980
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

How deep can straight instruments be inserted into the femoral canal: a simulation study based on cadaveric femora*

, , , &
Pages 56-62 | Received 19 Jan 2015, Accepted 29 Apr 2016, Published online: 18 May 2016

References

  • Fletcher M, Jennings GJ, Warren PJ. Ultrasonically driven instruments in the transfemoral approach – an aid to preservation of bone stock and reduction of implant length. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:559–561.
  • Laing A, Mullett H, Curtin W. Segmental femoral cement extraction at revision hip arthroplasty – a safe technique. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2002;12:132–136.
  • Nogler M, Krismer M, Hozack WJ, et al. A double offset broach handle for preparation of the femoral cavity in minimally invasive direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:1206–1208.
  • Schmidt J, Nordmann K. Removal of bone cement from the femoral canal using an acoustic emission-controlled milling device. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1994;32:258–260.
  • Akiyama H, Kawanabe K, Goto K, et al. Computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation system for removal of distal femoral bone cement in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:445–448.
  • Nogler M, Lass-Florl C, Ogon M, et al. Environmental and body contamination through aerosols produced by high-speed cutters in lumbar spine surgery. Spine. 2001;26:2156–2159.
  • Nogler M, Lass-Florl C, Wimmer C, et al. Contamination during removal of cement in revision hip arthroplasty. A cadaver study using ultrasound and high-speed cutters. J Bone Joint Surg, Br Vol. 2003;85:436–439.
  • Schulz AP, Seide K, Queitsch C, et al. Results of total hip replacement using the Robodoc surgical assistant system: clinical outcome and evaluation of complications for 97 procedures. The International Journal of Medical Robotics + Computer Assisted Surgery: MRCAS. 2007;3:301–306.
  • Nogler M, Polikeit A, Wimmer C, et al. Primary stability of a robodoc implanted anatomical stem versus manual implantation. Clin Biomech. 2004;19:123–129.
  • Prymka M, Hassenpflug J. Clinical outcome, 6 years after robot assisted hip endoprostheses implantation – a prospective study. Z Orthopadi Unfallch. 2009;147:675–682.
  • Honl M, Dierk O, Gauck C, et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted and manual implantation of a primary total hip replacement. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2003;85-A(8):1470–1478.
  • Wolf A, Shoham M. Medical automation and robotics. In: Nof SY, editor. Springer handbook of automation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. p. 1397–1407.
  • Guthart GS, Salisbury JK Jr, editors. The IntuitiveTM telesurgery system: overview and application. 2000 Proceedings ICRA '00 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2000.
  • Kazanzides P, Fichtinger G, Hager GD, et al. Surgical and interventional robotics: core concepts, technology, and design. IEEE Robot Autom Mag/IEEE Robot Autom Soc. 2008;15:122–130.
  • Banks SA. Haptic robotics enable a systems approach to design of a minimally invasive modular knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2009;38:23–27.
  • Taylor RH, Stoianovici D. Medical robotics in computer-integrated surgery. IEEE Trans Robot Automat. 2003;19:765–781.
  • Pan ZX, Zhang H, Zhu ZQ, et al. Chatter analysis of robotic machining process. J Mater Process Technol. 2006;173:301–309.
  • Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, et al. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988:148–165.
  • Noble PC, Box GG, Kamaric E, et al. The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995:31–44.
  • Joskowicz L, Taylor RH. Interference-free insertion of a solid body into a cavity: an algorithm and a medical application. Int J Robot Res. 1996;15:211–229.
  • Tawada K, Iguchi H, Tanaka N, et al. editors. A908. Measurement of the canal flare index using 3-D models and the effect of the rotational femur position. J Bone Joint Surg, Br Vol. 2011;93(Suppl IV):475.