Governing the Extraterritorial: Global Environmentalities of China’s Green Belt and Road Initiative

References

• Aalberts, T. E. 2012. Patterns of global governmentality and sovereignty. In The diffusion of power in global governance: International political economy meets Foucault, ed. S. Guzzini and I. B. Neumann, 229–55. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A. 2005. Environmentality: Community, intimate government, and the making of environmental subjects in Kumaon, India. Current Anthropology 46 (2):161–90. doi: 10.1086/427122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, A. C. 2021. BRI and global development praxis: Is a paradigm shift eminent? In Research handbook on the belt and road initiative, ed. J. C. Liow, H. Liu, and G. Xue, 76–87. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Asiyanbi, A. P., E. Ogar, and O. A. Akintoye. 2019. Complexities and surprises in local resistance to neoliberal conservation: Multiple environmentalities, technologies of the self and the poststructural geography of local engagement with REDD+. Political Geography 69:128–38. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, Y., Z. Fang, and A. C. Hughes. 2021. Ecological redlines provide a mechanism to maximize conservation gains in mainland Southeast Asia. One Earth 4 (10):1491–1504. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.09.010.
   Google Scholar
• Beneito-Montagut, R. 2011. Ethnography goes online: Towards a user-centred methodology to research interpersonal communication on the Internet. Qualitative Research 11 (6):716–35. doi: 10.1177/1468794111413368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BRI International Green Development Coalition(BRIGC) 2020. Green development guidance for BRI projects baseline review report. Beijing: BRIGC.
   Google Scholar
• Brundtland, G. H., M. Khalid, S. Agnelli, S. Al-Athel, and B. Chidzero. 1987. Our common future. New York: World Commission on Environment and Development.
   Google Scholar
• CAPC. 2021. ICBC: Contribution to Belt and Road financial cooperation. https://www.capco.org.cn/gjhz/yxalxb/202104/20210419/j_2021041914304500016188138581484695.html.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, J., M. D. Aguila Mejía, R. Ramírez Reátegui, and C. Sandbrook. 2020. Why joint conservation and development projects often fail: An in-depth examination in the Peruvian Amazon. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 3 (2):365–98. doi: 10.1177/2514848619873910.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W. 2022. Harden the hardline, soften the softline: Unravelling China’s Qiaoling-centred diaspora governance in Laos. The China Quarterly 250:397–416. doi: 10.1017/S0305741022000455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z. 2017. Winning economic growth and ecological protection in the belt and road initiative. The People’s Daily. http://www.cafiecmofcom.org.cn/article/zjsj/201707/20170702607649.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Y. R. 2017. The blue economy as governmentality and the making of new spatial rationalities. Dialogues in Human Geography 7 (1):37–41. doi: 10.1177/2043820617691649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, C. K. L., and J. Xu. 2021. Scalar politics of urban sustainability: Governing the Chinese city in the era of ecological civilisation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 46 (3):689–703. doi: 10.1111/tran.12436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, J., S. Bager, P. Meyfroidt, J. Newig, and E. Challies. 2021. Environmental governance of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Environmental Policy and Governance 31 (1):3–17. doi: 10.1002/eet.1901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Y. A. 2020. How REDD + governs: Multiple forest environmentalities in Guyana and Suriname. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 3 (2):323–45. doi: 10.1177/2514848619860748.
   Google Scholar
• Conduit, D. 2020. Authoritarian power in space, time and exile. Political Geography 82:102239. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darier, É. 1996. Environmental governmentality: The case of Canada’s green plan. Environmental Politics 5 (4):585–606. doi: 10.1080/09644019608414294.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 2010. Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Death, C. 2013. Governmentality at the limits of the international: African politics and Foucauldian theory. Review of International Studies 39 (3):763–87. doi: 10.1017/S0260210512000307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressler, W. 2014. Green governmentality and Swidden decline on Palawan Island. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39 (2):250–64. doi: 10.1111/tran.12026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, C. C. 2006. China’s eleventh five-year plan (2006–2010): From “getting rich first” to “common prosperity.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 47 (6):708–23. doi: 10.2747/1538-7216.47.6.708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R. J. 2021. Green silk: China’s governance gamble. In Greening China’s new silk roads: The sustainable governance of Belt and Road, ed. R. J. Ferguson, 2–42. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. 2017. Environmentality unbound: Multiple governmentalities in environmental politics. Geoforum 85:311–15. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. 2019. Diverse ecologies: Mapping complexity in environmental governance. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 3:481–502.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., and J. A. Cortes-Vazquez. 2020. Beyond the green panopticon: New directions in research exploring environmental governmentality. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 3 (2):289–99. doi: 10.1177/2514848620920743.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1979. Governmentality. Ideology and Consciousness 6:5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1982. The subject and power. Critical Inquiry 8 (4):777–95. doi: 10.1086/448181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1991. Governmentality. In The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, ed. G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 87–104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gare, A. 2012. China and the struggle for ecological civilization. Capitalism Nature Socialism 23 (4):10–26. doi: 10.1080/10455752.2012.722306.
   Google Scholar
• Geall, S., and A. Ely. 2018. Narratives and pathways towards an ecological civilization in contemporary China. The China Quarterly 236:1175–96. doi: 10.1017/S0305741018001315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, Q., and K. Lo. 2022. China’s Green Belt and Road Initiative: Transnational environmental governance and causal pathways of orchestration. Environmental Politics. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2022.2156176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, M. 2001. Constructing an environmental state: Eco-governmentality and other transnational practices of a “green” World Bank. Social Problems 48 (4):499–523. doi: 10.1525/sp.2001.48.4.499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green BRI Center 2022. China Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Investment Report 2021. Beijing: Green BRI Center, International Institute of Green Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, T., C. Liu, and J. Urpelainen. 2020. Belt and Road decision-making in China and recipient countries: How and to what extent does sustainability matter? In ISEP & BSG Report. ISEP, BSG, and ClimateWorks Foundation, 1–99. https://www.geg.ox.ac.uk/publication/belt-and-road-decision-makingchina-and-recipient-countries-how-and-what-extent-does.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. H., H. Li, and R. Svarverud. 2018. Ecological civilization: Interpreting the Chinese past, projecting the global future. Global Environmental Change 53:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlan, T. 2021. Green development or greenwashing? A political ecology perspective on China’s Green Belt and Road. Eurasian Geography and Economics 62 (2):202–26. doi: 10.1080/15387216.2020.1795700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himley, M. 2008. Geographies of environmental governance: The nexus of nature and neoliberalism. Geography Compass 2 (2):433–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00094.x.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, M. 2008. Space and government: Governmentality and geography. Geography Compass 2 (5):1635–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00133.x.
   Google Scholar
• Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC). 2019. ICBC successfully issued the world’s first green BRBR bond. https://www.icbc.com.cn/icbc/en/newsupdates/icbc%20news/ICBCSuccessfullyIssuedtheWorldsFirstGreenBRBRBond.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, A., J. Opena Disterhoft, G. Marr, P. McCully, R. Breech, T. Dilworth, M. Beenes, H. Butijn, J. Frijns, and E.-J. Kuiper. 2021. Banking on climate chaos: Fossil fuel finance report 2021. Rainforest Action Network, BankTrack, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Reclaim Finance, and the Sierra Club. https://www.bankingonclimatechaos.org/bankingonclimatechaos2021/.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, J. M. 2020. Environment, development, and security politics in the production of Belt and Road spaces. Territory Politics Governance 8 (5):657–75. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2019.1582358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolas, A. 2014. Degradation discourse and green governmentality in the Xilinguole grasslands of Inner Mongolia. Development and Change 45 (2):308–28. doi: 10.1111/dech.12077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larner, W., and W. Walters. 2004. Global governmentality: Governing international spaces. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Z. 2021. Ecological civilization shapes the future of China and ASEAN countries. China Today. http://www.chinatoday.com.cn/ctenglish/2018/ii/202110/t20211011_800260110.html.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, K. 2020. Shenzhen: A model of the China model? If yes, is it replicable? The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies 45:3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L. 2008. Sustainability efforts in China: Reflections on the environmental Kuznets curve through a locational evaluation of “eco-communities.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98 (3):604–29. doi: 10.1080/00045600802013452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., and M. M. Bennett. 2022. The geopolitics of knowledge communities: Situating Chinese and foreign studies of the Green Belt and Road Initiative. Geoforum 128:168–80. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liverman, D. 1999. Geography and the global environment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89 (1):107–20. doi: 10.1111/0004-5608.00133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liverman, D. 2004. Who governs, at what scale and at what price? Geography, environmental governance, and the commodification of nature. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94:734–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J. 2022. For profit or patriotism? Balancing the interests of the Chinese state, host country and firm in the Lao rubber sector. The China Quarterly 250:332–55. doi: 10.1017/S0305741022000522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, T. W. 1995. On environmentality: Geo-power and eco-knowledge in the discourses of contemporary environmentalism. Cultural Critique 31:57–81. doi: 10.2307/1354445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEE. 2017. The Belt and Road ecological and environmental cooperation plan. http://english.mee.gov.cn/Resources/Policies/policies/Frameworkp1/201706/t20170628_416869.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• MEE, MFA, NDRC, and MOFCOM. 2017. Guidance on promoting Green Belt and Road. http://english.mee.gov.cn/Resources/Policies/policies/Frameworkp1/201706/t20170628_416864.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• MEE and MOFCOM. 2022. Guidelines on ecological and environmental protection for outbound investment and construction projects. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk05/202201/t20220110_966571.html.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M. C. 2021. Why nations rise: Narratives and the path to great power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MOFCOM and MEE. 2021. Guidelines for green development of outbound investment and international cooperation. https://www.lawinfochina.com/display.aspx?id=36414&lib=law.
   Google Scholar
• Murton, G. 2021. Power of blank spaces: A critical cartography of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 62 (3):274–80. doi: 10.1111/apv.12318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NDRC, MFA, and MOFCOM. 2015. Vision and actions on jointly building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-century Maritime Silk Road. http://2017.beltandroadforum.org/english/n100/2017/0410/c22-45.html.
   Google Scholar
• NDRC, MFA, MEE, and MOFCOM. 2022. Opinions on jointly promoting the green development of the Belt and Road Initiative. https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/202203/t20220328_1320629.html.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B., and O. J. Sending. 2007. The international as governmentality. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 35 (3):677–701. doi: 10.1177/03058298070350030201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K. 2011. Responding to environmental change: A new age for human geography? Progress in Human Geography 35 (4):542–49. doi: 10.1177/0309132510377573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. 2012. Bankers governing the environment? Private authority, power diffusion and the United Nations Environment Programme finance initiative. In The diffusion of power in global governance: International political economy meets Foucault, ed. S. Guzzini and I. B. Neumann, 141–71. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• People’s Daily. 2017. Chinese enterprises built coal-fired power station project in Hub, Pakistan. People’s Daily. http://www.scio.gov.cn/m/31773/35507/35510/document/1545882/1545882.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Pohlner, H. 2016. Institutional change and the political economy of water megaprojects: China’s South-North Water Transfer. Global Environmental Change 38:205–16. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pow, C. 2018. Building a harmonious society through greening: Ecological civilization and aesthetic governmentality in China. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (3):864–83. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1373626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puggioni, R. 2021. Governing global subjects? Border-crossers and the limits of (global) governmentality. Global Society 35 (3):289–306. doi: 10.1080/13600826.2020.1810641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RDCY. 2021. Global ambition: Opportunities and challenges for China to promote reform of the international discourse system. Beijing: Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies and Global Governance Research Center, Renmin University of China.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. K., A. E. Pavlakis, and M. P. Richards. 2021. It’s more complicated than it seems: Virtual qualitative research in the COVID-19 era. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20:160940692110029. doi: 10.1177/16094069211002959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodenbiker, J. 2021. Making ecology developmental: China’s environmental sciences and green modernization in global context. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111:1–18. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1863766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodenbiker, J. 2022. Green silk roads, partner state development, and environmental governance: Belt and Road infrastructure on the Sino-East African frontier. Critical Asian Studies 55 (2):169–92. doi: 10.1080/14672715.2022.2150249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, S., J. Barnett, M. Webber, B. Finlayson, and M. Wang. 2016. Governmentality and the conduct of water: China’s South-North Water Transfer Project. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41 (4):429–41. doi: 10.1111/tran.12141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1999. Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, S. 2007. Green governmentality: Insights and opportunities in the study of nature’s rule. Progress in Human Geography 31 (3):291–307. doi: 10.1177/0309132507077080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Traub, G. 2020. Learning from China to protect nature. China Dialogue. https://chinadialogue.net/en/nature/11921-learning-from-china-to-protect-nature/.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, F. 2021. Actors and agency in China’s Belt and Road Initiative: An introduction. In Global perspectives on China’s Belt and Road Initiative, ed. F. Schneider, 11–32. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheng, J., M. Webber, and X. Han. 2018. Governmentality within China’s South-North Water Transfer Project: Tournaments, markets and water pollution. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 20 (4):533–49. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2018.1451309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng, J., M. Webber, and X. Han. 2021. Authoritarian neoliberalization of water governance: The case of China’s South-North Water Transfer Project. Territory Politics Governance 9 (5):691–707. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2020.1755891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Si, Y. 2020. Why “a shared future for mankind” is not welcomed in the west? VOA Chinese. https://www.voachinese.com/a/community-of-shared-future-china-world-order-10012020/5605867.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, X. 2020. Co-evolutionary pragmatism: Re-examine “China model” and its impact on developing countries. Journal of Contemporary China 29:853–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). 2016. Green is gold: The strategy and actions of China’s ecological civilization. UN Environment Program. https://reliefweb.int/report/china/green-gold-strategy-and-actions-chinas-ecological-civilization.
   Google Scholar
• Vakulchuk, R., I. Overland, and D. Scholten. 2020. Renewable energy and geopolitics: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 122:109547. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. J., and J. Xu. 2022. Strategic state–firm relations for the Belt and Road Initiative: A geoeconomics reading. China Review 22:105–35.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, N. 2019. Philosophical interpretation of communities with a shared future (gongtongti). Guangming Daily. https://www.ydylcn.com/zjgd/335890.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W., X. Sun, and M. Zhang. 2021. Does the central environmental inspection effectively improve air pollution? An empirical study of 290 prefecture-level cities in China. Journal of Environmental Management 286:112274. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, L. 2013. Eco-governmentality revisited: Mapping divergent subjectivities among integrated water resource management experts in Paraguay. Geoforum 46:91–102. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, M. 2002. Preface: Green capitalism, green governmentality. American Behavioral Scientist 45 (9):1313–17. doi: 10.1177/0002764202045009002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. 2019. Authoritarian environmental governance: Insights from the past century. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (2):314–23. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1538767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi, J. 2017. Secure a decisive victory in building a moderately prosperous society in all respects and strive for the great success of socialism with Chinese characteristics for a new era. Speech delivered at the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/interface/flipboard/1142846/2017-11-06/cd_34188086.html.
   Google Scholar
• Xi, J. 2021a. Bolstering confidence and jointly overcoming difficulties to build a better world. https://language.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202109/22/WS614a82b1a310cdd39bc6a948.html.
   Google Scholar
• Xi, J. 2021b. For man and nature: Building a community of life together. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2021-04/22/c_139899289.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Xi, J. 2021c. Strengthening cooperation among political parties to jointly pursue the people’s wellbeing. https://language.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202107/07/WS60f4d920a310efa1bd662bbf.html.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Z. 2020. China’s historical evolution of environmental protection along with the forty years’ reform and opening-up. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology 1:100001. doi: 10.1016/j.ese.2019.100001.
   Google Scholar
• Xinhua News. 2018. Cambodia, China sign MoUs on environmental protection, biodiversity conservation. Xinhua News, July 5. http://english.www.gov.cn/state_council/ministries/2018/07/05/content_281476209811333.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, E. T. 2005. Green governmentality and pastoralism in western China: “Converting pastures to grasslands.” Nomadic Peoples 9 (1):9–30. doi: 10.3167/082279405781826164.
   Google Scholar
• Youdelis, M. 2020. Multiple environmentalities and post-politicization in a Canadian mountain park. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 3 (2):346–64. doi: 10.1177/2514848619879447.
   Google Scholar
• Zeller, N. R. 2015. Doing a dam better? Understanding the World Bank’s eco-governmentality in Lao hydropower development. Journal of Lao Studies Special Issue 1:161–80. https://www.laostudies.org/sites/default/files/public/12%20Zeller.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, M., L. Xime, Y. Li, and L. Peng. 2014. Review of renewable energy investment and financing in China: Status, mode, issues and countermeasures. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 31:23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S. 2010. The China model: Can it replace the Western model of modernization? Journal of Contemporary China 19 (65):419–36. doi: 10.1080/10670561003666061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zijin Mining Group. 2020. Ecological and environmental protection policy. https://www.zjky.cn/social/huan-jing-sheng-tai-bao-hu-new.htm.
   Google Scholar