Environmental NGOs and Protected Area Conservation in Australia: The Political Consequences of Aligning with Private Interests

References

• Aldashev, G., and E. Vallino. 2019. The dilemma of NGOs and participatory conservation. World Development 123:104615. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apostolopoulou, E., A. Chatzimentor, S. Maestre-Andrés, M. Requena-I-Mora, A. Pizarro, and D. Bormpoudakis. 2021. Reviewing 15 years of research on neoliberal conservation: Towards a decolonial, interdisciplinary, intersectional and community-engaged research agenda. Geoforum 124:236–56. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibald, C. L., M. D. Barnes, A. I. Tulloch, J. A. Fitzsimons, T. H. Morrison, M. Mills, and J. R. Rhodes. 2020. Differences among protected area governance types matter for conserving vegetation communities at-risk of loss and fragmentation. Biological Conservation 247:108533. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balboa, C. M. 2017. Mission interference: How competition confounds accountability for environmental nongovernmental organizations. Review of Policy Research 34 (1):110–31. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, C. M. 2023. Bankrolling biodiversity: The politics of philanthropic conservation finance in Chile. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 6 (2):1191–1213. doi: 10.1177/25148486221108171.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, M., and A. Firth. 1998. Neoliberalism as a political rationality: Australian public policy since the 1980s. Journal of Sociology 34 (3):215–31. doi: 10.1177/144078339803400301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betsill, M. M., A. Enrici, E. Le Cornu, and R. L. Gruby. 2022. Philanthropic foundations as agents of environmental governance: A research agenda. Environmental Politics 31 (4):684–705. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2021.1955494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and N. Theodore. 2002. Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism.” Antipode 34 (3):349–79. doi: 10.1002/9781444397499.ch1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockington, D., and R. Duffy. 2010. Capitalism and conservation: The production and reproduction of biodiversity conservation. Antipode 42 (3):469–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00760.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockington, D., R. Duffy, and J. Igoe. 2008. Nature unbound: Conservation, capitalism and the future of protected areas. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., and R. Fletcher. 2020. The conservation revolution: Radical ideas for saving nature beyond the Anthropocene. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D., and E. Rosenman. 2020. From the school yard to the conservation area: Impact investment across the nature/social divide. Antipode 52 (5):1259–85. doi: 10.1111/anti.12628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colvin, R. M., and F. Jotzo. 2021. Australian voters’ attitudes to climate action and their social-political determinants. PLoS ONE 16 (3):e0248268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 1997. Tasmanian regional forest agreement. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2021. Collaborative Australian Protected Areas Database (CAPAD) 2020. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., A. Davison, J. Kirkpatrick, and L. M. Pearce. 2022. Protecting 30% of Australia’s land and sea by 2030 sounds great—but it’s not what it seems. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/protecting-30-of-australias-land-and-sea-by-2030-sounds-great-but-its-not-what-it-seems-187435.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., and R. Lane. 2018. Plant–human commoning: Navigating enclosure, neoliberal conservation, and plant mobility in exurban landscapes. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (6):1715–31. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1453776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., and R. Lane. 2020. Making ecologies on private land: Conservation practice in rural-amenity landscapes. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, M., and H. Kurtz. 2017. Organizing, coding and analyzing qualitative data. In Key methods in geography, ed. N. Clifford, M. Cope, T. Gillespie, and S. French, 642–59. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, K. 2021. Effective environmental federalism? Australia’s Natural Heritage Trust. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 17 (1):1–382. doi: 10.1002/jepp.95.
   Google Scholar
• Damiens, F. L., A. Davison, and B. Cooke. 2023. Professionalisation and the spectacle of nature: Understanding changes in the visual imaginaries of private protected area organisations in Australia. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 6 (3):1825–53. doi: 10.1177/25148486221129418.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, A., L. M. Pearce, B. Cooke, and J. B. Kirkpatrick. 2023. From activism to “not-quite-government”: The role of government and non-government actors in the expansion of the Australian protected area estate since 1990. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 66 (8):1743–64. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2040452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, J., and P. Bigger. 2019. Intimate mediations of for-profit conservation finance: Waste, improvement, and accumulation. Antipode 51 (2):517–38.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, J., and D. C. Suarez. 2016. Arrested development? The promises and paradoxes of “selling nature to save it.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 106 (3):653–71. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1140018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, T. 1990. Environmental movement power brokers. Philosophy and Social Action 16 (8):37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, T. 2000. Green power: The environment movement in Australia. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, T., D. McEachern, and S. MacGregor. 2015. Environment and politics. 4th ed. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Drakopulos, L. 2022. Privatizing the fisheries observer industry: Neoliberal science and policy in the U.S. West Coast fisheries. Geoforum 131:116–25. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A. 2003. Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NHOs. World Development 31 (5):813–29. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00014-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. 2010. Neoliberal environmentality: Towards a poststructuralist political ecology of the conservation debate. Conservation and Society 8 (3):171. doi: 10.4103/0972-4923.73806.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., and B. Büscher. 2017. The PES conceit: Revisiting the relationship between payments for environmental services and neoliberal conservation. Ecological Economics 132:224–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons, J. A. 2015. Private protected areas in Australia: Current status and future directions. Nature Conservation 10:1–23. doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.10.8739.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, D., B. Williamson, and J. Weir. 2021. Cultural burning and public sector practice in the Australian capital territory. Australian Geographer 52 (2):111–29. doi: 10.1080/00049182.2021.1917133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooden, J., and M. Sas-Rolfes. 2020. A review of critical perspectives on private land conservation in academic literature. Ambio 49 (5):1019–34. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01258-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, I. 2022. Effectiveness of the biodiversity offsets scheme. Audit Office of New South Wales. Accessed May 4, 2022. https://www.audit.nsw.gov.au/our-work/reports/effectiveness-of-the-biodiversity-offsets-scheme
   Google Scholar
• Greaves, A. 2021. Protecting Victoria’s biodiversity. Victorian Auditor-General’s Office. Accessed May 4, 2022. https://www.audit.vic.gov.au/report/protecting-victorias-biodiversity?section=
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, M. J., J. A. Fitzsimons, S. A. Bekessy, and A. Gordon. 2018. Purchase, protect, resell, repeat: An effective process for conserving biodiversity on private land? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 16 (6):336–44. doi: 10.1002/fee.1821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2007. Neoliberalism as creative destruction. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 610 (1):21–44. doi: 10.1177/0002716206296780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, G., and G. Paxton. 2019. Infrastructures of conservation: Provoking new natures with predator fencing. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 2 (4):1009–28. doi: 10.1177/2514848619866078.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, I., and S. Muller. 2014. Questioning generosity in the golden age of philanthropy: Towards critical geographies of super-philanthropy. Progress in Human Geography 38 (5):635–53. doi: 10.1177/0309132513500893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, V., J. Dibden, and C. Cocklin. 2012. Market instruments and the neoliberalisation of land management in rural Australia. Geoforum 43 (3):377–86. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, G. 2012. Biodiversity for billionaires: Capitalism, conservation and the role of philanthropy in saving/selling nature. Development and Change 43 (1):185–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01749.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, G. 2015. Philanthrocapitalism, biodiversity conservation and development. In New philanthropy and social justice: Debating the conceptual and policy discourse. Contemporary issues in social policy: Challenges for change, ed. B. Morvaridi, 81–100. Chicago: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, G., and C. J. Cavanagh. 2016. A review of the social impacts of neoliberal conservation: Formations, inequalities, contestations. Geoforum 75:199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannuzzi, G., R. Santos, and J. M. Mourato. 2020. The involvement of non-state actors in the creation and management of protected areas: Insights from the Portuguese case. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 63 (9):1674–94. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2019.1685475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igoe, J., and D. Brockington. 2007. Neoliberal conservation: A brief introduction. Conservation and Society 5 (4):432–49.
   Google Scholar
• International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). 2000. Financing protected areas: Guidelines for protected area managers. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) of IUCN, in collaboration with the Economics Unit of IUCN. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanova, I. M., and C. N. Cook. 2020. The role of privately protected areas in achieving biodiversity representation within a national protected area network. Conservation Science and Practice 2 (12):1–12. doi: 10.1111/csp2.307.
   Google Scholar
• Jepson, P. 2005. Governance and accountability of environmental NGOs. Environmental Science & Policy 8 (5):515–24. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, J., J. Fielder, A. Davison, L. Pearce, and B. Cooke. 2022. The role of government in a partial transition from public to private in the expanding Australian Protected Area System. Conservation and Society 20 (3):201–10. doi: 10.4103/cs.cs_100_21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, P. B. 2016. The good, the ugly and the dirty Harry’s of conservation: Rethinking the anthropology of conservation NGOs. Conservation and Society 14 (1):21–33. doi: 10.4103/0972-4923.182800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, P. B., and D. Brockington, eds. 2018. The anthropology of conservation NGOs. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Louder, E., and K. Bosak. 2023. Spectacle of nature 2.0: The (re)production of Patagonia National Park. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 113 (2):331–45. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2022.2106176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallin, M. F., D. C. Stolz, B. S. Thompson, and M. Barbesgaard. 2019. In oceans we trust: Conservation, philanthropy, and the political economy of the Phoenix Islands protected area. Marine Policy 107:103421. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. 2016. Bush heritage Australia: Restoring nature step by step. Sydney, Australia: NewSouth.
   Google Scholar
• Mcdonald, M. 2016. Bourdieu, environmental NGOs, and Australian climate politics. Environmental Politics 25 (6):1058–78.
   Google Scholar
• McEachern, D. 1993. Environmental policy in Australia 1981–91: A form of corporatism? Australian Journal of Public Administration 52 (2):173–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1993.tb00267.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, B., S. Stolton, J. Bezaury-Creel, H. C. Bingham, T. L. Cumming, N. Dudley, J. A. Fitzsimons, D. Malleret-King, K. H. Redford, and P. Solano. 2018. Guidelines for privately protected areas: Best practice protected area guidelines. Series No. 29. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. W. 2008. Easing conservation? Conservation easements, public accountability and neoliberalism. Geoforum 39 (3):1215–27. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2005. On the political. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, M., and S. Hill. 2001. Ecological pioneers: A social history of Australian ecological thought and action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nasiritousi, N. 2019. NGOs and the environment. In Routledge handbook of NGOs and international relations, 329–42. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, T., R. Carter, T. Nelson, and M. Bourke. 2019. Walking together: A decolonising experiment in bushfire management on Dja Dja Wurrung Country. Cultural Geographies 26 (3):341–59. doi: 10.1177/1474474018821419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. 2015. Nature conservation. In Routledge handbook of political ecology, ed. T. Perreault, G. Bridge, and J. McCarthy, 391–405. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ngurra, D., L. Dadd, P. Glass, R. Scott, M. Graham, S. Judge, P. Hodge, and S. Suchet-Pearson. 2019. Yanama budyari gumada: Reframing the urban to care as Darug Country in western Sydney. Australian Geographer 50 (3):279–93. doi: 10.1080/00049182.2019.1601150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palfrey, R., J. A. Oldekop, and G. Holmes. 2022. Privately protected areas increase global protected area coverage and connectivity. Nature Ecology & Evolution 6 (6):730–37. doi: 10.1038/s41559-022-01715-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. 2001. Creating markets for biodiversity. Accessed April 3, 2020. https://www.abc.net.au/local/archives/landline/content/2005/s1330004.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, S. 2012. A paradigm shift in philanthropy: The arc of innovation. In The index of global philanthropy and remittances 2012, dir. C. Adelman. Washington, DC: Hudson Institute Center for Global Prosperity.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. M. 2004. The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: Wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum 35 (3):361–73. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandbrook, C. 2019. From passion to professionalism and back again: The battle for the soul of conservation. Seeds of Change: Biodiversity Revisited Symposium 66:37–39.
   Google Scholar
• Selinske, M. J., B. Cooke, N. Torabi, M. J. Hardy, A. T. Knight, and S. A. Bekessy. 2017. Locating financial incentives among diverse motivations for long-term private land conservation. Ecology and Society: 22.
   Google Scholar
• Staples, J. 2012. Australian ENGOs and government. In Environmental policy failure: The Australian story, ed. K. Crowley and K. J. Walker, 160–72. Prahan, Australia: Tilde University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2010. Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change. Theory, Culture and Society 27 (2–3):213–32. doi: 10.1177/0263276409358728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tickell, A., and J. Peck. 2002. Neoliberalizing space. Antipode 34 (3):380–404. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torpey-Saboe, N. 2015. Does NGO presence decrease government spending? A look at municipal spending on social services in Brazil. World Development 74:479–88. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyne, P. 1994. The reluctant nation: Environment, law, and politics in Australia. Sydney, Australia: ABC Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tranter, B. 2011. Political divisions over climate change and environmental issues in Australia. Environmental Politics 20 (1):78–96. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2011.538167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, D., and L. Veronis. 2009. Enacting state restructuring: NGOs as “translation mechanisms.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27 (6):1117–34. doi: 10.1068/d0906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., K. Neves, and E. De Lijster. 2014. “Measurementality” in biodiversity governance: Knowledge, transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 46 (3):581–97. doi: 10.1068/a4629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unerman, J., and B. O’Dwyer. 2010. NGO accountability and sustainability issues in the changing global environment. Public Management Review 12 (4):475–86. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2010.496258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, E., and T. Neale. 2016. Unstable relations: Indigenous people and environmentalism in contemporary Australia. Perth: University of Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Wamsley, J., and S. L. Davey. 2020. A vanishing kind: A memoir of Dr. John Wamsley in conversations. Bloomington, IN: Balboa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, A., and M. Lassen. 2018. Scoping paper: Expanding finance opportunities to support private land conservation in Australia. Australian Land Conservation Alliance. https://trustfornature.org.au/resources/conservation-finance-scoping.
   Google Scholar
• Woronov, T. 2019. Waging lawfare: Law, environment and depoliticization in neoliberal Australia. Capitalism Nature Socialism 30 (3):110–28. doi: 10.1080/10455752.2017.1385639.
   Google Scholar