholar