Prediction of coronary plaque progression using biomechanical factors and vascular characteristics based on computed tomography angiography

References

• Koskinas KC, Feldman CL, Chatzizisis YS, et al. Natural history of experimental coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling in relation to endothelial shear stress: a serial, in vivo intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 2010;121:2092–2101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzizisis YS, Jonas M, Coskun AU, et al. Prediction of the localization of high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques on the basis of low endothelial shear stress: an intravascular ultrasound and histopathology natural history study. Circulation. 2008;117:993–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:226–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samady H, Eshtehardi P, McDaniel MC, et al. Coronary artery wall shear stress is associated with progression and transformation of atherosclerotic plaque and arterial remodeling in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2011;124:779–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone PH, Saito S, Takahashi S, et al. Prediction of progression of coronary artery disease and clinical outcomes using vascular profiling of endothelial shear stress and arterial plaque characteristics: the PREDICTION Study. Circulation. 2012;126:172–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corban MT, Eshtehardi P, Suo J, et al. Combination of plaque burden, wall shear stress, and plaque phenotype has incremental value for prediction of coronary atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability. Atherosclerosis. 2014;232:271–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso L, Weinbaum S. Changing views of the biomechanics of vulnerable plaque rupture: a review. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014;42:415–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang X, Xenos M, Alemu Y, et al. Biomechanical factors in coronary vulnerable plaque risk of rupture: intravascular ultrasound-based patient-specific fluid-structure interaction studies. Coronary Artery Dis. 2013;24:75–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan R, Tang D, Yang C, et al. Human coronary plaque wall thickness correlated positively with flow shear stress and negatively with plaque wall stress: an IVUS-based fluid-structure interaction multi-patient study. Biomed Eng Online. 2014;13:32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadat U, Teng Z, Gillard JH. Biomechanical structural stresses of atherosclerotic plaques. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010;8:1469–1481.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadat U, Teng Z, Young VE, et al. Association between biomechanical structural stresses of atherosclerotic carotid plaques and subsequent ischaemic cerebrovascular events–a longitudinal in vivo magnetic resonance imaging-based finite element study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40:485–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz GS, Garcia-Garcia HM, Nicholls SJ, et al. Clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound regression/progression studies. Euro Intervention. 2011;6:1123–1130.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulou SL, Neefjes LA, Garcia-Garcia HM, et al. Natural history of coronary atherosclerosis by multislice computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imag. 2012;5:S28–S37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurovich-Horvat P, Ferencik M, Voros S, et al. Comprehensive plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:390–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamirani YS, Kadakia J, Pagali SR, et al. Assessment of progression of coronary atherosclerosis using multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCT). Int J Cardiol. 2011;149:270–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbara S, Arbab-Zadeh A, Callister TQ, et al. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput. 2009;3:190–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakazato R, Shalev A, Doh JH, et al. Aggregate plaque volume by coronary computed tomography angiography is superior and incremental to luminal narrowing for diagnosis of ischemic lesions of intermediate stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:460–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A, et al. Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:672–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badak O, Schoenhagen P, Tsunoda T, et al. Characteristics of atherosclerotic plaque distribution in coronary artery bifurcations: an intravascular ultrasound analysis. Coronary Artery Dis. 2003;14:309–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipahi I, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, et al. Static and serial assessments of coronary arterial remodeling are discordant: an intravascular ultrasound analysis from the Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering (REVERSAL) trial. Am Heart J. 2006;152:544–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torii R, Wood NB, Hadjiloizou N, et al. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of a patient-specific right coronary artery with physiological velocity and pressure waveforms. Commun Num Meth Eng. 2009;25:565–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Friedman MH. Relationship between the dynamic geometry and wall thickness of a human coronary artery. Arterioscl Throm Vas. 2003;23:2260–2265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman CL, Ilegbusi OJ, Hu Z, et al. Determination of in vivo velocity and endothelial shear stress patterns with phasic flow in human coronary arteries: A methodology to predict progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Am Heart J. 2002;143:931–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siogkas PK, Sakellarios AI, Exarchos TP, et al. Blood flow in arterial segments rigid vs deformable walls simulations. J Serb Socie Comput Mech. 2011;5:69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Tang D, Yang C, Canton G, et al. Correlations between carotid plaque progression and mechanical stresses change sign over time: a patient follow up study using MRI and 3D FSI models. Biomed Eng Online. 2013;12:105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Nieman K, et al. Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1655–1662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voros S, Rinehart S, Qian Z, et al. Prospective validation of standardized, 3-dimensional, quantitative coronary computed tomographic plaque measurements using radiofrequency backscatter intravascular ultrasound as reference standard in intermediate coronary arterial lesions: results from the ATLANTA (assessment of tissue characteristics, lesion morphology, and hemodynamics by angiography with fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound and virtual histology, and noninvasive computed tomography in atherosclerotic plaques) I study. JACC Cardiovasc Int. 2011;4:198–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulou SL, Neefjes LA, Schaap M, et al. Detection and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaque by 64-slice multidetector CT: a systematic head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Atherosclerosis. 2011;219:163–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormode DP, Roessl E, Thran A, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque composition: analysis with multicolor CT and targeted gold nanoparticles. Radiology. 2010;256:774–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Giessen AG, Toepker MH, Donelly PM, et al. Reproducibility, accuracy, and predictors of accuracy for the detection of coronary atherosclerotic plaque composition by computed tomography: an ex vivo comparison to intravascular ultrasound. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:693–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar